ield has docValues? That may be faster, but I don’t know for
sure.
Best regards,
Radu
--
Sematext Cloud - Full Stack Observability - https://sematext.com
Solr and Elasticsearch Consulting, Training and Production Support
On 8 Dec 2020, at 06:17, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi Radu
Apologies for not making
/blob/main/quaerite-examples/README.md#genetic-algorithms-ga-runga
Best regards,
Radu
--
Sematext Cloud - Full Stack Observability - https://sematext.com
Solr and Elasticsearch Consulting, Training and Production Support
On 7 Dec 2020, at 10:51, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I have added the following
Hi
I have added the following boosting requirements to the search query of
a page. Feedback from monitoring team is that the overall response of
the page has increased since then.
I am trying to find out if the added boosting parameters (below) could
have contributed to the increased.
The
.
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 22:28, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I have read in the mailings list that we should try to avoid using stop
words.
I have a use case where I would like to know if there is other
alternative solutions beside using stop words.
There is business requirement to return zero result when
,
Alex.
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 22:28, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I have read in the mailings list that we should try to avoid using stop
words.
I have a use case where I would like to know if there is other
alternative solutions beside using stop words.
There is business requirement to return zero
Hi
I have read in the mailings list that we should try to avoid using stop
words.
I have a use case where I would like to know if there is other
alternative solutions beside using stop words.
There is business requirement to return zero result when the search is
cigarette related words
I have the following boost requirement using bf
response_rate is 3, boost by ^0.6
response_rate is 2, boost by ^0.3
response_time is 4, boost by ^0.6
response_time is 3, boost by ^0.3
I am using a bf for each of the boost requirement,
Hi
I would like to know if there are suggestions on how I can handle my
task below. Please pardon the lengthy description.
I need to store product attributes in a collection.
Attributes like Size, Color, Material etc.
Each product can have up to max of 5 attributes.
Between products, their
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 6:17 PM Derek Poh wrote:
Does any one have any idea whatcould be the causeof this?
On 19/9/2018 11:40 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
In addition, I tried withmaxErrors=3 and with only 1error document,
the indexing process still gets aborted.
Could it be the way I defined
Does any one have any idea whatcould be the causeof this?
On 19/9/2018 11:40 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
In addition, I tried withmaxErrors=3 and with only 1error document,
the indexing process still gets aborted.
Could it be the way I defined the TolerantUpdateProcessorFactory in
solrconfg.xml
In addition, I tried withmaxErrors=3 and with only 1error document, the
indexing process still gets aborted.
Could it be the way I defined the TolerantUpdateProcessorFactory in
solrconfg.xml?
On 18/9/2018 3:13 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I am using CSV formatted indexupdates to index on tab
Hi
I am using CSV formatted indexupdates to index on tab delimited file.
I have define "TolerantUpdateProcessorFactory" with "maxErrors=-1" in
the solrconfig.xml to skip any document update error and proceed to
update the remaining documents without failing.
Howeverit does not seemto be
Hi
I am using CSV formatted indexupdates to index on tab delimited file.
I have define "TolerantUpdateProcessorFactory" with "maxErrors=-1" in
the solrconfig.xml to skip any document update error and proceed to
update the remaining documents without failing.
Howeverit does not seemto be
SG refers to Singaporeand the time is UTC +8.
That means I need to set the P_TradeShowOnlineEndDate date to UTC
instead of UTC +8 as a workaround to it.
On 31/8/2018 10:16 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 8/30/2018 7:26 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
Can the timezone of the NOW parameter
Hi
Can the timezone of the NOW parameter in the |deleteByQuery| of the
DocExpirationUpdateProcessorFactory be change to my timezone?
I am in SG and using solr 6.5.1.
The timestamp of the entries in the solr.log is in my timezone but the
NOW parameter of the |deleteByQuery| is a different
Hi
We have a setup of 2 servers, running Solr 6.6.2, on production.
There are 5 collections.
All collection are created as 1 shard x 2 replicas.
4 of the collections have this issue.
A replica of each of this 4 collections is in Recovery Mode. The
affected replicas are on the same server or
woah
Erik Hatcher
Senior Solutions Architect, Lucidworks.com
On Jun 11, 2018, at 11:16 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
How can I find out which search terms have matches in a search?
Eg.
The search terms are "big brown bear".And only "big" and "brown&quo
Seems like theHighlight feature could help but with some workaround.
Will need to explore more on it. Thank you.
On 12/6/2018 5:32 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
I would recommend to look into the Highlight feature[1] .
There are few implementations and they should be all right for your user
it does
not have a match in the search result.
On 12/6/2018 11:16 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
How can I find out which search terms have matches in a search?
Eg.
The search terms are "big brown bear".And only "big" and "brown" have
matches in the searchresult
Hi
How can I find out which search terms have matches in a search?
Eg.
The search terms are "big brown bear".And only "big" and "brown" have
matches in the searchresult.
Can Solr return this information that "big" and "brown" have matches in
the search result?
I want touse this information to
Hi
From your experience, would like to know if It is advisable to change
the gc parameters in solr.in.sh or solrfile?
It is mentioned in the documentation to edit solr.in.sh but would like
toknow which file you actually edit.
I am using Solr 6.6.2at the moment.
Regards,
Derek
I see. Thank you.
On 9/13/2017 2:36 PM, Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
Am 13.09.2017 um 04:04 schrieb Derek Poh:
Hi Michael
"Then continue using binary search depending on the returned score
values."
May I know what do you mean by using binary search?
An example algorithm is in J
there're lots of documents with the same score
value.
-Michael
Am 12.09.2017 um 03:21 schrieb Derek Poh:
Some additional information.
I have a query from user that a supplier's product(s) is not in the
search result.
I debugged by adding a fq on the supplier id to the query to verify
the s
:12 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
I have a collection of productdocument.
Each productdocument has supplier information in it.
I need to check if a supplier's products is return in a search
resultcontaining over 100,000 products and in which page (assuming
pagination
Hi
I have a collection of productdocument.
Each productdocument has supplier information in it.
I need to check if a supplier's products is return in a search
resultcontaining over 100,000 products and in which page (assuming
pagination is 20 products per page).
Itis time-consuming and
incorrectly. Could explain more on this?
On 5/22/2017 6:12 PM, Rick Leir wrote:
On 2017-05-22 02:25 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
Due to the source data structure, I need to concatenate the values of
2 fields ('supplier_id' and 'product_id') to form the unique 'id' of
each document.
However
Hi
Due to the source data structure, I need to concatenate the values of 2
fields ('supplier_id' and 'product_id') to form the unique 'id' of each
document.
However there are cases where some documents only have 'supplier_id' field.
This will result in some documents with a longer/larger 'id'
n April 27, 2017 8:50:59 AM EDT, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
On 4/26/2017 11:57 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
There are some common fields between them.
At the source data end (database), the supplier info and product info
are updated separately. In this regard, I should separate th
: XXXYYY
supplier id: S1
supplier name: XXX
supplier address: XXX
I may be influenced by DB concepts. Is such a design logical?
On 4/27/2017 8:50 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 4/26/2017 11:57 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
There are some common fields between them.
At the source data end (database), the supplier
. Otherwise, probably separate.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Apr 26, 2017, at 10:25 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
I amplanning for a migration of a legacy searchengine to Solr.
Basically theda
Hi
I amplanning for a migration of a legacy searchengine to Solr.
Basically thedata can be categorisedinto suppliersinfo, suppliers
products info and products category info. These sets of data are related
to each other.
suppliers products data, which is the largest, have around 300,000
records
r append the code to the query
search words.
On 3/30/2017 7:28 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
What's you actual business use case?
On 30 Mar 2017 1:53 AM, "Derek Poh" <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi Erick
So I could also not use the query analyzer stage to append
:38, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
Ineed to create afield that will be prefix and suffix with code 'z01x'.This
field needs to have the code in the index and during query.
I can either
1.
have the source data of the field formatted with the code before indexing
(outside solr
ltiple clients feeding into Solr) but is before
individual field processing (so will survive - for example - a
copyField).
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 29 March 2017 at 23:38, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote
Hi
Ineed to create afield that will be prefix and suffix with code
'z01x'.This field needs to have the code in the index and during query.
I can either
1.
have the source data of the field formatted with the code before
indexing (outside solr).
use a charFilter in the query stage of the field
or
the moving alias you mentioned?
On 3/24/2017 10:23 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
I have collections of products. I am doing indexing 3-4 times daily.
Every day there are products that expired and I need to remove the
ection, number of deleted items etc. You can even combine approaches,
e.g. delete daily and do full reindex once a week.
HTH,
Emir
On 23.03.2017 07:10, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I have collections of products. I am doing indexing 3-4 times daily.
Every day there are products that expired and
to make the right decision, you have to look at size of your
collection, number of deleted items etc. You can even combine
approaches, e.g. delete daily and do full reindex once a week.
HTH,
Emir
On 23.03.2017 07:10, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I have collections of products. I am doing indexing 3-4 times
Hi
I have collections of products. I am doing indexing 3-4 times daily.
Every day there are products that expired and I need to remove them from
these collectionsdaily.
Ican think of 2 ways to do this.
1. using collection aliasto switch between a main and temp collection.
- clear and index
don't have
enough items in a list, etc.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 29 November 2016 at 12:56, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi Walter
You used field collapsing for your case as well?
For my case the
, probably in 1997 or 1998.
With field collapsing, you provide a link to show more results from that source.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Nov 28, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi Walter
You used
of our customers
was a magazine publisher, and they wanted the best hit from each magazine
on the first page.
I expect that field collapsing would work for this.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Nov 28, 2016, at 4:19 PM, Derek Poh &l
. And, most likely, using Collapse and Expand:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collapse+and+Expand+Results
.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 28 November 2016 at 20:09, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
We have a business requirement to breakupa supplier's products from
dominating search resultso as to allow othersuppliers' products in the
search result to have exposure.
Business users are open to implementing this for the first page of the
search resultif it is not possible to apply
Why didn't I thought of that. That's another alternative. Thank you for
your suggestion. Appreciate it.
On 10/13/2016 5:41 AM, Georg Sorst wrote:
You could use a PatternReplaceCharFilter before your tokenizer to replace
the dot with a space character.
Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.
, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
How can I split words with period in between into separate tokens.
Eg. "Co.Ltd" => "Co" "Ltd" .
I am using StandardTokenizerFactory and it does notreplace periods (dots)
that are not
your requirement.
You can also try with other available flags enabled.
Best,
Modassar
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
I tried adding Word Delimiter Filter to the field but it does not process
or it truncate away the term "Co.Ltd".
On
I tried adding Word Delimiter Filter to the field but it does not
process or it truncate away the term "Co.Ltd".
generateNumberParts="0" catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0"
catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="0"/>
On
Hi
How can I split words with period in between into separate tokens.
Eg. "Co.Ltd" => "Co" "Ltd" .
I am using StandardTokenizerFactory and it does notreplace periods
(dots) that are not followed by whitespace are kept as part of the
token, including Internet domain names.
This is the field
I have a couple of filtersthat is text input based, where user will
input a value into the text boxes of these filters.
The condition is these filters will only be display if the facets exists
in the search result.
Eg. Min Order Qty filter will be displayif theMin Order Qty facet exists
in
Hi Shawn
Got it.
Will delete all replicas on thatserver first before shutting down solron it.
Thank you,
Derek
On 7/11/2016 9:43 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 7/10/2016 7:34 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
I need to remove a server from the cluster of serversrunning solr in
my production environment
Hi
This is my situation.
I need to remove a server from the cluster of serversrunning solr in my
production environment. 1of the collection's replica is a leader on this
server.
The collection is setup as 1shard with 5 replicas. With each replica
residing on a physical server.
How can I
think they WOULD BE GLOBALIZED. You can consider our solution.
scott.chu，scott@udngroup.com
2016/6/15 (週三)
- Original Message -
From: Derek Poh
To: solr-user
CC:
Date: 2016/6/13 (週一) 11:21
Subject: Define search query parameters in Solr or let clients
applicationscraft them?
Hi
be a chance of
inefficient queries. Only way to fight that is to have full control of
Solr interface and provide some search API, or to do regular search
log grooming.
Emir
On 14.06.2016 03:05, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi Emir
Thank you for pointing out the cons of defining them in Solr config.
One
come with some cons: it is less expressive than what you can do in
client code, you have to reload cores when you want to change, people
tend to override it from client so you get configs in two places.
HTH,
Emir
On 13.06.2016 05:21, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
Would like to get some advice on should
Hi
Would like to get some advice on should the queries parameters be define
in Solr or let the clients applications define and pass the queries
parameters to Solr?
Regards,
Derek
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
en changed
in any way by creating the new alias.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi Erick
Thank you for pointing out the sort behaviour of numbers in a string field.
I did not think of that. Will use float.
Would like to know ho
pact.
bq: do I need to delete all documents in the index and do a full indexing
That's the way I'd do it. You can always index to a _new_ collection
(assuming SolrCloud) and use collection aliasing to switch your
search all at once
Best,
Erick
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globa
I am using solr 4.10.4.
On 5/29/2016 3:52 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I have a field that is of "int" type currentlyand it's values are
whole numbers.
stored="true" multiValued="false"/>
Due tochange inbusiness requirement, this field will need to
Hi
I have a field that is of "int" type currentlyand it's values are whole
numbers.
stored="true" multiValued="false"/>
Due tochange inbusiness requirement, this field will need to take in
decimal numbers as well.
This fieldis sorted onand filter by range (field:[ 1 to *]).
Should I
Mikhail
It was caused by an endless loop in the page's codes that is triggered
only under certain conditions.
On 5/11/2016 4:07 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi Erick
Yes we have identified and fixed the pag
product searches then stored-only
is fine.
If you want to perform queries like "show me all the products
supplied by supplier X", then you need to index at least
some values too.
Best,
Erick
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi E
Erick
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
We have a "product" collection and a "supplier" collection.
The "product" collection contains products information and "supplier"
collection contains the product's suppl
Hi
We have a "product" collection and a "supplier" collection.
The "product" collection contains products information and "supplier"
collection contains the product's suppliers information.
We have a subsidiary page that query on "product" collection for the
search. The display result include
TieBreaker%29Parameter
Regards,
Alex.
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 1 April 2016 at 14:03, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
Correct me if I am wrong, my understanding of edismax parser is it use the
max scor
Hi
Correct me if I am wrong, my understanding of edismax parser is it use
the max score of the matches in a doc.
How do I make docs with more matches rank higher with edismax?
These 2 docs are from the same query resultand this is their order in
the result.
P_ProductId: 1116393488
Hi Alex
Can you advice how can I make use of copyField to handle this issue?
NLP lematisation will be the last resort and subject to budget and
business usersdecision.
Derek
On 3/1/2016 8:13 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
On 29 February 2016 at 20:40, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.
Hi Emir
For my use case, it is to do a exact match (enclosed searchkeyword in
double quotes) on a search field. Searchon "power banks" should return
matches for "power bank" and "power banks", singular and plural forms.
I will need to do furthertesting with porterstemfilter to ensure it meet
Hi
I am using EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory to reducewords in plural
forms to singular forms.
The filter factory is not reducingthe plural formof 'es' to the singular
form correctly. It is reducing correctly for plural form of 's'.
"boxes" is reduced to "boxe" instead of "box"
"glasses" to
ield value is a single
term.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
It is using KeywordTokenizerFactory. It is still consider as tokenized?
Here's the
On 2/15/2016 12:43 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
pf stands for phrase boosting, which implies tokenized text...
spp_keyword_exact sounds like it is not tokenized.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Hi
Correct me If I am wr
Hi
Correct me If I am wrong, edismax is an extension of dismax, so it will
support "pf".
But from my testing I noticed "pf" is not working with edismax.
From the debug information of a query using "pf" with edismax, there is
no phrase match for the "pf" field "spp_keyword_exact".
If I
Hi Erick
<<
The manual way of doing this would be to construct an elaborate query,
like q=spp_keyword_exact:"dvd bracket" OR P_ShortDescription:(dvd
bracket) OR NOTE: the parens are necessary or the last part of the
above would be parsed as P_ShortDescription:dvd
Hi Emir
For the other search fields, if they have matches it should be return.
On 1/28/2016 8:17 PM, Emir Arnautovic wrote:
Hi Derek,
It is not clear what you are trying to achieve: "one of the search
fields is an exact phrase match while the rest of the search fields
can be exact or partial
Do you mean for the spp_keyword_exact field, I should use String field
with keyword tokenised and lowercase token filtered?
On 1/28/2016 10:54 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
I think you are overthinking the problem :
I agre the described one is the most obvious solution in your case.
Only
Hi
First of all, sorry for the long post.
How do I implement or structured the query such that one of the search
fields is an exact phrase match while the rest of the search fields can
be exact or partial matches? Is this possible?
I have the following search fields
- P_VeryShortDescription
Hi Erick and all
Yes I am trying to apply the same search term to all the 4 search
fieldsand 1 of the search field must be an exact match.
You mentioned "In particular, the pf parameter will automatically apply
the search terms _as a phrase_ against the field specified, relieving
you of
Hi
Any advice how to resolve or workaround to this issue?
On 11/17/2015 8:28 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi Scott
I amusing Solr 4.10.4.
On 11/16/2015 10:06 PM, Scott Stults wrote:
Hi Derek,
Could you please add what version of Solr you see this in? I didn't
see a
related Jira, so this might
Hi Scott
I amusing Solr 4.10.4.
On 11/16/2015 10:06 PM, Scott Stults wrote:
Hi Derek,
Could you please add what version of Solr you see this in? I didn't see a
related Jira, so this might warrant a new one.
k/r,
Scott
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.
Hi
Iam using spellcheck and synonyms.I am getting
"java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range:
-1" for some keywords.
I think I managed to narrow down to the likely caused of it.
I have thisline of entry in the synonyms.txt file,
body
which kind of indicates you're
trying to boost on unique values which is unusual.
If you're confident in your model though, the only way to guarantee
what you want is to optimize/expungeDeletes.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
Erick
Yes,
ble.
Upayavira
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6711
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 02:43 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi Upayavira
In fact we are using optimize currently but was advised to use expunge
deletes as it is less resource intensive.
So expunge deletes will only remove deleted docume
ct but did not reflect on dashboard view.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com>
wrote:
Hi
I tried doing a expungeDeletes=true with the following but get the message
'missing content stream'. What am I missing? I need to provide additional
paramet
Hi
I tried doing a expungeDeletes=true with the following but get the
message 'missing content stream'. What am I missing? I need to provide
additional parameters?
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/supplier/update/json?expungeDeletes=true';
Thanks,
Derek
--
Hi
I came across a document that does not has the query field MATCH weight
information in the debugbut the query fields do have the search term in
them.
What can cause this?
Here is some info of the document.
Search keyword is LED
The search fields and their values,
P_CatConcatKeyword =
Hi Upayavira
Thank you for your explanation onthe difference between traditional
grouping and collapsingQParser. I understand more now.
On 6/19/2015 7:11 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015, at 06:20 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I read about collapsingQParser returns the facet count
/
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Derek Poh d...@globalsources.com wrote:
Hi
I read about collapsingQParser returns the facet count the same as
group.truncate=true and has this issue with the facet count and the after
filter facet count notthe same.
Using group.facetdoes not has this issue
Hi
I read about collapsingQParser returns the facet count the same as
group.truncate=true and has this issue with the facet count and the
after filter facet count notthe same.
Using group.facetdoes not has this issue but it's performance is very
badcompared to collapsingQParser.
I trying to
Hi
I am trying to sort on multiple fields. These fields donot necessary
exist in every document.
sort=sppddrank asc, ddrank asc
From the sorted result, it seems that documents which donot have
sppddrank field is at the top.
How can I make the documents that have the sppddrank field to be
, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Hi,
I think you are looking for sortMissing* attributes:
sortMissingLast and sortMissingFirst attributes are optional attributes are
currently supported on types that are sorted internally as strings
and on numeric types.
Ahmet
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:36 AM, Derek Poh d
PM, Derek Poh d...@globalsources.com wrote:
Hi Ahmet
The sortMissingLast and sortMissingFirst attributes are defined at the
field or fieldType level?
field name=P_TSRank type=int indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=false/
fieldType name=int class=solr.TrieIntField precisionStep=0
Level. You might find some reference examples in
schema.xml using them.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Type+Definitions+and+Properties
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Derek Poh d...@globalsources.com wrote:
Hi Ahmet
The sortMissingLast and sortMissingFirst attributes
on the params that are echoed back.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Derek Poh d...@globalsources.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying to search or filter by alist ofdocuments by their ids (product
id field).The requirement is the return documents must be in the same order
as search or filter
Hi
Any advise on this?
Thanks,
Derek
On 4/23/2015 5:17 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
Hi
I am trying to search or filter by alist ofdocuments by their ids
(product id field).The requirement is the return documents must be in
the same order as search or filter by.
Eg.if i search or filter
Hi
I am trying to search or filter by alist ofdocuments by their ids
(product id field).The requirement is the return documents must be in
the same order as search or filter by.
Eg.if i search or filter on the below list of ids, the documents must be
return in the same order too
1083342171
Hi
I have enabled spellcheck but not getting any suggestions
withincorrectly spelled keywords.
I added the spellcheck into the/select request handler.
What steps did I miss out?
spellcheck list in return result:
lst name=spellcheck
lst name=suggestions/
/lst
solrconfig.xml:
requestHandler
240 suppliers.
On 4/1/2015 7:05 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
Exactly correct.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Derek Poh d...@globalsources.com wrote:
Hi Joel
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Using supplier id as the field to collapse
Yonik
Isee. Thank you for the updates.
On 4/3/2015 12:28 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorting the result set or the facets? For the facets there is
facet.sort=index (lexicographically) and facet.sort=count. So maybe you
are
Is sorting on facet index supported?
I would like to sort on the below facet index
lst name=P_SupplierRanking
int name=014/int
int name=18/int
int name=212/int
int name=3349/int
int name=481/int
int
group members that aren't
being expanded?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Derek Poh d...@globalsources.com wrote:
If I want to group the results (by a certain field) even if there is only
1 document, I should use the group parameter instead
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
