[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12676551#action_12676551
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Cool, I am open for queries and requests about the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12676643#action_12676643
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
By the way, when looking through the schema code, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12676717#action_12676717
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
{quote}
bq. Just an idea (that came to me...): How
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12676721#action_12676721
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
I would program this tokenizer in this way (using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12676726#action_12676726
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
bq. But, a tokenizer cannot add tokens in another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12677726#action_12677726
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
{quote}
bq. Assuming TrieRange does all the number
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12677740#action_12677740
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Just one question:
In queryParser you use: FieldType
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12677799#action_12677799
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Looks cool, great!
I have no Solr installed here to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12677801#action_12677801
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
About the sorting problem:
As already discussed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12678367#action_12678367
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Cool!
When looking through the code, I found out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12678485#action_12678485
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
The patch is the same as before, maybe you uploaded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12694975#action_12694975
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
I created a new issue LUCENE-1582 to fix the sorting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: SOLR-940-newTrieAPI.patch
TrieRange support
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695581#action_12695581
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
This patch modifies Solr support for trie fields to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695761#action_12695761
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
I forget to mention: with LUCENE-1582 and this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695766#action_12695766
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
bq. I'm having trouble applying the patch:
I created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: SOLR-940-newTrieAPI.patch
Updated patch, that supports ValueSource (currently not for Date
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696492#action_12696492
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
The change is now committed in Lucene trunk!
Shalin:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696681#action_12696681
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
One note to sorting:
I am not really sure, if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1079:
Attachment: SOLR-1079-fixcompilation.patch
This is a first patch to remove the dummy implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696702#action_12696702
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
I attached a patch to SOLR-1079 to fix the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12698188#action_12698188
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
bq. I'm also not very familiar with that code in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: SOLR-940-LUCENE-1602.patch
I modified the patch a little bit to also include an updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708560#action_12708560
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-773:
bq. Also, how does the TrieRange stuff factor into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708560#action_12708560
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-773 at 5/12/09 12:01 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708825#action_12708825
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-773:
{quote}
Agreed on the first, not 100% certain on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12715282#action_12715282
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-465:
I committed a changed version of the FSDirectory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12721947#action_12721947
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
The first part of the move to core is done, when the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: SOLR-940-LUCENE-1701.patch
Patch with changes for new Trie API in Lucene Core, the term
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12723938#action_12723938
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
{quote}
Regarding Collector#acceptsDocsOutOfOrder, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12725568#action_12725568
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Oh, this was intended.
the reason was, that all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12725568#action_12725568
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-940 at 6/30/09 4:30 AM:
-
Oh,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12725590#action_12725590
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
You are right, but normally a new Term(field,null)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12725594#action_12725594
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Fixed in Lucene trunk rev 789692. The strange null
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12725600#action_12725600
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
bq. I think you are fixing it the wrong way.
You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12725605#action_12725605
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Yes, it now works with RangeQuery/Filter (as
Lucene trunk renamed RangeQuery Co to TermRangeQuery
--
Key: SOLR-1261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1261
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Components: search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1261:
Attachment: SOLR-1261.patch
Attached is a patch, that does this (untested, but should work).
In my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: SOLR-940-LUCENE-1701-addition.patch
Hi Shalin,
here is an additional patch (but only for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: SOLR-940-LUCENE-1701-addition.patch
Same patch updated, but uses the new feature of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: (was: SOLR-940-LUCENE-1701-addition.patch)
TrieRange support
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: (was: SOLR-940-LUCENE-1701-addition.patch)
TrieRange support
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940:
---
Attachment: SOLR-940-LUCENE-1701-addition.patch
TrieRange support
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731396#action_12731396
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
I think your problem is solved now (thanks Mike).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731567#action_12731567
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
Patch looks good!
TrieRange support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731614#action_12731614
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1261:
-
The only problem with the above code are Date
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12738986#action_12738986
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1322:
-
bq. If trie fields are indexed in parts,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12738993#action_12738993
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1322:
-
Correct, but it is good to think about it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12739069#action_12739069
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1322:
-
I added a test to Lucene Core that verifies, that
SortableXXXField could use native FieldCache for sorting
Key: SOLR-1334
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1334
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12739371#action_12739371
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1334:
-
Ok, so it should stay as it is.
The problem with
Lucene 2.9 RC4 may need some changes in Solr Analyzers using CharStream others
Key: SOLR-1423
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754162#action_12754162
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1404:
-
bq. Will LUCENE-1906 fix it (in an alternate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754836#action_12754836
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1423:
-
I have seen this PatternTokenizer, too. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1423:
Attachment: SOLR-1423-FieldType.patch
I searched for setOffset() in Solr source code and found one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1423:
Attachment: SOLR-1423.patch
This is a complete more effective rewrite of the whole Tokenizer (I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755409#action_12755409
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1423:
-
bq. I think the empty tokens is a bug and should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755410#action_12755410
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1423:
-
I foget: I would deprecate the unneeded methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1423:
Attachment: SOLR-1423-with-empty-tokens.patch
Some refactoring (I moved the PatternTokenizer to its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1423:
Attachment: SOLR-1423-fix-empty-tokens.patch
This is a patch that fixes the empty tokens:
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755564#action_12755564
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1423:
-
Then you could use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1423:
Attachment: SOLR-1423-fix-empty-tokens.patch
Attached a new patch with the empty token fix.
It has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757344#action_12757344
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-908:
In my opinion, the problem is BufferedTokenStream
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760114#action_12760114
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1221:
-
Does RangeQuery really need to be highlighted? It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12761350#action_12761350
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1221:
-
Does the highlighter rewrite before checking the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12761366#action_12761366
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1221:
-
A even simplier workaround:
Instead of using a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12761759#action_12761759
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1221:
-
I have no preference...
But we fix the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12761763#action_12761763
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1221:
-
I would also stay with 2.9 in Solr. Just mark the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12791370#action_12791370
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1662:
-
Just the short desription from the API side in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12791867#action_12791867
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1662:
-
bq. I think cloning should be done by sub-classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12791940#action_12791940
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1662:
-
+1 Looks good!
BufferedTokenStream incorrect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12792378#action_12792378
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1667:
-
Too bad, this tokenizer was rewritten by me. How
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12792998#action_12792998
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1657:
-
i would help working on this, but before
Add support for o.a.lucene.util.Version for BaseTokenizerFactory and
BaseTokenFilterFactory
---
Key: SOLR-1677
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1677:
Attachment: SOLR-1677.patch
Patch.
I did not go through all factories, so maybe more need to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1677:
Attachment: SOLR-1677.patch
Better patch:
- more dynamic Version map creation
- improved warning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12793047#action_12793047
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1677:
-
bq. for example, if i was setting up a new solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1677:
Attachment: SOLR-1677.patch
Fix problem in one test, because the english stop word set is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1677:
Attachment: SOLR-1677.patch
New patch with some schema and config hacking. Also new test:
- As a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12794447#action_12794447
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1677:
-
Thanks for the hint. This means it can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795746#action_12795746
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1677:
-
The problem is the default value. If you leave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796872#action_12796872
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1677:
-
In my opinion, the default in solrconfig.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796872#action_12796872
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-1677 at 1/5/10 10:29 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12798937#action_12798937
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1677:
-
{quote}
My suggestion for how to implement this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1677:
Attachment: SOLR-1677-lucenetrunk-branch.patch
This patch was committed to the Lucene-trunk upgrade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845214#action_12845214
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1677:
-
I also added support for instantiating Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1677:
Attachment: SOLR-1677-lucenetrunk-branch-3.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845419#action_12845419
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1824:
-
It should be easy to fix. The init() method in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854700#action_12854700
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1869:
-
bq. the RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter seems broken
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855640#action_12855640
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1876:
-
Looks good, I will check this in more detail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855699#action_12855699
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1876:
-
OK, all is fine!
Convert all tokenstreams and
91 matches
Mail list logo
