I'm trying to set solr up with CentOS 4.2, Apache 2.0.55, Tomcat 5, and Java
SDK 1.5 for the first time.
I copied the solr.war to the tomcat webapps folder and it created the solr
folders. I then try running the app with
http://localhost:8080/solr/adminand I get an error (I don't have the
error
, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/06, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to set solr up with CentOS 4.2, Apache 2.0.55, Tomcat 5, and
Java
SDK 1.5 for the first time.
I copied the solr.war to the tomcat webapps folder and it created the solr
folders. I then try
Ahhh!! OK.. next time you see me you can back-slap me. I was doing a cd
into bin and starting tomcat. Now it is working. Sorry to waste your time,
it was my mistake all along. I did install tomcat 5.5 but the issue was the
startup.
Thanks,
Mike
I know that I asked something like this before, but...
I read that you need cygwin for shell support, but is that just for the cmd
line post.sh support? I would like to run ASP.NET apps that use solr as the
search platform(on the same server for now). So, can I run IIS and
solr/servlets together?
I'm trying to figure out the best way to do filters based on price. I've
been thinking that I would do it based on the query such as price[10-20],
however I wanted opinions on whether it would be better to do it based on
pre-filtering the item into a price range and searching for the string that
Let me back up.. for a second. I want to create price ranges. I was thinking
that I would do a search with a sort on price and create ranges by getting
the document price every (docCount / #ofpricerangesIwant). Basically create:
10, 10 - 60, 60 - 100 etc.. If the initial search wasn't sorted by
/23/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/06, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get a count like I do by using searcher.numDocs(query, docset)
but
with it doing an OR operation? I want the number of documents that match
a
OR b?
It's not clear to me what you are trying
Very nice. This will help me also. I will try this out and let you know how
it goes. (Windows XP with a custom request handler and some other custom
classes)
Could someone give advise on a better way to do this?
I have an index of many merchants and each day I delete merchant products
and re-update my database. After doing this I than re-create the entire
index and move it to production replacing the current index.
I was thinking about updating the
- simple xml configuration for the final outputted category configuration
file
I'm sure there are more cool things but that is all for now. Join the
mailing list to see more improvements in the future.
Also.. how do I get added to the Using Solr wiki page?
Thanks,
Mike Austin
a search and noticed pages were executed through aspx. Are you using
.net to parse the xml results from SOLR? Nice site, just trying to figure
out where SOLR fits into this.
On 5/16/07, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the creation of solr
fast too.
-Yonik
On 5/16/07, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the creation of solr. I've
been
using it for a while now and I have recently brought one of my side
projects
online. I have several other projects that will be using solr
Niraj: What environment are you using? SQL Server/.NET/Windows? or something
else?
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Faceted Search!
: define the sub-categories.
I have content that I index for several different domains. What I'd like
to do is have all search results found for domainA returned first and
results for domainB,C,D..etc.. returned second. I could do two different
searches but was wondering if there was a way to only do one query but
return
Boom!
This works: sort=map(query($qq,-1),0, ,
1)+desc,score+descqq=domain:domainA
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com wrote:
I have content that I index for several different domains. What I'd like
to do is have all search results found
I've heard some people talk about solr4.. but I only see solr 3.5 available.
Thanks
I have a master with two slaves. For some reason on the master if I do an
optimize after indexing on the master it double in size from 42meg to 90
meg.. however, when the slaves replicate they get the 42meg index..
Should the master and slaves always be the same size?
Thanks,
Mike
Is there a way mark a master as write only and the slaves as read only? I
guess I could just remove those handlers from the config?
Is there a benefit from doing this as far as performance or anything else?
Thanks,
Mike
I'm looking at the solr admin interface site. On the dashboard right
panel, I see three sections with size numbers like 227MB(light),
124MB(darker), and 14MB(darkest).
I'm on a windows server.
Couple questions about what I see in the solr app admin interface:
- In the top right section of the
searching service during indexing, the old files may be
opened by old SolrIndexSearcher. they will be deleted later. So when
indexing, the index size may double. But a moment later, old indexes will
be deleted.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com
wrote:
I have
Thanks. I might just remove the optimize. I had it planned for once a
week but maybe I'll just do it and restart the app if performance slows.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingrambook.comwrote:
SOLR-3033 is related to ReplcationHandler's ability to do backups. It
Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 3/14/2012 2:54 PM, Mike Austin wrote:
The odd thing is that if I optimize the index it doubles in size.. If I
then, add one more document to the index it goes back down to half size?
Is there a way to force this without needing to wait until another
Why don't you just use that formula and calculate the weighted rating for
each movie and index that value? sort=wrating desc
Maybe I didn't understand your question.
mike
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Zac Smith z...@trinkit.com wrote:
Does anyone have an example formula that can be used to
(but work on *nix so can't personally guarantee it). And replication
won't replicate the stale files, so that's not a problem either
Best
Erick
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com
wrote:
Shawn,
Thanks for the detailed answer! I will play around
I'm trying to understand the difference between multiple Tomcat indexes
using context fragments versus using one application with multiple cores?
Since I'm currently using tomcat context fragments to run 7 different
indexes, could I get help understanding more why I would want to use solr
cores
I would like to have the ability to keep requests from being slowed from new
document adds and commits by having a separate index that gets updated.
Basically a read-only and an updatable index. After the update index has
finished updating with new adds and commits, I'd like to switch the update
,
-Simon
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com
wrote:
I would like to have the ability to keep requests from being slowed from
new
document adds and commits by having a separate index that gets updated.
Basically a read-only and an updatable index
I've been trying to follow the progress of this and I'm not sure what the
current status is. Can someone update me on what is currently in Solr4 and
does it support multi-valued location in a single document? I saw that
SOLR-2155 was not included and is now lucene-spatial-playground.
Thanks,
that you would use
with a standard set of spacial features like what is in solr4 now.
Thanks,
Mike
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Darren Govoni dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
It doesn't.
On 08/29/2011 01:37 PM, Mike Austin wrote:
I've been trying to follow the progress of this and I'm
How does warming work when a collection is being distributed to a slave. I
understand that a temp directory is created and it is eventually copied to
the live folder, but what happens to the cache that was built in with the
old index? Does the cache get rebuilt, can we warm it before it becomes
always been my understanding that the caches are discarded, then
rebuilt/warmed:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#Caching_and_Distribution.2BAC8-Replication
hth,
rob
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com
wrote:
How does warming work when a collection
Correction: Will traffic be served with a non warmed index searcher at any
point?
Thanks,
Mike
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com wrote:
Distribution/Replication gives you a 'new' index on the slave. When Solr
is told to use the new index, the old caches have
I've set up a master slave configuration and it's working great! I know
this is the better setup but if I had just one index due to requirements,
I'd like to know more about the performance hit of the commit. let's just
assume I have a decent size index of a few gig normal sized documents with
Wow.. thanks for the great answers Erick! This answered my concerns
perfectly.
Mike
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
See below:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com
wrote:
I've set up a master slave configuration
I'm trying to push to get solr used in our environment. I know I could have
responses saying WHY can't you get more RAM etc.., but lets just skip those
and work with this situation.
Our index is very small with 100k documents and a light load at the moment.
If I wanted to use the smallest
or actually disabling caching as mentioned here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#Cache_Sizing
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Mike Austin mike.aus...@juggle.com wrote:
I'm trying to push to get solr used in our environment. I know I could have
responses saying WHY can't you get more
Just wanted to follow up and say thanks for all the valuable replies. I'm
in the process of testing everything.
Thanks,
Mike
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
Beyond the suggestions already made, i would add:
a) being really aggressive about
37 matches
Mail list logo
