What is your text_general type definition in schema.xml?
-Original Message-
From: anurag.jain [mailto:anurag.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:16 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Regarding Copyfield
hi
in copy field i am not storing first_name last_name
Hi,
I'd like to use two separate indexes (Solr 3.6.1).
I've read several wiki pages and looked at the multicore example bundled
with the distribution but it seems I missing something.
I have this hierarchy :
solr-home/
|
-- conf
|
-- solr.xml
-- solrconfig.xml (if I don't put it,
Hi Bruno,
Maybe this helps. I wrote something about it:
http://www.coderthing.com/solr-with-multicore-and-database-hook-part-1/
Dariusz
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Bruno Dusausoy bdusau...@yp5.be wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to use two separate indexes (Solr 3.6.1).
I've read several wiki
Hi there,
sometimes we have to load very big documents, 1-2 multi-value-fields of it
can contain 10.000 items. And unfortunately we need this informations.
We have to load 50 documents in order to show to the result table in the
UI.
The query takes around 50 seconds. I guess 48 seconds of
You should put your solr.xml into your 'cores' directory, and set
-Dsolr.solr.home=cores
That should get you going. 'cores' *is* your Solr Home. Otherwise, your
instanceDir entries in your current solr.xml will need correct paths to
../cores/procedure/ etc.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013, at
Dariusz Borowski a écrit :
Hi Bruno,
Maybe this helps. I wrote something about it:
http://www.coderthing.com/solr-with-multicore-and-database-hook-part-1/
Hi Darius,
Thanks for the link.
I've found my - terrible - mistake : solr.xml was not in solr.home dir
but in solr.home/conf dir, so it
Hi,
Retry on a better machine (2CPU, 8GB RAM, 1.5GB for java half used according
admin interface) still have the same issue.
It seems to grow with matches count : with a search matching 100k documents,
it takes 700ms, vs 70ms without ngroup (CPU is 100% during request)
For information, my index
Hi Gastone,
I am not very sure, but I think phrase query will resolve this problem.
q=title:white house will always have higher relevance that term white and
house separately.
Regards
Harshvardhan Ojha
-Original Message-
From: Gastone Penzo [mailto:gastone.pe...@gmail.com]
Sent:
I have tried to search for my specific problem but have not found solution. I
have also read the wiki on the DIH and seem to have everything set up right
but my Query still fails. Thank you for your help
I am running Solr 3.6.1 with Tomcat 6.0 Windows7 64bit and IBM Optim Archive
File
I have all
Get user's input, form the solr query and send a request to the server (you
can also pass a parameter called wt (xml,json etc) to direct solr to return
output in that format). Parse the results from solr and display them to
user in your website.
Depending on what kind of server-side programming
Mickael,
I just wonder you have considered BlockJoin? it performs much better than
query time approaches
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2012/08/block-join-query-performs.html ,but
faceting hasn't been implemented for it yet.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Mickael Magniez
Dmitry,
I have some relevant experience and ready to help, but I can not get the
core problem. Could you please expand the description and/or provide a
sample?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Is there a simple way of accessing the matched
You're confusing shards and slaves here. Shards are splitting a logical
index amongst N machines, where each machine contains a portion of the
index. In that setup, you have to configure the slaves to know about the
other shards, and the incoming query has to be distributed amongst all the
shards
Trying again, original reply rejected as spam.
This won't be all that helpful, but 4.1 has a lot of improvements as
far as SolrCloud is concerned, and it's in the process of being put
together now.
So I suspect the best use of time would be to work with 4.1 (or a
nightly build between now and
Hi,
I'm trying to write my own search handler, but i have problem loading it
into solr.
Error message is :
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
'com.company.solr.GroupRequestHandler'
at
The sum of all the count in the groups… does not match the total no of docs
found.
./zahoor
On 12-Jan-2013, at 1:27 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Not sure exactly what you mean, can you give an example?
Upayavira
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013, at 06:32 AM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
Is your group field multivalued? Could docs appear in more than one
group?
Upayavira
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013, at 01:22 PM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
The sum of all the count in the groups… does not match the total no of
docs found.
./zahoor
On 12-Jan-2013, at 1:27 PM, Upayavira
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your comments but I am migrating an existing index (single instance)
to a sharded setup and currently I have no access to the code involved in the
indexation process. That`s why I made a simple copy of the index on each shards.
In the end, the data will be distributed
Does anyone have a great tutorial for learning the solr query language,
dismax and edismax?
I've searched endlessly for one but I haven't been able to locate one that
is comprehensive enough and has a lot of examples (that actually work!).
I also tried to use wildcards, logical operators, and a
He was referring to master/slave setup, where a slave will poll the
master periodically asking for index updates. That frequency is
configured in solrconfig.xml on the slave.
So, you are saying that you have, say 1m documents in your master index.
You then copy your index to four other boxes. At
You are setting yourself up for disaster.
If you ask Solr for documents 1000 to 1010, it needs to sort documents 1
to 1010, and discard the first 1000, which causes horrible performance.
I'm curious to hear if others have strategies to extract content
sequentially from an index. I suspect a new
Hi,
maybe it helps to have a closer look on the other params of edismax.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#pf_.28Phrase_Fields.29
'mm=2' will be to strong, but th usage of pf, pf2, and pf is likely your
solution.
uwe
Am 15.01.2013 10:15, schrieb Gastone Penzo:
Hi,
i'm using
Ok I see what Erick`s meant now.. Thanks.
The original index I`m working on contains about 120k documents. Since I have
no access to the code that pushes documents into the index, I made four copies
of the same index.
The master node contains no data at all, it simply use the data available in
It's a well know search engines limitation. This post will help you get
into the core problem
http://www.searchworkings.org/blog/-/blogs/lucene-solr-and-deep-paging . it
seems that the solution is contributed into Lucene, but not yet for Solr.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Upayavira
I think your JDBC driver is complaining because it doesn't like what is being
set for the fetch size on the Statement. Fetch size is controlled by the
batchSize parameter on dataSource / .
Using batchSize=-1, I believe, is a workaround for MySql but I suspect your
driver requires it to be 0
No, SolrIndexSearcher has no mechanism to do that. The only way is to disable
the cache altogether or patch it up :)
-Original message-
From:Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 15-Jan-2013 16:57
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Disabling document cache
Hi,
Thanks Markus.
How are caches disabled these days... in Solr 4.0 that is? I remember
trying to comment them out in the past, but seeing them still enabled and
used with some custom size and other settings.
Thanks,
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Jan 15,
I don't understand how to add data into the document. I created a core in
version 4.0.0 test_core I can read the data on solr/test_core/select and insert
does not work. How to add data?
Mikhail,
Yeah, I considered that originally, but then after analyzing the data
noticed that was not possible. Some of the content we analyze contains
large tables that after ocr get turned into long running sentences which
contain 500k+ words per a sentence. Overall there are probably around 10k
It looks like a use case for using Solrj with queryAndStreamResponse ?
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api-4_0_0-BETA/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrServer.html#queryAndStreamResponse%28org.apache.solr.common.params.SolrParams,%20org.apache.solr.client.solrj.StreamingResponseCallback%29
André
Hi,
once i have indexed data from multiple tables from mysql database into
solr, is there any way that it update data(automatically) if any change is
made to the data in mysql?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Naresh [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n403343...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
Get user's
You should not need to use wildcards.
Most configurations of Solr will index space-separated words as separate
tokens. They can be matched separately.
DId you use a string field type (probably the wrong choice)? How are your
fields tokenized?
Solr/Lucene query syntax:
Thanks Erick, can you tell me how to do the appending
(lowercaseversion:LowerCaseVersion) before indexing. I tried pattern
factory filters, but I could not get it right.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
One way I've seen this done is to index pairs
Hi,
Commenting them out works fine. We don't use documentCaches either as they eat
too much and return only so little.
Cheers
-Original message-
From:Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 15-Jan-2013 17:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Disabling
Have you gone through the tutorial on the wiki first? It should cover basic
use cases. If you have, how do you send the data in?
Regards,
Alex
On 15 Jan 2013 11:22, Николай Измаилов bob...@mail.ru wrote:
I don't understand how to add data into the document. I created a core in
version
Hi,
Have a look under
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV#Methods_of_uploading_CSV_recordsabout
uploading a *local* file.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Uwe Clement uwe.clem...@exxcellent.dewrote:
Hi there,
sometimes we have
Hi all,
I'm currently in the process of doing some performance testing in preparations
for upgrading from Solr 3.6.1 to Solr 4.0. (We're badly in need of NRT
functionality)
Our existing deployment is not a typical deployment for Solr, as we use it to
search and facet on financial data such as
On 1/15/2013 9:20 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
Hi,
once i have indexed data from multiple tables from mysql database into
solr, is there any way that it update data(automatically) if any change is
made to the data in mysql?
You need to write a program to do this.
Although this list can provide
You can store structured data in Solr. You can't *query* it, in such a
way as respects its structure.
E.g. If I had xmlthisband/bthat/xml, I could parse that into
terms:
[this] [and] [that], and do searches upon them.
But you couldn't search for documents that match an xpath such as
He is talking about this list, the list we are using to communicate. You are
sending your messages to a mailing list -- thousands are on it.
Example of programs that will run the delta-import/full-import commands: Cron
You are basically calling a URL with specific parameters to pull data from
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj client. You'd have to configure it / use it
based on your application needs.
-Original Message-
From: hassancrowdc [mailto:hassancrowdc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index data from
On 1/15/2013 11:54 AM, Lighton Phiri wrote:
I would like to get a sense of the top terms for fields in my index
and just enable the LukeRequestHandler [1] in my solrconfig.xml file.
However, Luke seems to include stopwords as well.
I've tried searching previous threads but nothing I've come
On 1/15/2013 12:00 PM, hassancrowdc wrote:
Which list are you reffering to?
The solr-user mailing list that we are both using here.
and can you please give an example of such program(doesn't matter if it is
for your setup)?
I can't do that. It is confidential and proprietary code.
Hi,
I got SolrException when submitting XML for indexing (using solr 3.6.1)
Jan 15, 2013 10:22:42 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR, cod
e 31))
at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [2,1169]
at
okay, thank you.
After indexing data from database to solr. I want to search such that if i
write any word (that is included in the documents been indexed) it should
return all the documents that include that word. But it does not. When i
write http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=anyword i
What error are you getting? Which field are you searching (default field)? Did
you try specifying a default field? What is your schema like? Which analyzers
did you use?
Which version of solr are you using? I highly recommend going through the
tutorial to get a basic understanding of
I dont want to search by one field, i want to search as a whole. I am
following that tutorial i got indexing, updating but now for search i would
like to search through everything i have indexed not a specific field. I
can do by using defaultfield but i would like to search through everything
i
Interesting point. Looks like CDATA is more limiting than I thought:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDATA#Issues_with_encoding . Basically, the
recommendation is to avoid CDATA and automatically encode characters such
as yours, as well as less/more and ampersand.
Regards,
Alex.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax
Specify your query fields in the qf parameter. Take a look at the example at
the bottom of the page.
-Original Message-
From: hassancrowdc [mailto:hassancrowdc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:56 PM
To:
First off, just reporting this:
I wound up with approx 58% few documents having submitted via
ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer. I went back and changed the code to use
HttpSolrServer and had 100%
This was a long running test, approx 12 hours, with gigabytes of data, so
conveniently shared /
On 1/15/2013 1:37 PM, hassancrowdc wrote:
After indexing data from database to solr. I want to search such that if i
write any word (that is included in the documents been indexed) it should
return all the documents that include that word. But it does not. When i
write
It's certainly true that wildcard suppresses the synonym filter since it is
not multi-term aware.
Other than implementing your own version of the synonym filter that was
multi-term aware and interpreted wildcards, you may have to do your own
preprocessor.
Or, you could do index-time
On 1/15/2013 2:10 PM, Mark Bennett wrote:
First off, just reporting this:
I wound up with approx 58% few documents having submitted via
ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer. I went back and changed the code to use
HttpSolrServer and had 100%
This was a long running test, approx 12 hours, with gigabytes
HI
I hope this doesn't turn out to be a very stupid question. I have
upgraded from solr 1.4 to 3.6 and now in the response that I am getting
from solr maxScore field in the [response] is missing. I am doing
something wrong? how can I get it back?
thanks,
--
Kaveh Minooie
www.plutoz.com
On 1/15/2013 4:14 PM, kaveh minooie wrote:
HI
I hope this doesn't turn out to be a very stupid question. I have
upgraded from solr 1.4 to 3.6 and now in the response that I am getting
from solr maxScore field in the [response] is missing. I am doing
something wrong? how can I get it back?
Hello,
Is *:* hardcoded somewhere as a unique special pattern or is there actually
a class of queries with *:'something'?
I tried searching for it, but I suspect this is not the patterns most
tokenizers will actually index as searchable. :-)
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog:
Semi-hard-coded.
In QueryParserBase.java:
protected Query getWildcardQuery(String field, String termStr) throws
ParseException
{
if (*.equals(field)) {
if (*.equals(termStr)) return newMatchAllDocsQuery();
Otherwise, if you try *:x, * is an undefined field.
-- Jack Krupansky
I suppose this will do; I just figured they'd be a built-in way of
excluding stopwords. Thank you.
On 15 January 2013 22:08, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
To get an idea for which non-stopwords are dominant in your index, just ask
for more top terms, instead of just the top ten or top
Dear James Dyer ,
Thank You Very Much. Its really working now. I was struggling past 3 weeks
to solve it. You are really awesome. I am really happy now. Thank you to
make me happy.
Regards,
Ashim
--
View this message in context:
59 matches
Mail list logo
