Hi Jed,
please paste the complete field definition of name_title from your
schema.xml.
You are using an analyzer that reduces your text in an undesired way, on
both index and query side. You probably want String for names, or
similar.
Spoorenberg or Saprano are analyzed in the same way as
Hi,
here is my solution. It has been some time since I last looked at it,
but it works fine. :-)
script type=text/javascript
src=/solr/epg/admin/file?file=/velocity/jquery-1.4.min.jscontentType=text/javascript/script
script type=text/javascript
Hi Erik,
thanks so much for your feedback!
hightlight? highlight :)
ups...
Seems that this parameter is false by default, though. At least it never
complained. *g*
This is one of the beauties of the VelocityResponseWriter, freeing the
client from having to deal with a Solr data
Hi Eric,
only with POST the action attribute in the form element is allowed to
have a query string. With GET, the query string is removed.
(Don't ask me why, though.)
Chantal
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 04:44 +0200, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Fixed.
form action URLs really shouldn't have query string
Hi Saïd,
I think your problem is the field's type: String. You have to use a
TextField and apply tokenizers that will find subcategory if you put
in cat. (Not sure which filter does that, though. I wouldn't think
that the PorterStemmer cuts off prefix syllables of that kind?)
If, however, you
Hi there,
consider the following response extract for a MoreLikeThis request:
result name=match numFound=1 start=0 maxScore=13.4579935
result name=response numFound=103708 start=0
maxScore=4.1711807
The first result element is the document that was input and for which to
return more like this
-lucene.com/?q=score+compare+absolute+relativefc_project=Lucenefc_project=Solr
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Chantal Ackermann chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de
Hi Mitch,
thanks for the answer and the link.
The use case is to provide content based recommendations for a single
item no matter where that came from. So, this input (match) item is the
best match, all more like this items compare to it, and the ones that
are the most alike would have the
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:12 +0200, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Solr's APIs are described as REST-like, and probably do qualify as
restful the way the term is commonly used.
I'm personally much more interested in making our APIs more powerful
and easier to use, regardless of any REST purity tests.
Hi there,
in the wiki, on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
it says:
The default is true/count if facet.limit is greater than 0, false/index
otherwise.
I've just migrated to 1.4.1 (reindexed). I can't remember how it was
with 1.4.0.
When I specify my facet query with
Oh well. Thanks for pointing that out. *sigh*
Chantal
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 04:15 +0200, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/07/01 1:12), Chantal Ackermann wrote:
Hi there,
in the wiki, on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
it says:
The default is true/count if facet.limit
Dear all,
this is not a new problem, I just wanted to check whether with 1.4 there
might have been changes that allow a different approach.
In my query, I retrieve results that have a date field. I have to sort
the result by day only, then by a different string field. The time of
that date shall
The request sent by the client was syntactically incorrect
(can not sort on undefined field: ms(start_date/DAY)).
I am a complete newbie when it comes to function queries.
Thanks for any suggestions!
Chantal
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:44 +0200, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
Dear all,
this is not a new
-07-09 at 12:08 +0200, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
[P.S. to my first post]
Further contemplating http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery.
I am using 1.4.1, the date field is configured like this:
fieldType name=date class=solr.DateField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
(The schema has
another Field to your Index where u put the Day only,
you can sort by this filed then
in your queries
cheers.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chantal Ackermann [mailto:chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2010 11:45
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff
Hi Hoss,
...somewhere you got confused, or missunderstood something. There is no
default date field in Solr, there are only recomendations and examples
provided in the example schema.xml -- in Solr 1.4.1 *and* in Solr 1.4 the
recommended field for dealing with dates is solr.TrieDateField
Hi Jörg,
the filter queries are exclusive. You can specify as many as you want
but everything that does not fit one of them will be excluded from your
result.
You can specify an OR clause in a single filter query to achieve what
you want:
fq=(EMAIL_HEADER_FROM:t...@mail.de OR
Hi Alex,
I think you have to explain the complete use case. Paging is done by
specifying the parameter start (and rows if you want to have more or
less than 10 hits per page). For each page you need of course a new
query, but the queries differ only in the parameter value start (first
page
Hi Frederico,
not sure about solrNET, but changing the http method from GET to POST
worked for me (using SolrJ).
Chantal
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 12:18 +0200, Frederico Azeiteiro wrote:
Hi,
I need to perform a search using a list of values (about 2000).
I'm using SolrNET
Hi Alex,
feedback inline:
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 12:03 +0200, Alex J. G. Burzyński wrote:
Hi Chantal,
The paging problem I've asked about is that having course-event pairs
and specifying rows limits the number of pairs returned not the courses
Hi and back again,
to create a copy of my date field that holds only the date with no
time (=0:00h time).
The question is:
Do I have to create the new date (without time) in my own transformer
(using a Calendar object) or is there some convenient way to use the
DateMathParser during indexing
Sure SOLR supports this: use facets on the field type:
add to your regular query:
facet.query=truefacet.field=type
see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 15:48 +0200, kenf_nc wrote:
parallel calls. simultaneously query for type:short rows=10 and
is this a typo in your query or in your e-mail?
you have the q parameter twice.
use fq for query inputs that mention a field explicitly when using
dismax.
So it should be:
select?q=motoqt=dismax fq =city:Paris
(the whitespace is only for visualization)
chantal
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 11:03
Hi,
unfortunately for iPad developers, it seems that it is not possible to
use the Spotlight engine through the SDK:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3133678/spotlight-search-in-the-application
Chantal
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:16 +0200, Mark Allan wrote:
Hi Stephan,
On the iPad, as with
Hi,
I haven't read everything thoroughly but have you considered creating
fields for each of your (I think what you call) party value?
So that you can query like client:Pramod.
You would then be able to facet on client and supplier.
Cheers,
Chantal
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 23:23 +0200,
Hi,
my use case is the following:
In a sub-entity I request rows from a database for an input list of
strings:
entity name=prog ...
field name=vip ... /* multivalued, not required */
entity name=ssc_entry dataSource=ssc onError=continue
query=select SSC_VALUE from
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 14:46 +0200, Rafal Bluszcz Zawadzki wrote:
EEE, d MMM HH:mm:ss z
not sure but you might want to try with an uppercase 'Z' for the
timezone (surrounded by single quotes, alternatively). The rest of your
pattern looks fine. But if you still run into problems try
Hi,
IMHO you can do this with date range queries and (date) facets.
The DateMathParser will allow you to normalize dates on min/hours/days.
If you hit a limit there, then just add a field with an integer for
either min/hour/day. This way you'll loose the month information - which
is sometimes
${dih.functions.getReplacementIfNeeded(prog.vip).
Kind regards,
- Mitch
Chantal Ackermann wrote:
Hi,
my use case is the following:
In a sub-entity I request rows from a database for an input list of
strings:
entity name=prog ...
field name=vip ... /* multivalued
Hi Mitch,
New idea:
Create a method which returns the query-string:
returnString(theVIP)
{
if ( theVIP != null || theVIP != )
{
return a query-string to find the vip
}
else
{
return SELECT 1 // you need to modify this,
Hi Mitch,
thanks for the code. Currently, I've got a different solution running
but it's always good to have examples.
If realized
that I have to throw an exception and add the onError attribute to the
entity to make that work.
I am curious:
Can you show how to make a method
make sure to set stored=true on every field you expect to be returned
in your results for later display.
Chantal
Hi Lance!
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 02:31 +0200, Lance Norskog wrote:
Should this go into the trunk, or does it only solve problems unique
to your use case?
The solution is generic but is an extension of XPathEntityProcessor
because I didn't want to touch the solr.war. This way I can deploy the
You could use org.apache.solr.handler.JsonLoader.
That one uses org.apache.noggit.JSONParser internally.
I've used the JacksonParser with Spring.
http://json.org/ lists parsers for different programming languages.
Cheers,
Chantal
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:08 +0200, MitchK wrote:
Hello ,
change the SOLR results at query time
according to your needs? Maybe you should ask for that, first (ask for X
instead of Y...).
Cheers,
Chantal
Thanks for sharing ideas.
- Mitch
Am 28.07.2010 15:35, schrieb Chantal Ackermann:
You could use org.apache.solr.handler.JsonLoader.
That one
Hi Gora,
your suggestion is good.
Two thoughts:
1. if both of the tables you are joining are in the same database under
the same user you might want to check why the join is so slow. Maybe you
just need to add an index on a column that is used in your WHERE
clauses. Joins should not be slow.
2.
This is probably what you want?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.LengthFilterFactory
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:44 +0200, Paul Dlug wrote:
Is there a filter available that will remove large tokens from the
token stream? Ideally something configurable to a
Hi Ahmed,
fields that are empty do not impact the index. It's different from a
database.
I have text fields for different languages and per document there is
always only one of the languages set (the text fields for the other
languages are empty/not set). It works all very well and fast.
I
Hi Shaun,
you create the SolrServer using multicore by just adding the core to the
URL. You don't need to add anything with SolrQuery.
URL url = new URL(new URL(solrBaseUrl), coreName);
CommonsHttpSolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url);
Concerning the default core thing - I wouldn't
Hi Andre,
changing the entity in your index from donor to gift changes of course
the scope of your search results. I found it helpful to re-think such
change from that other side (the result side).
If the users of your search application look for individual gifts, in
the end, then changing the
Hi Ravi,
with dismax, use the parameter q.alt which expects standard lucene
syntax (instead of q). If q.alt is present in the query, q is not
required. Add the parameter qt=dismax.
Chantal
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 06:22 +0200, Ravi Kiran wrote:
Hello Mr.Rochkind,
I am
hi Stefan
users can send privates messages, the selection of recipients is done via
auto-complete. therefore we need to restrict the possible results based on
the users confirmed contacts - but i have absolutely no idea how to do that
:/ Add all confirmed contacts to the index, and use it
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 20:14 +0200, Arunkumar Ayyavu wrote:
Thanks for the responses. Now, I included the EdgeNGramFilter. But, I get
the following results when I search for canon pixma.
Canon PIXMA MP500 All-In-One Photo Printer
Canon PowerShot SD500
As you can guess, I'm not expecting the
Hi Allistair,
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:37 +0200, Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hello list,
I am implementing a directory using Solr. The user is able to search with a
free-text query or 2 filters (provided as pick-lists) for country. A
directory entry only has one country.
I am using Solr
Hi Bernadette,
Bernadette Houghton schrieb:
Thanks for this Patrick. If I remove one of the hyphens, solr doesn't throw up
the error, but still doesn't find the right record. I see from marklo's
analysis page that solr is still parsing it with a hyphen. Changing this part
of our schema.xml -
Hi Joe,
WordDelimiterFilter removes different delimiters, and creates several
token strings from the input. It can also concatenate and add that as
additional token to the stream. Though, it concatenates without space.
But maybe you can tweak it to your needs?
You could also use two different
Hi Patrick,
have you added that SynonymFilter to the index chain and the query
chain? You have to add it to both if you want to have it replaced at
index and query time. It might also be enough to add it to the query
chain only. Than your index still preserves the original data.
Cheers,
Hi Avlesh,
that is mean to sent something like that
http://mumbai.burrp.com/pack/list/kolkata-on-a-roll
around at lunch time - in Germany(!).
Very very sadly, there are many places in Mumbai that have mastered the
art of making authentic Kolkata rolls but I don't know of any here in
Another option is the RegexTransformer in DIH:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler?highlight=%28regex%29#RegexTransformer
Chantal
William Pierce schrieb:
I'd recommend two ways: The way I do it in my app is that I have written a
MySql function to transform the column as part of
Hi!
Just to make sure - you did see the search form in the SOLR admin ui?
Chantal
scabbage schrieb:
Hi,
I'm a new solr user. I would like to know if there are any easy to setup web
UIs for solr. It can be as simple as a search box, term highlighting and
basic faceting. Basically I'm using
Hi Lucas,
check out the thread:
DataImportHandler / Import from DB : one data set comes in multiple rows
I am doing this successfully with my custom EntityProcessor as described
in that thread.
If you have any more questions or need some more code examples, just
ask. I'd be glad to help!
multiValued=true/
field name=categoryName type=text indexed=true stored=true
required=false multiValued=true/
what am I missing?
thanks
Joel
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
That depends a bit on your database, but it is tricky and might not
be performant.
If you
I'm using a code generator for my entities, and I cannot modify the generation.
I need to work out another option :(
shouldn't code generators help development and not make it more complex
and difficult? oO
(sry off topic)
chantal
Hi all!
Are these attributes required to make TermVectorComponent requests work?
termPositions=true termOffsets=true
I have quite a lot of fields with termVectors=true (for facetting),
but I don't get any results when requesting:
.../solr/epg/select?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=1
=participant,role
regex=([^\|]+)\|\d+,\d+,\d+,(.+) /--
Chantal
Chantal Ackermann schrieb:
follow-up:
regex=([^\|]+)\|\d+,\d+,\d+,(.+)
is the version I chose after I had the following problems with
regex=([^\|]+)\|\d+,\d+,\d+,(.*)
(changed * into + for the second group):
The role field contained
Hi Jonathan,
the concatenation seems to return a byte array because those are
rendered into a string starting with [B when calling toString() on them.
I have no suggestion on how to get a different return value from that
sql query.
To concatenate you could also use a transformer. Simply
Just for the records - this works like a charm:
.../select?q=*potter*qt=dismax
response
−
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime93/int
−
lst name=params
str name=q*potter*/str
str name=qtdismax/str
/lst
/lst
−
result name=response numFound=572 start=0 maxScore=5.3375173
...
Hi all,
my search for any postings answering the following question haven't
produced any helpful hints so far. Maybe someone can point me into the
right direction?
Situation:
I have two cores with slightly different schemas. Slightly means that
some fields appear on both cores but there are
Did the schema browser really show a different type after restarting? I
would think you'd have to reindex before the change gets applied to the
actual data. Or is you're index/import process launched on Tomcat startup?
(schema.xml != schema browser ?!)
Chantal
Bertie Shen schrieb:
Oh.
Hi all,
has anyone some code snippet on how to convert the String representation
of a SortableIntField (or SortableLongField or else) to a
java.lang.Integer or int?
Input: String (cryptic, non human readable, value of a sint field)
Output: Integer or int
I would appreciate if anyone could
core?
Exactly
See parameter mlt.interestingTerms in MoreLikeThisHandler
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThisHandler
You can get interesting terms and build query (with N optional clauses
+ boosts) to second core yourself
HIH,
Alex
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Chantal Ackermann
a JIRA issue on that?
Cheers,
Chantal
Yonik Seeley schrieb:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Chantal Ackermann
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de wrote:
has anyone some code snippet on how to convert the String representation of
a SortableIntField (or SortableLongField or else
Jan-Eirik B. Nævdal schrieb:
Some extra for the pros list:
- Full control over which content to be searchable and not.
- Posibility to make pages searchable almost instant after publication
- Control over when the site is indexed
+1 expecially the last point
you can also add a robot.txt and
Hi Andrew,
no idea, I'm afraid - but could you sent the output of
interestingTerms=details?
This at least would show what MoreLikeThis uses, in comparison to the
TermVectorComponent you've already pasted.
Chantal
Andrew Clegg schrieb:
Any ideas on this? Is it worth sending a bug report?
in this case?
But seems a bit like work around.
Cheers,
Chantal
Andrew Clegg schrieb:
Chantal Ackermann wrote:
no idea, I'm afraid - but could you sent the output of
interestingTerms=details?
This at least would show what MoreLikeThis uses, in comparison to the
TermVectorComponent you've already
The DismaxRequestHandler can handle that query input.
Add qt=dismax to your call.
There is a default configuration of dismax in the solrconfig sample that
ships with each release. You want to adopt that to your schema. Dismax
will also allow you to search on multiple selected fields with
Dear all,
happy New Year!
For my custom searchHandler (called /list) that uses the
VelocityResponseWriter I would like to use the existing dismax
configuration. Therefore I did NOT specify ANY dismax configuration in
that custom handler.
In short: it's not using (my existing) dismax at
for a dismax.vm template for
rendering.
Erik
On Jan 8, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
Dear all,
happy New Year!
For my custom searchHandler (called /list) that uses the
VelocityResponseWriter I would like to use the existing dismax
configuration. Therefore I did NOT specify
2) Also, is CommonsHttpSolrServer thread safe?
it is only if you initialize it with the MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager:
http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/apidocs/org/apache/commons/httpclient/MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager.html
Cheers,
Chantal
Hi Kelly,
...the criteria for this hypothetical search involves multi-valued fields,
where the index of one matching criteria needs to correspond to the same
value in another multi-valued field in the same index. You can't do that...
Just my two cents:
By storing values in two different
try /solr/select?q.alt=*:*qt=dismax
or /solr/select?q=some search termqt=dismax
dismax should be configured in solrconfig.xml by default, but you have
to adapt it to list the fields from your schema.xml
and for anything with known field:
/solr/select?q=field:valueqt=standard
Cheers,
Chantal
Hi all,
is it possible to restrict the returned facets to only those that apply
to the filter query but still use mincount=0? Keeping those that have a
count of 0 but apply to the filter, and at the same time leaving out
those that are not covered by the filter (and thus 0, as well).
Some
not
to everything - that might describe it, as well.
Does that make sense?
Thanks,
Chantal
Shalin Shekhar Mangar schrieb:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Chantal Ackermann
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to restrict the returned facets to only those that apply
Thank you, Chris!
That did clarify it. :-)
Cheers,
Chantal
Von: Chris Hostetter [hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 23:27
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Restricting Facet to FilterQuery in combination with mincount
I find the DismaxRequestHandler perfect for matching multiple fields, matching
phrases in other/subset of fields, weighting the different matches. It's
powerful and fast.
You can define several DismaxRequestHandlers if you want to offer different
kinds of search areas to the user (e.g. search
Hi Noam,
if you know about those rules at index time, you should put the
information into the index and simply query only for those documents
that have the desired value(s).
Cheers,
Chantal
Noam G. schrieb:
Hi Guys,
I'll start by thanking every one for an amazing search engine!
What am I
Hi Shawn,
maybe the requests that fail have a certain pattern - for example that
they are longer than all the others.
Chantal
Hi Ahmed,
if you have a multi core setup, you could change the file
programmatically (e.g. via XML parser), copy the new file to the
existing one (programmatically, of course), then reload the core.
I haven't reloaded the core programmatically, yet, but that should be
doable via SolrJ. Or - if
The problem with the wildcard searches is that the input is not
analyzed. For english, this might not be such a problem (except if you
expect case insenstive search). But than again, you don't get that with
like, either. Ngrams bring that and more.
What I think is often forgotten when comparing
Thanks, Erick! That sounds great. I really do have to upgrade.
Chantal
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 16:42 +0100, Erick Erickson wrote:
Chantal:
bq: The problem with the wildcard searches is that the input is not
analyzed.
As of 3.6/4.0, this is no longer entirely true. Some analysis is
Hi Alex,
for me, ICUFoldingFilterFactory works very good. It does lowercasing and
removes diacritica (this is how umlauts and accenting of letters is
called - punctuation means comma, points etc.). It will work for any any
language, not only German. And it will also handle apostrophs as in
C'est
Hi wunder,
for us, it works with internal dots when specifying the properties in
$SOLR_HOME/[core]/conf/solrcore.properties:
like this:
db.url=xxx
db.user=yyy
db.passwd=zzz
$SOLR_HOME/[core]/conf/data-config.xml:
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource
driver=oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
Hi Dipti,
just to make sure: are you aware of
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin
This will handle the user input in a very conventional and user friendly
way. You just have to specify on which fields you want it to search.
With the 'mm' parameter you have a powerfull option to
/)
Do I need also add dependecy... and where?
Thanks.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Chantal Ackermann chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de
To: solr-user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, Jan 13, 2012 1:52 am
Subject: Re: can solr automatically search for different
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 23:45 +0100, alessio crisantemi wrote:
hi all,
I would index on solr my pdf files wich includeds on my directory c:\myfile\
so, I add on my solr/conf directory the file data-config.xml like the
following:
dataConfig
dataSource type=BinFileDataSource /
document
Hi Bráulio,
I don't know about HunspellStemFilterFactory especially but concerning
accents:
There are several accent filter that will remove accents from your
tokens. If the Hunspell filter factory requires the accents, then simply
add the accent filters after Hunspell in your index and query
Hi,
you would not want to include the unique ID and similar stuff, though?
No idea whether it would impact the number of hits but it would most
probably influence the scoring if nothing else.
E.g. if you compare by certain fields, I would expect that a score of
1.0 indicates a match on all of
does anyone of the maillinglist users use solr as an API to avoid database
queries? [...]
Like in a... cache?
Why not use a cache then? (memcached, for example, but there are more).
Good point. A cache only uses lookup by one kind of cache key while SOLR
provides lookup by ...
Hi,
I've got these errors when my client used a different SolrJ version from
the SOLR server it connected to:
SERVER 3.5 responding --- CLIENT some other version
You haven't provided any information on your client, though.
Chantal
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 13:09 +0100, mechravi25
I've done something like that by calculating the hours during indexing
time (in the script part of the DIH config using java.util.Calendar
which gives you all those field values without effort). I've also
extracted information on which weekday it is (using the integer
constants of Calendar).
If
If your script turns out too complex to maintain, and you are developing
in Java, anyway, you could extend EntityProcessor and handle the data in
a custom way. I've done that to transform a datamart like data structure
back into a row based one.
Basically you override the method that gets the
Make sure your Tomcat instances are started each with a max heap size
that adds up to something a lot lower than the complete RAM of your
system.
Frequent Garbage collection means that your applications request more
RAM but your Java VM has no more resources, so it requires the Garbage
Collector
Hi Ritesh,
you could add another field that contains the size of the list in the
AREFS field. This way you'd simply sort by that field in descending
order.
Should you update AREFS dynamically, you'd have to update the field with
the size, as well, of course.
Chantal
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 11:27
Sorry to have misunderstood.
It seems the new Relevance Functions in Solr 4.0 might help - unless you
need to use an official release.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Relevance_Functions
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 13:04 +0100, rks_lucene wrote:
Dear Chantal,
Thanks for your reply, but
You can download Oracle's Java (which was Sun's) from Oracle directly.
You will have to create an account with them. You can use the same
account for reading the java forum and downloading other software like
their famous DB.
Simply download. JDK6 is still a binary as were all Sun packages
Hi Alp,
if you have not changed how SOLR logs in general, you should find the
log output in the regular server logfile. For Tomcat you can find this
in TOMCAT_HOME/catalina.out (or search for that name).
If there is a problem with your schema, SOLR should be complaining about
it during
Hi,
I put all those jars into SOLR_HOME/lib. I do not specify them in
solrconfig.xml explicitely, and they are all found all right.
Would that be an option for you?
Chantal
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:43 +0100, ViruS wrote:
Hello,
I just now try to switch from 3.4.0 to 3.5.0 ... i make new
Hi Henri,
you have not provided very much information, so, here comes a guess:
try ${bdte1} instead of $bdte1 - maybe Velocity resolves $bdte and
concatenates 1 instead of trying the longer value as variable, first.
Chantal
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 12:04 +0200, henri.gour...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi g,
have a look at the PlainTextEntityProcessor:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#PlainTextEntityProcessor
you will have to call the URL twice that way, but I don't think you can
get the complete document (the root element with all structure) via
xpath - so the
Hi g,
ok, I understand your problem, now. (Sorry for answering that late.)
I don't think PlainTextEntityProcessor can help you. It does not take a
regex. LineEntityProcessor does but your record elements probably do not
come on their own line each and you wouldn't want to depend on that,
anyway.
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
