it'll negatively impact the desired goal of low latency new index readers?
- yes, i think so, thats the reason because i dont understand the
wiki-article ...
i set the warmupCount to 500 and i got no error messages, that solr isnt
available ...
but solr-stats.jsp show me a warmuptime of
okay, not the time ... the items ...
-
--- System
One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores,
1 Core with 31 Million Documents other Cores 100.000
- Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx
-
I figured it out. Since this Solr server does not has an SSL interface,
I had to change the following line from 443 to 80:
AuthScope scope = new AuthScope(host, 80, resin);
Erlend
On 09.03.11 17.09, Erlend Garåsen wrote:
I'm trying to do a search with SolrJ using digest authentication, but
Hi,
I'm trying to setup Solr so that we can sort using:
document_views asc,score
...is this possible via the solrconfig.xml/schema.xml file?
I know its possible to do via adding sort= , but the Perl module
(WebService::Solr) doesn't seem to offer the option to pass in this value :(
TIA
--
Is there no generic parameter store in the Solr module you can use for passing
the sort parameter? If not, you can define your sort parameter as default in
the request handler you use in solrconfig. See the shipped config for
examples.
On Thursday 10 March 2011 11:25:01 Andy Newby wrote:
Hi,
No, look for request handlers.
requestHandler name=search class=solr.SearchHandler default=true
!-- default values for query parameters can be specified, these
will be overridden by parameters in the request
--
lst name=defaults
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
Hi
i understand what qf and qs parameters are
but i can't understand what pf and ps are exactly.
someone can explain it to me??
for example
qf=title^2 name^1.2 surname^1
qs=3
it means i search in title field with boost 2 or in name field with boost
1.2 or in surname field with boost 1
and the
Hi
i understand what qf and qs parameters are
but i can't understand what pf and ps are exactly.
someone can explain it to me??
for example
qf=title^2 name^1.2 surname^1
qs=3
it means i search in title field with boost 2 or in name
field with boost
1.2 or in surname field with
Thank you very much. i understand the difference beetween qs and ps but not
what pf is...is it necessary to use ps?
Yes you can use all 4 parameters together. Please see similar discussion:
http://search-lucene.com/m/KWkYf2kE4Ng1/
--
Gastone Penzo
Not at the moment if i'm not mistaken. The same issue is with Solr 3.1 where
relative distances are not being returned as field value when doing spatial
filtering. To retrieve the value one must use the score as the some pseudo
field.
i understand the
difference beetween qs and ps but not
what pf is...is it necessary to use ps?
pf (Phrase Fields) and ps (Phrase Slop) related to each other.
Lets say you have q=term1 term1pf=title textps=10
We can think as if dismax adds title:term1 term2~10 text:term1 term2~10
imaginary
Bill,
I think all of the improvements can be made, however they are fairly
large structural changes that would require perhaps several patches.
The other issue is we'll likely land RT this year (or next) and then
the cached values need to be appended to as the documents are added,
that and
Well, it's quite hard to debug because the values listed on the stats page in
the fieldCache section don't make much sense. Reducing precision with
NOW/HOUR, however, does seem to make a difference.
It is hard (or impossible) to reproduce this is a test setup with the same
index but without
- yes, i think so, thats the reason because i dont understand the
wiki-article ...
Maybe the article is out of date? I think it's grossly inefficient to
warm the searchers at all in the NRT case. Queries are being
performed across *all* segments, even though there should only be 1
that's new
Dear all,
in DIH, is it possible to have two sibling entities where:
- the first one is the root entity that creates the documents by
iterating over a table that has one row per document.
- the second one is executed after the completion of the first entity
iteration, and it provides more data
Alright, i can now confirm the issue has been resolved by reducing precision.
The garbage collector on nodes without reduced precision has a real hard time
keeping up and clearly shows a very different graph of heap consumption.
Consider using MINUTE, HOUR or DAY as precision in case you suffer
Maybe the article is out of date?
- maybe .. i dont know
in my case it make no sense and i use another configuration ...
-
--- System
One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores,
1 Core with 31 Million Documents
I have a text field indexed using WordDelimeter
Indexed in that way
doc
field name=myfieldS.#L.W.VI.37/field
...
/doc
Serching in that way:
http://192.168.3.3:8983/solr3.1/core0/select?q=myfield:(S.#L.W.VI.37)
Makes this error:
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse
I think that the problem is with the # symbol, because it has a special
meaning when used inside a URL. Try replacing it with %23, like this:
http://192.168.3.3:8983/solr3.1/core0/select?q=myfield:(S.%23L.W.VI.37)
Regards,
*
Juan G. Grande*
-- Solr Consultant @ http://www.plugtree.com
-- Blog @
As a workaround can you not have a search component run after the
querycomponent, and have the qty_ordered,unit_price as stored fields
and returned with the fl parameter and have your custom component do
the calc, unless you need to sort by this value too?
Dan
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:06 PM,
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 04:53:51 pm Juan Grande wrote:
I think that the problem is with the # symbol, because it has a special
meaning when used inside a URL. Try replacing it with %23, like this:
http://192.168.3.3:8983/solr3.1/core0/select?q=myfield:(S.%23L.W.VI.37)
If I do urlencoding
Hi Chantal,
i'm not sure if i understood you correctly (if at all)? Two entities,
not arranged as sub-entitiy, but using values from the previous
entity? Could you paste your dataimport the relevant part of the
logging-output?
Regards
Stefan
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Chantal Ackermann
Hi,
- Original Message
From: Jake Luciani jak...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 8:07:00 PM
Subject: Re: True master-master fail-over without data gaps (choosing CA in
CAP)
Yeah sure. Let me update this on the Solandra wiki. I'll send across
Hi,
I am using rev 1036236 of solr trunk running as a servlet in Tomcat 7.
The doc set is sharded over 11 shards.
Currently, I have all the shards running in a single tomcat.
Please see the bottom of the email for the bits of my schema.xml and
solrconfig.xml that might help you understand my
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 04:58:43 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
It seems fixed by setting into WordDelimiterTokenizer
catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0
Instead of 1 on both...
Nice to know...
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 04:53:51 pm Juan Grande wrote:
I think that the problem is with the #
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Chantal Ackermann
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de wrote:
[...]
Is this supposed to work at all? I haven't found anything so far on the
net but I could have used the wrong keywords for searching, of course.
As answer to the maybe obvious question why I'm not
On 3/10/2011 8:15 AM, Gastone Penzo wrote:
Thank you very much. i understand the difference beetween qs and ps but not
what pf is...is it necessary to use ps?
It's not neccesary to use anything, including Solr.
pf: Will take the entire query the user entered, make it into a single
phrase,
Hi Stefan,
thanks for your time!
No, the second entity is not reusing values from the previous one. It
just provides more fields to it, and, of course the unique identifier -
which in case of the second entity is not unique:
document name=contributor
entity name=contributor pk=id
Hi Dan,
Yes, you're right - in fact that was precisely what I was thinking of
doing! Also looking at SOLR-1298 SOLR-1566 - which would be good for
applying functions generically rather than on a per-use-case basis.
Thanks!
Peter
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:58 PM, dan sutton danbsut...@gmail.com
Hi Gora,
thanks for making me read this part of the documentation again!
This processor probably cannot do what I need out of the box but I will
try to extend it to allow specifying a regular expression in its where
attribute.
Thanks!
Chantal
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 17:39 +0100, Gora Mohanty
Hi all,
I'm having an issue with using a custom fieldtype with distributed
search. It may be the case that what I'm looking for could be
accomplished in a different way, but this is my first stab at it.
I'm looking to store XML in a field. What I've done, which works fine,
is to:
- on
Can you use 2 fq parameters ? The default op is usually set to AND.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Mar 10, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Jerry Mindek jmin...@manta.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using rev 1036236 of solr trunk running as a servlet in Tomcat 7.
The doc set is sharded over 11 shards.
Currently,
Also _query_ is the right approach when using fq with 2 Boolean values. Just
make sure you double quote the {!geofilt} when using that.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Mar 10, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Jerry Mindek jmin...@manta.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using rev 1036236 of solr trunk running as a
Okay I think I have the idea:
dataConfig
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource
name=animals
batchSize=-1
driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql://localhost/animals?characterEncoding=UTF8amp;zeroDateTimeBehavior=convertToNull
Any ideas on this one?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I know that I can add sort=score desc to the url to sort in descending
order. However, I would like to sort a MoreLikeThis response which returns
records like this:
lst
Hi ,
I need notes and detail about solr because of Now I am working in solr so i
need help .
Regards ,
Yazhini . K
NCSI ,
M.Sc ( Software Engineering ) .
: I know its possible to do via adding sort= , but the Perl module
: (WebService::Solr) doesn't seem to offer the option to pass in this value :(
according to the docs, you can pass any query params you want to the sort
method...
Start by reading http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage and the provided
links (introduction, tutorial, etc. )
2011/3/10 yazhini.k vini yazhini@gmail.com
Hi ,
I need notes and detail about solr because of Now I am working in solr so i
need help .
Regards ,
Yazhini . K
NCSI ,
Is it possible to conditionally load sub-entities in
DataImportHandler, based on the gathered value of parent entities?
How about the Solr PHP Client (http://code.google.com/p/solr-php-client/)?
We use this and have been quite happy with it, and it seems that it
addresses all of the concerns you expressed.
What advantages does yours offer?
Liam
On 8 March 2011 17:02, Burak burak...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Morning,
We use solr to index a range of content to which, within our application,
access is restricted by a system of user groups and permissions. In order
to ensure that search results don't reveal information about items which the
user doesn't have access to, we need to somehow filter the
How about assigning content types to documents in the index, and map
users to a set of content types they are allowed to access? That way you
will pass in fewer parameters in the fq.
-sujit
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 11:53 +1100, Liam O'Boyle wrote:
Morning,
We use solr to index a range of
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to conditionally load sub-entities in
DataImportHandler, based on the gathered value of parent entities?
Probably the easies way to do that is with a transformer.
Please see the DIH Wiki page for
Right that's not within the XML however, and it's unclear how to
access the upper level entities that have already been instantiated,
eg, beyond the given 'transform' row.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jason Rutherglen
I have similar requirements.
Content type is one solution; but there are also other use cases where this not
enough.
Another requirement is, when the access permission is changed, we need to
update
the field - my understanding is we can not unless re-index the whole document
again. Am I
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Right that's not within the XML however, and it's unclear how to
access the upper level entities that have already been instantiated,
eg, beyond the given 'transform' row.
The second example for a
The DIH is strictly tree-structured. Data flows down the tree. If the
first sibling is the root entity, nothing is used from the second
sibling. This configuration is something that it the DIH should fail.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Chantal Ackermann
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de wrote:
As Canal points out, grouping into types is not always possible.
In our case, permissions are not on a per-type level, but either on a per
folder (of which there can be hundreds) or per item in some cases (of
which there can be... any number at all).
Reindexing is also to slow to really be an
To be fair, I think there is a slight difference between a Content Management
and a Search Engine.
Access control at per document level, per type level, supporting dynamic role
changes, etc.are more like content management use cases; where search solution
like Solr focuses on different set of
I want to implement type ahead styling feature for description field.For that I
defined ngtext fieldtype.I indexed
description as text and then using copyfield indexed into ngtext field.But I
found out that it is not working.
If I put ngtext directly as a field type value without using
50 matches
Mail list logo
