Hello,
I am planning to use Solr for an application that would be indexing a lot of
documents. I am trying to understand the advantage/disadvantage of embedding
the Solr Server into my application.
When does one use one over the other? Speed of Search and Result Retrieval
is of course of
I tried but it still not correct :(
hossman wrote:
: I am developing a seach engine with Solr, and now I want to search both
with
: and without diacritics, for example: if I query kho, it will response
kho,
: khó, khò,... But if I query khó, it will response only khó.
:
: Who anyone
result retrieval - same
speed of search - embeeded
maintenance cost and flexibility - http
[]s,
Lucas Frare Teixeira .·.
- lucas...@gmail.com
- lucastex.com.br
- blog.lucastex.com
- twitter.com/lucastex
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Vijay Rao raovi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am
Seems to work for me... (I mean, I don't get a NoClassDefFoundError but I
have other issues).
I just put spatial-solr-1.0-RC3.jar in the core's lib directory and it
worked.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Thomas Rabaix thomas.rab...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I would like to set up the spatial
Hello All,
I am having a trouble in following an approach for
field boosting. I have possibility of two cases in searching. One is
similar to DisMax, which uses field boosting, and the second one is
normal. To go for which of them is based on user query ( probably
inside query
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way to retrieve the facets from a query
based on their mincount without specifying facet.field?
I submit a query and want to retrieve all the faceted fields with
mincounts 2, but don't know what they might be since I also use
dynamic fields. Is this possible?
Hi everyone,
I'm getting inconsistent behavior from Spatial Solr when searching with
different radii. For the same lat/long I get:
radius=1 - 1 result
radius=10 - 0 result
radius=25 - 2 results
radius=100 - 2 results
radius=250 - 0 results
I don't understand why radius=10 and 250 return no
Hi Olala,
You can get something similar to what you want by copying the original field to
another one where, as Hoss suggests, you apply ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory, and
the rewrite queries to match against both fields, with higher boost given to
the original field.
@Hoss: Olala would benefit
in Solr 1.4 the boolean syntax was deprecated in place of keywords that
are more meaninful...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.sort
... count and index replaced true and false
Yes, I thought about adding some 'new syntax', but I opted for a separate
Hi there
I’m using solr 1.4 under tomcat server in windows server 2008
and I want to index some data that contain Greek chars
When I try to index my data and query all of them with *:* all
the greek chars
returned like hieroglyphics
can anybody help ???
What do your queries look like?
On Dec 28, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm getting inconsistent behavior from Spatial Solr when searching with
different radii. For the same lat/long I get:
radius=1 - 1 result
radius=10 - 0 result
radius=25 - 2 results
Hi,
Did you post your documents in UTF-8? Also, for querying through GET using
non-ascii you must reconfigure Tomcat6 as per the manual [1].
Cheers,
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat#URI_Charset_Config
ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS zei:
Hi there
Iâm using solr 1.4 under
q={!spatial lat=43.705 long=116.3635 radius=100}*:*
with no other parameters.
When changing the radius to 250 I get no results.
In my config I have startTier = 9 and endTier = 17 (default values)
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsi...@gmail.com wrote:
What do your queries
Thanks
Unfortunately thats not the case.
We are using the same field to do search on and display that text.
So looks like in this case this is not possible
Am i correct
We have a custom field type with synonyms defined at query time.
Erik Hatcher-4 wrote:
On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:26 PM,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Prasanna R plistma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious how an approach that
I am using Solr 1.4 and DIH to build the index from a table.
I use full import once to create the index and then i keep using delta
import to update the index.
All woks fine as long a the table gets added with only new rows.
if there are some rows in the table that get deleted then the index
Here's a couple more options:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1555610/solr-dih-how-to-handle-deleted-documents/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1555610/solr-dih-how-to-handle-deleted-documents/
Cheers,
Mauricio
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Mohamed Parvez par...@gmail.com wrote:
I am
I'm having trouble performing deletes on a Solr 1.4 index. Whether I perform
the deletes by query or by id, the document in question doesn't seem to get
removed from the index. Even after a commit.
I thought the problem might be the fact that I wasn't committing with
expungeDeletes=true, but
I have looked in the that thread earlier. But there is no option there for a
solution from Solr side.
I mean the two more options there are
1] Use database triggers instead of DIH to manage updating the index :-
This out of question as we cant run 1000 odd triggers every hour to delete.
2] Some
Are you deleting from correct index.[Meaning verify - Solr home]
Also inspect thru luke to check the contents
Ankit
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade [mailto:gfernandez-kinc...@capitaliq.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 4:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
I opened up my index using Luke, found a document by searching for a specific
ID (versionId:2002366155), and then I deleted it using Luke. After committing,
performing the search again in Luke yielded no results.
However, when I perform that same search using Solr, I get a result.
That got
I opened up my index using Luke,
found a document by searching for a specific ID
(versionId:2002366155), and then I deleted it using Luke.
After committing, performing the search again in Luke
yielded no results.
However, when I perform that same search using Solr, I get
a result.
My HTTP caching is currently configured for Open Time
httpCaching lastModifiedFrom=openTime
etagSeed=Solr
So that shouldn't be the problem, right?
-Original Message-
From: AHMET ARSLAN [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 5:31 PM
To:
I use dynamic fields heavily in my SOLR config. I would like to be able to
specify which fields should be returned from a query based on a pattern for the
field name. For instance, given:
dynamicField name=Bool_* type=boolean
indexed=true stored=true /
I might
Sorry - hit reply too early. I edited my config as you suggested, rebooted
Tomcat, and I can still find the doc through the Solr Admin interface even
though I can't find it in Luke.
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade [mailto:gfernandez-kinc...@capitaliq.com]
Sent:
On Dec 28, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote:
q={!spatial lat=43.705 long=116.3635 radius=100}*:*
What's QParser is the spatial plugin? I don't know of any such QParser in
Solr. Is this a third party tool? If so, I'd suggest asking on that list.
with no other parameters.
When
It's jteam's plugin ( http://www.jteam.nl/news/spatialsolr ) which AFAIK is
just the latest patch for SOLR-773 packaged as a stand-alone plugin.
I'll try to contact jteam directly.
Thanks
Mauricio
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Dec 28, 2009, at
Could you share both your solr.xml and solrconfig.xml
Ankit
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade [mailto:gfernandez-kinc...@capitaliq.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 5:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unable to delete from index
Sorry - hit reply
Here you go.
Thanks for your help!
Gio.
-Original Message-
From: Ankit Bhatnagar [mailto:abhatna...@vantage.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:09 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Unable to delete from index
Could you share both your solr.xml and solrconfig.xml
I am new for Lucene.
I haven't any idea about Lucene.
I want to implement Lucene in my search script.
Please guide me what I needs to be do for Lucene implementation.
Actually, I want to integrate lucene search with message board system where
people come to post new topic, edit that topic and
I think you need to send a message to the lucene mailing list instead if you
want to use Lucene directly.
java-u...@lucene.apache.org
The API core Javadoc page has a very simple example which you can use to get
started with a few modifications.
I think what Erik was referring to was for you to create a separate copy
field with different analyzers and just copy the original value to that copy
field and index it differently.
That way you can use one field for search and another one to display the
highlighting results.
On Mon, Dec 28,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Maheshwar maheshwar2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new for Lucene.
I haven't any idea about Lucene.
I want to implement Lucene in my search script.
Please guide me what I needs to be do for Lucene implementation.
Yes probably the wrong list or not, but for both
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Mohamed Parvez par...@gmail.com wrote:
I have looked in the that thread earlier. But there is no option there for
a
solution from Solr side.
I mean the two more options there are
1] Use database triggers instead of DIH to manage updating the index :-
This
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov wrote:
I use dynamic fields heavily in my SOLR config. I would like to be able to
specify which fields should be returned from a query based on a pattern for
the field name. For instance,
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Darren Govoni dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way to retrieve the facets from a query
based on their mincount without specifying facet.field?
I submit a query and want to retrieve all the faceted fields with
mincounts 2, but
36 matches
Mail list logo
