Hi Li,
Yes, you can issue a delete all by:
curl http://your_solr_server:your_solr_port/solr/update -H
Content-Type: text/xml --data-binary
'deletequery*:*/query/delete';
Hope it helps.
Cheers,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Li Li [mailto:fancye...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June 2010 03:41
Hi
I reported this issue a long time ago and if I remember it correctly
someone told me this issue no longer happens on 1.3 onwards. But as the
Jira issue hasn't been commented or changed states I'm writing to
confirm.
Regards,
Daniel
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is
Hi John,
Have you considered buying an existing commercial product that delivers
what you want (searching over log files / maybe monitoring)? It may be
cheaper than developing it... http://www.splunk.com/product
Just a disclaimer: I'm not related to the company or product so if you
need any
me to only use
proportional control when on/off didn't work. Well, stop words don't
work and idf does.
For a longer list of movie titles entirely made of stop words, go here:
http://wunderwood.org/most_casual_observer/2007/05/invisible_titles.html
wunder
On 7/16/09 8:50 AM, Daniel Alheiros
Hi Walter,
Has it always been there? Which version of Lucene are we talking about?
Regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wunderw...@netflix.com]
Sent: 16 July 2009 15:04
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Word frequency count in the index
Lucene
Hi
Are you ever going to search for earlier revisions or only the latest?
If in your use cases you need the latest, just replace earlier revisions
with the latest on your index
Regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Reza Safari [mailto:r.saf...@lukkien.com]
Sent: 15 July 2009
Come on it's time to cut this release, folks! I'm just waiting for that
since it was forecasted for early summer. :)
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 15 July 2009 02:18
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.4
Hi Leonardo,
I've been using the synonym filter at index time (expand = true) and it works
just fine. Also use OR as the default operator. Once you do it at index time
there is no point doing it at query time (which in fact is likely to be the
reason of your problems).
Have a look at the
Hi Sujatha.
I've developed a search system for 6 different languages and as it was
implemented on Solr 1.2 all those languages are part of the same index,
using different fields for each so I can have different analyzers for
each one.
Like:
content_chinese
content_english
content_russian
-XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=50 -XX:NewSize=1024m
-XX:NewRatio=2 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=360
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=360
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Daniel Alheiros
-Original Message-
From: Fuad Efendi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 July 2008 23:23
To: solr-user
Hi Hoss.
I'm using Solr 1.2 and a SolrJ client built from the trunk some time ago
(21st of June 2007).
When a document is indexed I can see that INFO message on my logs showing
exactly what you said, but nothing is logged in this situation I've
described initially.
I'm using this logging conf:
Hi Hoss.
Well I'll enable this ignore options for fields that aren't declared in my
schema. Thanks.
Exactly, you can try it really easily, just remove one of your fields on the
example schema config and try to add content using the Java client API...
Well I'm using SOLRJ and it returns no error
Hi
I experienced a very unpleasant problem recently, when my search indexing
adaptor was changed to add some new fields. The problem is my schema didn't
follow those changes (new fields added), and after that SOLR was silently
ignoring all documents I sent.
Neither SOLR Java client or SOLR
If you do want more stopwords sources, there is this one too:
http://snowball.tartarus.org/algorithms/
And I would go for the language identification and then I would apply the
proper set.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/10/07 16:18, Maria Mosolova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot Peter!
Maria
Hi Hoss,
Yes I know that, but I want to have a proper dummy backup (something that
could be kept in a very controlled environment). I thought about using this
approach (a slave just for this purpose), but if I'm using it just as a
backup node there is no reason I don't use a proper backup
Hi
I'm about to deploy SOLR in a production environment and so far I'm a bit
concerned about availability.
I have a system that is responsible for fetching data from a database and
then pushing it to SOLR using its XML/HTTP interface.
So I'm going to deploy N instances of my application so it's
On 8/10/07 17:30, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/8/07, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I believe I can live with some staleness at certain moments, but it's
not good as users are supposed to need it 24x7. So the common practice is to
make one of the slaves as the new
OK, I'll define it as a procedure in my disaster recovery plan.
That would be great. I'm looking forward to it.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 8/10/07 18:07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/8/07, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, is there any exception thrown in case the index get
) and
it is very flexible and appropriate for each language.
I've also created for management simplicity a dismax handler that allows me
to query all documents no matter in which language it is. May be useful for
you too.
Regards,
Daniel Alheiros
On 29/9/07 03:29, Lance Norskog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi
I'm having problems trying to setup my schedulled tasks. Sorry if it's
something Linux related, as I'm not a Linux expert...
I created a scripts.conf file (for my slave server) containing:
user=solr
solr_hostname=10.133.132.159
solr_port=8080
rsyncd_port=20280
user on the
root group should be able to do anything on any files)
Any other suggestion?
Regards,
Daniel
On 21/9/07 13:12, Thorsten Scherler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:02 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi
I'm having problems trying to setup my schedulled tasks. Sorry
Hi Yonik.
Do you have any performance statistics about those changes?
Is it possible to upgrade to this new Lucene version using the Solr 1.2
stable version?
Regards,
Daniel
On 17/9/07 17:37, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to see what performance will be like on the next
Hi
I'm using the released version 1.2.
I was using HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory to remove from my index some
rubish (html tags that are not relevant in my structure), but it is making
the highlighting fail in some conditions. It seems to me that it's not
keeping track of the proper
Thanks Yonik.
Noted and fixed. I'll take extra care with this scenarios.
Regards,
Daniel
On 1/8/07 20:08, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/07, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the PorterStemmerFilterFactory when indexing but not when
querying.
That's
,
Daniel
On 31/7/07 18:50, Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31-Jul-07, at 9:41 AM, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi
I've started using highlighting and there is something that I
consider a bit
odd... It may be caused by the way I'm indexing or querying I'm
sure, but
just to avoid doing
so it will
have to query for it¹s specific fields (and I will need to make those
stored=true)?
Thanks again,
Daniel
On 1/8/07 10:43, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike.
Thanks for your reply, but seems that I haven't expressed myself clearly.
Here I go:
I want that when I
Hi
I've started using highlighting and there is something that I consider a bit
odd... It may be caused by the way I'm indexing or querying I'm sure, but
just to avoid doing a huge number of tests...
I'm querying for butter and only exact matches of butter are returning
highlighted, when I
I'm using both the qb and the function, so the function gradually boost
fresher documents and the qb act as an extra boost for the most recent ones.
Good to now that it's interesting to avoid such precision, in fact I'm
rounding my times avoiding using NOW, so it's fine for me.
Regards,
Daniel
Sorry just correcting myself:
str name=bqyour_date_field:[NOW-24HOURS TO NOW]^10.0/str
Regards,
Daniel
On 19/7/07 15:25, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think in this case you can use a bq (Boost Query) so you can apply this
boost to the range you want.
str name
Tokenizers and Filters?
Can you provide some code examples?
Regards,
Andrew
Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi Andrew
Yes, I saw that. As I'm not knowledgeable in Russian I had to infer it was
adequate. But as you have much more to add to it, it could be interesting
if
you could contribute
Hi Hoss
Yes, no error and that strange behaviour on the numbers shown by the admin
console. I'll try an see how to make my SOLR logging better, because so far
it's not that good.
Regards,
Daniel
On 9/7/07 19:16, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: After I removed manually it worked
stop filter factory (with hardcoded stopwords)
russian stem filter
Regards,
Andrew
Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi Andrew
In fact I did it creating all the Factories for Solr, but I think you can
use it directly, changing your index like this:
fieldtype name=cpstext_russian class
Hi Thierry.
I'm not sure this is the best approach. What I've adopted an so far is
working really well is to have one field per language (like text_french and
text_dutch) and in your schema you declare both plus one that just receives
the copy of them.
Your index/query analysis have to be
Hi Matthew.
It¹s probably caused by the way you are processing this field. As you have
defined it as a ³text² that has a Whitespace tokenizer and a set of filters
related to it. You could create a new field type or just use a numeric type
(like sfloat) for that.
Anyway you can always see how your
Hi
I'm developing a search application using SOLR/Lucene and I think I found a
bug.
I was trying to index more documents and the total document number wasn't
changing, but for each document batch I was sending to update the index, the
numbers shown by the console in the update handler section
to be knowledgeable of Russian
language your comments are very useful).
Regards,
Daniel
On 9/7/07 18:00, Andrew Stromnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yes, I want to try RussianAnalyzer. How to enable it in Solr config?
Thank you.
Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi Andrew.
I'm using
Thanks a lot!
Now it is working. It was the Tomcat connector setup
Regards,
Daniel
On 28.06.2007 17:19, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: You can also ensure the browser sends an utf8 encoded post by
: form accept-charset=UTF-8 ...
: It works even if the page the form is in
Internet shops to the crawler, from Russia...
Quoting Daniel Alheiros:
Hi
I'm in trouble now about how to issue queries against Solr using in my q
parameter content in Russian (it applies to Chinese and Arabic as well).
The problem is I can't send any Russian special character in URL's
Thanks Mike.
Regards,
Daniel Alheiros
On 25/6/07 20:15, Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25-Jun-07, at 8:02 AM, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
I've configured my Solr instance using autocommit in the following
way:
!-- autocommit pending docs if certain criteria are met --
autoCommit
Hi Hoss.
Yes, it's the tricky part when re-structuring configs...
One possible solution is, when you create a new schema, you offer a
conversion tool... Other is to define a version on the config and
depending on the version, the expected structure will be different.
I'm sure you know this all,
Hi Hoss.
I've done a few tests using reflection to instantiate a simple object and
the results will vary a lot depending on the JVM. As the JVM optimizes code
as it is executed it will vary depending on the usage, but I think we have
something to consider:
If done 1,000 samples (5 clean X loop
Sorry I've confused things a bit... The thread safeness have to be
considered only on the Tokenizers, not on the factories. So are the
Tokenizers thread safe?
Regards,
Daniel
On 22/6/07 11:36, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hoss.
I've done a few tests using reflection
Hi Hoss.
I've tried that yesterday using the same approach you just said (I've
created the base fields for any language with basic analyzers) and it worked
alright.
Thanks again for you time.
Regards,
Daniel
On 20/6/07 21:00, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: So far it sounds
to use?
If using dismax you can define a boost function:
recip(rord(numberField),1,1000,1000)
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Daniel Alheiros
On 20/6/07 16:47, David Xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
I am using solr to index web contents. I want to know is that possible to tell
client
library.
- will
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grotzke [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.2 HTTP Client for Java
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:13 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Thanks
Hi
I've been using one Java client I got from a colleague but I don't know
exactly its version or where to get any update for it. Base package is
org.apache.solr.client (where there are some common packages) and the client
main package is org.apache.solr.client.solrj.
Is it available via Maven2
Thanks Martin.
I'm using one of them which the optimize command doesn't work properly
Have you seen the same problem?
Regards,
Daniel
On 14/6/07 13:07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:32 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi
I've been using one Java client
Grotzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.2 HTTP Client for Java
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:13 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Thanks Martin.
I'm using one of them which the optimize command doesn't work
properly
Hi Hoss
One bad thing in having fields specific for your language (in my point of
view) is that you will have to re-index your content when you add a new
language (some will need to start with one language and in future will have
others added). But OK, let's say the indexing is done.
So using
Which version of Weblogic are you trying?
Some old versions have a wrong javax.servlet.Filter interface definition...
Regards,
Daniel
On 13/6/07 15:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,
I've tried deploying Solr on Weblogic and am gettting the following error
in my
Sorry, probably it's not the case then...
On 13/6/07 16:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
sorry - I'm using weblogic 9.2
Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13/06/2007 16:05
Please respond to solr-user
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi
And about the fields, if they are/aren't going to be present on the
responses based on the user group, you can do it in many different ways
(using XML transformation to remove the undesirable fields, implementing
your own RequestHandler able to process your group information, filtering
the
This sounds OK.
I can create a field name mapping structure to change the requests /
responses in a way my client doesn't need to be aware of different fields.
Thanks for this directions,
Daniel
On 8/6/07 21:32, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Can't I have the same index, using
Hi Henri,
Thanks again, your considerations will sure help on my decision.
Now I'll do my homework to check document volume / growth - expected index
sizes and query load.
Regards,
Daniel Alheiros
On 9/6/07 10:53, Henrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Trying to recap: you
you will need to modify the values a bit, more info here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
-Nick
On 6/9/07, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
For my search use, the document freshness is a relevant aspect that should
be considered to boost results.
I have a field
Hi
For my search use, the document freshness is a relevant aspect that should
be considered to boost results.
I have a field in my index like this:
field name=created type=date indexed=true stored=true /
How can I make a good use of this to boost my results?
I'm using the DisMaxRequestHandler
part coming through
stemming/snowball analyzers, per-lang stopwords al) and the same field
name could be used in each of them.
You could either deploy that solution through multiple web-apps (one per
lang) (or try the patch for issue Solr-215).
Regards,
Henri
Daniel Alheiros wrote
Hi,
I'm just starting to use Solr and so far, it has been a very interesting
learning process. I wasn't a Lucene user, so I'm learning a lot about both.
My problem is:
I have to index and search content in several languages.
My scenario is a bit different from other that I've already read in
58 matches
Mail list logo
