uccessful full replication Solr remove old timestamp dir.
>
> On Wed, 31 Jul, 2019, 8:02 PM Aman Tandon,
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are having a situation where whole disk space is full and in server
> > where we are seeing the multiple index directories
Hi,
We are having a situation where whole disk space is full and in server
where we are seeing the multiple index directories ending with the
timestamp. Upon checking the index.properties file for a particular shard
replica, it is not referring to the folder name *index *but when I am using
the
,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:42 AM Aman Tandon
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Erick,
> >
> > Any suggestions on this?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Aman
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 17:07 Aman Tandon >
> > > Hi Erick,
> >
Hi Erick,
Any suggestions on this?
Regards,
Aman
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 17:07 Aman Tandon Hi Erick,
>
> I find this thread very relevant to the people who are facing the same
> problem.
>
> In our case, we have a signals aggregation collection which is having
> total of around
Hi Erick,
I find this thread very relevant to the people who are facing the same
problem.
In our case, we have a signals aggregation collection which is having total
of around 8 million records. We have Solr cloud architecture(3 shards and 4
replicas) and the whole size of index is of around 2.5
I see two rows params, looks like which will be overwritten by rows=2, and
then your tags filter is resulting only one document. Please remove extra
rows and try.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 08:44 Pratik Patel Hi Everyone!
>
> I am trying to use MLT request handler. My query matches more than one
>
Hi Shilpa,
I am assuming you know the functionality of synonym.
Synonym in Solr can be applied over the tokens getting indexed/queried for
the field. In order to apply synonym to a field you need to update the
configuration file schema.xml where you also define a file (synonym.txt is
default,
As Jan mentioned also see GC activity or memory issues, also check out for
the threads by looking if any thread pending/waiting too long.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018, 16:14 AshB Hi Dominique,
>
> Yes,we are load testing with 50 users.We tried changing the timeout but its
> not reflecting.
>
> Regards
>
++ correction
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, 01:10 Aman Tandon For me today, I deleted the leader replica of one of the two shard
> collection. Then other replicas of that shard wasn't getting elected for
> leader.
>
> After waiting for long tried the setting addreplicaprop preferred lea
For me today, I deleted the leader replica of one of the two shard
collection. Then other replica of that shard was getting elected for leader.
After waiting for long tried the setting addreplicaprop preferred leader on
one of the replica then tried FORCELEADER but no luck. Then also tried
Hi Piyush,
I suppose your end goal is to search special chars too and I hope you are
using it typeahead.
Keyword tokenizer keep the complete string as token. So when you search
with partial it won't match.
You could add the n-gram filter. Then output of keyword tokenizer will be
broken in
t;
> > It really acted like a normal function this happened on 5 different pairs
> > in the same way.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 2:23 PM Aman Tandon
> wrote:
> >
> >> Could you please check the replication request commands in solr logs of
> >
Hi,
Suppose id field is the UUID linked field in the configuration and if this
is missing in the document coming to index then it will generate a UUID and
set it in id field. However if id field is present with some value then it
shouldn't.
Kindly refer
Could you please check the replication request commands in solr logs of
slave and see if it is complaining anything.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 23:45 Jeff Courtade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This I think is a very simple question.
>
> I have a solr 4.3 master slave setup.
>
> Simple replication.
>
> The master
Hi Faraz,
Solr score which you could retrieved by adding in fl parameter could be
helpful to understand the following:
1) search relevance ranking: how much score solr has given to the top &
second top document, and with debug=true you could better understand what
is causing that score.
2) You
Hi,
I have a doubt regarding how to do the range facet on some different
currency.
I have indexed the price data in USD inside the field price_usd_c and I
have currency.xml which is getting generated by a process.
If I want to do the range facet on the field price_usd_c in Euro currency,
then
Hi Srini,
Kindly refer to the READ.ME section of this link of GitHub, this should
work.
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/README.md
With regards,
Aman Tandon
On Sep 21, 2017 1:53 PM, "srini sampath" <sampathsrini.c...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> How to
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for your reply, this is really helpful. I will try this out to see
the performance with the docValues.
With regards,
Aman Tandon
On Sep 15, 2017 9:10 PM, "Shawn Heisey" <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 9/11/2017 9:06 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> &
alues is another index that gets build for faster
> sorting/faceting.
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:30 PM Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
&
performance, please share
your experience.
With regards,
Aman Tandon
Did you find any error in Solr logs?
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017, 23:13 Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Kindly check the Solr logs when you are hitting the query. Attach the same
> here, that I could gave more insight.
>
> For me it looks like the OOM,
r is that it interprets the AND / OR
> parameters correctly so it should generate the bi-gram phrases respecting
> the AND /OR parameters as well, right?
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
> Regards,
> Niraj
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Aman Tandon <amantandon.
ebug=true to know more about the query &
timings of different component.
*And when the ps2 is not specified default ps will be applied on pf2.*
I hope this helps.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Niraj Aswani <nirajasw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello,
Kindly check the Solr logs when you are hitting the query. Attach the same
here, that I could gave more insight.
For me it looks like the OOM, but check the Solr logs I hope we could get
more information from there.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017, 14:35 SOLR6932 wrote:
>
Hello Sara,
There is hard n fast rule, performance depends on caches, RAM, hdd etc.and
how much resourced you could invest to keep the acceptable performance.
Information on Number of Indexed documents, number of dynamic fields can be
viewed from the below link. I hope this helps.
Hi,
I want to do the range facets with gap of 10 and I don't know the end as it
could be a very large value so how could I do that.
Thanks
Aman Tandon
any help here?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Wonderful Little Things <
amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to do the sorting on multiple fields using the JSON-facet API, so
> is this available? And if it is, then what would be the
Hi Everyone,
If anyone is interested to apply for noida, India location for Solr
Developer position, then please forward me your resume with the contact
number and email.
*Company Name: Genpact Headstrong Capital Markey*
*Experience required:- 3 - 7 years*
With Regards
Aman Tandon
l
>
>
>
> : Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 04:40:57 +0530
> : From: Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com>
> : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> : To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> : Subject: Help: Lucidwork Fusion d
Hi,
How could I download the Fusion documentation pdf ? If anyone is aware,
please help me!!
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Hi Prateek,
Your question is little ambiguous. Could you please describe it more
precisely what you want to configure on server and what is your requirement
and problem. This will be more helpful to understand your problem.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Prateek
cessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:310)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
> 500
>
>
okay Thanks
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Just beware of performance here. This is fine for smaller indexes, but
> for larger ones won't work so well. It will need to do this calculation
> for every document in your
Thanks Mikhail the suggestion. I will try that on monday will let you know.
*@*Walter This was just an random requirement to find those fields which
are not same and then reindex only those. I can full index but I was
wondering if there might some function or something.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
No Susheel, As our index size is 62 GB so it seems hard to find those
records.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Aman, Did the problem resolved or still having some errors.
>
> Thnx
>
> On Fri, O
But I want to find do it at run time without index extra field
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:55 AM, NutchDev <nutchsolru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One option could be creating another boolean field field1_equals_field2 and
> set it to true for documents match
parser.
Any suggestions or observations will be helpful.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Hi,
Is there a way in solr to remove all those documents from the search
results in which two of the fields, *mapping* and *title* is the exactly
same.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
okay thanks Markus :)
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io>
wrote:
> Hello - as far as i remember, you don't. A file itself is not the unit to
> cache, but blocks are.
> Markus
>
>
> -Original message--
Awesome thank you Mikhail. This is what I was looking for.
This was just a random question poped up in my mind. So I just asked this
on the group.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> What about Linux:
>
Hi,
Is there any way to know that the index file/s is present in the OS cache
or RAM. I want to check if the index is present in the RAM or in OS cache
and which files are not in either of them.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Sure. thank you Upayavira
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> You cannot do multi valued fields with LatLongType fields. Therefore, if
> that is a need, you will have to investigate RPT fields.
>
> I'm not sure h
We are using LatLonType to use the gradual boosting / distance based
boosting of search results.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Aman,
>
> I cannot promise to answer questions promptly - like most people on this
&g
Hi,
Is there a way in solr to do the distance based boosting using Spatial RPT
field?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Upayavira, please help
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Error is
>
>
>
> 400 name="QTime">28ERROR:
> [doc=9474144846] multiple values encountered for non multiValued field
> latl
Hi Erick,
I am getting the same error because my dynamic field *_coordinate is
stored="true".
How can I get rid of this error?
And I have to use the atomic update. Please help!!
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Franco Giacosa <fgiac...@gmail.com> wrote:
etting any multiple values in the _coordinate fields. However, I
_do_ get the error if my dynamic *_coordinate field is set to stored="true".
And stored="true" is mandatory for using the atomic updates.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Upayavira <u...@od
>
> boost=product_guideline_score
Thank you Upayavira.
Leonardo, thanks for the suggestion. But I think boost parameter will work
great for us. Thank you so much for your help.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> A
Hi,
I figured it out to implement the same. I will be doing this by using the
boost parameter
e.g. http://server:8112/solr/products/select?q=jute=title
*=product(1,product_guideline_score)*
If there is any other alternative then please suggest.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015
map(query({!dismax qf=attribs v='hot'}),0,0,1,1.2)*
* map(query({!dismax qf=isphoto v='true'
pf=""}),0,0,0.05,1)*
**
*xml*
*0*
*0.3*
*synonym_edismax*
*on*
*true*
* *
**
With Regards
Aman Tandon
o this in single query on runtime in solr.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
>
> I can provide examples if needed.
Yes that will be so much helpful. Thank you so much.
Then I will try both methodology. And will report the results back here.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> If you have
ternal file field. And this might reduce some time.
Just to mention we are doing incremental updates after every 10 minutes.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Have you tried it? I suspect your issue will be with the pr
Hi,
How much ids information can I define in External File? Currently I am
having the 100 Million records in my index.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Any suggestions?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Upayavira,
>
> Have you tried it?
>
>
> No
>
> E.g. external file fields don't play nice with Solr Cloud
>
>
> We are not usin
I am currently doing boosting for 5-7 things. will it work great with this
too?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> External file field would work, but requires a full import of the
> external file field every time you cha
Hi Samy,
Any particular reason to not to use the -p paratmeter to start it on
another port?
./solr start -p 9983
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Modassar Ather modather1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think you need to add the port number in solr.xml too under hostPort
Hi,
I am seeing a significant difference in the query time after using docValue
what kind of difference, is it good or bad?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Nagasharath sharathrayap...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am seeing a significant difference in the query time after
.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ravi:
Yep, this is the standard way to have recency influence the rank rather
than
take over absolute ordering via a sort=date_time or similar.
Of course how strongly the rank
name=citydv type=string docValues=true stored=true required=
false omitNorms=true multiValued=false /
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com wrote:
So first of all,
DocValues is a strategy to store on the disk ( or in memory
Anything wrong?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried to query the without and with docValues, the query with docValues
was taking more time. Does it may be due to IO got involved as some data
will be in some file
So should I use Memory format?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Toke Eskildsen t...@statsbiblioteket.dk
wrote:
Alessandro Benedetti benedetti.ale...@gmail.com wrote:
DocValues is a strategy to store on the disk ( or in memory) the
Un-inverted index for the field
at every 10 minutes and I am using solr
4.8.1
With Regards
Aman Tandon
.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Aman,
Solr uses the same Token filter instances over and over, calling reset()
before sending each document through. Your code sets “exhausted to true
and then never sets it back to false, so the next
);*
* offsetAttribute.setOffset(offsetAttribute.startOffset(),
offsetAttribute.startOffset()+sbLength);*
* stringBuilder.setLength(0);*
* //typeAtrr.setType(CONCATENATED);*
* return true;*
*}*
*return false;*
* }*
*}*
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Please help, what wrong I am doing here. please guide me.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I created a *token concat filter* to concat all the tokens from token
stream. It creates the concatenated token as expected
Hi Steve,
you never set exhausted to false, and when the filter got reused, *it
incorrectly carried state from the previous document.*
Thanks for replying, but I am not able to understand this.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote
Yes I just saw.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Aman,
My version won’t produce anything at all, since incrementToken() always
returns false…
I updated the gist (at the same URL) to fix the problem by returning true
from
to concatenate 50 tokens?
We are applying it on *title field* of product so max length can be 10 I
guess and that too will be in rare case.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you used the JIRA I linked, vote for it, add any
also analyzed our search satisfaction feedback, it improved by 13% (54%
- 67%) just after implementing the same.
And we want to contribute the same to solr, So how could I do it.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
requirement. Thank you so much for
your help and guidance. So how could I contribute it to the solr.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Erick,
Thank you so much, it will be helpful for me to learn how to save the
state of token. I
:-* solr train
Position 1 2
*Concatenated :-* solr train
solrtrain
Position 1 2
Please help me out. How to create custom filter for this requirement.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
e.g. Intent for solr training: fq=id: 234, 456, 545 title(solr training)
typo error
e.g. Intent for solr training: fq=id:(234 456 545) title:(solr training)
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
We has some business logic
words phrase query. So we want to
reduce the search time by implementing this feature.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I ask you why you need to concatenate the tokens ? Maybe we can find a
better solution
Hi,
Any guesses, how could I achieve this behaviour.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
e.g. Intent for solr training: fq=id: 234, 456, 545 title(solr training)
typo error
e.g. Intent for solr training: fq=id:(234 456 545
it.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
I really question the premise, but have a look at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7193
Note that this is not committed and I haven't reviewed
it so I don't have anything to say about
Please help me here
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Alex, yes it for my testing to understand the code/process flow
actually.
Any other ideas.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM
will be
thankful to you.
*add doc field name=title![CDATA[Aman Tandon]]/field
field name=job_role![CDATA[Search Engineer]]/field*
* /doc/add*
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Hi Upayavira,
How the copyField will help in my scenario when I have to add the synonym
in docValue enable field.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Use copyField to clone the field for faceting purposes.
Upayavira
On Fri, May 29
.
*field name=citymumbai/fieldfield name=citybombay/field*
The only prob is if we have to remove the 'city alias/synonym facets' when
we are providing results to the clients.
*mumbai, 1000*
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do
Thanks Alex, yes it for my testing to understand the code/process flow
actually.
Any other ideas.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
In production or in test? I assume in test.
This level of detail usually implies some
Thanks chris.
Yes we are using it for handling multiword synonym problem.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Reitzel, Charles
charles.reit...@tiaa-cref.org wrote:
Again, I would recommend using Nolan Lawson's
SynonymExpandingExtendedDismaxQParserPlugin.
http
Thank you Alessandro.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Aman,
this feature can be interesting for you :
Shard Splitting
When you create a collection in SolrCloud, you decide on the initial
number
. And In case of
another class how and where should I need to define our customized *defType*
.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
*ii)* Does it lower down the load on our search servers?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Ok and what synonym processor you is talking about maybe it could help ?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Reitzel, Charles
charles.reit...@tiaa-cref.org wrote:
Sorry, my bad. The synonym processor I mention works differently. It's
an extension of the EDisMax query
Hi Charles,
The problem here is that the docValues works only with primitives data type
only like String, int, etc So how could we apply synonym on primitive data
type.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Reitzel, Charles
charles.reit...@tiaa-cref.org wrote
Yes it could be :)
Anyway thanks for helping.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com wrote:
I should investigate that, as usually synonyms are analysis stage.
A simple way is to replace the word with all its synonyms
Thank you so much Ahmet :)
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Aman,
Start with creating a jira account and vote/watch that issue.
Post on the issue to see if there is still interest on this.
Declare that you will be volunteer
Hi,
We have some field *city* in which the docValues are enabled. We need to
add the synonym in that field so how could we do it?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Hi Ahmet,
Can you please guide me to contribute for this *issue*. I haven't did this
before.
So I need to know...what should I need to know and how should I start..what
IDE or whatever you thought is need to know for a novice. I will be
thankful to you :)
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, May
Okay So how could I do it with UpdateProcessors?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com wrote:
mmm this is different !
Without any customisation, right now you could :
- use docValues to provide exact value facets.
- Than
will
applying filter of bombay on search results.
I need this functionality to apply with docValues enabled field.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked in the Documentation to be sure, but apparently :
DocValues
That link you provided is exactly I want to do. Thanks Ahmet.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Hi Aman,
changing protected words without reindexing makes little or no sense.
Regarding protected words, trend is to use
question might be stupid, the thought came in my
mind and I want to share and ask some suggestions here. Is it possible or
not and how can i achieve the same?
I will be thankful for guidance.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Please help or I am not clear here?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
*Problem Statement: *I want to reload an hash of protwords created by the
kstem filter without reloading the whole index core.
*My Thought: *I am
Thanks chris, but in the issue it is mentioned that first searcher listener
is opening twice but in my case firstly the firstSearcher is opening and
then newSearcher. Is it same?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
wrote:
I
Any help here..
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks chris, but in the issue it is mentioned that first searcher
listener is opening twice but in my case firstly the firstSearcher is
opening and then newSearcher
Please help.
The solr version is 4.8.1
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Please help me here, when I am doing the reload of core, my searcher is
being opening twice. I am also attaching the logs output, please suggest
):C108769/21:delGen=2
_ogc(4.8):C24435/384:delGen=4 _ogi(4.8):C23088/158:delGen=3
_ogj(4.8):C4217/2:delGen=1 _ohs(4.8):C7 _oh6(4.8):C20509/205:delGen=5
_oh7(4.8):C3171 _oho(4.8):C6/1:delGen=1 _ohq(4.8):C1
_ohv(4.8):C10484/996:delGen=2 _ohx(4.8):C500 _ohy(4.8):C1 _ohz(4.8):C1)}
With Regards
Aman
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo