>I am trying to connect to a solrcloud through a elb from a Drupal 7
>install, the elb is a tcp elb which seems to work well, drupal says it
>can talk to the solr install through the elb but when I try to index
>nothing seems to happen.
>
>Does anyone have any ideas on how to r
Hi All
I am trying to connect to a solrcloud through a elb from a Drupal 7 install,
the elb is a tcp elb which seems to work well, drupal says it can talk to the
solr install through the elb but when I try to index nothing seems to happen.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to resolve
As per my understanding, distrib=false will be added in select query to
restrict the document selection to particular shard. But how should i route
the documents to only particular shard, is still my need.
Thanks
Hemanth
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I suspect that when you create your collections, somehow you're not
doing it like you expect.
The red flag is:
I tried creating a collection with compositeId routing which
created shard1,shard2,shard3 , but when I indexed , all the documents went
to one shard only
This simply shouldn't be
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your reply. I have no issues of using either Implicit or
Composite routing but I want to insert the documents to a particular shard,
so that when I want to query the data , I can hit a particular shard, which
gives me the results in lesser time as it hits only particular shard.
> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > On 12/19/2017 3:06 PM, Greg Roodt wrote:
>> >> > > > Thanks for your reply Erick.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > This is what I'm doing at the moment with Solr 6.2 (I was
>&
> Thanks for your reply Erick.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This is what I'm doing at the moment with Solr 6.2 (I was
> mistaken,
> >> > > before
> >> > > > I said 6.1).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 1. A
>> > > > 1. A new instance comes online
>> > > > 2. Systemd starts solr with a custom start.sh script
>> > > > 3. This script creates a core.properties file that looks like this:
>> > > > ```
>> > > > name=blah
>> > >
; > name=blah
> > > > shard=shard1
> > > > ```
> > > > 4. Script starts solr via the jar.
> > > > ```
> > > > java -DzkHost=... -jar start.jar
> > > > ```
> > >
> > > The way that we would expect this
gt; > > 4. Script starts solr via the jar.
> > > ```
> > > java -DzkHost=... -jar start.jar
> > > ```
> >
> > The way that we would expect this to be normally done is a little
> > different. Adding a node to the cloud normally will NOT copy any
t; shard=shard1
> > ```
> > 4. Script starts solr via the jar.
> > ```
> > java -DzkHost=... -jar start.jar
> > ```
>
> The way that we would expect this to be normally done is a little
> different. Adding a node to the cloud normally will NOT copy any
to the cloud normally will NOT copy any
indexes. You have basically tricked SolrCloud into adding the replica
automatically by creating a core before Solr starts. SolrCloud
incorporates the new core into the cluster according to the info that
you have put in core.properties, notices that it has no i
Thanks for your reply Erick.
This is what I'm doing at the moment with Solr 6.2 (I was mistaken, before
I said 6.1).
1. A new instance comes online
2. Systemd starts solr with a custom start.sh script
3. This script creates a core.properties file that looks like this:
```
name=blah
shard=shard1
What have you configured to add the replica when a new node is spun up?
If you're just copying the entire directory including the core.properties file,
you're just getting lucky. The legcyCloud=true default is _probably_ adding
the replica with a new URL and thus making it distinct.
Please
Hi
Background:
* I am looking to upgrade from Solr 6.1 to Solr 7.1.
* Currently the system is run in cloud mode with a single collection and
single shard per node.
* Currently when a new node is added to the cluster, it becomes a replica
and copies the data / core "automagically".
Question:
Is
You're misinterpreting the docs. _route_ is used to
tell _queries_ where to go, or to route a document
as part of the parameters when you send the doc,
not a field in the doc.
So when you added the _route_ field to the doc, you
didn't have it in the schema in the first place.
So you could add a
I created a collection with implicit routing mechanism and my shared names
are Active and Disabled , these are the values of one of my collection
field: Status. But when I am trying to upload the document using Solr UI
documents section : Upload using JSON format with all the fields including
Thanks Erick. I agree SolrCloud is better than master/slave, however we
have some questions between managing replicas separately vs with solrcloud.
For eg how much overhead do SolrCloud nodes have wrt memory/cpu/disk in
order to be able to sync pending index updates to other replicas? What
The main advantage in SolrCloud in your setup is HA/DR. You say you
have multiple replicas and shards. Either you have to index to each
replica separately or you use master/slave replication. In either case
you have to manage and fix the case where some node goes down. If
you're using master/slave
Hello,
We are thinking about migrating to SolrCloud. Our current setup is:
1. Multiple replicas and shards.
2. Each query typically hits a single shard only.
3. We have an external system that assigns a document to a shard based on
it's origin and is also used by solr clients when querying to find
solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: sharing the same param value in Solrcloud
Solr gets the query on some node. It then sends sub-requests out to one replica
for each shard, perhaps on other nodes. You'd have to insure that the
parameters get added before
Solr gets the query on some node. It then sends sub-requests out to
one replica for each shard, perhaps on other nodes. You'd have to
insure that the parameters get added before the subrequests are made.
In the logs you'll see things like DISTRIB=false for sub-requests, so
the first thing to check
I am trying to work out how to share a parameter value in all the Solr nodes in
a cluster.
I have two custom search components. One is defined in the first-components
list and the other is defined in the last-components list. Ideally, the
first-component creates the parameter value and sets
gt; wrote:
> We are setting up solrcloud 6.6 in production. In some blogs, I see that
> Jetty is not recommended in prod environment. Is that the case ? Any
> specific disadvantages of going with Jetty ?
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
We are setting up solrcloud 6.6 in production. In some blogs, I see that Jetty
is not recommended in prod environment. Is that the case ? Any specific
disadvantages of going with Jetty ?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
is available as a Java
object that's easy to use in code -- you don't have to worry about
parsing the response into Java objects.
> Now, I want to deploy the application in SolrCloud mode and for each core,
> there will be 2 more replicas.
Most things in SolrCloud should be done at the collection
; On 11 Dec 2017, at 14:57, Fengtan <fengtan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Drupal can talk to a SolrCloud cluster the same way it talks to a
> > standalone Solr server, i.e. by using the Search API suite
> > https://www.drupal.org/project/search_a
the instances.
Regards
Per
> On 11 Dec 2017, at 14:57, Fengtan <fengtan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Drupal can talk to a SolrCloud cluster the same way it talks to a
> standalone Solr server, i.e. by using the Search API suite
> https://www.drupal.org/project/se
Hi,
Drupal can talk to a SolrCloud cluster the same way it talks to a
standalone Solr server, i.e. by using the Search API suite
https://www.drupal.org/project/search_api
You will have to create the collection yourself on Solr though (Drupal will
not do it for you).
If you want to take
the redundancy and
maybe even the performance, I followed
http://www.francelabs.com/blog/tutorial-deploying-solrcloud-6-on-amazon-ec2/ to
get the cloud up and running but I need some guidance on how to add in a new
shard/collection so I can point the drupal instances to the new solr cloud,
does
new InputStreamReader(
connection.getInputStream()));
String decodedString;
while ((decodedString = in.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(decodedString);
}
in.close();
out.cl
On 12/6/2017 11:15 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> If I sign out, I lose my running Solr. I need to start it up and then sign
> out.
If you're starting Solr with NSSM and having that problem, I think that
would be something to discuss with the NSSM project. That behavior
sounds like Solr is not
If I sign out, I lose my running Solr. I need to start it up and then sign out.
Thanks.
-S
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 12:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: SolrCloud Windows Service
On 12/6/2017 9:39 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> Can someone suggest the best method for starting SolrCloud as a Windows
> Service?
>
> I have used nssm prior. It works ok for Solr standalone, but doesn't seem to
> work correctly for SolrCloud. This could simply be me not configuring
Can someone suggest the best method for starting SolrCloud as a Windows Service?
I have used nssm prior. It works ok for Solr standalone, but doesn't seem to
work correctly for SolrCloud. This could simply be me not configuring the
service in nssm.
If anyone has a working method, my thanks
+Business Media.
> ---
> Springer Science+Business Media Deutschland GmbH
> Registered Office: Berlin / Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 152987 B
> Directors: Derk Haank, Martin Mos, Dr. Ulrich Vest
>
> ____
> Von: Walter Underwood
cht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 152987 B
Directors: Derk Haank, Martin Mos, Dr. Ulrich Vest
Von: Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 16:20
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Logging in Solrcloud
In 6.5.1, t
In 6.5.1, the intra-cluster requests are POST, which makes them easy to
distinguish in the request logs. Also, the intra-cluster requests go to a
specific core instead of to the collection. So we use the request logs and grep
out the GET lines.
We are considering fronting every Solr process
To be more precisely and provide some more details, i tried to simplify the
problem by using the Solr-examples that were delivered with the solr
So i started bin/solr -e cloud, using 2 nodes, 2 shards and replication of 2.
To understand the following, it might be important to know, which
Hi Stefan,
I am not aware of option to log only client side queries, but I think that you
can find workaround with what you currently have. If you take a look at log
lines for query that comes from the client and one that is result of querying
shards, you will see differences - the most simple
Hey everybody,
i have a question regarding query-request logging in solr-cloud. I've set the
the "org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.Request"-logger to INFO-level and its
logging all those query-requests. So far so good. BUT, as I'm running Solr in
cloud mode with 3 nodes and 3 shards per
't define this, Solr will use Java APIs to figure out the
primary IP address of the machine, and it will use that when registering
itself into the SolrCloud clusterstate in ZK. Sometimes the Java APIs
will choose the wrong address, especially on multi-homed systems, which
is why Solr provid
:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: starting SolrCloud nodes
On 12/1/2017 10:13 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> Thanks to previous help. I have a ZK ensemble of three nodes running. I
> have uploaded the config for my collection and the solr.xml file.
> I have Solr insta
y correct.
If ZK_HOST is defined or you use the -z option, you do not need to
include the -c option when starting Solr. SolrCloud mode is assumed
when ZK info is available. The only time the -c option is *required* is
when you want to start the embedded zookeeper. Having the option won't
On 11/30/2017 8:53 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> I took the hint and looked at both solr.in.cmd and solr.in.sh. Clearly
> setting ZK_HOST is a first step. I am sure this is explained somewhere, but
> I overlooked it.
> From here, once I have Solr installed, I can run the Control Script to upload
Looks good. If you set ZK_HOST in your solr.in.sh you can forgo
setting it when you start, but that's not necessary.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> Thanks to previous help. I have a ZK ensemble of three nodes running. I
> have uploaded
Thanks to previous help. I have a ZK ensemble of three nodes running. I have
uploaded the config for my collection and the solr.xml file.
I have Solr installed on three machines.
I think my next steps are:
Start up each Solr instance: bin/solr start -c -z
"zoo1:2181,zoo2:2181,zoo3:2181" //
Thanks Shawn, it all mainly made sense.
I took the hint and looked at both solr.in.cmd and solr.in.sh. Clearly setting
ZK_HOST is a first step. I am sure this is explained somewhere, but I
overlooked it.
From here, once I have Solr installed, I can run the Control Script to upload a
config
On 11/29/2017 11:44 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> I want ZK to manage the config files. The config set and the solr.xml file.
> I wanted to upload them explicitly.
>
> This is where my questions begin.
> I assume I upload the config files prior to starting Solr?
If you're storing solr.xml in ZK,
A couple of steps are still not clear to me.
Currently, I have my schema defined. Plus, I have six VM's.
I have ZK running on three of the VM's.
Now I want to get a SolrCloud cluster running on other three. I may use only
two VM's and use my local machine as the third node.
I want ZK to manage
learly user error, we have a
collection in solrcloud that is started numShards=2 replicationFactor=1 solr
seems happy the collection seems happy. Yet when we post and update to it and
then look at the record again, it seems to only affect one core and not the
second.
What are we likely to be
, all of the replicas
associated with that shard would change.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Tom Barber <magicaltr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I can't find an answer to this, and its clearly user error, we have a
> collection in solrcloud that is s
Hi folks
I can't find an answer to this, and its clearly user error, we have a
collection in solrcloud that is started numShards=2 replicationFactor=1 solr
seems happy the collection seems happy. Yet when we post and update to it and
then look at the record again, it seems to only affect one
On the Solr side there's at least
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9818 which may cause trouble
with the queue. I once had the core reload command in the admin UI add
more than 200k entries to the overseer queue..
--Ere
Shawn Heisey kirjoitti 25.10.2017 klo 15.57:
On 10/24/2017
0
down vote
favorite
I have solrCloud installed with SSL settings I have created collection1 on
solr and created following external table.
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE SolrExtTable (id int,time string,sourceaddress)
STORED BY 'com.lucidworks.hadoop.hive.LWStorageHandler'
with serdeproperties
ding nodes when it exceeds
> the buffer.
>
> We are currently using ZK 3.4.6 to use with SolrCloud 5.1.0.
The ZOOKEEPER-1162 issue has not been fixed. It is a very old bug --
opened six years ago. They probably aren't going to fix it.
If you find that restarting a single Solr instance e
r suggestion and hope it will
> resolve the issue.
>
> On the side note, would you know if this is an existing bug? if yes, has it
> been resolved in later version? i.e. zk allows adding nodes when it exceeds
> the buffer.
>
> We are currently using ZK 3.4.6 to use with SolrCloud
using ZK 3.4.6 to use with SolrCloud 5.1.0.
Thanks again!
Best Regards,
Christopher Tarjono
Accenture Pte Ltd
+65 9347 2484
c.a.tarj...@accenture.com
From: Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org>
Sent: 25 October 2017 20:57:30
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
On 10/24/2017 8:11 AM, Tarjono, C. A. wrote:
> Would like to check if anyone have seen this issue before, we started
> having this a few days ago:
>
>
>
> The only error I can see in solr console is below:
>
> 5960847[main-SendThread(172.16.130.132:2281)] WARN
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn [
Thanks Eric for your response, please see below link for the image of our
solrcloud dashboard that shows the error.
https://imgur.com/QCn9BCl
Best Regards,
Christopher Tarjono
Accenture Pte Ltd
+65 9347 2484
c.a.tarj...@accenture.com
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
The mail server aggressively removes attachments and the like, you'll have
to put it somewhere and provide a link.
Did anything change in that time frame?
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Tarjono, C. A.
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Would like to check if
Hi All,
Would like to check if anyone have seen this issue before, we started having
this a few days ago:
[cid:image003.jpg@01D34D14.FC34F4D0]
The only error I can see in solr console is below:
5960847 [main-SendThread(172.16.130.132:2281)] WARN
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn [ ] - Session
hmoud
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Emir Arnautović <
>>>>> emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Mahmoud,
>>>>>> Is this something t
Some time ago, I did some testing with SolrCloud (mostly 5.0 and
branch_5x) handling thousands of collections.
How that testing went is documented in SOLR-7191. That issue has been
marked as resolved in version 6.3, but no commits were made in the
issue, and I haven't seen any evidence
or Cipher_MISMATCH.
-Original Message-
From: SOLR6931 [mailto:solrpubl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solrcloud dead-lock
Hey Kent,
Have you managed to find a solution to your problem?
I'm currently encountering the exact same
Hey Kent,
Have you managed to find a solution to your problem?
I'm currently encountering the exact same issue.
Jack
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
ources. Even if host same documents (e.g.
> leader
> >> and
> >>>> replica) merges are not likely to happen at the same time and you can
> >>>> expect to see such cases.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 16 Oct 2017, at 11:58, Mahmoud Almokadem <prog.mahm...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>
gt; >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Mahmoud Almokadem <
> >> prog.mahm...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Emir,
> >>>>
> >>>> We doesn't use routing.
> >>>>
>
> prog.mahm...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Emir,
>>>>
>>>> We doesn't use routing.
>>>>
>>>> Servers is already balanced and the number of documents on each shard
>> are
>>>> approxi
n't use routing.
> >>
> >> Servers is already balanced and the number of documents on each shard
> are
> >> approximately the same.
> >>
> >> Nothing running on the servers except Solr and ZooKeeper.
> >>
same.
>>
>> Nothing running on the servers except Solr and ZooKeeper.
>>
>> I initialized the client as
>>
>> String zkHost = "192.168.1.89:2181,192.168.1.99:2181";
>>
>> CloudSolrClient solrCloud = new Cl
s is already balanced and the number of documents on each shard are
> approximately the same.
>
> Nothing running on the servers except Solr and ZooKeeper.
>
> I initialized the client as
>
> String zkHost = "192.168.1.89:2181,192.168.1.99:2181";
>
&g
SolrClient solrCloud = new CloudSolrClient.Builder()
.withZkHost(zkHost)
.build();
solrCloud.setIdField("document_id");
solrCloud.setDefaultCollection(collection);
solrCloud.setRequestWriter(new BinaryRequestWriter());
size?
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> On 16 Oct 2017, at 10:46, Mahmoud Almokadem <prog.mahm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We've installed SolrCloud 7.0.1 with two
We've installed SolrCloud 7.0.1 with two nodes and 8 shards per node.
The configurations and the specs of the two servers are identical.
When running bulk indexing using SolrJ we see one of the servers is fully
loaded as you see on the images and the other is normal.
Images URLs:
https
(Replicable)
There is no other error messages related to replication.Any idea why this is
happening?
Is there any API to run replication manually.
The replication feature (which is what exposes the version numbers you
have referenced) is *not* a part of normal SolrCloud operation
The problem was replicationFactor was set to 1.Now replication works fine
while setting replicationFactor as 2.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Good day,
*Context and background:*
I have a set of documents, that initially are quite deeply nested, but as
part of the pre-index step the documents are flattened, such that they are
at most 2 levels deep - a root document and a list of child documents. Each
child document is given some
Thanks! I was trying the distrib=false option but was apparently using it
incorrectly for the cloud. The shard.info parameter was what I was
originally looking for.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:09 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> You can route a request to a specific replica by
You can route a request to a specific replica by
solr_node:port/solr/collection1_shard1_replica1/query?distrib=false
blah blah
The "distrib=false" bit will cause the query to go to that replica and
only that replica. You can get the shard (collection1_shard1_replica1)
from the admin UI "cores"
Hi,
We're trying to investigate a possible data issue between two replicas in
our cloud setup. We have docValues enabled for a string field, and when we
facet by it, the results come back with the expected numbers per value, or
zero for all values.
Is there a way to tell which replica is
Thanki
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 4:18 PM
> To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: Issue while using Document Routing in SolrCloud 6.1
>
> Hi,
>
> Need the help regarding to below mention query.
> I have configure the 2 collections with each has 2 shard and 2 r
r 10, 2017 4:18 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: Issue while using Document Routing in SolrCloud 6.1
Hi,
Need the help regarding to below mention query.
I have configure the 2 collections with each has 2 shard and 2 replica and i
have implemented Composite document routing for my unique f
Hi Ketan,
Is it possible that you are indexing only one tenant and that is causing single
shard to become hotspot?
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 12:47, Ketan
Hi,
Need the help regarding to below mention query.
I have configure the 2 collections with each has 2 shard and 2 replica and i
have implemented Composite document routing for my unique field 'Id' where I
have use 2 level Tenant route as mentions below.
e.g : projectId:158380 modelId:3606
i could see different version of the below entries in Leader and replica.
While doing index , in replica instance logs we could see it is keep
receiving update request from leader but it says no changes, skipping
commit.
Master (Searching)
Master (Replicable)
There is no other error
.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gopesh:
>
> There is brand new functionality in Solr 7, see: SOLR-10233, the
> "PULL" replica type which is a hybrid SolrCloud replica that uses
> master/slave type replication. You should fin
thanks.
We dont see any error message/any message in logs. And we have enough disk
space.
We are running solr as root user in ubuntu box but zookeeper process running
as zookeeper user.Will that cause the problem?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
We are using Solr 6.4.2 & SolrCloud setup. We have two solr instances in the
solr cluster.This solrcloud running in ubuntu OS. The problem is replication
is not happening between these two solr instances. sometimes it replicate
10% of the content and sometimes not.
In Zookeeper ensembl
com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using Solr 6.4.2 & SolrCloud setup. We have two solr instances in the
> solr cluster.This solrcloud running in ubuntu OS. The problem is replication
> is not happening between these two solr instances. sometimes it replicate
> 10%
Gopesh:
There is brand new functionality in Solr 7, see: SOLR-10233, the
"PULL" replica type which is a hybrid SolrCloud replica that uses
master/slave type replication. You should find this in the reference
guide, the 7.0 ref guide should be published soon. Meanwhile, that
JIRA will le
Hi,
We are using Solr 6.4.2 & SolrCloud setup. We have two solr instances in the
solr cluster.This solrcloud running in ubuntu OS. The problem is replication
is not happening between these two solr instances. sometimes it replicate
10% of the content and sometimes not.
In Zookeeper ensembl
Hello Guys,
As of now we are running Solr 3.4 with Master Slave Configuration. We are
planning to upgrade it to the lastest version (6.6 or 7). Questions I have
before upgrading
1. Since we do not have a lot of data, is it required to move to SolrCloud
or continue using it Master Slave
uys,
>
> As of now we are running Solr 3.4 with Master Slave Configuration. We are
> planning to upgrade it to the lastest version (6.6 or 7). Questions I have
> before upgrading
>
>
> 1. Since we do not have a lot of data, is it required to move to SolrCl
Hello Guys,
As of now we are running Solr 3.4 with Master Slave Configuration. We are
planning to upgrade it to the lastest version (6.6 or 7). Questions I have
before upgrading
1. Since we do not have a lot of data, is it required to move to SolrCloud
or continue using it Master Slave
On 9/29/2017 6:34 AM, John Blythe wrote:
complete noob as to solrcloud here. almost-non-noob on solr in general.
we're experiencing growing pains in our data and am thinking through moving
to solrcloud as a result. i'm hoping to find out if it seems like a good
strategy or if we need to get
Log -
2017-10-02 20:08:19.346 WARN (qtp1533664441-161957) [ ]
o.e.j.h.HttpParser parse exception: java.lang.IllegalStateException: too
much data seeking EOF in CLOSE for
HttpChannelOverHttp@1aec8a82{r=1,c=false,a=IDLE,uri=null}
2017-10-02 20:08:19.409 ERROR (qtp1533664441-160833) [ ]
/S will work for you.
>
> But otherwise I'd be using SolrCloud.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:48 PM, John Blythe <johnbly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > thanks for the responses, guys.
> >
> > erick: we do need NRT in several cases. also in need of
NRT it's really "10 minutes is OK" then
M/S will work for you.
But otherwise I'd be using SolrCloud.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:48 PM, John Blythe <johnbly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks for the responses, guys.
>
> erick: we do need NRT in several cases. also in
801 - 900 of 5468 matches
Mail list logo