Will check later to use different data dirs for the core on
each instance.
But because each Solr sits in it's own openvz instance (virtual
server respectively) they should be totally separated. At least
from my point of understanding virtualization.
Will check and get back here...
Thanks.
On
OK, I think I have found it. I provided when starting the 4 solr instances
via start.jar always the data directory property via
*-Dsolr.data.dir=/home/myuser/data
*
After removing this it worked fine. What is weird is, that all 4 instances
are totally separated, so that instance-2 should never
I want to find documents whose title is starting with digit, what will be
solr query for this. I have tried many queries but could not able to
configure proper query for this.
Note : title is a field in my index.
--
View this message in context:
Hi all,
It seems that DIH always holds two connections open to the database.
One of them is almost always 'idle in transaction'. It may sometimes
seem to do a little work but then it goes idle again.
datasource definition:
dataSource name=df-stream-store-ds
On 6/14/2012 2:05 AM, Daniel Brügge wrote:
Will check later to use different data dirs for the core on
each instance.
But because each Solr sits in it's own openvz instance (virtual
server respectively) they should be totally separated. At least
from my point of understanding virtualization.
I want to find documents whose title
is starting with digit, what will be
solr query for this. I have tried many queries but could not
able to
configure proper query for this.
Note : title is a field in my index.
Something like this? q=title:(1* 2* 3* 4* ... 9*)q.op=OR
Are you trying to query for any numeric term at the start of a title or a
specific numeric term at the start of a title?
Unless you are using a query parser that supports Lucene's SpanFirstQuery or
SpanPositionRangeQuery, you have two choices:
1. Explicitly (or implicitly via a custom update
Try readOnly=true in the dataSource configuration. This causes several
defaults to get set in the JDBC connection, and often will solve problems like
this. (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Configuring_JdbcDataSource)
Also, try a batch size of 0 to let your jdbc driver pick
Actually, the readOnly=true makes things worse.
What it does (among other things) is:
c.setTransactionIsolation(Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED);
which leads to:
Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Cannot change
transaction isolation level in the middle of a
Aha, OK. That was new to me. Will check this. Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Yury Kats yuryk...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 6/14/2012 2:05 AM, Daniel Brügge wrote:
Will check later to use different data dirs for the core on
each instance.
But because each Solr sits in it's own openvz
I am running a full-import. DIH reported that 1125 documents were added
after indexing. This number did not change even after I added the new
entries.
How do I check the ID for an entry and query it against Solr?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On 14
I have documents that are word definitions (basically an online
dictionary) that can have alternate titles. For example the document
entitled Read-only memory might have an alternate title of ROM. In
search results, I want to boost documents with an alternate title that
is a case-insensitive
Hmmm, your maxSize is pretty high, it may just be that you've set this
much higher
than is wise. The maxSize setting governs the number of entries. I'd start with
a much lower number here, and monitor the solr/admin page for both
hit ratio and evictions. Well, and size too. 16,000 entries puts a
Here's a quick thing to check. Delete your index and do a fresh import. Then
go to the admin/statistics. Check the numDocs and maxDocs entries. If
they're different, it means that some of your documents have been deleted.
Deleted you say? What's that about? Well, if more than one record has the
What is the version of solrj you are trying to get working?
If you download version 3.6 of solr there's a directory dist/solrj-lib
in the binary release artifact that includes the required
dependencies. I would start with those.
--
Sami Siren
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Welty, Richard
: Correct. In 3.6 it is simply ignored. In 4.x it currently does work.
That's not true.
the example cofigs in Solr 3.6 no longer mention defaultSearchField,
but Solr 3.6 will still respect a defaultSearchField/ declaration if
it exists in your schema.xml -- I just verified this by running
: So if defaultSearchField has been removed (deprecated) from schema.xml then
why
: are the still calls to
org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName()?
Because even though the syntax is deprecated/discouraged in schema.xml, we
don't want things to break for existing users
I have 2 fields in my schema - e.g.
long field field1 and long field field 2.
I'd like my boost query to be such that field1 is boosted by the value of
field 2 for each document.
What should the query time boost for this look like? I was able to do this
using Index time boosting with the
See Function Query:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
If you are using the dismax or edismax query parser you can use the bf
request parameter.
e.g.,
q=foobf=ord(popularity)^0.5 recip(rord(price),1,1000,1000)^0.3
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: smita
Sent:
Hmmm... how could I have gotten so confused?!?! Actually, I recognized my
mistake yesterday (after reading the code some more for David's Jira) but
hadn't gotten around to correcting myself.
In any case, the original problematic scenario may have been simply copying
3.5 request handler/params
Thanks all, for your inputs.
We found what the problem was, the reason certain entries were missing from
the index and not from the MySQL search results was that we had some
customized transformers in the data config, that skipped the entries when a
particular field was missing.
On Thu, Jun 14,
: I have computed pagerank offline for document set dump. I ideally
: want to use pagerank and solr relevency score together in formula to
: sort search solr result. I have already looked at
:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_increase_the_score_for_specific_documents
:
It can be true that filters cache max size is set to high value. That is
also true that.
We looked at evictions and hit rate earlier. Maybe you are right that
evictions are
not always unwanted. Some time ago we made tests. There are not so high
difference in hit rate when filters maxSize is set to
23 matches
Mail list logo
