It depends on what you are going to do.
If you are adding/modifying code and Junit tests use Junit test cases.
If you are debugging runtime problems under load use remote debugging.
If you are going for in deep debugging (even into Jetty and Java) use
RunJettyRun for Eclipse.
Regards
Bernd
Am
t;> The weight is a float value between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates the highest
>> relevance.
>>
>> The similarity vector is created during item processing and indicates the
>> most important terms or concepts in the item and the corresponding
>> weight.”
>>
>>
Hi list,
as the title says, is anyone besides Solr also using Elasticsearch?
If so, are you:
- using JSON for ES search queries?
- using the sparse URI search of ES for search queries?
- having your own addon/plugin for turning Solr URI queries into JSON quries
for ES?
- having any other combina
per
>>> collection.Are all the caches used by solr on or off heap ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Given this scenario where GC is the primary bottleneck what is a good
>>> recommended memory settings for solr? Should i increase the heap memory
>>> (that will
But it still has the error about TrimFilterFactory in it, which I reported a
couple of days back.
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg92064.html
So what it needs to correct the Reference Guide is to place a note like under
StopFilter somewhere under TrimFilter:
"As of Solr
Now this is strange,
while using TrimFilterFactory with attribute "updateOffsets=true" as described
in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.TrimFilterFactory
and
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Filter+Descriptions#FilterDescriptions-TrimFilter
I get "
Years ago when "Federated Search" was a buzzword we did some development and
testing with Lucene, FAST Search, Google and several other Search Engines
according Federated Search in Library context.
The results can be found here
http://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2516631/2516644
Some minor parts a
I have a table of links to all my servers running SOLR.
So I can jump from one admin page any other servers admin page.
And also a link to my monitoring server.
Not very innovative but better than an empty page.
So, yes I'm using it.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 08.08.2013 00:24, schrieb Stefan Matheis:
Yes, UseNuma is only for Parallel Scavenger garbage collector and only
for Solaris 9 and higher and Linux kernel 2.6.19 and glibc 2.6.1.
And it performs with 64-bit better than 32-bit.
So no effects for G1.
With standard applications CMS is very slightly better than G1 but
when it comes to huge he
Am 29.07.2013 14:46, schrieb Michael Ryan:
> This is interesting... How are you measuring the heap size?
This is displayed in jvisualvm and also logged with munin via JMX.
Bernd
>
> -Michael
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bie
Something interesting I have noticed today,
after running my huge single index (49 mio. records / 137 GB index) for
about a week and replicating today I recognized that the heap usage after
replication did not go down as expected. Expected means if solr is started
I have a heap size between 4 to 5
Try setting dataSource="null" for your toplevel entity and
use filename="\.zip$" as filename selector.
Am 28.06.2013 23:14, schrieb ericrs22:
> unfortunately not. I had tried that before with the logs saying:
>
> Full Import failed:java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
> java.
Am 24.06.2013 16:37, schrieb Jack Krupansky:
> I won’t continue to bore annoy anybody on this list with tedious comments
> about my new Solr book on Lulu.com... please bookmark my blog,
> http://basetechnology.blogspot.com/, for further updates on the book.
>
> The book itself is here:
> http:/
Hi Shawn,
some good information about G1 tuning, may be something for the wiki about GC
tuning.
Am 20.06.2013 18:01, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
> On 6/20/2013 8:02 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> ...
> ... When you take a look at the overall stats and the memory graph over time,
> G1 looks way better.
> U
Am 20.06.2013 00:18, schrieb Timothy Potter:
> I'm sure there's some site to do this but wanted to get a feel for
> who's running Solr 4 on Java 7 with G1 gc enabled?
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
Currently using Solr 4.2.1 in production with Oracle Java(TM) SE Runtime
Environment (build 1.7.0_07-b10)
an
you have queryResultCache set to 10 which means IF you
calculate
with 100 qps (which is a lot) it will cache the last 1000 seconds (if all
queries are unique)
which is 16.6 minutes. Is that what you want and what your system should serve?
And with the halfe of it (5) a new searcher
May be I have just luck with it, but for big heaps it works fine.
Regards
Bernd
Am 06.06.2013 16:23, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
> On 6/6/2013 3:50 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>> What helped me a lot was switching to G1GC.
>> Faster, smoother, very little ripple, nearly no sawtooth.
Am 05.06.2013 18:09, schrieb SandeepM:
> /So we see the jagged edge waveform which keeps climbing (GC cycles don't
> completely collect memory over time). Our test has a short capture from
> real traffic and we are replaying that via solrmeter./
>
> Any idea why the memory climbs over time. Th
Am 05.06.2013 11:28, schrieb Raheel Hasan:
> Hi,
>
> I have a small question about solr logging.
>
> In resources>log4j.properties, we have
>
> *log4j.rootLogger=INFO, file, CONSOLE*
>
> However, what I want is:
> *log4j.rootLogger=INFO, file
> *
> and
> *log4j.rootLogger=WARN, CONSOLE*
> (bo
gt; also inside SolrIndexSearcher).
> My understanding is that it will stop your server from consuming
> unnecessary resources.
>
> --roman
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Bernd Fehling <
> bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>
>> How are you handl
er (broken
pipe)?
And the container has no way to simulate a "browser stop button" in case of a
timeout
to get a sane termination?
Bernd
Am 03.06.2013 16:20, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
> On 6/3/2013 2:39 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>> How are you handling "killer queries&q
How are you handling "killer queries" with solr?
While solr/lucene (currently 4.2.1) is trying to do its best I see sometimes
stupid queries
in my logs, located with extremly long query time.
Example:
q=???+and+??+and+???+and++and+???+and+??
I even get hits for this (hits=34
Am 16.05.2013 17:19, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
> On 5/16/2013 3:24 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>> OK, solved.
>> I have now run-jetty-run with log4j running.
>> Just copied log4j libs from example/lib/ext to webapp/WEB-INF/classes and
>> set -Dlog4j.configuration in run-jetty
OK, solved.
I have now run-jetty-run with log4j running.
Just copied log4j libs from example/lib/ext to webapp/WEB-INF/classes and
set -Dlog4j.configuration in run-jetty-run VM classpath.
Thanks,
Bernd
Am 15.05.2013 16:31, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
> On 5/15/2013 12:52 AM, Bernd Fehling wr
Hi list,
while I can't get solr 4.3 with run-jetty-run up and running under eclipse
for debugging I tried to switch back to slf4j and followed
the steps of http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrLogging
Unfortunately eclipse bothers me with an error:
The import org.apache.log4j.AppenderSkeleton cannot be
A question about CJK, how will U+3000 be handled?
U+3000 belongs to "CJK Symbols and Punctuation" and is named "IDEOGRAPHIC
SPACE".
Is it wrong if I just map it to U+0020 (SPACE)?
What is CJK Analyzer doing with U+3000?
If "two CJK words" have U+3000 inside, does it mean these "two CJK words"
rom the core and then tries to get
via the IndexReader the IndexCommit and then the commitData.
I think I should use remote debugging on master.
At least I now know that it is the master.
Regards
Bernd
Am 09.04.2013 08:35, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
> Hi Hoss,
>
> we don't u
Hi Hoss,
we don't use autoCommit and autoSoftCommit.
We don't use openSearcher.
We don't use transaction log.
I can see it in the AdminGUI and with
http://master_host:port/solr/replication?command=indexversion
All files are replicated from master to slave, nothing lost.
It is just that the gen/v
I know there was some effort to fix this but I must report
that solr 4.2.1 has still problems with index version and
index generation numbering in master/slave mode with replication.
Test was:
1. installed solr 4.2.1 on master and build index from scratch
2. installed solr 4.2.1 on slave with empt
Hi list,
I want to try docValues for my facets and sorting with solr 4.2.1
and have already seen many papers, examples and source code about
and around docValues, but there are still some questions.
The example schema.xml has fields:
and it has a comment for docValues:
For popularity with do
tten in the tomcat logs as
> well or will I only see it in the memory graphs?
>
> BR,
> Arkadi
> On 03/25/2013 03:50 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>> We use munin with jmx plugin for monitoring all server and Solr
>> installations.
>> (http://munin-monitoring.org/)
&g
d java from 6 to 7...
> How exactly do you monitor the memory usage and the affect of the garbage
> collector?
>
>
> On 03/25/2013 01:18 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>> The of UseG1GC yes,
>> but with Solr 4.x, Jetty 8.1.8 and Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
>> (1.
util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method)
>>>>>> at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:127)
>>>>>> at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:144)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.poi.openxml4j.opc.internal.ZipHelper.openZipFile(ZipHelper.java:157)
>>>> [...]
>&g
That issue was already with solr 4.1.
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/replication-problems-with-solr4-1-td4039647.html
Nice to know that it is still there in 4.2.
With some luck it will make it to 4.2.1 ;-)
Regards
Bernd
Am 21.03.2013 21:08, schrieb Uomesh:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing an issue af
Am 15.03.2013 12:24, schrieb Per Steffensen:
> On 3/15/13 9:13 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>> How do you know that it is Solr and nothing else?
> It is memory usage inside the Jetty/Solr JVM we monitor, so by definition it
> is Solr (or Jetty, but I couldnt imagine). The lower borde
We are currently using
Oracle Corporation Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (1.7.0_07 23.3-b01)
Runs excellent and also no memory parameter tweaking neccessary.
Give enough physical and JVM memory, use "-XX:+UseG1GC" and thats it.
Also no "saw tooth" and GC timeouts from JVM as with earlier versi
How do you know that it is Solr and nothing else?
Have you check with MemoryAnalyzer?
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/MemoryAnalyzer
As we are always using the most recent released version we
have never seen any memory leaks with Solr so far.
Regards
Bernd
Am 15.03.2013 08:21, schrieb Per Ste
May be the info about index version is pulled from the repeaters
"data/replication.properties" file and the content of that file
is wrong.
Had something similar and only solution for me was deleting the
replication.properties file. But no guarantee about this.
Actually the replication is pretty mu
OK then index generation and index version are out of count when it comes
to verify that master and slave index are in sync.
What else is possible?
The strange thing is if master is 2 or more generations ahead of slave then it
works!
With your logic the slave must _always_ be one generation ahea
to slave,
more like a sync?
Am 11.02.2013 09:29, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
> Hi list,
>
> after upgrading from solr4.0 to solr4.1 and running it for two weeks now
> it turns out that replication has problems and unpredictable results.
> My installation is single index 41 mio. docs
Hi list,
after upgrading from solr4.0 to solr4.1 and running it for two weeks now
it turns out that replication has problems and unpredictable results.
My installation is single index 41 mio. docs / 115 GB index size / 1 master / 3
slaves.
- the master builds a new index from scratch once a week
Am 02.02.2013 03:48, schrieb Yonik Seeley:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Bernd Fehling
> wrote:
>> A question to the experts,
>>
>> why is the replicated index copied from its temporary location
>> (index.x)
>> to the real index directory and NOT
A question to the experts,
why is the replicated index copied from its temporary location (index.x)
to the real index directory and NOT moved?
Copying over 100s of gigs takes some time, moving is just changing the file
system link.
Also, instead of first deleting the old index, why not
-
Hi list,
I recognized that the result order is FIFO if documents have the same score.
I think this is due to the fact that documents which are indexed later get a
higher
internal document ID and the output for documents with the same score starts
with the lowest internal document ID and raises.
I
Now this must be said, thanks for solr 4.1 (and lucene 4.1)!
Great improvements compared to 4.0.
After building the first 4.1 index I thought the index was broken, but had no
error messages anywhere.
Why I thought it was damaged?
The index size went down from 167 GB (solr 4.0) to 115 GB (solr 4.
Hi Shawn,
actually I use munin for monitoring but just checked with jvisualvm
which also runs fine for remote monitoring.
You might try the following:
http://www.codefactorycr.com/java-visualvm-to-profile-a-remote-server.html
You have to:
- generate a policy file on the server to be monitored
-
Hi Uwe,
sorting should be well prepared.
First rough check is fieldCache. You can see it with SolrAdmin Stats.
The "insanity_count" there should be 0 (zero).
Only sort on fields which are prepared for sorting and make sense to be sorted.
Do only faceting on fields which make sense. I've seen syst
Hi Hoss,
my config has definately not changed and it worked with 3.6 and 3.6.1.
Yes I have a custom plugin and if q was empty with 3.6 it picked automatically
q.alt from solrconfig.xml.
This all was done with params.get()
With 4.x this is gone due to some changes in DefaultSolrParams(?).
Which is
Dear list,
after going from 3.6 to 4.0 I see exceptions in my logs.
It turned out that somehow the "q"-parameter was empty.
With 3.6 the "q.alt" in the solrconfig.xml worked as fallback but now with 4.0
I get exceptions.
I use it like this:
SolrParams params = req.getParams();
String q = params.
There are also other solutions:
Multi-word synonym filter (synonym expansion)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4499
Since Solr 3.4 i have my own solution which might be obsolete if
LUCENE-4499 will be in a released version.
http://www.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/~befehl/base/solr/eurovoc.html
I just downloaded, compiled and opened an optimized solr 4.0 index
in read only without problems.
Could browse through the docs, search with different analyzers, ...
Looks good.
Am 19.11.2012 08:49, schrieb Toke Eskildsen:
> On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:10 +0100, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>>
ispatchThread.java:188)
> at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:122)
> o
>
>
> any ideas?
>
>
> I,ve created another index with lucene 4.0 and this luke open the index
> well.
>
> thanks in advance
>
--
*
Bernd F
I guess you should give JVM more memory.
When starting to find a good value for -Xmx I "oversized" and set
it to Xmx20G and Xms20G. Then I monitored the system and saw that JVM is
between 5G and 10G (java7 with G1 GC).
Now it is finally set to Xmx11G and Xms11G for my system with 1 core and 38
m
Have a look at the report about EuroVoc integration into Solr
which gives you an idea about the problems and solutions with
multiword synonyms and query expansion.
http://www.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/~befehl/base/solr/eurovoc.html
Regards
Bernd Fehling
Am 18.10.2012 02:36, schrieb Nicholas Ding
Hi list,
while checking the runtime behavior of solr 4.0.0 I recognized that the handling
of write.lock seams to be different.
With solr 3.6.1 after calling optimize the index is optimzed and write.lock
removed.
This tells me everything is flushed to disk and its save to copy the index.
With so
l the paths with a regex or something
> and see if something jumps out and backtrack.
>
> I really, really, _hate_ having to deal with this kind of thing
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Bernd Fehling
> wrote:
>> The solr home dir is as s
The solr home dir is as suggested for solr 4.0 to be located below jetty.
So my directory structure is:
/srv/www/solr/solr-4.0.0/
-- dist ** has all apache solr and lucene libs not in .war
-- lib** has all other libs not in .war and not in dist, but required
-- jetty ** the jetty copied from
Hi,
while starting solr-4.0.0 I get the following exception:
SEVERE: null:java.lang.IllegalAccessError:
class org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene3x.PreFlexRWPostingsFormat cannot access
its superclass org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene3x.Lucene3xPostingsFormat
Very strange, because some lines earlier i
7;d need to include foreign language
> versions of (not to mention needing to know which languages to include).
> This isn't trivial either.
>
> I'm assuming there's no built-in functionality that supports the foreign
> language translation on the fly, so what do people
uery:
>
>
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery(((produto_nome:preservativo produto_nome:vaselina
> produto_nome:viagra produto_nome:lubrificante intimo) ))
>
>
> I Dont undersant why it brings no results.
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this messag
Hi Amanda,
we don't use solr cloud jet, just 3 dedicated server.
When it comes to distribution the choice will be either solr cloud or elastic
search.
But currently we use unix shell scripts with ssh for switching.
Easy, simple, stable :-)
Regards,
Bernd
Am 21.09.2012 16:03, schrieb yangqian_nj
iteup about GC and memory in Solr/Lucene:
>
> http://searchhub.org/dev/2011/03/27/garbage-collection-bootcamp-1-0/
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Bernd Fehling
>> wrote:
>>
>&g
Hi Alex,
during replication the slave is still available and serving requests but
as you can imagine the responses will be slower because of disk usage,
even with 15k rpm disks.
We have one master and two slaves. Master only for indexing, slaves for
searching.
Only one slave is online the other i
That is the problem with a jvm, it is a virtual machine.
Ask 10 experts about a good jvm settings and you get 15 answers. May be a
tradeoff
of the flexibility of jvm's. There is always a right setting for any application
running on a jvm but you just have to find it.
How about a Solr Wiki page abo
ue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Bernd Fehling
> wrote:
>> Hi Otis,
>>
>> not really a problem because I have plenty of memory ;-)
>> -Xmx25g -Xms25g -Xmn6g
>
> Good.
>
>> I'm just interested into this.
>> Can you report similar jumps within JVM w
- Original Message -
> | From: "Yonik Seeley"
> | To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> | Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:38:41 AM
> | Subject: Re: SOLR memory usage jump in JVM
> |
> | On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Bernd Fehling
> | wrote:
> | > I use
measure after that.
>
> Uwe has an interesting blog about memory, he recommends using as
> little as possible,
> see:
> http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Bernd Fehli
ch-analytics/index.html
> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Bernd Fehling
> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> while monitoring my systems I see a jump in memory consumption in JVM
>> after 2 to 5 days of running o
Hi list,
while monitoring my systems I see a jump in memory consumption in JVM
after 2 to 5 days of running of about 5GB.
After starting the system (search node only, no replication during search)
SOLR uses between 6.5GB to 10.3GB of JVM when idle.
If the search node is online and serves requests
gt;> />
>>>
>>>
>>> but by doing this way , only last mentioned filed (in this case
>>> 'article_time') get inserted in solr index , but no data inserted for
>>> article_time_DT field.
>>>
>>> Can any body please suggest
Some month ago I have tested YaCy, this works pretty well.
http://yacy.net/en/
You can install it as stand-alone and setup your own crawler (single or
cluster).
Very nice admin and control surface.
After installation disable the internal database and enable the feed to SOLR,
thats it.
Regards,
;> Ouch, not to mention the potential for XSS.
>>
>> I'll see if I can get in touch with someone.
>>
>> Michael Della Bitta
>>
>>
>> Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017
>&g
Now this is very scary, while searching for "solr direct access per docid" I
got a hit
from US Homeland Security Digital Library. Interested in what they have to tell
me
about my search I clicked on the link to the page. First the page had nothing
unusual
about it, but why I get the hit?
http://
StringBuilder
> 43: 424801 20390448
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.miscellaneous.WordDelimiterIterator
> 44: 424801 20390448
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.StopFilter
> 45: 424801 20390448
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.miscellaneous.KeywordMarkerFilter
> 46: 424801 20390448
+1
What would be if ALL external projects using lucene and/or solr are announcing
on this list
that they have stepped up to the next higher release after a release change?
Also "Realtime NRT", if NRT stands for "Near_Real_Time" he has a "Realtime
Near_Real_Time" Algorithm.
Regards,
Bernd
Am
Hi,
I started with SysUsage http://sysusage.darold.net/ which grabs all system
activities
using unix Sar and system commands. Pretty easy and simple.
I also tried zabbix. Very powerful but for me to much to configure.
Have now munin 2.0.2 installed for testing. Needs some perl knowledge to get
While porting from 3.6.1 to 4.x I noticed the doubling content of some fields
in my index.
Didn't have this with 3.6.1.
This can also be seen with luke. I could trace it down to DIH so far.
Anyone seen this?
I'm using XPathEntityProcessor with RegexTransformer.
Will look into this closer tomorro
Dear developers,
while upgrading from 3.6.x to 4.x I have to rewrite some of my code and
search for the new methods and/or classes. In 3.6.x and older versions
the API Javadoc interface had an "Index" which made it easy to find the
appropriate methods. The button to call the "Index" was located in
Hi list,
while monitoring my solr 3.6.1 installation I recognized an increase of memory
usage
in OldGen JVM heap on my slave. I decided to force Full GC from jvisualvm and
send optimize to the already optimized slave index. Normally this helps because
I have monitored this issue over the past. Bu
Because we use in many cases mutli-term search together with synonyms
as thesaurus we had to develop a solution for this. There is a whole
chain of pitfalls through the system and you have to be careful.
The thesaurus (synonym.txt) solves not only single-terms to multi-terms
but also multi-terms t
Unfortunately I must see that defaultSearchField and param df are
pretty much messed up in solr 3.6.x
Yes, I have seen issue SOLR-2724 and SOLR-3292.
So if defaultSearchField has been removed (deprecated) from schema.xml then why
are the still calls to
"org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.getDefau
ord synonyms work better if you use LUCENE_33 is because
> then Solr uses the SlowSynonymFilter instead of SynonymFilterFactory
> (FSTSynonymFilterFactory).
>
> But I don't know if the difference between them is a bug or not. Maybe
> someone has more insight?
>
>
Are you sure with LUCENE_33 (Use of BitVector)?
Am 31.05.2012 17:20, schrieb O. Klein:
> I have been struggling with this as well and found that using LUCENE_33 gives
> the best results.
>
> But as it will be deprecated this is no everlasting solution. May somebody
> knows one?
>
otel de ville
>
> mairie => mairie, hotel\ de\ ville
>
> but nothing prevents mairie from matching with "hotel"...
>
> The only way I found is to use
> tokenizerFactory="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" in my synonyms declaration
> in schema.xml, bu
>>>>>>> --Jeevanandam
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:30 PM, elisabeth benoit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <' mapping instead? Something
>>>>>>>>>&
I have tried all hints from internet for debugging a junit test of
solr 3.6 under eclipse but didn't succeed.
eclipse and everything is running, compiling, debugging with runjettyrun.
Tests have no errors.
Ant from command line ist also running with ivy, e.g.
ant -Dtestmethod=testUserFields -Dtest
I just looked through my logs of solr 3.6 and saw several "0 hits" which were
not seen with solr 3.5.
While tracing this down it turned out that edismax don't like queries of type
"...&q=(text:ide)&..." any more.
If parentheses around the query term the edismax fails with solr 3.6.
Can anyone
I'm trying to get the default operator of a schema in solr 3.6 but unfortunately
everything is deprecated.
The API solr 3.6 says:
getQueryParserDefaultOperator() - Method in class
org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema
Deprecated.
use getSolrQueryParser().getDefaultOperator()
getSolrQueryP
Paul,
nearly two years ago I requested an evaluation license and tested BASIS Tech
Rosette for Lucene & Solr. Was working excellent but the price much much to
high.
Yes, they also have compound analysis for several languages including German.
Just configure your pipeline in solr and setup the pr
You might have a look at:
http://www.basistech.com/lucene/
Am 12.04.2012 11:52, schrieb Michael Ludwig:
> Given an input of "Windjacke" (probably "wind jacket" in English), I'd
> like the code that prepares the data for the index (tokenizer etc) to
> understand that this is a "Jacke" ("jacket")
There were some changes in solrconfig.xml between solr3.1 and solr3.5.
Always read CHANGES.txt when switching to a new version.
Also helpful is comparing both versions of solrconfig.xml from the examples.
Are you sure you need a MaxPermSize of 5g?
Use jvisualvm to see what you really need.
This i
Nothing against RankingAlgorithm and your work, which sounds great, but
I think that YOUR "Solr 4.0" might confuse some Solr users and/or newbees.
As far as I know the next official release will be 3.6.
So your "Solr 4.0" is a trunk snapshot or what?
If so, which revision number?
Or have you do
Hi list,
I have looked into the CLOSE_WAIT problem and created an issue with a patch to
fix this.
A search for CLOSE_WAIT shows that there are many Apache projects hit by this
problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3280
Can someone recheck the patch (it belongs to SnapPuller) and
What is netstat telling you about the connections on the servers?
Any connections in "CLOSE_WAIT" (passive close) hanging?
Saw this on my servers last week.
Used a little proggi to spoof a local connection on those servers ports
and was able to fake the TCP-stack to close those connections.
It a
Use
sprayer, washer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
Regards
Bernd
Am 23.02.2012 07:03, schrieb remi tassing:
Same question here...
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012, geeky2 wrote:
hello all,
i need to support the following:
if the user
Hi,
run-jetty-run issue #9:
...
In the VM Arguments of your launch configuration set
-Drjrxml=./jetty.xml
If jetty.xml is in the root of your project it will be used (you can also use a
fully
qualified path name).
The UI port, context and WebApp dir are ignored, since you can define them in
j
After changing the below suggested lines and compiling the branch_3x runs fine
now.
SolrException is gone.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 31.01.2012 14:21, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
On January 11th I downloaded branch_3x with svn into eclipse (indigo).
Compiled and tested it without problems.
Today I updated
On January 11th I downloaded branch_3x with svn into eclipse (indigo).
Compiled and tested it without problems.
Today I updated my branch_3x from repository.
Compiled fine but get now SolrException when starting.
Jan 31, 2012 1:50:15 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore initListeners
INFO: [] Added S
Yes and No.
If using Synonyms funtionality out of the box you have to do it at index time.
But if using it at query time, like we do, you have to do some programming.
We have connected a thesaurus which is actually using synonyms functionality at
query time.
There are some pitfalls to take care
Hi Mikhail,
thanks for pointing me to the issue.
Regards, Bernd
Am 11.01.2012 21:47, schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
FYI,
it's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2804
I'm trying to address it.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Bernd Fehling<
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de>
201 - 300 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
