Hi everyone!
We are working on Solr - 3.4.
In Short: If my query term matches more than one words I want it to be
considered as one match (in a particular field).
Details:
Our index has a multi-valued field category which contains possible
category names of the company. It is entered by the
sry.
i need the sum of values of the found documents. e.g. the total amount of
one day. each doc in index has ist own amount.
i try out something with StatsComponent but with 48 Million docs in Index
its to slow.
-
--- System
1) Is it safe to reuse a single _mgr and _client
across all 28 cores?
both are thread-safe API as per HttpClient specs. You shld go ahead with
this.
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
Did you rebuild the index from scratch. Since this is index time factor, you
need to build complete index from scratch.
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/to-prevent-number-of-matching-terms-in-contributing-score-tp3486373p3486447.html
Sent from
Hi Pravesh, thanks for your reply but I am not asking about the omitNorms
(index time parameter) I am asking about how to consider multiple matches
of a term in a single field as one during query time.
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM, pravesh suyalprav...@yahoo.com wrote:
Did you
Hi Samar,
You can write your custom similarity implementation, and override the
/lengthNorm()/ method to return a constant value.
Then in your /schema.xml/ specify your custom implementation as the default
similarity class.
But you need to rebuild your index from scratch for this to come into
I Guess,
This has nothing to do with search part. You can post process the search
results(I mean iterate through your results and sum it)
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/best-way-for-sum-of-fields-tp3477517p3486536.html
Sent from the Solr -
Hi,
I am trying to write JUnit Test Code for my Solr interaction and while
executing I keep getting the following errors.
Mind you, I am using JUnit 4.7 and I have been calling super.setUp().
Here is some sample code...
/* (non-Javadoc)
* @see
yes, this way i am using on another part in my application. i hoped, that
exists another way to avoid the way over php
-
--- System
One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 8 Cores,
1 Core with 45 Million Documents other
Hi,
If you only need to sum over displayed results, go with the
post-processing of hits solution, that's fast and easy.
If you sum over the whole data set (i.e your sum is not query
dependant), have it computed at indexing time, depending on your
indexing workflow.
Otherwise, (sum over the
hi thanks for the big reply ;)
i had the idea with the several and small 5M shards too.
and i think thats the next step i have to go, because our biggest index
grows each day with avg. 50K documents.
but make it sense to keep searcher AND updater cores on one big server? i
dont want to use
That looks promising... Will look into that a bit more.
--Tiernan
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Hmmm, MultiValues are guaranteed to be returned in the order they were
inserted, so you might be able to do the linking yourself given the
results.
Hello folks,
i have questions about MLT and Deduplication and what would be the best
choice in my case.
Case:
I index 1000 docs, 5 of them are 95% the same (for example: copy pasted
blog articles from different sources, with slight changes (author name,
etc..)).
But they have differences.
*Now
I tried to do the same but problem still persist and my document is not
getting indexed. I am using solr 3.4.0 and it was having tika 0.8 i replaced
core and parser jar with the 0.6 but document is not getting indexed. Please
help and nothing is coming in my logs related to that.
--
View this
Hi again,
Since you have a custom high availability solution over your solr
instances, I can't help much I guess... :-)
I usually rely on master/slave replication to separate index build and
index search processes.
The fact is that resources consumption at build time and search time are
You have to provide a lot more information about what you're doing. Are
you trying to use DIH? the extracting update request handler? What
do your config files look like?
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:18 AM, kumar8anuj
Hi, there,
I am trying to look into the performance impact of data replication on
query response time. To get a clear picture, I would like to know how
to get the size of data being replicated for each commit. Through the
admin UI, you may read a x of y G data is being replicated; however,
y is
Shaun:
You should try NRT available with Solr with RankingAlgorithm here. You
should be able to add docs in real time and also query them in real
time. If DIH does not retain the old index, you may be able to convert
the rss fields to a XML format as needed by Solr and update the docs
(make
Hi Xin,
I don't know if you can see this information anywhere in Solr's UI...
... but I know you could see this information using SPM for Solr [1]. I don't
have a screenshot handy to show this visually, but it's easy to explain. One
of the SPM for Solr reports shows the index size (in terms
Having some trouble clustering my data ... These symptoms are similar to some
problems that were fixed last year. Possible regression? Suggestions on how
to proceed? Thanks in advance!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1883
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1404
Nov 7, 2011
Any options that do not require adding new software?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Nagendra Nagarajayya
nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com wrote:
Shaun:
You should try NRT available with Solr with RankingAlgorithm here. You
should be able to add docs in real time and also query them in real
Solr also can query link(url) text and rank them higher if we specify url in qf
field. Only problem is that why it does not rank pages with both words higher
when mm is set as
1lt;-1. It seems to me that this is a bug.
Thanks.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning
: I am trying to connect the SOLR with Java code using URLConnection, i have
: deployed solr war file in jboss server(assuming server machine in some other
: location or remote) its working fine if no exception raises... but if any
: exception raises in server like connection failure its stopping
: It looks to me like everything matches down the line but top level says
: otherQuery is a non-match... I don't get it?
Note the parsed query...
: str name=parsedquery_toString+moreWords:syncmaster
: -moreWords:sync (master syncmaster)/str
...and the top level explanation message...
: str
: Ideally this means that for a given query, I would like Solr just to return
: the ranks of selected unique keys within the results.
If i understand you correctly, given a query MY_QUERY and a set of IDs
(ID1, ID2, ID3, etc...) you would like to know the score of those IDs
against that query?
Thanks Nagendra, I'll take a look.
So question for you et al, so Solr in its default installation will ALWAYS
delete content for an entity prior to doing a full import?
You cannot simply build up an index incrementally from multiple imports
(from XML)? I read elsewhere that the 'clean' parameter
Chris Hostetter-3 wrote:
Agreed. In 3.x and below this type of logic is expected to live in the
QueryResponseWriters.
Forgive my ignorance, but where do QueryResponseWriters live? And where do
they fit into the flow?
I know how the different components fit into a distributed search,
Hello,
While working on our Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr [1] we've noticed
Solr MBeans are registered under a different JMX domain name, depending on the
Solr version and on the servlet container. In some cases the domain name is
solr, while in others it is solr/. But we also saw
: So for example, if searching on Santa Clara I would like to display all
: sections/paragraphs where Santa Clara occurs in the document.
can you clarify what you mean by display and how you intend to use that
info?
it may be obvious to you what you mean by display but depending on the
: depending on the Solr version and on the servlet container. In some
: cases the domain name is solr, while in others it is solr/. But we
: also saw further inconsistencies. For example, we have 2 Solr 1.4.0
: instances on the same version of the servlet container, and one has
: solr,
: finally I want to use Solr highlighting. But there seems to be a problem
: if I combine the char filter and the compound word filter in combination
: with highlighting (an
: org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.InvalidTokenOffsetsException is
: raised).
Definitely sounds like a bug somwhere
: I see that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653 removed this
: support from SolrJ, because it was deemed too dangerous for mere
: mortals.
I believe the concern was that the novice level API was very in your
face about asking if you wanted to overwrite and made it too easy to
: ./NoLengthNormAndTfSimilarity.java:7: error: lengthNorm(String,int) in
: NoLengthNormAndTfSimilarity cannot override lengthNorm(String,int) in
: Similarity
: public float lengthNorm(String fieldName, int numTerms) {
: ^
: overridden method is final
: 1 error
: -
: What am I
So, I have a bunch of products indexed in Solr. Each product may exist in any
number of product categories. The product category field is therefore
multivalued in Solr. This allow us to show categories a product exists in.
Now, instead we want to browse the products by category. This also works
On 10/27/2011 9:14 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Well, this could be explained if your fields are very short. Norms
are encoded into (part of?) a byte, so your ranking may be unaffected.
Try adding debugQuery=on and looking at the explanation. If you've
really omitted norms, I think you should see
hi all, i followed steps in link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Example_C:_Two_shard_cluster_with_shard_replicas_and_zookeeper_ensemble
and created Two shard cluster with shard replicas and zookeeper ensemble,
and then for Solr Replication i followed steps in link
Hi,
I've noticed that when field collapsing and faceting are both used in the
one query the facet numbers ignore the grouping. In my example I have three
documents (I have a small index for testing) and if I group on a certain
field I get two groups in the results but the facet numbers show that
: Now, instead we want to browse the products by category. This also works
: since we can simply find all products for category A. So, we show them.
: Now, we also want to show a list of categories underneath (in the tree
: structure) that category, and, a count of items in each. Just the
:
: We've successfully setup Solr 3.4.0 to parse and import multiple news
: RSS feeds (based on the slashdot example on
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler) using the HttpDataSource.
: The objective is for Solr to index ALL news items published on this feed
: (ever) - not just the
From: Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
compconsult...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Faceting a multi valued field
how are you modeling the tree nature of your cateory taxonomy when
: You can write your custom similarity implementation, and override the
: /lengthNorm()/ method to return a constant value.
The postered already said (twice!) that they have already set
omitNorms=true, so lengthNorm won't even be used
omiting norms (or mucking with norms by modifying the
: Someone always wants to understand the full use case. :-) I do
: understand why, but, sometimes said use case is extremely complex with
: dozens and dozens of search requirements. I was trying to limit the
: explanation and was hoping someone could just answer the question as is.
well -- i
: I understand that's a valid thing for faceting to do, I was just wondering
: if there's any way to get it to do the faceting on the groups returned.
: Otherwise I guess I'll need to convince the UI people to just show the
: facets without the numbers.
what you are asking about is generally
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I understand that's a valid thing for faceting to do, I was just wondering
: if there's any way to get it to do the faceting on the groups returned.
: Otherwise I guess I'll need to convince the UI people to just
Hi all.
I am using Solr 3.4 under Win 7.
In schema there is a multivalue field indexed in this way:
==
Schema:
==
field name=myEvent type=myCustomText multiValued=true indexed=true
stored=true omitNorms=true/
fieldType
Hi,
I'm having an issue with sorting because the PHP plugin converts the + to
%2B, I get the error Can't determine Sort Order: 'name+desc'.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Cheers
Nov 8, 2011 1:53:00 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [pending] webapp=/solr path=/select/
: I'm having an issue with sorting because the PHP plugin converts the + to
: %2B, I get the error Can't determine Sort Order: 'name+desc'.
then it sounds like the PHP library you are using is URL escaping
things properly, and you should just be passing a simple space
character to it.
the
That works well, thanks very much.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: I understand that's a valid thing for faceting to do, I was just
wondering
: if there's any way to get it to do the faceting on the groups returned.
: Otherwise I guess I'll
Thanks again
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: I'm having an issue with sorting because the PHP plugin converts the + to
: %2B, I get the error Can't determine Sort Order: 'name+desc'.
then it sounds like the PHP library you are using is URL
From: Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
To: Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Faceting a multi valued field
: A B C D E
: Z C D E
: Z C F G H E
: Y G H E
:
:
50 matches
Mail list logo
