Thanks for the reply Yonik!
I'm using the nightly from 2009-08-20, so its a rather fresh build. And by
comparing the schema with the one im using now I had made a mistake when
defining the field.
By examining the most recent build, i noticed that the normal date field is
defined as follows:
AHMET ARSLAN schrieb:
If i analyse this field type in analysis.jsp, the follwoing
are the results
if i give running its stems word to run which is fine
If i give machine why is that it stems to machin, now
from where does
this word come from
If i give revolutionary it stems to revolutionari, i
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:57 PM, GiriGG giri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I need to build a Search system using Solr. I need to keep data of 30 days
which will be around 400GB.
I will be using Distributed Search with Master/Slaves (Data will be
published to each shard on round robin basis).
Hmm, seems I was one day too early with my nightly then:p
Quote from Chris (2009-08-20 17:04):
i changed it to be manufacturedate_dt since that fits with the existing
scheme ... the data is all made up, but so is all hte rest of our data.
seems like lucene.apache.org is down at the moment but
Hi.
We are now rethinking our sharding strategy to shard on the blog entry
publishdate instead of just a simple hash. This is due to that the index
size is growing too much to be handled in one index.
Thing is that we want to select a core based on the publishdate of the
entry. Let's say we have
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
Can I get all the distinct values from the Solr database, or do I
have to select everything and aggregate it myself?
No, Solr has no way to do a distinct at query-time.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
but you could use facets to do something similar as a distinct where...
lets say you filter your query on something and want to know how many
distinct categories that your results comprise.
then you can facet on the category field and count the number of facet
values that are returned, right?
but
have you looked at the coreadminhandler?
say you always write to newcore
after say august , you cretae andn empty core core-aug and swap it
out with newcore.
Make every core use the same instancedir with different dataDir
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Heroumarcus.he...@tailsweep.com
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Paul Tomblinptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
cwd=/Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20
SolrHome=/Users/ptomblin/src/lucidity/solr/
Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:04 AM, J G skinny_joe...@hotmail.com wrote:
We have multiple solr webapps all running from the same WAR file. Each
webapp is running under the same Tomcat container and I consider each webapp
the same thing as a slice (or instance). I've configured the Tomcat
That seems sweet! One conf dir, many data-dirs = perfect.
Some short questions
* How and where do one configure each core to have separate data vs
instancedirs ? Still manually in solr.xml or by using the coreadminhandler ?
* How do one use the CoreAdminHandler ? (Google gives me only refs to
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangarshalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right place,
it's still looking for the data in
/Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/solr/data/
How can I changed that?
One easy way is to hard code
Paul Tomblin schrieb:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangarshalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've spotted the problem - while SolrHome is in the right place,
it's still looking for the data in
/Users/ptomblin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/solr/data/
How can I changed that?
One
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Marcus Herou marcus.he...@tailsweep.comwrote:
That seems sweet! One conf dir, many data-dirs = perfect.
Some short questions
* How and where do one configure each core to have separate data vs
instancedirs ? Still manually in solr.xml or by using the
Are you using SOLR-769 or did you roll your own Carrot2 integration?
Your question might be better served on the Carrot2 mailing list if
you are not using SOLR-769.
On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:17 PM, bhaskar chandrasekar wrote:
Hi,
We have integrated Solr index with Carrot2 Search
Thanks.
Yup, I have reloaded the wiki all morning (GMT+1 time)
Cheers
//Marcus
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Marcus Herou marcus.he...@tailsweep.com
wrote:
That seems sweet! One conf dir, many
Hi,
Is there a way to query solr about fields which names contain
whitespaces? Indexing such data does not cause any problems but I have
been unable to retrieve it.
Regards,
Marcin Kuptel
I guess this thread went offline
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:32 PM, erikea...@yahoo.comerikea...@yahoo.com wrote:
So...that's the correct place for the updateRequestProcessorChain element?
I know nothing happened because:
- the feild I'm creating with it does not get created in updated/new
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Chantal
Ackermannchantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de wrote:
Paul Tomblin schrieb:
The conf file says:
dataDir${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}/dataDir
That indicates to me that there is some way to override that default
./solr/data involving something called
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Ryan McKinleyryan...@gmail.com wrote:
Say you have an embedded solr server and an http solr server pointed to the
same location.
1. make sure only is read only! otherwise you can make a mess.
2. calling commit on the embedded solr instance, will not have any
Erik Earle wrote:
I've read through the wiki for this and it explains most everything except
where in the solrconfig.xml theupdateRequestProcessorChain goes.
I tried it at the top level but that doesn't seem to do anything.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
Hi,
I have a faceted-search enabled index where I first do a simple
search, e.g. by specifying the query term nursing. Then, I'm trying
tor refine that result using facets.
I found out that the facet-filtered results contain titles which match
nursing exactly that aren't in the original
Short version:
Is there a way to either do partial updates to documents (update/add one or
two fields only), or to search across multiple documents grouped by a
(non-unique) key stored in a field?
Long version:
I've run into an issue with the way I'm indexing documents for a new
product, and
Sorry, I have misinterpreted my test results.
In fact, I can see that facets are missing in the original search.
So the question becomes: how is it possible that a search doesn't
report all the facets of a specific result set?
On 28 Aug 2009, at 17:46, Candide Kemmler wrote:
Hi,
I have a
Spot on. Fantastic, it works like a charm now.
Thanks a million.
On 28 Aug 2009, at 18:26, Joe Calderon wrote:
facet.mincount=1, facet.limit=-1
On 08/28/2009 09:15 AM, Candide Kemmler wrote:
Sorry, I have misinterpreted my test results.
In fact, I can see that facets are missing in the
Is the Solr wiki down?
I have tried to access the following URLs and none of them is loading.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryParametersIndex
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
I have 2 fields:
realprice
avgprice
I'd like to be able to take the contents of avgprice if realprice is not
available.
due to design the average price cannot be encoded in the 'realprice'-field.
Since I need to be able to filter, sort and facet on these fields, it would
be really nice to
Thanks Paul.
It was confirmed. I hope it will be back soon.
Here is the result from that page : It's not just you!
http://wiki.apache.org looks down from here.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Paul Tomblin ptomb...@xcski.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Israel
You also need a requestHandler that uses your updateRequestProcessorChain:
requestHandler name=/customUpdate class=solr.XmlUpdateRequestHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=update.processorcustom/str
/lst
/requestHandler
updateRequestProcessorChain name=custom
...
I'm trying to instantiate multiple cores. Since nothing is different
between the two cores except the schema and the data dir, I was hoping
to share the same instanceDir. Solr seems to recognize that there are
two cores, and gives me two different admin pages. But unfortunately
both the admin
can you just add a new field that has the real or ave price?
Just populate that field at index time... make it indexed but not
stored
If you want the real or average price to be treated the same in
faceting, you are really going to want them in the same field.
On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:16
Hi,
As one of our requirement we need to backup Master indexes to Slave
periodically. I've been able to successfully sync the index using
fetchIndex command,
That sounds very similar to my use case, too. (Mentioned in the recent
thread Updating a solr record). So +1 on allowing updates!
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Don,
I started work on fixing this a while back. However I plan to
resume again soon. Basically one would be able to update fields
to a
I oversimplified my question somewhat.
The realprice can actually be 1 out +/- 10 thousand dynamic fields. Which
one is determined at query time. (price depends on date, class, and some
other properties. The product of the options of these properties amount to
the 10k number ) The avg field
Fantastic! Anything I can do to help out?
Firstly, to everyone who has been helping me, thank you very much. All
this feedback is helping me narrow down these issues.
I deleted the index and re-indexed all the data from scratch and for a
couple of days we were OK, but now it seems to be erring again.
It happens on different input
i had a similar issue with text from past requests showing up, this was
on 1.3 nightly, i switched to using the lucid build of 1.3 and the
problem went away, im using a nightly of 1.4 right now also without
probs, then again your mileage may vary as i also made a bunch of schema
changes that
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Preetam Raoblogathan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If I have documents of type a, b and c but when I sort by some criteria,
lets say date,
can I make documents of kind c always appear at the bottom ?
One way is to simply use sorting.
You could have a string field
I know in my last message I said I was having issues with extra
content at the start of a response, resulting in an invalid document.
I still am having issues with documents getting truncated (yes, I have
problems galore).
I will elaborate on why its so difficult to track down an actual
document
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Rupert Fiascorufia...@gmail.com wrote:
If I run these through curl on the command its
truncated and if I run the search through the web-based admin panel
then I get an XML parse error.
Are you running curl directly against the solr server, or going
through a
Yes, I am hitting the Solr server directly (medsolr1.colo:9007)
Versions / architectures:
Jetty(6.1.3)
o...@medsolr1 ~ $ uname -a
Linux medsolr1 2.6.18-xen-r12 #9 SMP Tue Mar 3 15:34:08 PST 2009
x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
o...@medsolr1 ~ $ java -version
I deployed LucidWorks with my existing solrconfig / schema and
re-indexed my data into it and pushed it out to production, we'll see
how it stacks up over the weekend. Already queries that were breaking
on the prior Jetty/stock Solr setup are now working - but I have seen
it before where upon an
yonik has a point, when i ran into this i also upgraded to the latest
stable jetty, im using jetty 6.1.18
On 08/28/2009 04:07 PM, Rupert Fiasco wrote:
I deployed LucidWorks with my existing solrconfig / schema and
re-indexed my data into it and pushed it out to production, we'll see
how it
43 matches
Mail list logo
