A facet heavy query which uses docValue fields for faceting returns about
5k results executes between 10ms to 5 secs and the 5 secs time seems to
coincide with after a hard commit.
Does that have any relation? Why the fluctuation in execution time?
Thanks,
Revas
We recently migrated from 6.6.2 to 8.2. We are seeing issues with indexing
where the leader and the replica document counts do not match. We get
different results every time we do a *:* search.
The only issue we see in the logs is Jira issue : Solr-13293
Has anybody seen similar issues?
Thanks
I am having the following issue on delete and update in solr 4.7.0
*Delete Issue*
I am using the following Curl command to delete a document from index
curl http://localhost:8080/solr/bf/update?commit=true -H Content-Type:
text/xml --data-binary 'deleteid1.0/id/delete'
?xml version=1.0
you with your problem.
Cheers
Angel
On 01.10.2014 09:19, Sujatha Arun wrote:
I am having the following issue on delete and update in solr 4.7.0
*Delete Issue*
I am using the following Curl command to delete a document from index
curl http://localhost:8080/solr/bf
if you issue an explicit update command? i.e.
http://blahlbah/solr/collection/update?commit=true?
Are you sure you aren't seeing, say, browser caching?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, BookId is the unique key, the issue is resolved
this problem come by
the boards.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Erick,
Actually I am synching data between solr and Mongodb using
mongo-connector.The details below. I have submitterd an issue in
Mongo-conenctor forum,just trying
Hi,
I am able to use TIKA and DIH to Index a pdf as a single document.However
I need each page to be single document. Is there any inbuilt mechanism to
achieve the same or do I have to use pdfbox or any other tool achieve this?
Regards
Hi ,
We have been using solr 3.6.1 .Recently downloaded the solr 4.3.1 version
and installed the same as multicore setup as follows
Folder Structure
solr.war
solr
conf
core0
core1
solr.xml
Created the context fragment xml file in
#Using_the_example_logging_setup_in_containers_other_than_Jetty
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
We have been using solr 3.6.1 .Recently downloaded the solr 4.3.1
version
and installed the same as multicore setup as follows
Folder Structure
Hi Andre,
In 3.6.1 version when we used the entities in schema.xml for language
analyzers ,it gave errors on server restart and core would not load .
Regards,
Sujatha
2013/4/12 Andre Bois-Crettez andre.b...@kelkoo.com
On 04/12/2013 09:31 AM, stockii wrote:
hello.
is it possible to
Hi,
We are comparing search request latency between Amazon Vs Dedicated
hosting [Rackspace] .For comparison we used solr version 3.6.1 and Amazon
small instance.The index size was less than 1GB.
We see that the latency is about 75 -100 % from Amazon. Any body who has
migrated form Dedicated
Hi,
We are planning to set up *2* *High-Memory Quadruple Extra Large Instance *as
master and slave for our multicore solr setup which has more than 200
cores spread between a couple of webapps on a single JVM on *AWS*
All indexing [via a queue will go to master ] . One Slave Server will
into
slave, but that's going to mean some down time...
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are planning to set up *2* *High-Memory Quadruple Extra Large Instance
*as
master
Is there anything wrong with set up?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Otis,
Since currently we are planning for only one slave due to cost
considerations, can we have an ELB fronting the master and slave for HA.
1. All index requests will go
. It will greatly reduce your
costs.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
, and more slaves.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Otis,Michael,
Thanks for your input and suggestions .
Yes, we were considering the sticky session for pagination and we
We have a multicore setup with more that 200 cores . Some of the cores have
different schema based on the search type /language.
While trying to migrate to Master /Slave set up.
I see that we can specify the Master /Slave properties in
solrcore.properties file . However does this have to done
Hi,
We are on solr 3.6.1 on Tomcat 5.5.25 . The Indexing of polish content
throws the following error .
*Caused by: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxIOException: Invalid UTF-8 middle byte
0x77 (at char #166, byte #127)*
at com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.throwFromIOE(StreamScanner.java:708)
at
Thanks for the pointer , but given the same index code ,why does this not
work in solr 3.6.1 but wors fine in solr 1.3
Any idea?
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi,
You've likely got some non-character code points in your data
Hi,
I need suggestion on solr Autocomplete for Full content with Filter query.
I have currently implemented this as below
1. Solr version 3.6.1
2. solr.StandardTokenizerFactory
3. EdgeNGramFilterFactory with maxGramSize=25 minGramSize=1
4. Stored the content field
5. Use the
Hi,
I need suggestion on solr Autocomplete for Full content with Filter query.
I have currently implemented this as below
1. Solr version 3.6.1
2. solr.StandardTokenizerFactory
3. EdgeNGramFilterFactory with maxGramSize=25 minGramSize=1
4. Stored the content field
5. Use the
/requestHandler
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Sujatha Arun
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: AutoComplete with FiterQuery for Full content
Hi,
I need suggestion on solr Autocomplete for Full content with Filter query.
I
Hi,
Our current architecture is as follows ,
- Single server [ On which we do both Indexing and Searching]
- Solr version 3.6.1 Multicores
- We have several small big indexes as cores within a webapp
- Our Indexing to the individual cores happen via an index queue ,due to
which
assumptions are correct. In
short, if the performance hit is too big then you simply need more ec2
instances (some have high cpu, some memory, some disk IO ... pick wisely).
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 10, 2013 4:44 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Hi ,
Our requirement is have a separate schema for every language which differs
in the field type definition for language based analysis.If I have a
standard schema which differs only in the language analysis part ,which can
be inserted by any of the 3 methods in the schema.xml as mentioned in
Anyone with suggestions on this?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Our requirement for auto complete is slightly complicated , We need two
types of auto complete
1. Meta data Auto complete
2. Full text Content Auto complete
In addition
Any Suggestions on this?
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I want suggestions for full content of several books with a filter
that restricts suggestions to a single book .However the best options of
suggester and terms component do
Hi,
A few question on Solr Auto suggest below
Q1)I tried using the Index based Suggest functionality with solr 3.6.1 ,
can I combine this with file based boosting .Currently when I specify the
index field and the sourcelocation,the file in the source location is not
considered.
Is there any
Thanks ,that worked.
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Iwan Hanjoyo ihanj...@gmail.com wrote:
you can download the code directly from here
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com/
hi,
I am unable to unzip the 5883_Code.zip file for solr 1.4 from paktpub site
.I get the error message
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
latter case the central directory and
did get some files by jar unpacking ,but could not get the ones I wanted
...thanks anyway !!
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Toke Eskildsen t...@statsbiblioteket.dkwrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 13:08 +0200, Sujatha Arun wrote:
I am unable to unzip the 5883_Code.zip file for solr 1.4 from
, Sujatha Arun wrote:
Hello,
In the case where there are over 200+ cores on a single node , is it
recommended to go with Tiered MP with segment size of 4 ? Our Index size
vary from a few MB to 4 GB .
Will there be any issue with Too many open files and the number of
indexes with respect to MP
Hello,
In the case where there are over 200+ cores on a single node , is it
recommended to go with Tiered MP with segment size of 4 ? Our Index size
vary from a few MB to 4 GB .
Will there be any issue with Too many open files and the number of
indexes with respect to MP ? At the moment we are
Hi,
On migrating from 1.3 to 3.6.1 , I see the query performance degrading by
nearly 2 times for all types of query. Indexing performance slight
degradation over 1.3 For Indexing we use our custom scripts that post xml
over HTTP.
Any thing that I might have missed . I am thinking that this
...@basetechnology.comwrote:
*
Run a query on both old and new with debugQuery=true on your query
request and look at the component timings for possible insight.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Sujatha Arun
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 7:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Performance
Any comments on this?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jack.
so Qtime = Sum of all prepare components + sum of all process components -
Debug comp process/prepare time
In 3.6.1 the process part of Query component for the following query
in 1.3 to avoid the too
many open file issue which we had encountered.
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Any comments on this?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Jack.
so Qtime = Sum
couldn't find any.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Sujatha Arun
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 10:00 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compond File Format Advice needed - On migration to 3.6.1
anybody?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Sujatha Arun
Hi,
I am unable to create compound Index format in 3.6.1 inspite of setting
useCompoundFile as true. I do not see any .cfs file ,instead all the
.fdx,frq etc are seen and I see the segments_8 even though the mergefactor
is at 4 . Should I not see only 4 segment files at any time?
Please find
be compound
format ,irrespective of *noCFSRatio .*
*
*
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to create compound Index format in 3.6.1 inspite of setting
useCompoundFile as true. I do not see any .cfs file ,instead all the
.fdx,frq
Hi ,
The default Index file creation format in 3.6.1 [migrating from 1.3]
in-spite of setting the usecompoundfile to true seems to be to create non
compound files due to Lucene
2790https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790
.
I have tried the following ,but everything seems to create non
anybody?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
The default Index file creation format in 3.6.1 [migrating from 1.3]
in-spite of setting the usecompoundfile to true seems to be to create non
compound files due to Lucene
2790https
issue was closed in 3.1. This must be some other problem.
4) You can pick another merge policy if TieredMergePolicy does not work
for you.
- Original Message -
| From: Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
| To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
| Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 10:12:13 AM
3.6 so that the keys of the
extra documents mapped to other existing keys in Solr 1.3, causing the
extra documents to overwrite existing documents in Solr 1.3.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Sujatha Arun
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 2:39 AM
To: solr-user
://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just migrated to 3.6.1 from 1.3 version with the following observation
Indexed content using the same source
1.3
3.6.1
Hi,
Just migrated to 3.6.1 from 1.3 version with the following observation
Indexed content using the same source
*1.3
3.6.1*
Number of documents indexed 11505 13937
Index Time - Full Index
://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
If I am looking to implement Suggester Implementation with 3.6.1 ,I
beleive
this creates it own index , now If I want to also use the spellcheck
also
,would it be using the same
Hi ,
If I am looking to implement Suggester Implementation with 3.6.1 ,I beleive
this creates it own index , now If I want to also use the spellcheck also
,would it be using the same index as suggester?
Regards
Sujatha
, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
If we are migrating from 1.3 ,which is the current stable version that we
should be looking at 3.6.1 or 3.6.2 ?
Regards
Sujatha
if we pre assigning the cache values in the solrconfig.xml as follows for
each core [solr 1.3] .IS the RAM memory pre assigned as follows per core
and how much would be used for each .Would I be able to calculate the RAM
reserved for each cache.since we have many such cores with the same Cache
sure they exist in 1.3.
Good luck
Erick
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we use the patch 2429 in solr 1.3?
Regards
Sujatha
Can we use the patch 2429 in solr 1.3?
Regards
Sujatha
the
documents.
Erik
On Aug 17, 2012, at 02:21 , Sujatha Arun wrote:
Hello,
One of the Index in a multicore set up has a 3GB+ index ,and it seems to
take around 5000ms+ to return simple boolean queries . The Index is
not optimized
Would it make sense to shard the index
, at 06:35 , Sujatha Arun wrote:
Hi Erick,
The number of documents is : 4389048
I have given 2 queries below with timing and the number of hits
INFO: [ipc_widget_search] webapp=/multicore_5 path=/select/
params={version=2.1fl=*+scorestylesheet=qt=standardfq=rows=100start=0q
.
Also, what's the query parse output? I imagine you're doing a boolean OR
query across all those terms (include a), yes? Maybe you'd rather the
operator be AND?
Erik
On Aug 17, 2012, at 08:01 , Sujatha Arun wrote:
No customization,its the default standard request handler.Solr
Sorry typo ,I meant upwards of 20s at any time. What should I be looking at?
Regards
Sujatha
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik,
What could be the issue Load / I/O ? It seems to shows upwards of 20 ms
at any time
Regards
Sujatha
On Fri, Aug
fast and when they became slow?
Thanks.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Sujatha Arun
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Muticore Sharding
Sorry typo ,I meant upwards of 20s at any time. What should I be looking
Hi ,
I would like to write a custom component for solr to address a particular
issue.
This is what I have been doing ,write the custom code directly in the
downloaded code base and rebuild the war file and deploy the same. We
currently have multiple cores ,hence I want to approach this in a
Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I would like to write a custom component for solr to address a
particular
issue
class.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Adding a new class
., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks ,I am going to try this on solr 1.3 version .Would the approach be
any different for the recent sorl versions?
Regards
or similar acl mechanism for your container.
SolrACLSecurity is for controlling fine-grained access to data within a
core.
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter,
In a multicore environment , where should the acl file reside , under
I am uable to use the rar file from the site
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872.
When I try to open it,I get the message 'SolrACLSecurity.rar is not RAR
archive.
Is the file there at this link?
Regards
Sujatha
later version --
SolrACLSecurity.java
26kb 12 Apr 2010 10:35
Thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I am uable to use the rar file from the site
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872.
When I try to open it,I get the message
Renamed to zip and worked fine,thanks
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks ,was looking to the rar file for instructions on set up .
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Peter Sturge peter.stu...@gmail.comwrote:
I
Peter,
In a multicore environment , where should the acl file reside , under the
conf directory ,Can I use a acl file per core ?
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Renamed to zip and worked fine,thanks
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Jul 31
Hello,
When we migrated the solr webapps to a new server in production,We did an
rsync of all the indexes in our old server . On checking with Jconsole
,the OS free Ram was already filled to twice the Index size .There is no
other service in this server. The rsync was done twice.
Even though
of the solrconfig.xml's maxBooleanClauses value. The first
core to be loaded wins. Or, maybe the source code is wrong. Either way, a
correction is needed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Sujatha Arun
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 1:30 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solr 1.3
Yes ,that is correct.
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:23 PM, lboutros boutr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Suajtha,
each webapps has its own solr home ?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
solr 1.3
Regards
Sujatha
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Siva Kommuri snv.komm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sujatha,
Which version of Solr are you using?
Best Wishes,
Siva
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes ,that is correct.
Regards
Hello,
The solrcore Wiki says that Lucene's
BooleanQueryhttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/BooleanQuerymaxClauseCount
is a static variable, making it a single value across the
entire JVM. Whichever Solr core initializes last will win the setting of
the solrconfig.xml's maxBooleanClauses value.
Hello ,
We have a multicore webapp for every 50 cores.Currently 3 Multicore webapps
and 150 cores distributed across the 3 webapps.
When we re started the server [Tomcat] ,we noticed that the solr.xml was
wiped out and we could not see any cores in webapp1 and webapp3 ,but only
a few cores in
you will have to create the directory and configs yourself .you will need
to call the command once you create the directory and give permissions ,the
following url only creates the data folder and makes an entry in solr.xml
Refer :http://blog.dustinrue.com/archives/690
Regards
Sujahta
On Wed,
Hello ,
I see that the code cache in the JVM is nearing its memory limits 47mb
/assigned in 50 MB .On deploying more solr webapps to the server,Will i
get any out of memory exceptions ? and will JVM freeze?
How should this be handled?
Regards
Sujatha
Sujatha,
You will likely have to increase the JVM permgen space for your
container when you launch it. This is normal. How you do this depends on
the container you're using and how you launch it.
Michael
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 16:54 +0530, Sujatha Arun wrote:
Hello ,
I see that the code
From: Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 7:24 AM
Subject: Solr Webapps and JVM code cache
Hello ,
I see that the code cache in the JVM is nearing its memory limits 47mb
/assigned in 50 MB .On deploying more solr webapps
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now the reason ,I have used different webapps instead of a single one for
the cores is ,while prototyping ,I discovered that ,when one of the cores
index is corrupt ,the entire webapp does not start up and the same must
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:24 +0530, Sujatha Arun wrote:
Hello,
*Background* :For each of our customers, we create 3 solr webapps with
different search schema's,serving different search requirements and we
have about 70 customers.So we have about 210 webapps curently .
*Hardware*: Single
Hello,
*Background* :For each of our customers, we create 3 solr webapps with
different search schema's,serving different search requirements and we
have about 70 customers.So we have about 210 webapps curently .
*Hardware*: Single Server , one JVM , Heap memory 19GB ,Total Ram :32GB ,
Permgen
...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes ,I must have mis-copied and yes, i do have the conf folder per core
with schema etc ...
Because of this issue ,we have decided to have multiple webapps with
about
50 cores per webapp ,instead
Hello,
I am having an issue with range query in solr 1.3 .
query is price: [ 1 TO 20 ] is returning values out of this range ,like
23.00 AND 55.00 .The field type of the price field is sfloat .
When I check this form admin Debug query ,I am seeing junk instead of price.
example:
str
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Suppose I have several cores in a single webapp ,I have issue with Index
beong corrupted in one core ,or schema /solrconfig of one core is not
well
formed ,then entire webapp refused to load on server restart
etc.
I suspect you've simply mis-copied something.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I was migrating to cores from webapp ,and I was copying a bunch of
indexes
from webapps to respective cores ,when I restarted ,I had this issue
where
Hello,
Suppose I have several cores in a single webapp ,I have issue with Index
beong corrupted in one core ,or schema /solrconfig of one core is not well
formed ,then entire webapp refused to load on server restart?
Why does this happen?
Regards
Sujatha
Hello,
When I issue this query to create a new Solr Core , I get the error message
HTTP Status 500 - Can't find resource 'solrconfig.xml' in classpath or
'/home/searchuser/searchinstances/multi_core_prototype/solr/conf/
http://
Hello All,
On Protyping from moving from solr Multiple Webapps to Solr Multi Cores
[1.3 Version both]..I am running into the following issues and Questions
1) We are primarily moving to Multicore because ,we saw the Permgen memory
being increased ,each time we created a new solr webapp ,so
PermGen. Accd. to this,
you should use both this and ClassUnload:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3717937/cmspermgensweepingenabled-vs-cmsclassunloadingenabled
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
When Loading multiple solr instances in JVM ,we see
, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single
JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with each
additional instance added.
I would Like to know ,if we can have solr cores
Hello,
We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single
JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with each
additional instance added.
I would Like to know ,if we can have solr cores , instead of individual
instances.
- Is there any limit to the
erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
This only really makes sense if you don't have enough in-house resources
to do your indexing locally, but it certainly is possible.
Amazon's EC2 has been used, but really any hosting service should do.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Sujatha
Would it make sense to Index on the cloud and periodically [2-4 times
/day] replicate the index at our server for searching .Which service to go
with for solr Cloud Indexing ?
Any good and tried services?
Regards
Sujatha
Hello,
I am Looking into trigger point for sharding Indexes based on response time
,and would like to define an acceptable response time.
Given a 3GB index ,when Can i think of sharding .The response times being
variable based on the query and varies from 100ms to
600ms .We are running solr
hi ,
I am planning to try Sematext Monitoring. Is there anything to watch out
for ?
Regards
Sujatha
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:21 PM, karsten-s...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Spark,
2009 there was a monitor from lucidimagination:
. (In Windows it may not throw away the old one until the next
Commit).
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Sujatha Arun [mailto:suja.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 12:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Optimization /Commit memory
Just one more thing ,when
, I have not found that to be the case.
This is just one of those your mileage may vary things. There is not a
single answer or formula that fits every situation.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Sujatha Arun [mailto:suja.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 11:58 PM
head will go nuts
trying to handle all of the requests.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Sujatha Arun [mailto:suja.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 12:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Otis Gospodnetic
Subject: Re: OS Cache - Solr
Thanks ,Otis
Just one more thing ,when we are talking about Optimization , we
are referring to HD free space for replicating the index (2 or 3 times
the index size ) .what is role of RAM (OS) here?
Regards
Suajtha
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
Do we require 2 or 3 Times OS RAM memory or Hard Disk Space while
performing Commit or Optimize or Both?
what is the requirement in terms of size of RAM and HD for commit and
Optimize
Regards
Sujatha
temporarily.
How much disk space depends very much upon how big your index is in the
first place. A 2 to 3 times factor of the sum of your peak index file size
seems safe, to me.
Solr uses only modest amounts of memory for the JVM for this stuff.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Sujatha
200 instances of Solr all accessing the same physical disk, the
results are not likely to be satisfactory - the disk head will go nuts
trying to handle all of the requests.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Sujatha Arun [mailto:suja.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 12:25
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
