Help understanding with Arbitrary Rectangle

as to why this isn't working, there are no errors being shown to help debug this. Any ideas what or what isn't going on will be welcomed. Thanks

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

). I have a need to find out a > > configuration where I can delete a shard , when number of documents > reaches > > to zero in the shard , can some one help me out to achieve that ? > > > > > > It is urgent , so a quick response will be highly appreciated . > >

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

/guide/7_5/time-routed-aliases.html >> >> Assuming your TTL isn’t a fixed-interval, you can configure >> DocExpirationUpdateProcessorFactory to deal with TTL automatically. >> >> And if you still think you need to handle this, you need to explain exactly >> what pro

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

ory to deal with TTL automatically. > > And if you still think you need to handle this, you need to explain exactly > what problem you’re trying to solve because so far it appears that > you’re simply taking on way more work than you need to. > > Best, > Erick > > > O

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

because so far it appears that you’re simply taking on way more work than you need to. Best, Erick > On Dec 1, 2020, at 9:46 AM, Pushkar Mishra wrote: > > Hi Team, > As I explained the use case , can someone help me out to find out the > configuration way to delete the shard here ? >

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

Hi Team, As I explained the use case , can someone help me out to find out the configuration way to delete the shard here ? A quick response will be greatly appreciated. Regards Pushkar On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:32 PM Pushkar Mishra wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, 9:15 PM Pushk

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

ally sounds like an XY problem. What’s the use case you’re trying >> to support where you expect a shard’s number of live docs to drop to zero? >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> > On Nov 30, 2020, at 4:57 AM, Pushkar Mishra >> wrote: >> > >> >

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

e docs to drop to zero? > > Best, > Erick > > > On Nov 30, 2020, at 4:57 AM, Pushkar Mishra > wrote: > > > > Hi Solr team, > > > > I am using solr cloud.(version 8.5.x). I have a need to find out a > > configuration where I can delete

Re: Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

eed to find out a > configuration where I can delete a shard , when number of documents reaches > to zero in the shard , can some one help me out to achieve that ? > > > It is urgent , so a quick response will be highly appreciated . > > Thanks > Pushkar > > -- > Pushkar

Need help to configure automated deletion of shard in solr

Hi Solr team, I am using solr cloud.(version 8.5.x). I have a need to find out a configuration where I can delete a shard , when number of documents reaches to zero in the shard , can some one help me out to achieve that ? It is urgent , so a quick response will be highly appreciated . Thanks

Re: security.json help

Hi Mark, It looks like you're using the "path" wildcard as it's intended, but some bug is causing the behavior you're seeing. It should be working as you expected, but evidently it's not. One potential workaround might be to leave out the "path" property entirely in your "custom-example"

Re: Need help to resolve Apache Solr vulnerability

ool. So can > you please check the below details and help us to fix this issue. > > /etc/init.d/solr-master version > > Server version: Apache Tomcat/7.0.62 > Server built: May 7 2015 17:14:55 UTC > Server number: 7.0.62.0 > OS Name: Linux > OS Version: 2.6.32-43

Need help to resolve Apache Solr vulnerability

Hi Team, Currently we are facing the below vulnerability for Apache Solr tool. So can you please check the below details and help us to fix this issue. /etc/init.d/solr-master version Server version: Apache Tomcat/7.0.62 Server built: May 7 2015 17:14:55 UTC Server number: 7.0.62.0 OS Name

Re: Need help in understanding the below error message when running solr-exporter

Can someone help on the above pls?? On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 6:22 AM yaswanth kumar wrote: > Using Solr 8.2; Zoo 3.4; Solr mode: Cloud with multiple collections; Basic > Authentication: Enabled > > I am trying to run the > > export JAVA_OPTS="-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStor

security.json help

Hey, I'm new to configuring Solr. I'm trying to configure Solr with Rule Based Authorization. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/rule-based-authorization-plugin.html I have permissions working if I allow everything with "all", but I want to limit access so that a site can only access its

Need help in understanding the below error message when running solr-exporter

these below messages and on the grafana solr dashboard I do see panels coming in but data is not populating on them. Can someone help me if I am missing something interms of configuration? WARN - 2020-10-17 11:17:59.687; org.apache.solr.prometheus.scraper.Async; Error occurred durin

Re: Need urgent help -- High cpu on solr

In addition to the insightful pointers by Zisis and Erick, I would like to mention an approach in the link below that I generally use to pinpoint exactly which threads are causing the CPU spike. Knowing this you can understand which aspect of Solr (search thread, GC, update thread etc) is taking

Re: Need urgent help -- High cpu on solr

Zisis makes good points. One other thing is I’d look to see if the CPU spikes coincide with commits. But GC is where I’d look first. Continuing on with the theme of caches, yours are far too large at first glance. The default is, indeed, size=512. Every time you open a new searcher, you’ll be

Re: Need urgent help -- High cpu on solr

The values you have for the caches and the maxwarmingsearchers do not look like the default. Cache sizes are 512 for the most part and maxwarmingsearchers are 2 (if not limit them to 2) Sudden CPU spikes probably indicate GC issues. The # of documents you have is small, are they huge documents?

Need urgent help -- High cpu on solr

I am using solr 8.2 with zoo 3.4, and configured 5 node solr cloud with around 100 collections each collection having ~20k documents. These nodes are vm's with 6 core cpu and 2 cores per socket. All of sudden seeing hikes on CPU's and which brought down some nodes (GONE state on solr cloud and

Need help in trying to understand the error

I am seeing the below errors frequently on the solr logs, every functionality seems to be working fine but not really sure why there are lots of these errors happening in the backend Using : solr8.2, zoo 3.4 we have enable solr basicauthentication with security.json 2020-10-13 20:37:12.320 ERROR

Re: Help with uploading files to a core.

wrote: > > Hello! My name is Guilherme and I'm a new user of Solr. > > Basically, I'm developing a database to help a research team in my > university, but I'm having some problems uploading the files to the > database. Either using curl commands or through the admin interface, I > c

Re: Help with uploading files to a core.

On 10/11/2020 2:28 PM, Guilherme dos Reis Meneguello wrote: Hello! My name is Guilherme and I'm a new user of Solr. Basically, I'm developing a database to help a research team in my university, but I'm having some problems uploading the files to the database. Either using curl commands

Help with uploading files to a core.

Hello! My name is Guilherme and I'm a new user of Solr. Basically, I'm developing a database to help a research team in my university, but I'm having some problems uploading the files to the database. Either using curl commands or through the admin interface, I can't quite upload the files from

Re: Help using Noggit for streaming JSON data

Yonic, Thanks for the reply, and apologies for the long delay in this reply. Also apologies for top-posting, I’m writing from my phone. :( Oh, of course... simply subclass the CharArr. In my case, I should be able to immediately base64-decode the value (saves 1/4 in-memory representation)

Re: Help using Noggit for streaming JSON data

See this method: /** Reads a JSON string into the output, decoding any escaped characters. */ public void getString(CharArr output) throws IOException And then the idea is to create a subclass of CharArr to incrementally handle the string that is written to it. You could overload write

Help using Noggit for streaming JSON data

All, Is this an appropriate forum for asking questions about how to use Noggit? The Github doesn't have any discussions available and filing an "issue" to ask a question is kinda silly. I'm happy to be redirected to the right place if this isn't appropriate. I've been able to figure out most

SolrJ and AWS help!

Hi, I’m a student working on a personal project that uses SolrJ to search a database using a solr core that lives on an AWS instance. Currently, I am using EmbeddedSolrServer() to initialize a Solr core. CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new CoreContainer.Initializer(); CoreContainer

Re: BasicAuth help

ks, Dwane From: Jan Høydahl Sent: Monday, 7 September 2020 5:21 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: BasicAuth help That github patch is interesting. My initial proposal for how to plug LDAP into Solr was to make the AuthenticationProvider pluggable in BasicAuthPlugin, so you

Re: BasicAuth help

That github patch is interesting. My initial proposal for how to plug LDAP into Solr was to make the AuthenticationProvider pluggable in BasicAuthPlugin, so you could plug in an LDAPAuthProvider. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8951

Re: BasicAuth help

    There is an effective alternative approach to placing authentication within Solr. It is to use the web server (say Apache) as a smart proxy to Solr and in so doing also apply access restrictions of various kinds. Thus Solr remains intact, no addition needed for authentication, and

Re: BasicAuth help

Try looking at a simple ldap authentication suggested here: https://github.com/itzmestar/ldap_solr You can combine this for authentication and couple it with rule based authorization. > On Aug 28, 2020, at 12:26 PM, Vanalli, Ali A - DOT

Re: BasicAuth help

Hi Ali, 1. Solr doesn't have any support for LDAP authentication ootb (at least, as far as I'm aware). The BasicAuth plugin requires users to be defined in the JSON configuration. 2. What failed when you ran the documented BasicAuth example? What error messages did you get etc.? If there's

BasicAuth help

Hello, Solr is running on windows machine and wondering if it possible to setup BasicAuth with the LDAP? Also, tried the example of Basic-Authentication that is published here but

Re: Production Issue: TIMED_WAITING - Will net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 help?

ed for >>>> > HttpDestination", >>>> > >>>> > >>>> solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/Http2SolrClient.java: >>>> >private static final int MAX_OUTSTANDING_REQUESTS = 1000; >>>> > >&g

Re: Production Issue: TIMED_WAITING - Will net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 help?

; >>> > how can I increase this? >>> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:01 AM Doss wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > We are having 3 node SOLR (8.3.1 NRT) + 3 Node Zookeeper Ensemble >>> now and >>> > > then we are facing "Max requests queued per destination 3000 >>> exceeded for >>> > > HttpDestination" >>> > > >>> > > After restart evering thing starts working fine until another >>> problem. >>> > > Once a problem occurred we are seeing soo many TIMED_WAITING threads >>> > > >>> > > Server 1: >>> > >*7722* Threads are in TIMED_WATING >>> > > >>> > ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ >>> ConditionObject@151d5f2f >>> > > ") >>> > > Server 2: >>> > >*4046* Threads are in TIMED_WATING >>> > > >>> > ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ >>> ConditionObject@1e0205c3 >>> > > ") >>> > > Server 3: >>> > >*4210* Threads are in TIMED_WATING >>> > > >>> > ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ >>> ConditionObject@5ee792c0 >>> > > ") >>> > > >>> > > Please suggest whether net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 will help ? or how >>> can we >>> > > increase the 3000 limit? >>> > > >>> > > Sorry, since I haven't got any response to my previous query, I am >>> > > creating this as new, >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Mohandoss. >>> > > >>> > >>> >>

Re: Production Issue: TIMED_WAITING - Will net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 help?

node SOLR (8.3.1 NRT) + 3 Node Zookeeper Ensemble now >> and >> > > then we are facing "Max requests queued per destination 3000 exceeded >> for >> > > HttpDestination" >> > > >> > > After restart evering thing starts working fine u

Re: Production Issue: TIMED_WAITING - Will net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 help?

gt; > > > > > Server 1: > > >*7722* Threads are in TIMED_WATING > > > > > > ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@151d5f2f > > > ") > > > Server 2: > > >*4046

Re: Production Issue: TIMED_WAITING - Will net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 help?

.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@1e0205c3 > > ") > > Server 3: > >*4210* Threads are in TIMED_WATING > > > ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@5ee792c0 > > ") > > > > Please suggest whether net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 will help ? or how can we > > increase the 3000 limit? > > > > Sorry, since I haven't got any response to my previous query, I am > > creating this as new, > > > > Thanks, > > Mohandoss. > > >

Re: Production Issue: TIMED_WAITING - Will net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 help?

f2f > ") > Server 2: >*4046* Threads are in TIMED_WATING > ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@1e0205c3 > ") > Server 3: >*4210* Threads are in TIMED_WATING > ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.lock

Fwd: Help For solr in data config.xml regarding fetching record

Hi Team, I need some help regarding this issue I have posted it on nabble but no response yet kindly check the shared link please provided an solution .if not please reply with a suggested solution/mail where i can get help regarding this issue. https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-Help

Production Issue: TIMED_WAITING - Will net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 help?

ctQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@1e0205c3 ") Server 3: *4210* Threads are in TIMED_WATING ("lock":"java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@5ee792c0 ") Please suggest whether net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 will help ? or how can we increase the 3000 li

Re: partial search help request

working for me. Is it version 8? > > StandardTokenizerFactory didn't work and when I was trying with the > KeywordTokenizerFactory it wasn't even matching the full search term. > > If anyone can shed any light, then I'd be grateful. > > Thanks. > > > > >

Re: partial search help request

; StandardTokenizerFactory didn't work and when I was trying with the > KeywordTokenizerFactory it wasn't even matching the full search term. > If anyone can shed any light, then I'd be grateful. > Thanks. > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:12 PM Philip Smith wrote: > Hello, &

Re: partial search help request

with the KeywordTokenizerFactory it wasn't even matching the full search term. If anyone can shed any light, then I'd be grateful. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:12 PM Philip Smith wrote: > Hello, > I'm new to Solr and to this user group. Any help with this problem > would be greatly ap

partial search help request

Hello, I'm new to Solr and to this user group. Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated. I'm trying to get partial keyword search results working. This seems like a fairly common problem, I've found numerous google results offering solutions for instance https://stackoverflow.com

Re: sorting help

That’s a good place to start. The idea was to make sure titles that started with a date would not always be at the forefront and the actual title of the doc would be sorted. > On Jul 15, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Yeah, it’s always a question “how much is enough/too much”.

Re: sorting help

Yeah, it’s always a question “how much is enough/too much”. That looks reasonable for alphatitle, but what about title? Your original question was that the sorting changes depending on which field you sort on. If your title field uses something that tokenizes or doesn’t include the same analysis

Re: sorting help

thanks, ill check the admin, didnt want to send a big clock of text but: - - Tokenizer: org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.KeywordTokenizerFactoryclass: solr.KeywordTokenizerFactoryluceneMatchVersion: 7.1.0 - Token Filters:

Re: sorting help

I’d look two places: 1> try the admin/analysis page from the admin UI. In particular, look at what tokens actually get in the index. 2> again, the admin UI will let you choose the field (alphatitle and title) and see what the actual indexed tokens are. Both have the issue that I don’t know

sorting help

howdy, i have a field that sorts fine all other content, and i cant seem to debug why it wont sort for me on this one chunk of it. "sort":"alphatitle asc", "debugQuery":"on", "_":"1594733127740"}}, "response ":{"numFound":3,"start":0,"docs":[ { "title":"Money orders", { "title":"Finance,

Needs Help for Using Jaeger to Trace Solr

ed online and probably it is an unfixed bug of Solr (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8552). So this also doesn’t work.Again, as I am new to Solr and Jaeger, I am not sure whether these operations are stupid or not :-(. So I do hope that I can get some help from your team for making Jaeger an

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

can be very complex with 100s of >>> wildcard and proximity terms in it. Different grouping option are also >>> enabled on search result. And the search queries vary a lot. >>> >>> Oh, another thing, are you concerned about availability? Do you have a >>>

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

queries vary a lot. > > > > Oh, another thing, are you concerned about availability? Do you have a > > replication factor > 1? Do you run those replicas in a different region > for > > safety? > > How many zookeepers are you running and where are they? > > A

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

ou run those replicas in a different region for > safety? > How many zookeepers are you running and where are they? > As of now we do not have any replication factor. We are not using zookeeper > ensemble but would like to move to it sooner. > > Best, > Modassar > >

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

gt; Yes the entire extra IOPs were never used to full other than a couple of > spike in its usage. So not able to understand how the increased IOPs makes > so much of difference. > Can you please help me understand what it involves to optimise? Is it the > more RAM/IOPs? > > Sear

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

other than a couple of spike in its usage. So not able to understand how the increased IOPs makes so much of difference. Can you please help me understand what it involves to optimise? Is it the more RAM/IOPs? Search response time is very important. Please advise if we increase the shard with extra

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

We are not using zookeeper ensemble but would like to move to it sooner. Best, Modassar On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:19 AM Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 5/20/2020 11:43 AM, Modassar Ather wrote: > > Can you please help me with following few questions? > > > > - What is the ideal inde

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

On 5/20/2020 11:43 AM, Modassar Ather wrote: Can you please help me with following few questions? - What is the ideal index size per shard? We have no way of knowing that. A size that works well for one index use case may not work well for another, even if the index size in both cases

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

- CPU(s) : 64 > - RAM : 512GB > - EBS size : 7 TB (For indexing as well as index optimisation.) > - IOPs : 3 (For faster index optimisation) > > > Can you please help me with following few questions? > > - What is the ideal index size per

Re: Need help on handling large size of index.

CPU(s) : 64 > - RAM : 512GB > - EBS size : 7 TB (For indexing as well as index optimisation.) > - IOPs : 3 (For faster index optimisation) > > > Can you please help me with following few questions? > > - What is the ideal index size per shard? > - The

Need help on handling large size of index.

instance type : r5a.16xlarge - CPU(s) : 64 - RAM : 512GB - EBS size : 7 TB (For indexing as well as index optimisation.) - IOPs : 3 (For faster index optimisation) Can you please help me with following few questions? - What is the ideal index size per shard

requesting help on auto scaling of solr

Hello, I am trying to add auto scaling for a cluster that is hosted on aws I am using cluster policy as { "set-cluster-policy": [ { "replica": "<2", "shard": "#EACH", "node": "#ANY" } ] } Node-added-trigger { "set-trigger": {

Re: requesting help to solve an issue

n.k...@spglobal.com> wrote: > Hi, > That’s not happening the replicas are created even on property > value-typeahead > Thanks. > > > -Original Message- > From: Sandeep Dharembra > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2020 8:23 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject

RE: requesting help to solve an issue

Hi, That’s not happening the replicas are created even on property value-typeahead Thanks. -Original Message- From: Sandeep Dharembra Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2020 8:23 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: requesting help to solve an issue Hi, You have used

Re: requesting help to solve an issue

Hi, You have used ! - not operator, so, the replicas would be created on all nodes not having that property value (typeahead) Thanks On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 4:21 PM saicharan.k...@spglobal.com < saicharan.k...@spglobal.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > We are trying to apply the following collection

requesting help to solve an issue

Hi there, We are trying to apply the following collection specific policy in solr { "set-policy": { "generalpolicy": [ { "replica": "<2", "shard": "#EACH", "sysprop.key":"!typeahead", "strict": "true"

Re: Need Help in Apache SOLR scores logic

to use the same score logic as SOLR 5.4.1. Could you > please help what configuration should I change in SOLR 8.4.1 to get the > same scores as version 5.4.1. Thanks in advance. > > > > Regards > Karthik Reddy >

Need Help in Apache SOLR scores logic

see the score which is returned by SOLR is got changed in 8.2.0. I would like to use the same score logic as SOLR 5.4.1. Could you please help what configuration should I change in SOLR 8.4.1 to get the same scores as version 5.4.1. Thanks in advance. Regards Karthik Reddy

Re: Need help in configuring Spell check in Apache Solr 8.4

HI Seetesh For IndexBasedSpellchecker default distanceMeasure is LevensteinDistance itself . Thats why it is commented in the Reference Guide regards Kumar Gaurav On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:01 PM seeteshh wrote: > Hello Kumar Gaurav > > For IndexBasedSpellchecker is there a better option of

Re: Need help in configuring Spell check in Apache Solr 8.4

My searchComponent is as follows text_general default name solr.DirectSolrSpellChecker internal 0.5 2 1 5 4 0.01 wordbreak solr.WordBreakSolrSpellChecker name

Re: Need help in configuring Spell check in Apache Solr 8.4

Hello Kumar Gaurav For IndexBasedSpellchecker is there a better option of using org.apache.lucene.search.spell.LevensteinDistance as this is not valid in Solr 8.4 This line seems to be commented in the Reference Guide Regards, Seetesh Hindlekar - Seetesh Hindlekar -- Sent from:

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

Hello, Kumar. I don't know. 3 / 84 ratio seems reasonable. The only unknown part of the equation was that {!simpleFilter}. Anyway, profiler/sampler might get exact answer. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 8:55 AM kumar gaurav wrote: > HI Mikhail > > Can you please see above debug log

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

HI Mikhail Can you please see above debug log and help ? Thanks On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:05 AM kumar gaurav wrote: > Also > > its not looks like box is slow . because for following query prepare time > is 3 ms but facet time is 84ms on the same box .Don't know why prepare tim

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

Also its not looks like box is slow . because for following query prepare time is 3 ms but facet time is 84ms on the same box .Don't know why prepare time was huge for that example :( . debug: { - rawquerystring: "{!parent tag=top which=$pq filters=$child.fq score=max v=$cq}", -

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

gt; I also notice limit: -1 that's really expensive usually. If tweaking can't > help, only profiling might give a clue. > Note: in 8.5 there will be uniqueBlockQuery() operation, which is expected > to be faster than uniqueBlock() > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:36 PM kumar gaurav wrote

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

- facet_module: { - time: 1122, that a reasonable ratio. I also notice limit: -1 that's really expensive usually. If tweaking can't help, only profiling might give a clue. Note: in 8.5 there will be uniqueBlockQuery() operation, which is expected to be faster than uniqueBlock() On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:36 PM

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

7, - prepare: { - time: 261, - query: { - time: 261 }, - facet: { - time: 0 }, - facet_module: { - time: 0 }, - mlt:

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

Screenshot didn't come though the list. That excerpt doesn't have any informative numbers. On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:18 PM kumar gaurav wrote: > Hi Mikhail > > Thanks for your reply . Please help me in this . > > Followings are the screenshot:- > > [image: image.png] &g

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

HI Mikhail Can you please help ? On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:48 PM kumar gaurav wrote: > Hi Mikhail > > Thanks for your reply . Please help me in this . > > Followings are the screenshot:- > > [image: image.png] > > > [image: image.png] > >

Re: Need help in configuring Spell check in Apache Solr 8.4

Can you share spellcheck component and handler which you have used ? On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 3:35 PM seeteshh wrote: > Hello all, > > I am not able to check and test the spell check feature in Apache solr 8.4 > > Tried multiple examples including > > >

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

Hi Mikhail Thanks for your reply . Please help me in this . Followings are the screenshot:- [image: image.png] [image: image.png] json facet debug Output:- json: { - facet: { - color_refine: { - domain: { - excludeTags: "rassortment,top

Re: Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

}docType:(product)"] >}, > type:terms, > field:color_refine, > limit:-1, > facet:{productsCount:"uniqueBlock(_root_)"}}} > > schema :- > multiValued="true" docValues="true"/> > > i have observed that json fac

Solr 8.0 Json Facets are slow - need help

ime than expected . Can anyone please check this query specially child.fq and json.facet part . Please help me in this . Thanks & regards Kumar Gaurav

Need help in configuring Spell check in Apache Solr 8.4

Hello all, I am not able to check and test the spell check feature in Apache solr 8.4 Tried multiple examples including https://examples.javacodegeeks.com/enterprise-java/apache-solr/solr-spellcheck-example/ However I am not getting any results Regards, Seetesh Hindlekar -- Sent from:

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

Hi Ken, I also recommend at least reading if not following "Taking Solr to Production": https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/taking-solr-to-production.html. Following this cleared my doubts regarding upgradation and core referencing while made upgradation very easy and fast. While starting

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

Exactly. Although I’m a bit curious why your going a .1 version up, I always wait until an x2, so I won’t be upgrading until 9.3 > On Dec 25, 2019, at 9:45 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Should work. At any rate, just try it. Since all you’re doing is copying > data, even if the new

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

Should work. At any rate, just try it. Since all you’re doing is copying data, even if the new installation doesn’t work you still have the original. > On Dec 25, 2019, at 1:35 AM, Ken Walker wrote: > > Hello Erick, > > Thanks for your reply! > > You mean that, we should follow below steps

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

Hello Erick, Thanks for your reply! You mean that, we should follow below steps right? Here is the data directory path : solr/solr-8.2.0/server/solr/product/item_core/data STEPS :- 1. Stop old solr-8.2.0 server 2. Copy data directory (from old solr version to new solr version) copy

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

>>> Hello, >>> >>> We are using solr version 8.2.0 in our production server. >>> >>> We are upgrading solr version from solr 8.2.0 version to solr 8.3.1 >>> version but we have faced out of memory error while importing data and >>> then

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

rsion from solr 8.2.0 version to solr 8.3.1 > > version but we have faced out of memory error while importing data and > > then we have extended memory in our server and then again start > > importing process but it has work too slowy for 8GB data ( it has > > taken more than

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

server and then again start > importing process but it has work too slowy for 8GB data ( it has > taken more than 2 days for importing data from solr 8.2.0 version to > solr 8.3.1 version). > > Could you please help me how we can do it fast for importing 8GB data > from old solr version

can you help me?

Highlight, display when the query ID is available Change to title. The return value of highlighting is only the ID information, and the content is empty

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

a ( it has > > taken more than 2 days for importing data from solr 8.2.0 version to > > solr 8.3.1 version). > > > > Could you please help me how we can do it fast for importing 8GB data > > from old solr version to new solr version? > > Why not just copy the i

Re: Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

data ( it has taken more than 2 days for importing data from solr 8.2.0 version to solr 8.3.1 version). Could you please help me how we can do it fast for importing 8GB data from old solr version to new solr version? Why not just copy the index and use it directly rather than importing it? Solr

Help for importing large data (approx. 8GB) from old solr version to new solr version

work too slowy for 8GB data ( it has taken more than 2 days for importing data from solr 8.2.0 version to solr 8.3.1 version). Could you please help me how we can do it fast for importing 8GB data from old solr version to new solr version? We are using below command for importing data from one

Re: Need help in GeoSpatial Searching into Solr Server

23, 2019, at 6:53 AM, niraj kumar wrote: > > I have 100 documents into Solr, type of location field is > *org.apache.solr.schema.TextField.* > > I am unable to run any query to search nearby points with reference to that > field. > > So if you can help into it or provide som

Need help in GeoSpatial Searching into Solr Server

I have 100 documents into Solr, type of location field is *org.apache.solr.schema.TextField.* I am unable to run any query to search nearby points with reference to that field. So if you can help into it or provide some program reference in JAVA with same kind of implementation. Thanks, Niraj

Re: Need some help on solr versions (LTS vs stable)

The LTS idea I believe comes from the solr downloads page where 7.7.x is designated as LTS. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/downloads.html On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:41 AM Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 11/6/2019 9:58 AM, suyog joshi wrote: > > So we can say its better to go with latest stable version

Re: Need some help on solr versions (LTS vs stable)

On 11/6/2019 9:58 AM, suyog joshi wrote: So we can say its better to go with latest stable version (8.x) instead of 7.x, which is LTS right now, but can soon become EOL post launching of 9.x sometime early next year. I don't know where you got the idea that 7.x is LTS ... but I do not think

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >