Hi,
Is that possible that solr on tomcat on windows 2008 is using only one core of
processor? Do I need configure something to use more cores?
Best Regards,
Solr_Beginner
Hallo everyone,
i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For testing i'm
using the solr-admin GUI to get responses. The Problem is, that i get
results only from one core, but not from the others also. Each core has its
own schema.xml.
The Cores are like follow structured
yea you can use solr on tomcat, i am doing the same actually... but have no
idea about multiple cores tho...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/tomcat-and-multicore-processors-tp2917973p2918015.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benyahya, Fahd fahd.benya...@netmoms.de wrote:
Hallo everyone,
i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For testing i'm
using the solr-admin GUI to get responses. The Problem is, that i get
results only from one core, but not from the others
fahd.benya...@netmoms.de
wrote:
Hallo everyone,
i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For testing
i'm
using the solr-admin GUI to get responses. The Problem is, that i get
results only from one core, but not from the others also.
[...]
What do you mean by get results
, and not on the
other?)
Regards,
Fahd
On 9 May 2011 10:58, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benyahya, Fahd fahd.benya...@netmoms.de
wrote:
Hallo everyone,
i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For testing
i'm
using the solr-admin
:
Hallo everyone,
i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For
testing
i'm
using the solr-admin GUI to get responses. The Problem is, that i get
results only from one core, but not from the others also.
[...]
What do you mean by get results only from one
, and not on the
other?)
Regards,
Fahd
On 9 May 2011 10:58, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benyahya, Fahd
fahd.benya...@netmoms.de
wrote:
Hallo everyone,
i'm using solr-multicore with 3 cores to index my Web-Site. For
testing
I'm just starting with Solr. I'm using Solr 3.1.0, and I want to use
EmbeddedSolrServer with a multicore setup, even though I currently have only
one core (various documents I read suggest starting that way even if you have
one core, to get the better administrative tools supported
: stopwords not working in multicore setup
Ahh, thank you for the hints Martin... German stopwords without Umlaut work
correctly.
So I'm trying to figure out where the UTF-8 chars are getting messed up. Using
the Solr admin web UI, I did a search for title:für and the xml (or json)
output
Registergericht Augsburg HRB 17382
Geschäftsführer: Peter Spiske
Steuernummer: 103/137/30412
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christopher Bottaro [mailto:cjbott...@onespot.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. März 2011 05:37
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: stopwords not working in multicore
. März 2011 05:37
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: stopwords not working in multicore setup
Hello,
I'm running a Solr server with 5 cores. Three are for English content and
two are for German content. The default stopwords setup works fine for the
English cores, but the German
Hello,
I'm running a Solr server with 5 cores. Three are for English content and
two are for German content. The default stopwords setup works fine for the
English cores, but the German stopwords aren't working.
The German stopwords file is stopwords-de.txt and resides in the same
directory as
Hi all,
I am setting up multicore and the schema.xml file in the core0 folder says
not to sure that one because its very stripped down. So I copied the schema
from example/solr/conf but now I am getting a bunch of class not found
exceptions:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error
What Solr are you using? That filter is not pre 3.1 releases.
On Wednesday 16 March 2011 13:55:21 Brian Lamb wrote:
Hi all,
I am setting up multicore and the schema.xml file in the core0 folder says
not to sure that one because its very stripped down. So I copied the schema
from example
the URL not being accessable :(
Could it be a syntax error in schema.xml maybe thats stopping it from
loading that particular multicore?
Cheers
Andy
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Wilkes, Chris [via Lucene]
ml-node+2591060-694286558-370...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
Did you copy the files
still getting the error about the URL not being accessable :(
Could it be a syntax error in schema.xml maybe thats stopping it from
loading that particular multicore?
Cheers
Andy
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Wilkes, Chris [via Lucene]
ml-node+2591060-694286558-370...@n3.nabble.com
Hi,
I already did answer that one =) I'm waiting on my host to add my IP to the
firewall for me, so I can test that part of it (they setup the bog standard
Solr for me, but I'm now trying to get it working with the multicore, as I
think we are gonna need several Solr instances for different
I'm waiting on my
host to add my IP to the
firewall for me, so I can test that part of it (they setup
the bog standard
Solr for me, but I'm now trying to get it working with the
multicore, as I
think we are gonna need several Solr instances for
different parts of the
If you have
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Solr install to work with multicores, as I wanna use it
on several sites (each totally different, and I don't obviously wanna have
loads of seperate Solr installs)
Here is what I've done so far (Solr was already uploaded and working
normally, without multicore):
1) Added
I'm trying to get a Solr install to work with multicores,
as I wanna use it
on several sites (each totally different, and I don't
obviously wanna have
loads of seperate Solr installs)
Here is what I've done so far (Solr was already uploaded
and working
normally, without multicore):
1
,
I'm trying to get a Solr install to work with multicores, as I wanna use it
on several sites (each totally different, and I don't obviously wanna have
loads of seperate Solr installs)
Here is what I've done so far (Solr was already uploaded and working
normally, without multicore):
1
into trouble.]
On 2/14/2011 1:59 PM, Tanner Postert wrote:
I have a multicore system and I am looking to boost results by date, but
only for 1 core. Is this at all possible?
Basically one of the core's content is very new, and changes all the time,
and if I boost everything by date, that core's
.
That is the problem sharding is meant to solve. People trying to use it to
solve other problems run into trouble.]
On 2/14/2011 1:59 PM, Tanner Postert wrote:
I have a multicore system and I am looking to boost results by date, but
only for 1 core. Is this at all possible?
Basically one
-reasons, because querying 2 identical and
available cores seems to be wasted capacity, no?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2363396.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
should use the syntax of specifying alternative shards for
failover due to performance-reasons, because querying 2 identical and
available cores seems to be wasted capacity, no?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Relaod-Theoretical-Question-tp2293999p2310709.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Relaod-Theoretical-Question-tp2293999p2312778.html
Thanks Alexander, what a valuable ressource :).
- Em
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Relaod-Theoretical-Question-tp2293999p2321335.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2327089.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2312763.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
of specifying alternative shards for
failover due to performance-reasons, because querying 2 identical and
available cores seems to be wasted capacity, no?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2312767.html
.
Regards,
Em
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Relaod-Theoretical-Question-tp2293999p2310709.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Relaod
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2309443.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
?
Regards
Em wrote:
Hello list,
I got a theoretical question about a Multicore-Situation:
I got two cores: active, inactive
The active core serves all the queries.
The inactive core is the tricky thing:
I create an optimized index outside the environment and want to insert
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Relaod-Theoretical-Question-tp2293999p2310709.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Relaod-Theoretical-Question-tp2293999p2310709.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2309443.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
Hello list,
I got a theoretical question about a Multicore-Situation:
I got two cores: active, inactive
The active core serves all the queries.
The inactive core is the tricky thing:
I create an optimized index outside the environment and want to insert that
optimized index 1 to 1
Hallo..
I have create multicore search and will search in more then one Core!
Now i have done:
http://192.168.105.59:8080/solr/mail/select?wt=phpsq=*:*shards=192.168.105.59:8080/solr/mail,192.168.105.59:8080/solr/mail11
But Error...
HTTP Status 500 - Map size must not be negative
That looks like this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2278
On Thursday 20 January 2011 13:02:41 Jörg Agatz wrote:
Hallo..
I have create multicore search and will search in more then one Core!
Now i have done:
http://192.168.105.59:8080/solr/mail/select?wt=phpsq
]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:03 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Zach Friedland
Subject: Re: multicore controlled by properties
The config files support XInclude. Some sites use this to include a
local configuration that affects your single global file.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM
We manage a large number of solr cores for a number of groups. To make this
manageable in production, we have a single 'multicore' configuration with all
cores deployed to a centralized NFS server, and each solr server loads this
shared configuration and writes its indexes to local disks
We have a large number of solr cores that are used by different groups for
different purposes. To make the source control simple, we keep a single
'multicore' directory and solr.xml references all cores. We deploy the same
configuration to all servers (shared NFS mount), and then only
. To make the source control simple, we keep a single
'multicore' directory and solr.xml references all cores. We deploy the same
configuration to all servers (shared NFS mount), and then only populate the
indexes of the cores that we want running on that server. However, it still
seems
Hi,
I'm trying to reuse schema.xml and solrconfig.xml from /lucidworks/solr/conf
in the /multicore/core0/conf,
specifically to index binary files, and have some loading problems, like
NullPointers, etrc.
What are the steps to do it correctly?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http
All of the cores have to have the same schema. And, they should not
have any documents in common.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Jörg Agatz joerg.ag...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have tryed some Thinks, now i have new news,
when i search in :
Hallo users,
I have create a Multicore instance from Solr with Tomcat6,
i create two Cores mail and index2 at first, mail and index2 are the
Same config, after this, i change the Mail config and Indexing 30 xml
No when i search in each core:
http://localhost:8080/solr/mail/select?q
I have tryed some Thinks, now i have new news,
when i search in :
Hallo Users,
I habve a Problem wit Solr 1.4.1 on Ubuntu 10.10
I have download the new version and extract it!
than i have copy the solr.xml from example/multicore/solr.xml to
/examples/solr/solr.xml
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
...@googlemail.com
Hallo Users,
I habve a Problem wit Solr 1.4.1 on Ubuntu 10.10
I have download the new version and extract it!
than i have copy the solr.xml from example/multicore/solr.xml to
/examples/solr/solr.xml
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
!--
Licensed to the Apache
: I am trying to debug my queries and see how scoring is done. I have 6 cores
and
: send the quesy to 6 shards and it's dismax handler (with search on various
: fields with different boostings). I enable debug, and view source but I'm
unable
: to see the explanations. I'm returning ID and
: SimplePostTool: FATAL: Solr returned an error:
:
Unexpected_character_m_code_109_in_prolog_expected___at_rowcol_unknownsource_11
if you look at your solr log (or the HTTP response body, SimplePostTool
only gives you the status line) you'll see the more human readable form of
that error
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: #SOLR-433 MultiCore and SpellChecker replication [1]. Based on the
: status of this feature request I'd asume that the normal procedure of
: keeping the spellchecker index up2date would be running a cron job
is simplicity, as with scripts based
replication our operations team would have to maintain rsync daemons /
cron jobs for each core.
Therefore my own preference would be to drop scripts and chose the
java based replication.
I'd just wanted to ask for experiences with the one or another in a
multicore
: #SOLR-433 MultiCore and SpellChecker replication [1]. Based on the
: status of this feature request I'd asume that the normal procedure of
: keeping the spellchecker index up2date would be running a cron job on
: each node/slave that updates the spellchecker.
: Is that right?
i'm not 100
Hi All,
I am trying to debug my queries and see how scoring is done. I have 6 cores and
send the quesy to 6 shards and it's dismax handler (with search on various
fields with different boostings). I enable debug, and view source but I'm
unable
to see the explanations. I'm returning ID and
for experiences with the one or another in a
multicore setup. What do you say?
Another question is regarding spellchecker replication. I know there's
#SOLR-433 MultiCore and SpellChecker replication [1]. Based on the
status of this feature request I'd asume that the normal procedure of
keeping
Hi,
i have recently moved Solr at one of our customers to a MultiCore environment
running 2 indexes. Since then, we seem to be having problems with locks not
being removed properly, .lock files keep sticking around in the index
directory.
Hence, any updates to the index keep returning 500
wrote:
Hi,
i have recently moved Solr at one of our customers to a MultiCore
environment running 2 indexes. Since then, we seem to be having problems
with locks not being removed properly, .lock files keep sticking around in
the index directory.
Hence, any updates to the index keep returning
On 11/12/2010 3:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I have not tried reloading the core instead of restarting Solr, I
should do that.
Just so everyone's aware: Reloading the core is not enough to get
solr.core.name to be updated in the healthcheck filename. Solr must be
restarted.
. So, I don't
want to wait for that time. I want to swap immediately after it is done.
Thanks again and please let me know if any of my approaches sound wrong.
Ram.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Corename-after-Swap-in-MultiCore-tp1835325p1889634.html
On 11/7/2010 9:11 AM, Ephraim Ofir wrote:
Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You
swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp?
This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you
using?
Why use postCommit? You're running
.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Corename-after-Swap-in-MultiCore-tp1835325p1891671.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 11/12/2010 2:48 PM, sivaram wrote:
That is good if we can restart the solr. But we don't want to restart the
whole solr after every commit because some of the core usually have to
update for comparatively short times. So, we do a core reload to get all the
synonyms and other stuff getting
Subject: Corename after Swap in MultiCore
Hi everyone,
Long question but please hold on. I'm using a multicore Solr instance to
index different documents from different sources( around 4) and I'm
using a
common config for all the cores. So, for each source I have core and
temp
core like 'doc
Hi everyone,
Long question but please hold on. I'm using a multicore Solr instance to
index different documents from different sources( around 4) and I'm using a
common config for all the cores. So, for each source I have core and temp
core like 'doc' and 'doc-temp'. So, everytime I want to get
yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501tag=nl.e036'
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
--- On Wed, 10/27/10, mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.com wrote:
From: mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: how well does multicore scale?
To: solr
Creating a unique id for a schema is one of those design tasks:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey
A marvelously lucid and well-written page, if I do say so. And I do.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Tharindu Mathew mcclou...@gmail.com wrote:
Really great to know you were able to fire up
, this would mean that if we want each shard's index to be able to fit
in memory, then (even with some beefy servers) each query would have to go
out to a few thousand shards (as opposed to 21 if we used the MultiCore
approach). This means the typical response time would be much slower.
-mike
On Tue
really don't know much about that file structure). By my simple
math, this would mean that if we want each shard's index to be able to fit
in memory, then (even with some beefy servers) each query would have to go
out to a few thousand shards (as opposed to 21 if we used the MultiCore
approach
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 14:20 +0200, mike anderson wrote:
[...] By my simple math, this would mean that if we want each shard's
index to be able to fit in memory, [...]
Might I ask why you're planning on using memory-based sharding? The
performance gap between memory and SSDs is not very big so
That's a great point. If SSDs are sufficient, then what does the Index size
vs Response time curve look like? Since that would dictate the number of
machines needed. I took a look at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceData but only one use case seemed
comparable. We currently have about
mike anderson [saidthero...@gmail.com] wrote:
That's a great point. If SSDs are sufficient, then what does the Index size
vs Response time curve look like? Since that would dictate the number
of machines needed. I took a look at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceData but only one use
So I fired up about 100 cores and used JMeter to fire off a few thousand
queries. It looks like the memory usage isn't much worse than running a
single shard. So thats good.
I'm really curious if there is a clever solution to the obvious problem
with: So your better off using a single index and
mike anderson wrote:
I'm really curious if there is a clever solution to the obvious problem
with: So your better off using a single index and with a user id and use
a query filter with the user id when fetching data., i.e.. when you have
hundreds of thousands of user IDs tagged on each article.
Really great to know you were able to fire up about 100 cores. But,
when it scales up to around 1000 or even more. I wonder how it would
perform.
I have a question regarding ids i.e. the unique key. Since there is a
potential use case that two users might add the same document, how
would we set
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an API now for dynamically loading, unloading, creating and
deleting cores.
Restarting a Solr with thousands of cores will take, I don't know, hours.
Is this in the trunk? Any docs available?
On Thu, Oct 21,
On 10/22/10 1:44 AM, Tharindu Mathew wrote:
Hi Mike,
I've also considered using a separate cores in a multi tenant
application, ie a separate core for each tenant/domain. But the cores
do not suit that purpose.
If you check out documentation no real API support exists for this so
it can
Thanks for the advice, everyone. I'll take a look at the API mentioned and
do some benchmarking over the weekend.
-Mike
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/22/10 1:44 AM, Tharindu Mathew wrote:
Hi Mike,
I've also considered using a separate
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
Since Solr 1.3
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:40 PM, mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice, everyone. I'll take a look at the API mentioned and
do some benchmarking over the weekend.
-Mike
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Mark
I'm exploring the possibility of using cores as a solution to bookmark
folders in my solr application. This would mean I'll need tens of thousands
of cores... does this seem reasonable? I have plenty of CPUs available for
scaling, but I wonder about the memory overhead of adding cores (aside from
No, it does not seem reasonable. Why do you think you need a seperate
core for every user?
mike anderson wrote:
I'm exploring the possibility of using cores as a solution to bookmark
folders in my solr application. This would mean I'll need tens of thousands
of cores... does this seem
Hi Mike,
I've also considered using a separate cores in a multi tenant
application, ie a separate core for each tenant/domain. But the cores
do not suit that purpose.
If you check out documentation no real API support exists for this so
it can be done dynamically through SolrJ. And all use cases
Hello
I have this in my solr.xml
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores defaultCoreName=live
core name=live instanceDir=core0 /
core name=staging instanceDir=core1 /
/cores
/solr
admin is working and the individual cores are working through
, October 13, 2010 9:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: multicore defaultCoreName not working
Hello
I have this in my solr.xml
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores defaultCoreName=live
core name=live instanceDir=core0 /
core name=staging
that explains it then, using 1.4.1
thanks for that
Ron
- Original Message -
From: Ephraim Ofir ephra...@icq.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October, 2010 2:11:49 PM
Subject: RE: multicore defaultCoreName not working
Which version of solr are you using
=pollInterval00:00:60/str
/lst
/requestHandler
That will get all of your cores replicating.
-- C
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Christopher Bottaro
cjbott...@onespot.com wrote:
Hello,
I can't get my multicore slave to replicate from the master.
The master is setup properly
Hello,
I can't get my multicore slave to replicate from the master.
The master is setup properly and the following urls return 00OKNo
command as expected:
http://solr.mydomain.com:8983/solr/core1/replication
http://solr.mydomain.com:8983/solr/core2/replication
http://solr.mydomain.com:8983/solr
: In-Reply-To: aanlktimwvhxxdhpup5hl-2e1teh9pu6yetopgu=98...@mail.gmail.com
: References: aanlktimwvhxxdhpup5hl-2e1teh9pu6yetopgu=98...@mail.gmail.com
: aanlktim46b_hcfpf2r6t=b8y_weq4bbhgi=8mappz...@mail.gmail.com
: Subject: In multicore env, can I make it access core0 by default
http
Thus when I access http://localhost/solr/select?q=*:* equals
http://localhost/solr/core0/select?q=*:*.
I'm using Solr Java replication with multiple master cores (at_bat
on_deck), and a single slave core (at_bat)
The at_bat cores of the master and slave are used for processing search
requests, and the on_deck core is used for complete index rebuilds. Once a
rebuild is complete, the at_bat
Hi,
Does anyone know how to access the dataimport handler on a multicore setup?
This is my solr.xml
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=advisors instanceDir=advisors /
core name=requests instanceDir=requests
know how to access the dataimport handler on a multicore
setup?
This is my solr.xml
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=advisors instanceDir=advisors /
core name=requests instanceDir=requests /
/cores
/solr
in solrconfig go
after that.
Erik
On Jun 14, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Moazzam Khan wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to access the dataimport handler on a multicore
setup?
This is my solr.xml
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name
: As it stands, solr works fine, and sites like
: http://locahost:8983/solr/admin also work.
:
: As soon as I put a solr.xml in the solr directory, and restart the tomcat
: service. It all stops working.
: solr persistent=false
: cores adminPath=/admin/cores
: core name=core0 instanceDir=.
with Tomcat server. I have configured two
: multicore inside the SOLR home directory. The solr.xml file looks like
:
: solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
: cores adminPath=/admin/cores
: core name=MyTestCore1 instanceDir=MyTestCore1
: dataDir=MyTestCore1/data /
: core name=MyTestCore2
,
Siddharth
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-Problem-with-SOLR-multicore-tp884745p896347.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Karich [mailto:peat...@yahoo.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Schema not replicating when using multicore property parameter
So the 'enable.master' property works and the 'solr.core.schemaName
multicore property parameter
Do you need it as property or could you use the solrconfig.xml directly?
this worked in my case ...
Regards,
Peter.
PS: Here is my snippet:
requestHandler name=/replication class=solr.ReplicationHandler
enable=${replication.master:false}
lst name=master
Hi,
I am using SOLR with Tomcat server. I have configured two
multicore inside the SOLR home directory. The solr.xml file looks like
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=MyTestCore1 instanceDir=MyTestCore1
dataDir=MyTestCore1/data /
core
201 - 300 of 680 matches
Mail list logo
