, this limitation does not appear to be documented in the Solr
ref guide.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Vinay B,
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:40 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Does updating a child document destroy the parent - child
relationship
When I edit a child document
it
is probably not Solr-related.
Sorry for the inconvenience!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Frederic Esnault
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 11:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about sending solrconfig and schema files with java
Hi Shawn,
Actually i should
Oops! Sorry I missed it. Please post of the rest of the info on SO as well.
We'll get to it!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Frederic Esnault
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 7:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about sending solrconfig and schema files
1. Wildcards do not work within quoted terms.
2. Spaces in terms need to be escaped.
3. The quotes embedded in a term do not need to be escaped.
So, try:
q=*[Steve,\ Wonder,\ ]]
or
q=*[Steve,\ Wonder,\ ]*
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ethan
Sent: Thursday, June 19
, that model is
clearly obsolete.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Apoorva Gaurav
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:15 AM
To: solr-user ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: docFreq coming to be more than 1 for unique id field
Yes we have updates on these. Didn't try optimizing will do
Is this a schema in when the text field is actually populated via
copyField from other fields?
Or maybe not, but the text field may not have been a stored field. It needs
to be one of the two.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: librarymark
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 10
You can easily write a JavaScript snippet using the stateless script update
processor and do whatever string manipulation you want on an input value,
and then write extracted strings to whatever field(s) you want. My e-book
has plenty of script examples.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
Take a look at this:
http://www.slideshare.net/lucenerevolution/wright-nokia-manifoldcfeurocon-2011
Karl has an old Jira patch somewhere for doing the ACLs processing in Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: lalitjangra
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:28 AM
To: solr-user
.
Small is better.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Joe Gresock
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 8:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Large disjunction query practices
I'm wondering what the best practice for large disjunct queries in Solr is.
A user wants to submit
Not currently.
You could have separate explicit fields for the categories such as cat_1,
cat_2, etc. The data would need to be replicated (possibly using a
copyField), but redundancy to facilitate access is a reasonable approach.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
you believe are the most complex queries your
users are likely to need. Start by expressing them clearly in simple, plain
English, unless the structured query is quite obvious.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: harikrishna
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 9:35 AM
To: solr-user
to keep it as text.
You can also use your own update processor to convert to some other text
format. See the stateless script update processor to write a simple
JavaScript script.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 4:32 AM
To: solr-user
Wildcard, fuzzy, and regex query do work on multivalued fields, but on only
a single value at a time. Your match cannot occur across values.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ethan
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 12:52 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Multivalue wild card search
Edismax has field aliasing:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#Field_aliasing_.2F_renaming
f.my_alias.qf=actual_field
f.brand.qf=brand_name
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Antoine LE FLOC'H
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 5:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Oops... for your example it would be:
f.brand_name.qf=brand
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Antoine LE FLOC'H
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 6:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mapping a field name before queryParser
OK thank you.
I wanted to see what's
Yeah, leaving holes as reservations for future fill-in seems like a
reasonable use case.
Why not just have explicit=n as an XML attribute for value. If no
explicit attribute is given, then simply use the previous value plus one. No
need for a separate pair then.
-- Jack Krupansky
As has been suggested on other threads here, the HDS distribution of Solr
from Heliosearch comes preconfigured with Tomcat, so it really is the
easiest way to install Solr with Tomcat.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 8:32 AM
Lucene uses trie for numeric and date fields:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_8_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/NumericRangeQuery.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 5:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Does lucene uses
Unfortunately, field aliasing works above the level of the qf parameter
values.
Maybe the Lucene guys could suggest a way to forcibly rename a field on
disk.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: devraj.jaiman
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:27 AM
To: solr-user
need to know.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Vineet Mishra
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 2:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr maximum Optimal Index Size per Shard
Thanks all for your response.
I presume this conversation concludes that indexing around
Wildcard, fuzzy, and regex query operate on a single term of a single
tokenized field value or a single string field value.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ethan
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:59 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Multivalue wild card search
I can't seem to find
11 * 11 or 121 query terms, which shouldn't be so bad.
But... maybe the Lucene FST for your synonym list is huge. Someone with
deeper Lucene knowledge would have to address that.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 3:57 AM
I think you need to use parameter substitution for those nested queries
since the boost parameter takes a white-space delimited sequence of
function queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 2:22 AM
To: solr-user
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Vineet Mishra
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr maximum Optimal Index Size per Shard
Hi All,
Has anyone came across the maximum threshold document or size wise for each
core of solr to hold.
As I
Anybody care to forecast when hardware will catch up with Solr and we can
routinely look forward to newbies complaining that they indexed some data
and after only 10 minutes they hit this weird 2G document count limit?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent
dug into the new REST API to know the answer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Archana R
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 10:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 4.8 synonyms expansion for each primary term
we recently upgraded to Solr 4.8 and we are using REST API
or docvalues,
right?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 10:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: change in EnumField configuration - what do you think?
Would both then be supported? I see where it would be easily detectable.
And I
Try to stay with a separate collection/core for each tenant - otherwise
relevancy for document scores gets polluted by other tenants, even if you
do use filter queries to isolate what documents get returned for a tenant in
a multi-tenant core.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
When you restart, how long does it take it hit the problem? And how much
query or update activity is happening in that time? Is there any other
activity showing up in the log?
If you bring up only a single node in that problematic shard, do you still
see the problem?
-- Jack Krupansky
Explain your use case a little more, but you can define terms as stop words
with a stop filter, which means they won't appear in the index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Christian Loock
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 5:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Block
Consider using the edismax query parser, which allows you to specify q.alt
which is an alternative query such as *:. Or use an application layer to
handle the situation before it gets to Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vit
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:01 AM
To: solr
Solr-based product. It re-executes enhanced queries in a
query component. I don't think the source is available though. And I don't
recall if it was cloud-enabled.
See:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/lweug/Queries+and+Relevance
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jitka
Sent
Make sure you checkout from the tagged branch, not trunk or the actual
release branch which has updates since the release.
See:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/tags/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: eShard
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 11:55 AM
To: solr-user
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Working+with+Enum+Fields
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: wildcard matches in EnumField - what do I need to change in code to
enable wildcard matches?
Hi all
for this particular thread.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 9:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: wildcard matches in EnumField - what do I need to change in
code to enable wildcard matches?
On 5/29/2014 12:50 AM, Elran Dvir wrote
Post the parsed query itself. Yes, edismax should always generate a
disjunctionmaxquery - in addition to the regexquery.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lokn
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Regex with local params
-MM-dd hh:mm:ss
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss
EEE MMM d hh:mm:ss z
EEE, dd MMM HH:mm:ss zzz
, dd-MMM-yy HH:mm:ss zzz
EEE MMM d HH:mm:ss
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Solr+Cell+using+Apache+Tika
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
You might consider an update request processor as an alternative. It runs on
the server and might be simpler. You can even use the stateless script
update processor to avoid having to write any custom Java code.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: T. Kuro Kurosaka
Sent
:
macbook,mac book
Only use the synonyms filter at index time. The standard query parsers don't
support phrases for synonyms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: rachun
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: about analyzer and tokenizer
Dear
mangled that message as well! Feel free to post the
complete message here as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Manikandan Saravanan
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 1:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Varuna Venkatesh
Subject: Solr - Cores not initialised
Hi,
I’m running
You could also consider DataStax Enterprise, which integrates Apache
Cassandra as the primary database and Solr for indexing and query.
See:
http://www.datastax.com/what-we-offer/products-services/datastax-enterprise
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ali Nazemian
Sent
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 10:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query translation of User Fields
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Jack Krupansky
j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Hmmm... that doesn't sound like
, or maybe
you would have to copy and edit it.
Also, note that the delete command also has a commitWithin setting.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to Disable Commit Option and Just Manage
Is there a particular reason you are adverse to using post.jar? I mean, if
there is some bug or inconvenience, let us know so we can fix it!
The Solr server itself does not provide any ability to crawl file systems
(LucidWorks Search does.) post.jar does provide that convenience.
-- Jack
Feel free to look at the source code for post.jar. I mean, all it is really
doing is scanning the directory (optionally recursively) and then streaming
each file to Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: benjelloun
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 8:15 AM
To: solr-user
Are you sure that you compiled your code with the proper Solr jars so that
the class signature (extends, implements, and constructors) matches the Solr
4.7.2 jars? I mean, Java is simply complaining that your class is not a
valid value source class of the specified type.
-- Jack Krupansky
Yeah, I recall running into infinite loop issues with PDFBox in Solr years
ago. They keep fixing these issues, but they keep popping up again. Sigh.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Goeschl
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
No, I was rejecting BOTH methods 1 and 2. I was suggesting a different
method. I'll leave it to somebody else to describe the method so that it is
easier to understand.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Belenkovich
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:00 AM
To: solr-user
Hmmm... that doesn't sound like what I would have expected - I would have
thought that Solr would throw an exception on the user field, rather than
simply treat it as a text keyword. File a Jira. Either it's a bug or the doc
is not complete.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
No, but it sure would be nice to have the Elasticsearch feature of supplying
a script for update.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Saumitra Srivastav
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 11:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Atomic update by query instead of ID
it.
Or, maybe we should enhance Solr to check available memory and log a stern
warning if the index size exceeds system memory when Solr is started.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
that is different?
For the latter, the fq is purely a filter that removes documents, but the
terms in fq do not participate in relevance or scoring calculation of
documents, so documents will not get boosted based on the terms present in
fq.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
Unfortunately the same query will be sent to all cores if you use the shards
parameter to query multiple cores.
Is there some characteristic of the first core that is distinct from the
second core so that you could OR the differences between the two?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
the filtering terms to participate in the
document scoring.
In other words, what exactly were you trying to achieve by using fq?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using fq
, or add a boosting query
using the bq parameter. The latter approach works for the dismax and edismax
query parsers only.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using fq as OR
Hi
Nothing special for this use case.
This seems to be a use case that I would call bulk data retrieval - based
on ID.
I would suggest batching your requests - limit each request query to, say,
50 or 100 IDs.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Belenkovich
Sent
Yes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vit
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: boosting multivalued fields
is it posiible to boost values of the same field. For example in a query
like
that:
category_id:(2271578^0.5 22718986^0.4
The results will be scored, but only based on terms in q, not terms in fq.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 6:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using fq as OR
Interesting!! I did not know that using fq means
Just add the boost to the keyword: q=toyota^100.
Or, use the dismax or edismax query parsers and then the boost can be
specified for the field: qf=keyword^100.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: manju16832003
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:04 AM
To: solr-user
symptom?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Brian McDowell
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: pdfs
Has anyone had issues with indexing pdf files? Some pdfs are bringing down
Solr completely so that it actually needs to be manually
Your original message had q=toyota featured:true^100 and also using bq -
both are valid. If either is not working for you, please be specific about
what exactly is not behaving as you expected - what the symptom is.
Sometimes you have to experiment with the boost factor.
-- Jack Krupansky
, but there are some examples in my e-book that shows how
to map @ and _ to ALPHA.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Howto Search word which contains the character
Hi,
It is special query parser
document would make it discontiguous with the rest of the block of
documents.
Just update the block by resending the entire block of documents.
For e previous discussion of this limitation:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/block-join-and-atomic-updates-td4117178.html
-- Jack Krupansky
Normally a delete-by-query needs to be distributed to all shards since it is
not known which document keys it will affect.
It sounds like SolrCloud does not support the feature you would really like:
support for distrb=false.
You can file a Jira request for a feature improvement.
-- Jack
Read this web page for information about subscribing:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 6:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Subscribe for Solr Mails
Dear Team
addresses.
And then you could output to multiple fields - one for the raw string for
wildcard matches, say, and one as an integer for proximity or range checks.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: SolrUser1543
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
What are you using for your default query operator, and do you have
autoGeneratePhraseQueries set to true for your field type?
I mean, a query for 192.168.1.4 shouldn't match 192.168.1.3 - unless you
have autoGeneratePhraseQueries set to false (the default.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
, it sure would be nice to see more substantial and easier
to use support for Payload in Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: ienjreny
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 1:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the usage of solr.NumericPayloadTokenFilterFactory
on WDF in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 1:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr
Is the mail list working again yet??
-- Jack Krupansky
For these specific examples, the results should be the same, but mostly
that's because the term is a simple sequence of letters.
I have an extended discussion of characters in terms in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook
query matches such as year without expanding
the date to a range for the full interval.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 6:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: date range queries efficiency
Hi,
There was a mention either
Add the debugQuery=true parameter and look at the timing section to see
which search component is consuming the time. Are you using faceting or
highlighting?
7 million documents is actually a fairly small index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: mizayah
Sent: Wednesday
Inside of quotes you only have to escape quote and backslash.
Add the debugQuery=true parameter to see exactly how Solr processes
characters and generates queries.
But... in a URL you have to URL-encode URL query parameters:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Query_string
-- Jack Krupansky
Please don't re-use an existing message thread for a new, completely
independent question!
Also, try to make the subject line indicate something about the actual
issue.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:56 AM
To: solr-user
rationale?
What is this odd mcat.intent query response writer type that you are
specifying with the qt parameter?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: distrib=false is not honoring
I am trying
://lucene.apache.org/core/4_8_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/classic/package-summary.html#Escaping_Special_Characters
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Romani Rupasinghe
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: KeywordTokenizerFactory
that to dates.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: hakanbillur
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 4:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Indexing DateField timezone problem
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4135079/Capture2.png
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file
Check out HDS from Heliosearch - it comes packaged with Tomcat, ready to go:
http://heliosearch.com/download.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 8:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Easises way to insatll solr cloud
One of the hard-core Lucene guys is going to have to help you out. Or you
may have to write some custom code to fix the index for any such shard. If
you have deleted any documents, it may be sufficient to simply optimize the
index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: yamazaki
I do have basic coverage for that filter (and all other filters) and the
parameter values in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
That said, are you sure you want to be using the payload feature of Lucene
Please post your full field type analyzer. The letter tokenizer should in
fact return I, can, and t - if it is used properly.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: ienjreny
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 8:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: LetterTokenizerFactory
clarify your use case.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Gharbi Mohamed
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 3:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: is it possible for solr to calculate and give back the price of a
product based on its sub-products
Hi,
I am using Solr
such an overstuffed index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: [Tech Fun]山崎
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 8:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Too many documents Exception
Hello everybody,
Solr 4.3.1(and 4.7.1), Num Docs + Deleted Docs
2147483647(Integer.MAX_VALUE) over
Caused
Sorry, but you have to create the schema manually, but... you could possibly
get by with Solr schemaless mode to dynamically create the schema based on
the actual data values.
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schemaless+Mode
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
a
word processor source file will retain smooth curves on characters while a
PDF generated from scanned page images will show heavy pixelation.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 1:30 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
The + symbol means a clause of a boolean query that must be present, as
opposed to should (optionally) be present. This is equivalent to the AND
operator.
The | means OR for a disjunction maximum query to indicates the
alternatives - at least one of the alternatives must match.
-- Jack
Think of debugQuery as your Solr BFF!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 7:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help to Understand a Solr Query
Thank you this is what I was looking for all this time
I wanted to understand
or MappingCharFilterFactory.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Román González
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 7:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Wildcard malfunctioning
Hi all!
Sorry in advance if this question was posted but I were unable to find it
with search engines
Read up on the edismax query parser first:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax
The ^ operator is known as boosting or field boosting and is used to
influence document scores for relevancy.
It has no analog in SQL.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent
dismax means Disjunction Maximum, which means Lucene takes the highest
scoring clause (field), for each search term. This is effectively an OR of
the clauses.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 11:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
the reindex incrementally (as you replace existing documents) as well if you
don't mind if the difference in relevancy takes an extended time to become
apparent.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tracey
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 4:52 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
the document scores look like.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ravi Solr
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 5:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Relevancy help
Hello,
I have a weird relevancy requirement. We search news content hence
chronology is very important and also
The term strict search is not in the Lucene/Solr nomenclature - it could
mean any number of things.
It sounds as if maybe you want to do a phrase search, looking for an exact
phrase - yes, you can do that by enclosing the phrase in quotes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
should start by telling us what you are trying to achieve, in
plain English.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nativecoder
Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 2:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Explain Solr Query Execution
How will a query like below will get executed
be analyzed
at index time for wildcard to work.
Ditto is your filed type uses the word delimiter filter with the split
digits option enabled - the alpha and numeric portions will generate
separate terms - and cause a wildcard to fail.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Geepalem
Wildcards and stemming are incompatible at query time - you need to manually
stem the term before applying your wildcard.
Wildcards are not supported in quoted phrases. They will be treated as
punctuation, and ignored by the standard tokenizer or the word delimiter
filter.
-- Jack Krupansky
Look at the SolrJ source code and doc.
JavaBin is more of a protocol than a file format.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 2:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How can I convert xml message for updating a Solr index
documents containing a phrase - just use the pf, pf2, and pf3 parameters of
edsimax or explicitly boost the phrase, such as research development^20.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: ksmith
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 5:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
, but it is not a substitute for professional review.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: John Thorhauer
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 7:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: dynamic field assignments
I have a scenario where I would like dynamically assign incoming
document fields to two
601 - 700 of 2643 matches
Mail list logo
