RE: Solr 4.3.1 - Spell-Checker with MULTI-WORD PHRASE

llChecking-Thespellcheck.maxCollationTriesParameter James Dyer Ingram Content Group -Original Message- From: SRINI SOLR [mailto:srini.s...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 12:05 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.3.1 - Spell-Checker with MULTI-WORD PHRASE Hi all - please he

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - Spell-Checker with MULTI-WORD PHRASE

Hi all - please help me here On Thursday, July 21, 2016, SRINI SOLR wrote: > Hi All - > Could you please help me on spell check on multi-word phrase as a whole... > Scenario - > I have a problem with solr spellcheck suggestions for multi word phrases. With the query for

Solr 4.3.1 - Spell-Checker with MULTI-WORD PHRASE

Hi All - Could you please help me on spell check on multi-word phrase as a whole... Scenario - I have a problem with solr spellcheck suggestions for multi word phrases. With the query for 'red chillies' q=red+chillies=xml=true=true=true=true I get 2 4 12 0

Re: Multi-word Synonyms Solr 4.3.1 does not work

-phrasing-tokenfilter/ On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:51 AM, SRINI SOLR <srini.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All - > Can you please help me out on the multi-word synonyms with Solr 4.3.1. > > I am using the synonyms as below > > test1,test2 => movie1 cinema,movie2 cinema,

Multi-word Synonyms Solr 4.3.1 does not work

Hi All - Can you please help me out on the multi-word synonyms with Solr 4.3.1. I am using the synonyms as below test1,test2 => movie1 cinema,movie2 cinema,movie3 cinema I am able to success with the above syntax like - if I search for words like test1 or test2 then right hand s

Re: EmbeddedSolrServer Loading Core Containers Solr 4.3.1

i.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team - > I am using Solr 4.3.1. > > We are using this EmbeddedSolrServer to load Core Containers in one of the > java application. > > This is setup as a cron job for every 1 hour to load the new data on to the > containers. > > Oth

EmbeddedSolrServer Loading Core Containers Solr 4.3.1

Hi Team - I am using Solr 4.3.1. We are using this EmbeddedSolrServer to load Core Containers in one of the java application. This is setup as a cron job for every 1 hour to load the new data on to the containers. Otherwise - the new data is not getting loaded on the containers , if we access

Re: solr-4.3.1 docValues usage

Can someone please help me with this? I am stuck for past few days. > On 15-Feb-2016, at 6:39 PM, Neeraj Lajpal wrote: > > Hi, > > I recently asked this question on stackoverflow: > > I am trying to access a field in custom request handler. I am accessing it > like

Re: solr-4.3.1 docValues usage

Hello Neeraj, Check slide 23 and overall http://www.slideshare.net/lucenerevolution/what-is-inaluceneagrandfinal On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Neeraj Lajpal wrote: > Hi, > I recently asked this question on stackoverflow: > I am trying to access a field in custom

Re: solr-4.3.1 docValues usage

Sorry - replied to wrong thread :( On 15.02.2016 15:17, Emir Arnautovic wrote: Hi, Not sure how ordering will help (maybe missing question) but what seems to me that would help your case is simple boosting. See

Re: solr-4.3.1 docValues usage

Hi, Not sure how ordering will help (maybe missing question) but what seems to me that would help your case is simple boosting. See https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_make_.22superman.22_in_the_title_field_score_higher_than_in_the_subject_field Regards, Emir On

Re: solr-4.3.1 docValues usage

DocValues has nothing to do with your handler. It is a field property. To use it simply put docValues=true in your field definitions and reindex. On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, 18:40 Neeraj Lajpal wrote: > Hi, > I recently asked this question on stackoverflow: > I am trying to

solr-4.3.1 docValues usage

Hi, I recently asked this question on stackoverflow: I am trying to access a field in custom request handler. I am accessing it like this for each document: Document doc;doc = reader.document(id);DocFields = doc.getValues("state");There are around 600,000 documents in the solr. For a query

Solr 4.3.1 snapshot ate up disk space

Hello, just a quick question about the expected behavior of the SnapShooter. We're running Solr 4.3.1 in a SolrCloud configuration, with two separate virtual machines running Solr and three Zookeepers in various places. Our search index is about 70GB in size. Today I took a snapshot of just one

Re: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping

On 3/26/2014 10:26 PM, Darrell Burgan wrote: Okay well it didn't take long for the swapping to start happening on one of our nodes. Here is a screen shot of the Solr console: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/panswers-darrell/solr.png And here is a shot of top, with processes sorted by

RE: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping

: Thursday, March 27, 2014 2:59 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping On 3/26/2014 10:26 PM, Darrell Burgan wrote: Okay well it didn't take long for the swapping to start happening on one of our nodes. Here is a screen shot of the Solr console: https://s3

Re: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping

It could be related to NUMA. Check out this article about it which has some fixes that worked for me. http://blog.jcole.us/2010/09/28/mysql-swap-insanity-and-the-numa-architecture/ -- View this message in context:

RE: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping

to work with. Could it be that the swapping is due to the memory-mapped file in some way? -Original Message- From: Lan [mailto:dung@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 12:45 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping It could be related to NUMA

RE: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping

Thanks - we're currently running Solr inside of RHEL virtual machines inside of VMware. Running numactl --hardware inside the VM shows the following: available: 1 nodes (0) node 0 size: 16139 MB node 0 free: 364 MB node distances: node 0 0: 10 So there is only one node being

RE: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping

, March 26, 2014 8:14 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping Thanks - we're currently running Solr inside of RHEL virtual machines inside of VMware. Running numactl --hardware inside the VM shows the following: available: 1 nodes (0) node 0 size: 16139 MB

Solr 4.3.1 memory swapping

Hello all, we have a SolrCloud implementation in production, with two servers running Solr 4.3.1 in a SolrCloud configuration. Our search index is about 70-80GB in size. The trouble is that after several days of uptime, we will suddenly have periods where the operating system Solr is running

Re: Solr 4.3.1 :: Error loading class 'solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory'

Thanks Shawn. Always grateful for your help... On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 11/27/2013 9:37 AM, Raheel Hasan wrote: I got a new issue now. I have Solr 4.3.0 running just fine. However on Solr 4.3.1, it wont load. I get this issue: {msg

Solr 4.3.1 :: Error loading class 'solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory'

Hi, I got a new issue now. I have Solr 4.3.0 running just fine. However on Solr 4.3.1, it wont load. I get this issue: {msg=SolrCore 'mycore' is not available due to init failure: Plugin init failure for [schema.xml] fieldType text_ws: Plugin init failure for [schema.xml] analyzer/filter: Error

Re: Solr 4.3.1 :: Error loading class 'solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory'

On 11/27/2013 9:37 AM, Raheel Hasan wrote: I got a new issue now. I have Solr 4.3.0 running just fine. However on Solr 4.3.1, it wont load. I get this issue: {msg=SolrCore 'mycore' is not available due to init failure: Plugin init failure for [schema.xml] fieldType text_ws: Plugin init failure

SV: spellcheck solr 4.3.1

] Sendt: 11. november 2013 15:54 Til: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Emne: RE: spellcheck solr 4.3.1 There are 2 parameters you want to consider: First is spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest. Because you have an OR query, you'll get hits if only 1 query term is in the index. This parameter lets you tune

spellcheck solr 4.3.1

Hey I am running af solr 4.3.1 and working is implementing spellcheck using solr.DirectSolrSpellChecker everything seems to be working fine but at have one issue. If I search for http://localhost:8765/solr/MainIndex/spell?q=kim%20AND%20larsen the result is some hits and the spell component

RE: spellcheck solr 4.3.1

Message- From: Daniel Borup [mailto:d...@alpha-solutions.dk] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 7:38 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: spellcheck solr 4.3.1 Hey I am running af solr 4.3.1 and working is implementing spellcheck using solr.DirectSolrSpellChecker everything seems

fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1

Hi If I do a search like /search?q=catid:{123} I get the results I expect. But if I do /search?q=*:*fq=catid{123} I get an error from Solr like: org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Cannot parse 'catid:{123}': Encountered } } at line 1, column 58. Was expecting one of: TO ... RANGE_QUOTED

Re: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1

Missing a colon before the curly bracket in the fq? On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, at 09:42 AM, Peter Kirk wrote: Hi If I do a search like /search?q=catid:{123} I get the results I expect. But if I do /search?q=*:*fq=catid{123} I get an error from Solr like:

RE: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1

To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1 Missing a colon before the curly bracket in the fq? On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, at 09:42 AM, Peter Kirk wrote: Hi If I do a search like /search?q=catid:{123} I get the results I expect. But if I do /search?q=*:*fq

RE: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1

For filtering categories i'm using something like this : fq=category:(cat1 OR cat2 OR cat3) - Thanks, Michael -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fq-with-or-in-Solr-4-3-1-tp4097170p4097183.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1

To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1 Sorry, that was just a typo. / search?q=*:*fq=catid:{123} Gives me the error. I think that { and } must be used in ranges for fq, and that's why I can't use them directly like this. /Peter -Original Message- From

SV: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1

Fra: Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com Sendt: 23. oktober 2013 12:59 Til: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Emne: Re: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1 Are you using the edismax query parser? It traps the syntax error and then escapes or ignores special characters. Curly

Synonym Expansion in Spellchecking Field Solr 4.3.1

Hi All, I've been debugging an issue where the query 'tpms' would make the spellchecker throw the following exception: 21021 [qtp91486057-17] ERROR org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter – null:java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1 at

Re: Synonym Expansion in Spellchecking Field Solr 4.3.1

Further to this. If I change: tpms,service tire monitor,tire monitor,tire pressure monitor,tire pressure monitoring system,tpm,low tire warning,tire pressure monitor system to service tire monitor,tire monitor,tire pressure monitor,tire pressure monitoring system,tpm,low tire warning,tire

Re: Synonym Expansion in Spellchecking Field Solr 4.3.1

Hi All, I didn't have the lucene-solr source compiling cleaning in eclipse initially so I created a very quick maven project to demonstrate this issue: https://github.com/rainkinz/solr_spellcheck_index_out_of_bounds.git Having said that I just got everything set up in eclipse, so I can create a

Re: [solr 4.3.1 admin ui] bug in Plugins / Stats Refresh Values option?

Hi Stefan, It is apparently a browser feature: works fine in Chrome (Version 28.0.1500.95). A side note: would return false; following the DOM instruction help here? Dmitry On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Stefan Matheis matheis.ste...@gmail.comwrote: Hey Dmitry That sounds a bit odd ..

[solr 4.3.1 admin ui] bug in Plugins / Stats Refresh Values option?

On the first click the values are refreshed. On the second click the page gets redirected: from: http://localhost:8983/solr/#/statements/plugins/cache to: http://localhost:8983/solr/#/ Is this intentional? Regards, Dmitry

Re: [solr 4.3.1 admin ui] bug in Plugins / Stats Refresh Values option?

It shouldn't .. but from your description sounds as the javascript-onclick handler doesn't work on the second click (which would do a page reload). if you use chrome, firefox or safari .. can you open the developer tools and check if they report any javascript error? which would explain why ..

Re: [solr 4.3.1 admin ui] bug in Plugins / Stats Refresh Values option?

Hi Stefan, I was able to debug the second click scenario (was tricky to catch it, since on click redirect happens and logs statements of the previous are gone; worked via setting break-points in plugins.js) and got these errors (firefox 23.0 ubuntu): [17:20:00.731] TypeError: anonymous function

Re: [solr 4.3.1 admin ui] bug in Plugins / Stats Refresh Values option?

Hey Dmitry That sounds a bit odd .. those are more like notices instead of real errors .. sure that those are stopping the UI from working? if so .. we should see more reports like those. Can you verify the problem by using another browser? I mean .. that is really a basic javascript handler

Re: Solr 4.3.1 only accepts UTF-8 encoded queries?

On 7/27/2013 5:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 7/26/2013 2:03 PM, Gustav wrote: The problem here is that in my client's application, the query beign encoded in iso-8859-1 its a *must*. So, this is kind of a trouble here. I just dont get how this encoding could work on queries in version 3.5, but

Solr 4.3.1 - query does not return documents, just numFounds, 2 shards, replication Factor 1

Hi, I am using Solr 4.3.1 with 2 Shards and replication factor of 1, running on apache tomcat 7.0.42 with external zookeeper 3.4.5. When I query select?q=*:* I only get the number of documents found, but no actual document. When I query with rows=0, I do get correct count of documents

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - query does not return documents, just numFounds, 2 shards, replication Factor 1

Nitin, You need to ensure the fields you wish to see are marked stored=true in your schema.xml file, and you should include fields in your fl= parameter (fl=*,score is a good place to start). Jason On Jul 29, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Nitin Agarwal 2nitinagar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using Solr

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - query does not return documents, just numFounds, 2 shards, replication Factor 1

to start). Jason On Jul 29, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Nitin Agarwal 2nitinagar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using Solr 4.3.1 with 2 Shards and replication factor of 1, running on apache tomcat 7.0.42 with external zookeeper 3.4.5. When I query select?q=*:* I only get the number of documents

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - query does not return documents, just numFounds, 2 shards, replication Factor 1

, 100, or whatever, but DO NOT set it to 0 unless you just want the header without any actual documents. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Nitin Agarwal Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 11:49 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.3.1 - query does not return

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - query does not return documents, just numFounds, 2 shards, replication Factor 1

: Here is what my schema looks like what is your uniqueKey field? I'm going to bet it's tn_lookup_key_id and i'm going to bet your lowercase fieldType has an interesting analyzer on it. you are probably hitting a situation where the analyzer you have on your uniqueKey field is munging the

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - query does not return documents, just numFounds, 2 shards, replication Factor 1

Erick, I had typed tn_lookup_key_id as lowercase and it was defined as fieldType name=lowercase class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory / filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory / /analyzer /fieldType Nitin

Re: Solr 4.3.1 only accepts UTF-8 encoded queries?

On 7/26/2013 2:03 PM, Gustav wrote: The problem here is that in my client's application, the query beign encoded in iso-8859-1 its a *must*. So, this is kind of a trouble here. I just dont get how this encoding could work on queries in version 3.5, but it doesnt in 4.3. I brought up the issue

Solr 4.3.1 only accepts UTF-8 encoded queries?

Hey guys, i have a Solr 4.3 instance running in my server, but Im having some troubles with encoding URL querystring. Im currently encoding my query characters, so, when its searched for Café, its actually encoded to caf%E9 and cão is encoded to c%E3o. My URLencoding in tomcat is iso-8859-1, but

Re: Solr 4.3.1 only accepts UTF-8 encoded queries?

On 7/26/2013 7:05 AM, Gustav wrote: Hey guys, i have a Solr 4.3 instance running in my server, but Im having some troubles with encoding URL querystring. Im currently encoding my query characters, so, when its searched for Café, its actually encoded to caf%E9 and cão is encoded to c%E3o. My

Re: Solr 4.3.1 only accepts UTF-8 encoded queries?

Thanks for the answer Shawn, The problem here is that in my client's application, the query beign encoded in iso-8859-1 its a *must*. So, this is kind of a trouble here. I just dont get how this encoding could work on queries in version 3.5, but it doesnt in 4.3. -- View this message in

Re: Solr 4.3.1 only accepts UTF-8 encoded queries?

On 7/26/2013 2:03 PM, Gustav wrote: Thanks for the answer Shawn, The problem here is that in my client's application, the query beign encoded in iso-8859-1 its a *must*. So, this is kind of a trouble here. I just dont get how this encoding could work on queries in version 3.5, but it doesnt

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Great. Thanks for your suggestions. I'll go through them and see what I can come up with to try and tame my GC pauses. I'll also make sure I upgrade to 4.4 before I start. Then at least I know I've got all the latest changes. In the meantime, does anyone have any idea why I am able to get leaders

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Log messages? On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Neil Prosser neil.pros...@gmail.com wrote: Great. Thanks for your suggestions. I'll go through them and see what I can come up with to try and tame my GC pauses. I'll also make sure I upgrade to 4.4 before I start. Then at least I know I've got

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Sorry, good point... https://gist.github.com/neilprosser/d75a13d9e4b7caba51ab I've included the log files for two servers hosting the same shard for the same time period. The logging settings exclude anything below WARN for org.apache.zookeeper, org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore and

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

One thing I'm seeing in your logs is the leaderVoteWait safety mechanism that I mentioned previously: 2013-07-24 07:06:19,856 INFO o.a.s.c.ShardLeaderElectionContext - Waiting until we see more replicas up: total=2 found=1 timeoutin=45792 From Mark M: This is a safety mechanism - you can turn

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

On 7/24/2013 10:33 AM, Neil Prosser wrote: The log for server09 starts with it throwing OutOfMemoryErrors. At this point I externally have it listed as recovering. Unfortunately I haven't got the GC logs for either box in that time period. There's a lot of messages in this thread, so I

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

That makes sense about all bets being off. I wanted to make sure that people whose systems are behaving sensibly weren't going to have problems. I think I need to tame the base amount of memory the field cache takes. We currently do boosting on several fields during most queries. We boost by at

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Neil: Here's a must-read blog about why allocating more memory to the JVM than Solr requires is a Bad Thing: http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html It turns out that you actually do yourself harm by allocating more memory to the JVM than it really needs. Of

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Hi, On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Neil: Here's a must-read blog about why allocating more memory to the JVM than Solr requires is a Bad Thing: http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html It turns out that you

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Very true. I was impatient (I think less than three minutes impatient so hopefully 4.4 will save me from myself) but I didn't realise it was doing something rather than just hanging. Next time I have to restart a node I'll just leave and go get a cup of coffee or something. My configuration is

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Wow, you really shouldn't be having nodes go up and down so frequently, that's a big red flag. That said, SolrCloud should be pretty robust so this is something to pursue... But even a 5 minute hard commit can lead to a hefty transaction log under load, you may want to reduce it substantially

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

No need to apologise. It's always good to have things like that reiterated in case I've misunderstood along the way. I have a feeling that it's related to garbage collection. I assume that if the JVM heads into a stop-the-world GC Solr can't let ZooKeeper know it's still alive and so gets marked

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Sorry, I should also mention that these leader nodes which are marked as down can actually still be queried locally with distrib=false with no problems. Is it possible that they've somehow got themselves out-of-sync? On 22 July 2013 13:37, Neil Prosser neil.pros...@gmail.com wrote: No need to

RE: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

:41 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents Sorry, I should also mention that these leader nodes which are marked as down can actually still be queried locally with distrib=false with no problems. Is it possible that they've somehow

RE: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

: Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents No need to apologise. It's always good to have things like that reiterated in case I've misunderstood along the way. I have a feeling that it's related to garbage collection. I assume that if the JVM heads into a stop-the-world GC

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

On 7/22/2013 6:45 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote: You should increase your ZK time out, this may be the issue in your case. You may also want to try the G1GC collector to keep STW under ZK time out. When I tried G1, the occasional stop-the-world GC actually got worse. I tried G1 after trying CMS

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

A couple of things I've learned along the way ... I had a similar architecture where we used fairly low numbers for auto-commits with openSearcher=false. This keeps the tlog to a reasonable size. You'll need something on the client side to send in the hard commit request to open a new searcher

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Are you feeding Graphite from Solr? If so, how? On 07/19/2013 01:02 AM, Neil Prosser wrote: That was overnight so I was unable to track exactly what happened (I'm going off our Graphite graphs here).

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

I just have a little python script which I run with cron (luckily that's the granularity we have in Graphite). It reads the same JSON the admin UI displays and dumps numeric values into Graphite. I can open source it if you like. I just need to make sure I remove any hacks/shortcuts that I've

Re: Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

Well, if I'm reading this right you had a node go out of circulation and then bounced nodes until that node became the leader. So of course it wouldn't have the documents (how could it?). Basically you shot yourself in the foot. Underlying here is why it took the machine you were re-starting so

Solr 4.3.1 - SolrCloud nodes down and lost documents

While indexing some documents to a SolrCloud cluster (10 machines, 5 shards and 2 replicas, so one replica on each machine) one of the replicas stopped receiving documents, while the other replica of the shard continued to grow. That was overnight so I was unable to track exactly what happened

Re: Solr 4.3.1: Errors When Attempting to Index LatLon Fields

Vanderbilt li...@datagenic.com wrote: I'm trying to index documents containing geo-spatial coordinates using Solr 4.3.1 and am running into some difficulties. Whenever I attempt to index a particular document containing a geospatial coordinate pair (using post.jar), the operation fails as follows

Re: How to use joins in solr 4.3.1

Not quite sure what's the problem with the second, but the first is: q=: That just isn't legal, try q=*:* As for the second, are there any other errors in the solr log? Sometimes what's returned in the response packet does not include the true source of the problem. Best Erick On Mon, Jul 15,

solr 4.3.1 Installation

Hi , We have been using solr 3.6.1 .Recently downloaded the solr 4.3.1 version and installed the same as multicore setup as follows Folder Structure solr.war solr conf core0 core1 solr.xml Created the context fragment xml file in tomcat/conf/catalina

Re: solr 4.3.1 Installation

been using solr 3.6.1 .Recently downloaded the solr 4.3.1 version and installed the same as multicore setup as follows Folder Structure solr.war solr conf core0 core1 solr.xml Created the context fragment xml file in tomcat/conf/catalina

Re: solr 4.3.1 Installation

#Using_the_example_logging_setup_in_containers_other_than_Jetty On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , We have been using solr 3.6.1 .Recently downloaded the solr 4.3.1 version and installed the same as multicore setup as follows Folder Structure

Re: How to use joins in solr 4.3.1

Looks like the JoinQParserPlugin is throwing an NPE. Query: localhost:8983/solr/location/select?q=*:*fq={!join from=key to=merchantId fromIndex=merchant} 84343345 [qtp2012387303-16] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore – java.lang.NullPointerException at

Re: How to use joins in solr 4.3.1

Found this post: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201302.mbox/%3CCAB_8Yd82aqq=oY6dBRmVjG7gvBBewmkZGF9V=fpne4xgkbu...@mail.gmail.com%3E And based on the answer, I modified my query: localhost:8983/solr/location/ select?fq={!join from=key to=merchantId

Re: How to use joins in solr 4.3.1

You can only join on indexed fields, our Location:merchantId field is not indexed. Best Erick On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Utkarsh Sengar utkarsh2...@gmail.com wrote: Found this post:

Solr 4.3.1: Errors When Attempting to Index LatLon Fields

I'm trying to index documents containing geo-spatial coordinates using Solr 4.3.1 and am running into some difficulties. Whenever I attempt to index a particular document containing a geospatial coordinate pair (using post.jar), the operation fails as follows: SimplePostTool version 1.5

Re: Solr 4.3.1: Errors When Attempting to Index LatLon Fields

Make sure that dynamicFields are within fields rather than types. Solr tends to ignore misplaced configuration elements. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Scott Vanderbilt Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 5:10 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr 4.3.1: Errors When

Re: Solr 4.3.1: Errors When Attempting to Index LatLon Fields

PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr 4.3.1: Errors When Attempting to Index LatLon Fields I'm trying to index documents containing geo-spatial coordinates using Solr 4.3.1 and am running into some difficulties. Whenever I attempt to index a particular document containing a geospatial

How to use joins in solr 4.3.1

Hello, I am trying to join data between two cores: merchant and location This is my query: http://_server_.com:8983/solr/location/select?q={!join from=merchantId to=merchantId fromIndex=merchant}walgreens Ref: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join Merchants core has documents for the query:

Re: How to use joins in solr 4.3.1

I have also tried these queries (as per this SO answer: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12665797/is-solr-4-0-capable-of-using-join-for-multiple-core ) 1. http://_server_.com:8983/solr/location/select?q=:fq={!join from=merchantId to=merchantId fromIndex=merchant}walgreens And I get this: {

Bootstrap solr 4.3.1 on tomcat 7 with compositeID routing

Hi, We are upgrading solr 4.0 to solr 4.3.1 on tomcat 7. We would like to use the compositeId router. It seems that there are two ways to do that: 1. using collections API to create a new collection by passing numShards; 2. Passing numShards in bootstrap process. For 1, we have a large amount

SOLRJ commit question - SOLR 4.3.1

Hi, I am adding around 100 million records to SOLR using SOLRJ. I am not performing commit operation until I add all the documents to SOLR. I see that my program adds the docs very fast (1 million per minute) for around 18 million documents which is expected result but after 18 million records

Re: SOLRJ commit question - SOLR 4.3.1

The queue size is high, but I doubt that's your issue. Here's what I'd do: 1 check the Solr server. Is it CPU bound? I/O bound? You have to identify where the resources are being spent before you get to implementing a solution. Are you using SolrCloud? If so, not committing until all 100M docs is

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 4.3.1 released

June 2013, Apache Solr™ 4.3.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.3.1 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

Re: SOLR 4.3.1?

It's already cut and the vote has been passed. It should be out any time now. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:26 AM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote: When is 4.3.1 coming out? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076 -- Anshum Gupta http://www.anshumgupta.net

SOLR 4.3.1?

When is 4.3.1 coming out? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076