[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797713#action_12797713
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1707:
OK, I whipped up a quick test with String
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797687#action_12797687
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1707:
True immutability? What's that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-1698:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1698.patch
Draft patch to LBHttpSolrServer that lays the groundwork for being able
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796874#action_12796874
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1703:
Indeed - that's a bug. New solr code sho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796837#action_12796837
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1698:
Looking into LBHttpSolrServer more, it looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796838#action_12796838
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1698:
Looking into LBHttpSolrServer more, it looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796760#action_12796760
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-1698 at 1/5/10 5:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796760#action_12796760
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1698:
Another big question is: can we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796491#action_12796491
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1568:
bq. For those who only want pure radial search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796478#action_12796478
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1568:
While it's nice that this works (to dou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796457#action_12796457
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1568:
bq. since if we use the FunctionRangeQParser,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796417#action_12796417
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1698:
Picking which shard replica to request ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796410#action_12796410
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1698:
This is related to the solr cloud branch, bu
load balanced distributed search
Key: SOLR-1698
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Yonik Seeley
Provide syntax and
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:29 PM, wrote:
>>> + public static final double KM_TO_MILES = 0.621371192;
>>> + public static final double MILES_TO_KM
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:29 PM, wrote:
> + public static final double KM_TO_MILES = 0.621371192;
> + public static final double MILES_TO_KM = 1.609344;
I don't care if these exist, but what are your plans for actually using them?
For spatial search, it seems like we should simply standardize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796348#action_12796348
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1568:
bq. Also, in all of these proposals, how d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796289#action_12796289
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1568:
The examples are not of equivalent power.
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:20 PM, wrote:
> ==
> --- lucene/solr/branches/cloud/src/webapp/web/admin/zookeeper.jsp (original)
> +++ lucene/solr/branches/cloud/src/webapp/web/admin/zookeeper.jsp Fri Jan 1
> 19:20:26 2010
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795692#action_12795692
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
FYI, I've added a basic zookeeper brows
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
>
> What does this tag mean/do?
It notifies anyone looking at it that it's "subject to change w/o notification."
We're primarily implementing higher-level features, not creating new
low-level APIs, and I just wanted to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795164#action_12795164
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. Sounds good. I'm open to specific su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795129#action_12795129
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. My original point was that this aspect of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795076#action_12795076
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. A tile is not a point.
Then we'r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795073#action_12795073
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-1586 at 12/29/09 4:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795073#action_12795073
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. I'm not sure I see how to use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795069#action_12795069
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
Unlike PointType, it seems odd that a user w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795001#action_12795001
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1647:
bq. I'd also like to be more clea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794913#action_12794913
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
The reason why I was asking about inter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794823#action_12794823
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. > How will it be used?
bq. It's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794747#action_12794747
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1688:
bq. Then why isn't ValueS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794734#action_12794734
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1688:
I'm against making all ValueSource class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794727#action_12794727
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1688:
bq. The troubling part is that some of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794714#action_12794714
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1688:
IMO, most of these should remain implementa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794690#action_12794690
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. One of the interesting things for Cart
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Dec 24, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that the docs for geo related functions have introduced
>> the notion of ValueSource. That's at the Java level, and in the
I've noticed that the docs for geo related functions have introduced
the notion of ValueSource. That's at the Java level, and in the past
I've tried to keep http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
completely away from that.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 7:21 A
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Any objection to moving the suffix/subfield stuff up to CoordinateFieldType?
> I'm working on the Cartesian Tier stuff and it has much the same pattern for
> this stuff.
I dunno... will it complicate things more? What's the difference
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2009, at 12:42 PM, yo...@apache.org wrote:
>> - > subFieldType="double"/>
>> + > subFieldSuffix="_d"/>
>>
>>
>
> Shouldn't we demo both?
There are tradeoffs to including all variations of something (that
being schema blo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794439#action_12794439
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-1131 at 12/24/09 3:4
So, what do people think about adding this documentation to the point
type... helpful? confusing?
Opinions on the example schema... should we use subFieldType (i.e.
have the type create the dynamic field for us) or subFieldSuffix?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794439#action_12794439
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-1131 at 12/24/09 3:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794439#action_12794439
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
OK, I'll try to diff what I had done befo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793813#action_12793813
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1553:
bq. why is "TO" listed as an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793684#action_12793684
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1670:
Duplicated tokens aside (that should have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793646#action_12793646
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1674:
Hmmm, isn't it a bug that th
Looks like the recently committed SOLR-1608 accidentally changed
this... it was "nservers<4" before that.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading the source of BaseDistributedSearchTestCase, with this method:
>
> pub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793621#action_12793621
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-236:
---
bq. As far as I understand from your coll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793482#action_12793482
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
> >It's more of an issue of di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793476#action_12793476
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-236:
---
bq. You think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-1670:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1670.patch
Here's a patch that removes duplicate tokens at the same position.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-1670:
--
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> synonymfilter/map repeat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793213#action_12793213
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1670:
Yep, must be a bug in the merging code, n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792940#action_12792940
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1670:
This is my mess that predates solr even going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792917#action_12792917
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-236:
---
First, thanks to everyone who has spent so much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792916#action_12792916
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-236:
---
First, thanks to everyone who has spent so much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792869#action_12792869
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1669:
The default should be to not include a sc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792855#action_12792855
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1664:
I like the direction I think... the current s
Unit tests used to take 15 minutes, and they have started taking 22-23
minutes for me. Has anyone else seem this, or is it some issue with
my box?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792848#action_12792848
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
bq. I think we want generic. Some geo stuff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-1131:
---
Attachment: diff.patch
SOLR-1131.patch
Here's an updated patch that fixes a l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792522#action_12792522
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
It doesn't look like subFieldSuffix actua
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792498#action_12792498
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1664:
bq. The point is , if we wish to go down this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792050#action_12792050
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1665:
bq? As the title says, it would be great i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792041#action_12792041
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1664:
bq. It did not make any non-backcompat cha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791942#action_12791942
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1664:
bq. I agree with that. As long as any o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791933#action_12791933
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1664:
SchemaField is final and very light weight f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791588#action_12791588
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
bq. How are we addressing a failed connection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791508#action_12791508
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
bq. Right - thats the problem I want to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791486#action_12791486
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
bq. I suppose what I am worried about is when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791459#action_12791459
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
bq. I don't necessarily like the idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791438#action_12791438
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
While our designs shouldn't preclude l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791414#action_12791414
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
I'm spot-checking mutiple different p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790930#action_12790930
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1658:
I agree. Extended dismax already implements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790814#action_12790814
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
I think I'll try to start implemen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790357#action_12790357
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
bq. That's inherited from a more general
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790237#action_12790237
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
Given the concerns of some people ar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789925#action_12789925
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1644:
bq. definitely it looks verbose (ugly) . But
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789917#action_12789917
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1644:
bq. This one change can keep the ResponseBui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789915#action_12789915
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1123:
I never got a chance to check out SOLR-1516,
2009/12/13 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> The point is , the underlying http request is still synchronous (
> correct me if I am wrong) . So there is some thread waiting somewhere
> either the httpclinet framework or the threadpool in solr.
Not if one uses async NIO (which I assume httpclient asyn
2009/12/13 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> I guess the async part is done by the client library itself. How does
> it help Solr?
The only place that makes sense for async in solr is sending multiple
requests as part of a distributed search (potentially hundreds) and
not having to have a thread for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789898#action_12789898
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1298:
A few comments and random thoughts on this fea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789812#action_12789812
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
Mark - I notice that you're currentl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789808#action_12789808
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
OK, I fixed it for now (rather hacked aroun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789769#action_12789769
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
Update: seems to pass for me on Linux, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789759#action_12789759
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
Been trying to get the cloud branch going...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789745#action_12789745
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1644:
While we should make it easy for custom compon
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Actually if it was the case that poly field mapped to a single dynamic
> field, then I would agree with you, but as is the discussion, poly field can
> map to _many_ dynamic fields, which is where the drift occurs.
I'm not sure if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789334#action_12789334
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1177:
The facet component internally uses long to ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789082#action_12789082
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
bq. parsePoint in DistanceUtils, why use &#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789079#action_12789079
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
Quick comment based on a spot check of the cha
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> While thinking about SOLR-1131, something important just came to mind. If we
> allow poly fields to add fields to the schema (be it via dynamic fields, or
> explicit field decls, either way), then we introduce a disconnect between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788900#action_12788900
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1277:
Nice work Mark! I'll try and get what yo
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
[...]
> Maybe, there are tradeoffs though.
>
> Let's get concrete and look at the VectorDistanceFunction (dist()). It can
> currently take in an even number of ValueSource instances
Geo will be the dominant use of points by far... so we sh
I wouldn't necessarily link FieldType.isPolyField() to the idea of a
poly value source... they are two different things.
For example, if NumericField had not already been written in Lucene, I
would have perhaps just indexed both the lat and lon into the same
lucene field. That part can be more of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788802#action_12788802
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
bq. Yonik, could you elaborate on this? It s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788800#action_12788800
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
bq. Next up: Implement ValueSource support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788319#action_12788319
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1131:
> Aside: it looks like the c
Proposal for handling points using only the field lookup mechanisms
currently in place in IndexSchema:
Option A: dynamic fields used for subfields, those dynamic fields need
to be explicitly defined in the XML
// needed t
201 - 300 of 3185 matches
Mail list logo
