or something like that
but I cannot confirm that that is the case nor do I know how to fix it even
if it were.
Any help here would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Hi all,
Any tips on this one?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I have a few questions about how the MySQL data import works. It seems it
creates a separate connection for each entity I create. Is there any way
been added yet or if there
were plans to do so.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
sometimes more straightforward.
Best
Erick...
P.S. Yes, it's pretty standard to have a single
field be the destination for several copyField
directives.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Brian Lamb
brian.l
?
Lastly, is it possible to use copyField to copy three regular fields into
one multiValued field and have all the data show up?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Any ideas on this one?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Sorry, the query is actually:
http://localhost:8983/solr/mycore/search/?q=test{!boost
b=product(sum(log(sum(myfield,1)),1),recip(ms(NOW,mydate_field),3.16e-11,1,8))}start=sort=score+desc
?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Sorry, the query is actually:
http://localhost:8983/solr/mycore/search/?q=test{!boost
b=product(sum(log(sum(myfield,1)),1),recip(ms(NOW,mydate_field),3.16e-11,1,8))}start=sort=score+desc,mydate_field+descwt=xslttr=mysite.xsl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l
I update my autocomplete so that it will match the middle of a word
as well as the beginning of the word?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I found that if I change
filter class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory minGramSize=1 maxGramSize=25
/
to
filter class=solr.NGramFilterFactory minGramSize=1 maxGramSize=25 /
I can do autocomplete in the middle of a term.
Thanks!
Brian Lamb
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Brian Lamb
brian.l
=+myname:Frank myname_str:Frank^100
Thanks for the help everyone!
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: With your solution, RECORD 1 does appear at the top but I think thats
just
: blind luck more than anything else because RECORD 3 shows as having
That's a clever idea. I'll put something together and see how it turns out.
Thanks for the tip.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: With your solution, RECORD 1 does appear at the top but I think thats
just
: blind luck more than anything else
than anything else because RECORD 3 shows as having the same
score. So what more can I do to push RECORD 1 up to the top. Ideally, I'd
like all three records returned with RECORD 1 being the first listing.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Emmanuel Espina
espinaemman
Is this possible to do? If so, how?
On 7/25/11, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
Yes and that's causing some problems in my application. Is there a way to
truncate the 7th decimal place in regards to sorting by the score?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo
expecting?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Yes and that's causing some problems in my application. Is there a way to
truncate the 7th decimal place in regards to sorting by the score?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.com
where if there is no value set
for common_names, I would not want that record included in the search
result.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
(score,1) just to see if I was using round
incorrectly but I get an error message there too saying score is not a
recognized field.
Please help!
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
of a sudden, its gone. I don't know what is triggering
that one record's disappearance but it is quite annoying. Any ideas what's
going on?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
. Is this possible? If
so, where should I look for a guide?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
There's no feature in Solr to do what you ask, no. I don't think.
On 6/7/2011 1:30 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for your reply. Your point about my example is a good one. So
let
me try to restate using your example. Suppose I
I feel like this should be fairly easy to do but I just don't see anywhere
in the documentation on how to do this. Perhaps I am using the wrong search
parameters.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to change the query parser
not be possible.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Nope, not possible.
I'm not even sure what it would mean semantically. If you had default
operator OR ordinarily, but default operator AND just for field2, then
what would happen
=field1:word AND token field2:parser
syntax
But, I only want it to be applied to field1, not field2 and I want the
operator to always be AND unless the user explicitly types in OR.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I mean instead of typing http://localhost:8983/?q=mysearch, I would send a
PDF file with the contents of mysearch and search based on that. I am
leaning toward handling this before it hits solr however.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick
=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory /
/analyzer
The first did not produce any results but the second worked beautifully.
Thanks!
Brian Lamb
2011/5/31 Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com
...or also use the LowerCaseTokenizerFactory at query time for consistency,
but not the edge ngram filter.
2011/5
I think in my case LowerCaseTokenizerFactory will be sufficient because
there will never be spaces in this particular field. But thank you for the
useful link!
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Be a little careful here
Is it possible to do a search based on a PDF file? I know its possible to
update the index with a PDF but can you do just a regular search with it?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
, case isn't important either.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
That'll work for your case, although be aware that string types aren't
analyzed at all,
so case matters, as do spaces etc.
What is the use-case here? If you
.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, bmdakshinamur...@gmail.com
bmdakshinamur...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you specify the analyzer you are using for your queries?
May be you could use a KeywordAnalyzer for your queries so you don't end up
matching parts of your query.
http
=org.apache.solr.schema.CustomSimilarityProviderFactory
str name=echois there an echo?/str
/similarityProvider
When would I use one over the other?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
For this, I ended up just changing it to string and using abcdefg* to
match. That seems to work so far.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I'm running into some confusion with the way edgengram works. I have the
field
I'm still not having any luck with this. Has anyone actually gotten this to
work so far? I feel like I've followed the directions to the letter but it
just doesn't work.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
I looked at the patch
my lucene and solr installs
and it still is not recognizing it on a per field basis.
Is the tag different inside a fieldType? Did I not update solr correctly?
Where is my mistake?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I looked at the patch page and saw the files that were changed. I went into
my install and looked at those same files and found that they had indeed
been changed. So it looks like I have the correct version of solr.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote
abc=2 abcd=2 abcde=2 abcdef=2 abcdefg=2)
I get why that's happening, but is there a way to avoid that? Do I need to
do a new field type to achieve the desired affect?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
DefaultSimilarity {
public MyClassSimilarity() { super(); }
public float idf(int a1, int a2) { return 1; }
}
So then this raises two questions. Why am I getting a
classNotFoundException and how can I go about fixing it?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Markus Jelsma
. Actually, my
lucene directory was not previously under svn so I removed everything in
there and did svn co
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/
So why isn't my installation taking the SweetSpot Similarity change?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
and how can I go about fixing it?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
As far as i know, SweetSpotSimilarty needs be configured. I did use it once
but
wrapped a factory around it to configure the sweet spot. It worked just
Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb wrote:
Hi all,
Based on advice I received on a previous email thread, I applied patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2338. My goal
So what was my mistake? I still have not resolved this issue.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jpwrote:
(11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb
similarity class didn't work either, I'm inclined to think it was a
problem with the patch.
Any thoughts on this one?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Also, I've tried adding:
similarity class=org.apache.lucene.misc.SweetSpotSimilarity/
To the end of the schema file so that it is applied globally but it does not
appear to change the score either. What am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Brian Lamb
I have for similarity is the line at the end of the file to
apply similarity to all searches but that does not even work. So where am I
going wrong?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Also, I've tried adding:
similarity class
I believe I have applied the patch correctly. However, I cannot seem to
figure out where the similarity class I create should reside. Any tips on
that?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Thank you Robert for pointing this out
Would I be better off trying to use something like PHP to read the PDF file
and extrapolate the information and then pass it on to the MoreLikeThis
handler or is there a way it can be done by giving it the PDF directly?
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l
for this particular
field?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
? I have
need to do more than one of them and from what I can find, it seems that
only computeNorm accounts for the name of the field.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi,
Although you can configure per field TF
one of them and from what I can find, it seems that
only computeNorm accounts for the name of the field.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi,
Although you can configure per field TF
Any thoughts on this one?
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I've become more and more familiar with the MoreLikeThis handler over the
last several months. I'm curious whether it is possible to do a MoreLikeThis
search by uploading a PDF
but is it
possible to combine the two?
Just to be clear, I don't want to send a PDF and have that be a part of the
index. But rather, I'd like to be able to use the PDF as a MoreLikeThis
search.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
If I change the field type in my schema, do I need to rebuild the entire
index? I'm at a point now where it takes over a day to do a full import due
to the sheer size of my application and I would prefer not having to reindex
just because I want to make a change somewhere.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
on the WIKI:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 9. mai 2011, at 20.57, Brian Lamb wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to set up solr so that it will only execute dataimport
commands if they come from localhost
that when I launch my application,
there will be the potential for abuse. Is the best solution to have
everything reside on the same server?
What are some other solutions?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
=(*:* -species:Sheltie)^1
Return the exact same set of results with a record about a Sheltie as the
top result each time. What am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
Hi all,
I have an mlt search set up on my site with over 2 million records in the
index. Normally, my results look like:
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name
to get results:
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt/?q=title:Some random title
Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Brian Lamb
Does anyone have any thoughts on this one?
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
I've looked at both wiki pages and none really clarify the difference
between these two. If I copy and paste an existing index value for field and
do an mlt search
I've looked at both wiki pages and none really clarify the difference
between these two. If I copy and paste an existing index value for field and
do an mlt search, it shows up under match but not results. What is the
difference between these two?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Brian Lamb
that search based on more like this.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I've been using MoreLikeThis for a while through select:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=field:more like
thismlt=truemlt.fl=fieldrows=100fl=*,score
I was looking over the wiki page today and saw
if it works with phrases though
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 31. mars 2011, at 16.49, Brian Lamb wrote:
No, I don't really want to break down the words into subwords. In the
example I provided, I would not want kind to match either record
I just noticed Juan's response and I find that I am encountering that very
issue in a few cases. Boosting is a good way to put the more relevant
results to the top but it is possible to only have the correct results
returned?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Brian Lamb
brian.l
://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/analysis/compound/DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter.html
2011/3/30 Brian Lamb [via Lucene]
ml-node+2754668-300063934-383...@n3.nabble.com
Hi all,
I have a field set up like this:
field name=common_names multiValued=true type=text indexed=true
so
that only RECORD1 is returned?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
RECORD2 to be returned because 'man' is not at the beginning
of the word.
How can I achieve this?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
difference is that id is my primary key field so
that could be why it is showing up but why aren't the others showing up?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
The full import wasn't spitting out any errors on the web page but in
looking at the logs, there were errors. Correcting those errors solved that
issue.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
try the schema browser from the admin page
RECORD1 is returned?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Thank you both for your input. I ended up using Ahmet's way because it seems
to fit better with the rest of the application.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:02 AM, lboutros boutr...@gmail.com wrote:
The other way could be to extend the SolrQueryParser to read a per field
default operator in the solr
=animal:german shepherdtype:dog canine
I would want it to effectively be:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=animal:german AND shepherdtype:dog OR
canine
Other than parsing the URL before I send it out, is there a way to do this?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
I'm still confused as to why I'm getting this error. To me it reads that the
.java file was declared incorrectly but I shouldn't need to change those
files so where am I doing something incorrectly?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
That fixed
Thank you for the suggestion. I followed your advice and was able to get a
version up and running. Thanks again for all the help!
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm still confused as to why I'm
getting this error. To me it reads that the
.java file
'org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler'
It looks like those files are there:
contrib/dataimporthandler/src/main/java/org/apache/solr/handler/dataimport/
But for some reason, they aren't able to be found. Where would I update this
setting and what would I update it to?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10
the same error.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Thanks everyone for the advice. I checked out a recent version from SVN and
ran:
ant clean example
This worked just fine. However when I went to start the solr server, I get
Awesome! That fixed that problem. I'm getting another class not found error
but I'll see if I can fix it on my own first.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 3/22/11, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
From: Brian Lamb brian.l
why this happens
and how to fix it.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Awesome! That fixed that problem. I'm getting another class not found error
but I'll see if I can fix it on my own first.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:56 AM
:
requestHandler name=/dataimport
class=org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=configdb-data-config.xml/str
/lst
/requestHandler
Thanks for all the help so far. You all have been great.
Brian Lamb
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com
. Additionally, when I go to http://localhost/solr/admin/, I get
the following message:
HTTP ERROR: 404
Problem accessing /solr/admin. Reason:
NOT_FOUND
What did I do incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
What do you
instead of this:
http://localhost/solr/admin/
try this instead:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/ http://localhost/solr/admin/
Cheers,
Geert-Jan
2011/3/18 Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.com
That does seem like a better solution. I downloaded a recent version and
there were
.
Did I not put the files in the right place? What am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
left off the bf parameter. So what am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
See boosting documents by function query. This way you can use document's
boost_score field to affect the final score.
http
to
simulate that but it seems horribly inefficient so I'd like to do it within
Solr if at all possible.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Any ideas on this one?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all
:
http://localhost/solr/search?q=dogboost=true
The score of each document would be boosted by the number in the field
boost_score.
Unfortunately, I have no idea how to implement this actually but I'm hoping
that's where you all can come in.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
://localhost/solr/search/?q=dog
Boosted search: http://localhost/solr/search?q=dogboost=true
To achieve this, would it be applied in the data import handler? If so, what
would I need to put in for some_condition?
Thanks for all the help so far. I truly do appreciate it.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
On Wed
Any ideas on this one?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I know that I can add sort=score desc to the url to sort in descending
order. However, I would like to sort a MoreLikeThis response which returns
records like this:
lst name
This has since been fixed. The problem was that there was not enough memory
on the machine. It works just fine now.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: INFO: Creating a connection for entity id with URL:
:
Hi all,
I know that I can add sort=score desc to the url to sort in descending
order. However, I would like to sort a MoreLikeThis response which returns
records like this:
lst name=moreLikeThis
result name=3 numFound=113611 start=0 maxScore=0.4392774
result name=2 numFound= start=0
Anyone have any clue on this on?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I am using dataimport to create my index and I want to use docBoost to
assign some higher weights to certain docs. I understand the concept behind
docBoost but I haven't
, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
Anyone have any clue on this on?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Hi all,
I am using dataimport to create my index and I want to use docBoost to
assign some higher weights to certain docs. I
Hi all,
I'm using MoreLikeThis to find similar results but I'd like to exclude
records by the id number. For example, I use the following URL:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=id:(2 3
5)mlt=truemlt.fl=description,idfl=*,score
How would I exclude record 4 form the MoreLikeThis results?
I
search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, March 9, 2011 4:05:10 PM
Subject: Excluding results from more like this
Hi all,
I'm using MoreLikeThis to find similar results
Hi all,
I am using dataimport to create my index and I want to use docBoost to
assign some higher weights to certain docs. I understand the concept behind
docBoost but I haven't been able to find an example anywhere that shows how
to implement it. Assuming the following config file:
document
:
Next question, do you have your type field set to index=true in
your
schema?
Upayavira
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:06 -0500, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
Thank you for your reply but the searching is still not working
out
, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Please also provide analysis part of fieldType text. You can also use Luke
to
inspect the index.
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/luke?fl=globalFieldnumTerms=100
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 16:09:33 Brian Lamb wrote
to change it so that it reads something like:
field1Val/field1
field2Val/field2
Is this possible? If so, how?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was able to get my dataimport to work correctly but I'm a little
unclear
as to how the entity within an entity works in regards to search results.
When I do a search for all results, it seems only the outermost responses
is
defined as text at the bottom of schema.xml).
If you want to specify a different field, well, you need to tell it :-)
Is that it?
Upayavira
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:38 -0500, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was able to get my installation of Solr indexed using
Thanks for the help Stefan. It seems removing column=specie fixed it.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Stefan Matheis
matheis.ste...@googlemail.com wrote:
Brian,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
field column=specie multiValued=true name
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
