Re: Solr admin Segments page legend

unsubscribe On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote: > Hi, > > I found some information about the pink bar from mail archive. > I think this should be written in ref. guide. > >> I think that pink segments are those segments >> which the system thinks

Re: Solr admin Segments page legend

Hi, I found some information about the pink bar from mail archive. I think this should be written in ref. guide. > I think that pink segments are those segments > which the system thinks are most likely to be chosen for automatic > merging, according to whatever merge policy you have active.

Solr admin Segments page legend

Hi, Solr has a nice segments visualization at [core_name]/segments , but I am wondering what the colors mean? Gray color is probably deleted documents., But I couldn't guess the significance of pink color: Thanks Nawab

RE: Solr 7.3, FunctionScoreQuery no longer displays debug output

Thanks Yonik, That is the suspect issue i stumbled upon when reading through the CHANGES.txt. Can you, or someone, please verify this? I need to know this before i can file a bug. There is a definitive difference in 7.2 and 7.3's respective outputs, i triple checked the debug output. But on

Re: Solr 7.3, FunctionScoreQuery no longer displays debug output

If this used to work, I wonder if it's something to do with changes to boost: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8099 -Yonik On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry to disturb. Is there anyone here able to reproduce and

RE: Multiple languages, boosting and, stemming and KeywordRepeat

Hello, And sorry to disturb again. Does anyone of you have any meaningful opinion on this peculiar matter? The RemoveDuplicates filter exists for a reason, but with query-time KeywordRepeat filter it causes trouble in some cases. Is it normal for the clauses to be absent in the debug output,

RE: Solr 7.3, FunctionScoreQuery no longer displays debug output

Hello, Sorry to disturb. Is there anyone here able to reproduce and verify this issue? Many thanks, Markus -Original message- > From:Markus Jelsma > Sent: Wednesday 9th May 2018 18:25 > To: solr-user > Subject: Solr 7.3,

Re: Date Query Confusion

A simple date range query does not really represent how people query over time and dates. If you want any form of date queries, above a single range, then a special field allowing tokenized query will be the only way to find documents. A query for 'ever tuesday in november of 2017' would have to

Re: Regarding LTR feature

"FQ_filter were 365 but below in the debugging part the docfreq used in the payload_score calculation was 3360" If you are talking about the doc frequency of a term, obviously this is corpus based ( necessary for the TF /IDF calculations) so it wil not be affected by the filter queries. The

Re: How to implement Solr auto suggester and spell checker simultaneously on a single search box

Hi Sonal, if you want to go with a plain Solr suggester, what about the : FuzzyLookupFactory ? 1) it does support fuzzy matching ( spellcheck) 2) it does support auto complete If you want the context filtering as well, unfortunately the FST based Solr suggesters don't support this feature. I

Re: Date Query Confusion

Hi Terry, let me go in order : /"Tried creation_date: 2016-11. That's supposed to match documents with any November 2016 date. But actually produces: |"Invalid Date String:'2016-11'| "/ Is "*DateRangeField*" the field type for your field : "creation_date" ? [1] You mentioned :

Re: Used debug log level on the interface

On 5/17/2018 3:03 AM, msaunier wrote: On solrCloud interface, I don't have with solr4j the info and debug level on the console. In < level > I have add my URP with INFO param and DEBUG param but never of the two work. I have just WARN and ERROR log on the interface. The admin UI won't show

Re: Date Query Confusion

Yeah, dates are "special". Those abbreviated dates are for DateRangeField, which is a distinct type from "TrieDate" in your schema. bq. And Solr doesn't seem to let me sort on a date field It's not a date field that's the problem, it's the "multiValued" part. When you specify in your schema

Re: Default Searches not working after migrating from Solr 4.7 to 7.3

Ok this is fixed. the _text_<\df> was not the issue. Certain copyFields had to be changed from dest="text" to dest="_text_". this issue is closed. thank you -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Default Searches not working after migrating from Solr 4.7 to 7.3

On 5/17/2018 7:23 AM, THADC wrote: , however for 7.3, "defaultSearchField" apparently no longer a valid type. I switched to "df". Also, "text" is no longer default data type, but rather "_text_". So, I replaced above with: _text_ , but still default search not working properly. By the way,

Default Searches not working after migrating from Solr 4.7 to 7.3

Hello, Migrating our system from solr 4.7 to 7.3. Simple default searches are not working. For our simply searches, we had the following in our schema.xml for 4.7: text , however for 7.3, "defaultSearchField" apparently no longer a valid type. I switched to "df". Also, "text" is no longer

Re: Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

Here is the reference I've found so far. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:26 PM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com < prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote: > > Hi Mikhail, > > > You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value > > source parser. > > But like my requirement for this

Date Query Confusion

To me, one of the more frustrating things I've encountered in Solr is working with date fields.  Supposedly, according to the documentation, this is straightforward.  But in my experience, it is anything but that.  In particular, I've found that the abbreviated forms of date queries, don't work as

Re: Add UUID on the schema

I strongly advise downloading the full Solr reference guide, searching there first often gets you answers quickly, in this case At the top of every on-line version, there's an "other formats" link that has an "archived PDFs" link that will take you to a page that allows you to download the

Re: Question regarding TLS version for solr

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Shawn, On 5/17/18 4:23 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 5/17/2018 1:53 AM, Anchal Sharma2 wrote: >> We are using solr version 5.3.0 and have been trying to enable >> security on our solr .We followed steps mentioned on site >>

Re: Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

Hi Mikhail, > You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value > source parser. But like my requirement for this was to add a field dynamically from cache or external source to the returned documents from the solr and perform sorting in the solr itself if required

Re: Add UUID on the schema

Here is some basic question based on that answers vary. 1) Are you going to use UUID column as unique column. 2) what do you with that column. Process :- Column is :- For Add this :- And then need to add in uniqueid section. id On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:00 PM, msaunier

Used debug log level on the interface

Hello, On solrCloud interface, I don't have with solr4j the info and debug level on the console. In < level > I have add my URP with INFO param and DEBUG param but never of the two work. I have just WARN and ERROR log on the interface. Have an idea ? Thanks you,

Add UUID on the schema

Hello, I use SolrCloud 7.0 and I don't have find how to add an UID field on the schema. I have add UUIDField type and add a field but it do not work. { "name": "uid", "class": "solr.UUIDField", "indexed": true, "stored": true }, Thanks for your help.

Re: Question regarding TLS version for solr

On 5/17/2018 1:53 AM, Anchal Sharma2 wrote: We are using solr version 5.3.0 and have been trying to enable security on our solr .We followed steps mentioned on site -https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/enabling-ssl.html .But by default it picks ,TLS version 1.0,which is causing an

Question regarding TLS version for solr

Hi All, We are using solr version 5.3.0 and have been trying to enable security on our solr .We followed steps mentioned on site -https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/enabling-ssl.html .But by default it picks ,TLS version 1.0,which is causing an issue as our application uses TLSv

Re: Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

Prateek, It's too late to sort on transformer result. You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value source parser. If you need to toss just result page, check rerank. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com < prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:

Sorting on pseudo field(The one which is added during doctransformer)

Hi all, I wanted to ask is it possible to sort on the field which is added during DocTransformer. I'm referring to something like this: (https://mariofebbraio.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/doctransformer.png) here the price is added using doctransformer so is it possible to sort on this field