I think you have to start from the lowest level and then go up the stack.
Solr uses Tika if you use extract handler (and for production you may
not want to)
Tika uses PDFBox to extract from PDF
Searching PDFBox remove headers gets you:
What about combining:
1) KeywordRepeatFilterFactory
2) An existing folding filter (need to check it ignores Keyword marked word)
3) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory
That may give what you are after without custom coding.
Regards,
Alex.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 16:14, Audrey Lorberfeld -
Luke may have it at least for a quick check:
https://github.com/dmitrykey/luke (part of last/next? version of
Lucene now).
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 16:20, Bram Van Dam wrote:
>
> Possibly somewhat unusual question: I'm looking for a way to query the
> number of *lucene
In Admin UI, there is schema browsing screen:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/schema-browser-screen.html
That shows you all the fields you have, their configuration and their
(tokenized) indexed content.
This seems to be a good midpoint between indexing and querying. So, I
would check
at shouldn't be a problem as updates to aliases are
> atomic as I understand them. GC's also are fine during that period.
>
> It's really weird
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:51 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> > I would take the server log for those 10 seconds (
I would take the server log for those 10 seconds (plus buffer) and really
try to see if something happens in that period.
I am thinking an unexpected commit, index large, alias switch. That may
help you to narrow down the kind of error.
Another option is whether you got empty result or a
What happens if they search for "hello monkey" and match against
"hello my monkeys"? What should it return? Why does your database not
contain "hello" instead of 199?
I am saying because if your clients are truly searching for just one
word, then Solr may be an overkill for you. Perhaps you are
gt;
> > Can you please give pointers to look into, We are using DIH for production
> > and facing few issues. We need to start phasing out
> >
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Srinivas Kashyap
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alexandre Rafa
A couple of things:
1) Solr on Tomcat has not been an option for quite a while. So, you
must be running an old version of Solr. Which one?
2) Compare that you have the same Solr config. In Admin UI, there will
be all O/S variables passed to the Java runtime, I would check them
side-by-side
3) You
So, if the recommendations are dynamic and come from outside Solr, why
do you need Solr to do anything at this stage? Sounds like the
original result list is where Solr responsibility ends.
You are not exposing Solr directly to the UI (you should not), so
whatever your middleware is, can be coded
That is probably a configuration in solrconfig.xml for the extract handler.
If so, you should be able to modify it easily.
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 12:46 PM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I index EML files to Solr, I realised that there are certain fields
> which
Hi Uma,
You have three options:
1) If you are indexing only that field and not returning to the user,
than you can mark it store=false and use one of the many filters to
transform your content
2) If you are interested in both storing and indexing, then be aware
that the stored representation will
The other options is to use query field alias:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#field-aliasing-using-per-field-qf-overrides
(example:
https://github.com/arafalov/solr-indexing-book/blob/master/published/languages/conf/solrconfig.xml#L20
). This still
You may also want to look at the existing systems, such as
https://nifi.apache.org/
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 08:23, Joseph_Tucker
wrote:
>
> Thanks again.
>
> I guess I'll have to start researching how to create such custom indexing
> scripts and determine which language would be
I don't think you should be designing this around DIH. It was never planned
for complex scenarios. Or particularly fault tollerant, which you may need.
Either use SolrJ or a third party tools that integrate with Solr.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 7:43 AM Joseph_Tucker,
wrote:
>
able hard commit and
> soft commit per 1000 docs
>
> I am wondering whether any configuration can speed it
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Sunday, June 30, 2019, 10:39 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> Indexing new documents is just
Indexing new documents is just adding additional segments.
Adding new field to a document means:
1) Reading existing document (may not always be possible, depending on
field configuration)
2) Marking existing document as deleted
3) Creating new document with reconstructed+plus new fields
4)
This past thread may be relevant: https://markmail.org/message/aau6bjllkpwcpmro
It suggests that using SpanFirst of XMLQueryParser will have automatic
boost for earlier matches.
The other approach suggested was to use Payloads (which got better
since the original thread).
Regards,
Alex.
On
Those are two different collections. Have you tried solving the easier
one (non secure), by accessing
/solr/master_doterraUSContent_Index/select in the browser? Seems to be
the collection is not there or named differently. So, that would be
the first step to check.
Regards,
Alex.
On Thu, 27
documents I
> copied the user value from the response and pasted user:value into the
> Admin console and get no results. Yet, in my code using SolrQuery I see a
> response for the same user:value with the ranking field.
> >
> > This makes no sense to me. The Admin console is usually
(If no other SolrJ specific advice shows up)
Can you divide the problem in a middle a see what happens and whether the
issue is Solr or SolrJ side.
Specifically, execute the query directly against Solr and see what happens.
Also I would triple-check that the documents you are getting back
Actually, the tutorial does say "Here’s the first place where we’ll
deviate from the default options." and the result name should be
techproducts.
It is the image that is no longer correct and needs to be updated. And
perhaps the text should be made clearer.
A pull request with updated image
No index encryption in the box. I am aware of a commercial solution but no
details on how good or what the price is:
https://www.hitachi-solutions.com/securesearch/
Regards,
Alex
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 11:32 AM Ahuja, Sakshi, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr 6.6 and want to encrypt index
You have couple of options to delete:
1) Explicit delete request
2) Expiration management:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_1_0//solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/DocExpirationUpdateProcessorFactory.html
3) If you are indexing in clear batches (e.g. monthly, and keep last 3
month), you
The easiest way is to do that with Update Request Processors:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_7/update-request-processors.html
Usually, you would clone a field and then do your transformations. For your
specific example, you could use:
*) FieldLengthUpdateProcessorFactory - int rather than
If you look at the data files, is any extension suddenly taking way more
space? That may give a clue.
Also is schema the same? Like you did not enable docvalues on strings by
default or similar.
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 6:19 AM Markus Jelsma,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are
Have you tried enabling remoteStreaming?
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_0/content-streams.html#remote-streaming
Regards,
Alex.
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 08:59, marotosg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to make a request to Solr to index documents hosted as urls.
> This works when I send
llation or you may oppose to their use by
> written request sent by recorded delivery to The Microsoft Research –
> University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology Scarl,
> Piazza Manifattura 1, 38068 Rovereto (TN), Italy.
> P Please don't print this e-mail unless you
r by the cited GDPR.
> It is your right to be informed on which of your data are used and how;
> you may ask for their correction, cancellation or you may oppose to their
> use by written request sent by recorded delivery to The Microsoft Research
> – University of Trento Centre for Comp
Those two queries look same after sorting the parameters, yet the
results are clearly different. That means the difference is deeper.
1) Have you checked that both collections have the same amount of
documents (e.g. mismatched final commit). Does basic "query=*:*"
return the same counts in the
Is there something special about parent/child blocks you cannot do through
JSON? Or XML?
Both Solr XML and Solr JSON support it.
New style parent/child mapping is also supported in latest Solr but I think
it is done differently.
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019, 6:29 PM Pratik Patel,
Hi John,
This may be useful:
https://www.slideshare.net/arafalov/json-in-solr-from-top-to-bottom
(there is the video of the session at the end too).
Basically, we have two ways to process JSON and sometimes they look
very similar and you have to be very deliberate in indicating which
one is the
Actually, the WIKI is going away (for all Apache project, not just Solr).
So, the preferred way now is to contribute to the Solr Reference
Guide, which is developed as part of normal Solr process and can be
patched as any other Git-based project:
You can use POST instead of GET.
But you may also want to see if you can refactor those 1500 strings somehow.
If you don't use it already, maybe Terms query parser could be useful:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_7/other-parsers.html#terms-query-parser
Also, if at least some of those
It is a Unix ".." - as in parent directory. So the path would be:
/usr/local/solr/example/cloud/node2/logs
And I am guessing you have installed Solr with one user and are trying
to use it with another. So, maybe a sudo is required.
Or maybe you could just download a fresh Solr install, unzip it
Sounds like you had some documents in the index already from before you
made ths change. You may need to delete, commit, reindex. Rather than
trying to overwrite.
Regards,
Alex
On Tue, May 7, 2019, 1:03 AM Jerry Lin, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Solr and am using Solr 8, and the Java API
let makes it straightforward to get the canonical XML.
>
> It looks like our schema.xml files are rather different from files
> like solr/example/solr/collection1/conf/schema.xml
>
> Any suggestions of sections I should focus on?
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 8:11 AM Alexan
XMLStarlet still works just fine. So if you want the fast way, that is the
one.
Otherwise, some xml editors can do it (not sure which ones) or you can look
for XSLT or XQuery examples on the web.
XMLStarlet actually just spits out XSLT internally, or even externally if
you ask.
Regards,
My presentation from 2016 may be interesting as I deconstruct a Solr
example, including the tips/commands on how to do so:
https://www.slideshare.net/arafalov/rebuilding-solr-6-examples-layer-by-layer-lucenesolrrevolution-2016
The commands start around the slide 20.
Hope this helps,
Alex.
What happens when you run it against a standalone Tika (recommended option
anyway)? Do you see the relevant fields?
Not every Tika field is captured, that is configured in solrconfig.xml. So
if Tika extracts them, next step is to check the mapping.
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:38
> Thanks and Regards,
> Srinivas Kashyap
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Sent: 30 April 2019 05:06 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: multi-level Nested entities in dih
>
> DIH may not be able to do arbitrary nesting. And it is not recom
DIH may not be able to do arbitrary nesting. And it is not recommended for
complex production cases.
However, in general, you also have to focus on what your _search_ will look
like. Amd only then think about the mapping.
For example, is that whole tree gets mapped to and returned as a single
Though one can insert an UpdateRequestProcessor to convert any date format.
See solrconfig.xml for how it is setup (as part of 'schemaless' parsing).
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019, 3:57 AM Nicolas Franck,
wrote:
> Dates need to be send in UTC format:
>
> -mm-ddTHH:MM:SSZ
>
> or
of bq at least describes it as an "optional" query that only
> influences the score, not the result list.
>
>
> > On 16 Apr 2019, at 23:59, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> >
> > If you set q.op=OR (and not as 'AND' you defined in your config), you
> > will see
If you set q.op=OR (and not as 'AND' you defined in your config), you
will see the difference between your last two queries. The second last
one will show 6 items and the last one still 5.
As is, with your custom config, booster query is added as one more
clause in the search. q.op=ALL forces it
; and to be honest I don't even remember how I got to the sow parameter...
> > and I'm not sure what that means for all other queries I have
> >
> >Il martedì 16 aprile 2019, 13:09:26 CEST, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > The issue is t
That's a bit "fast" to expect somebody to reproduce this from
information given. Or even in general to check the mailing list, given
that we are not paid support :-)
Could you please
1) Download the latest 8.0 distribution
2) Do one of the basic examples
3) Give the search query that shows
The issue is that the Standard Query Parser does pre-processing of the
query and splits it on whitespace beforehand (to deal with all the
special syntax). So, if you don't use quoted phrases then by the time
the field specific query analyzer chain kicks in, the text is already
pre-split and the
Specifically, the pre-processing can be done with
UpdateRequestProcessors:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/update-request-processors.html
In your case, you probably want to chain
*) CloneUpdate:
Two quick thoughts without computer access:
1) have you tried post? Usually they do work for all calls.
2) if the list does not change often, you can add it to the request handler
definition. Or even as a separate paramset to pass by reference. Either way
you would not need to have it in URL every
One of the files that post tool identified as XML is not. Possibly a 404
error or some such. So it is trying to parse the file and sees non-xml
content right at start. Or if you are sure it is an XML file, maybe there
is a BOM mark. Either way try to isolate the specific file.
On a bigger picture
You may have warming queries to prepopulate your cache. Check your
solrconfig.xml.
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 4:16 PM Lewin Joy (TMNA), wrote:
> ** PROTECTED 関係者外秘
> How do I clear the solr caches without restarting Solr cluster?
> Is there a way?
> I tried reloading the
Well, Tika would use different libraries to extract different formats.
So maybe there is a bug. I would just get a standalone tika (of
matching version to the one in Solr) and see what the output from two
sample files are. Then, I would check with the latest Tika, just in
case.
I would also use
Sounds like timezone normalization issue. Possibly at Tika stage.
Check what your SOLR_TIMEZONE variable set to. Not sure in which file.
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, 12:50 AM Where is Where, wrote:
> Hello , I was following the instruction
>
>
It is probably autocommit setting in your solrconfig.xml.
But you may also want to consider indexing into a new core and then doing a
core swap at the end. Or re-aliasing if you are running a multiCore
collection.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 2:25 AM 黄云尧, wrote:
> when I do the
Apache NiFi may also be something of interest: https://nifi.apache.org/
Regards,
Alex.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 11:15, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I did this deck some time ago. It might be useful for choosing one.
>
In Admin UI, there is an Analysis screen. You can enter your text and
your query there and see what happens to it at every step of the
processing pipeline.
This should tell you whether the problem is in indexing, query, or
somewhere else entirely (e.g. you are querying a different field as
Scott
d
> because it's easier for me to just use xml to define my schema. Is
> there
> a preferred approach? I don't (want to) use solr cloud, as for our
> use
> case a single instance of solr is more than enough.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Aleks
>
> Alexandre Rafalovitch writes:
>
What do you mean schema.xml from managed-schema? schema.xml is old
non-managed approach. If you have both, schema.xml will be ignored.
I suspect you are not running with the schema you think you do. You can
check that with API or in Admin UI if you get that far.
Regards,
Alex
On Tue, Jan
I think asking this question on Tika mailing list may give you better
answers. Then, if the conclusion is that the behavior is configurable,
you can see how to do it in Solr. It may be however, that you need to
do the parsing outside of Solr with standalone Tika. Standalone Tika
is a production
I believe the answer is yes, but specifics depends on whether you mean
online or offline index creation (as in when does the content appear)
and also why you want to do so.
Couple of ideas:
1) If you just want to make sure all updates are visible at once, you
can control that with commit
Do you have _src_ field declared in schema? It is just a non-indexed string:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/releases/lucene-solr/7.5.0/solr/server/solr/configsets/sample_techproducts_configs/conf/managed-schema#L169
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 04:35, Shubhangi Shinde
quot;solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>
> class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 11:29, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> > Specifically, a custome Update Requ
Specifically, a custome Update Request Processor chain can be used before
indexing. Probably with HTMLStripFieldUpdateProcessorFactory
Regards,
Alex
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, 9:26 PM Vincenzo D'Amore Hi,
>
> I think this kind of text manipulation should be done before indexing, if
> you have
EchoParams=all
May also be helpful to pinpoint differences in params from all sources,
including request handler defaults.
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018, 8:25 PM Shawn Heisey On 12/27/2018 10:47 AM, Kay Wrobel wrote:
> > Now starting from SOLR version 5+, I receive zero (0) results
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/ is probably your best bet.
But also, perhaps you can just use or start from SourceGraph?
https://sourcegraph.com/start
Regards,
Alex.
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 20:26, Steven White wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm in need of providing a search
If you are on the latest Solr (7.3+), try switching from TextField to
SortableTextField in your string_ci definition above.
That type implicitly uses docValues and should return original text
for faceting purposes, while still allowing analyzers.
Regards,
Alex.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 08:26,
stop
words, but I do not know the expected behavior.
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 11:05, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
>
> I am not sure I fully understand what you are saying.
>
> When you create a collection based on a configset, all the files
> should be copied, includin
I am not sure I fully understand what you are saying.
When you create a collection based on a configset, all the files
should be copied, including the stopwords.
You can also provide an absolute path.
Solr also supports variable substitutions (as seen in solrconfig.xml
library statements), but
The stopwords are defined at the field type level as part of the
analyzer chain. So, you have per-field granularity. Not just
per-collection.
As stop-words are using files (though we have managed version as well,
you can share or not-share as much as you want even across different
field type
You should not be exposing Solr directly to the client, but treating
it more as a database.
Given that, why would you not write your processing code in that
middle-ware layer?
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 06:43, Lucky Sharma wrote:
>
> Hi have one scenario,
> where I need to make a
a bug? Should I submit an issue?
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:03 PM Doug Turnbull <
> dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> > I think the similarity way (setting k1 to 0) or a constant score query are
> > probably the best ways. Omitting term freqs and position w
Solr does not have a built-in scheduler for triggering indexing. Only
for triggering commits and purging auto-expiring records.
So, if you want to trigger DIH indexing, you need to use an external
scheduling mechanism for that.
Regards,
Alex.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Ma Man wrote:
>
>
Perhaps constant score would be useful here:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/the-standard-query-parser.html#constant-score-with
Also, all the options like omitTermFreqAndPositions are described
here:
For all those who wanted to be at the conference for the talks :-) but
could not:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm98XL0Mw5c=PLU6n9Voqu_1HW8-VavVMa9lP8-oF8Oh5t
(Plug) Mine was: "JSON in Solr: from top to bottom", video at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzYbTe3-nFI , slides at:
However, to add to Edward's message, you can with eDismax create
synthetic field names that expand to multiple fields under the covers,
using per-field 'qf' parameter.
See:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#field-aliasing-using-per-field-qf-overrides
It is not clear how much flexibility you expect in those queries. Can
the second word never be full name? Can there be more than 2 words?
How do you know the length of the prefix? When you say prefix, do you
mean 'jo' is expected to match 'joseph'?
So, just generically, I would say why not index
You really have to split your index. The good news is that you can use
aliases to search multiples cores at ones. That's probably what you
are looking for. So, you can start with one index and when it gets
close to capacity, add the second one and the third one, etc. But have
an alias that you
You can always replace String type with Text type and KeywordAnalyzer
definition.
That keeps the whole input as one token, but still allows to modify
(e.g. normalize spaces with PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory) or even
one of the ICU filters (warning: ICU is dark magic...)
Regards,
Alex.
On
This seems very similar to:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/48b6dcb20058de29936616633b88d21e1b6f6a32bc968d161eae4a21@%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 11:15, Tech Support wrote:
>
> Hello Solr Team,
>
>
>
> I am using Solr 7.5. , Indexed data stored
at 8:36 AM David Hastings
> wrote:
>
> > Which function of the SKG are you using? significantTerms?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:09 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think the underscore actually comes from the Shingles (parameter
>
I think the underscore actually comes from the Shingles (parameter
fillerToken). Have you tried setting it to empty string?
Regards,
Alex.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 17:16, Pratik Patel wrote:
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I tried using ShingleFilter and it seems to
> be working.
You can configure where your data directory is in core.properties:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/defining-core-properties.html#defining-core-properties-files
Or probably via API.
Regards,
Alex.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 12:45, John Milton wrote:
>
> Hi Solr Team,
>
> I have installed
field list. deadline:[* TO NOW] was
> simple enough to convert to function query syntax. But what about something
> more complex? It feels strange to have to convert from one syntax to another.
> I can't be the only one thinking like this, surely? :)
>
> /Jimi
>
> -Ursprun
Function query looks like the nearest match to your requirement:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/function-queries.html#ms-function
You can use it in the field list too.
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 09:12, Hullegård, Jimi
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe I have been working too
Which version of Solr is it? Because we have not used schema.xml for a
very long time. It has been managed-schema instead.
Also, have you tried using DIH example that uses database and
modifying it just enough to read data from your database. Even if it
has a lot of extra junk, this would test
The extract handler is mostly there for prototyping purposes. It uses
Tika under the covers and you can use that yourself in the client.
Given your merge requirements, it would probably be best to have that
separated out.
In terms of structuring, you can do nested document, combined with
[child]
SOLR-9947 perhaps?
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 16:08, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 11/5/2018 1:09 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> > Solr 6.3.0 had SolrInfoMBean.Category.QUERYHANDLER. However, I cannot see
> > it at Solr 6.5.0.
>
> You might find it at QUERY instead. I seem to remember some confusion
> about
That is kind of unusual. What is the business issue you are trying to
solve? Perhaps there is a different way to look at this problem.
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 5:20 AM Modassar Ather Hi,
>
> Is there a way to restrict search with a term/phrase occurring n number of
> times in it?
Simon Hughes presentation on just finished Activate may be relevant:
https://www.slideshare.net/SimonHughes13/vectors-in-search-towards-more-semantic-matching
The video will be available in a couple of weeks, I am guessing from
LucidWorks channel.
Related repos:
*)
Maybe
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/update-request-processors.html#atomicupdateprocessorfactory
Regards,
Alex
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 7:57 AM Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ), wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to merge files from different sources and with different
> content (except for one
I am not sure. I haven't tried this particular path. Your original
question was without using SolrJ. Maybe others have.
However, I am also not sure how much sense this makes. This Atomic
processor is to make it easier to do the merge when you cannot modify
the source documents. But if you are
Maybe this was introduced in the later version of Solr. Check the Changes
file to compare yours and the releases version.
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 6:37 AM Zahra Aminolroaya,
wrote:
> Thanks Alex. I try the following to set the atomic processor:
>
>
unless im missing something?
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:41 AM David Hastings <
> hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Wow, thanks for that. Will do some research and come back with the
> > inevitable questions I will have.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25
gt; On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:25 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> > That's being worked on as well. We've migrated the documentation from
> > Confluence to standalone setup, so not all the pieces are in place
> > yet.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
t very
> search friendly :)
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:29 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> > I think you are looking for:
> >
> > http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/json-facet-api.html#semantic-knowledge-graphs
> >
> > Or, as a second option,
>
I think you are looking for:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/json-facet-api.html#semantic-knowledge-graphs
Or, as a second option,
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/stream-source-reference.html#significantterms
Regards,
Alex.
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 08:47, David Hastings
wrote:
You could use something like AtomicUpdateProcessorFactory:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/update-request-processors.html#atomicupdateprocessorfactory
Regards,
Alex.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 04:48, Zahra Aminolroaya wrote:
>
> Does Solr have a partial update like elastic?
>
> Elastic
First one treats space as end of operation, so the second keyword is
searched against default field (id). Try putting the whole thing into the
quotes. Or use Field Query Parser:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/other-parsers.html#field-query-parser
Regards,
Alex.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018,
Have you tried using aliases:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/collections-api.html#collections-api
You can also - I think - specify a collection of shards/collections
directly in the query, but there may be side edge-cases with that (not
sure).
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at
101 - 200 of 1977 matches
Mail list logo
