t;>>
>>>> multiValued="true"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> multiValued="true"/>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> stored="false"
>>>>
>>>>>
on this. I
have
to
implement it on urgent basis and i think i am very close to it.
Thanks
all
of you. I have reached to this level just because of you guys.
Thanks and Regards,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257782.htm
;
> >
> http://localhost:8983/solr/tgl/select?q=rheumatoid%20arthritis=xml=1.0=200=AND=true=edismax=true=true=true;
> > > > pf=topTitle^200 subtopTitle^80 indTerm^40 drugString^30 tglData^6&
> > > > pf2=topTitle^200 subtopTitle^80 indTerm^40 drugString^30 tglData^
^30 tglData^6&
> > > qf=topic_title^100 subtopic_title^40 index_term^20 drug^15 content^3
> > >
> > > After making these changes, I am able to get my search results
> correctly
> > for
> > > a single term but in case of phrase search, i am still not ab
t; After making these changes, I am able to get my search results correctly
> for
> > a single term but in case of phrase search, i am still not able to get
> the
> > results in the correct order.
> >
> > Hi Modassar,
> >
> > I tried using mm=100, but the order is still
r suggestion on this. I have to
implement it on urgent basis and i think i am very close to it. Thanks all
of you. I have reached to this level just because of you guys.
Thanks and Regards,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257782.ht
s level just because of you guys.
Thanks and Regards,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257782.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lowing error:
> >
> > can not sort on multivalued field: index_term
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257378.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
; > > > >>
>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> multiValued="true"/>
>> > > > > >> > > stored="false"
>> > > > > >> multiValued="true"/>
>> >
; > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > >> positionIncrementGap="100" omitNorms="true"&g
gt; > > > >> ignoreCase="true"
> > > > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
> > > > >> > class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > > > >>
> > &
ry"/>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > > class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > > >> > > >> ignoreCase="true&q
> class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >> > >> ignoreCase="true"
> > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
> > >> > >> synonyms=&quo
e"/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >> positionIncrementGap="100"
> >> omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" omitNorms="true">
> >>
> >>
individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257556.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr &
, its deciding the order.
> >
> > kindly let me know, how can i first search the phrase and then go to the
> > individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabbl
order.
>
> kindly let me know, how can i first search the phrase and then go to the
> individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257556.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
the mutual count
of both the terms and based on that, its deciding the order.
kindly let me know, how can i first search the phrase and then go to the
individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257556.html
Sent
fields and
also indexed them with term positions for phrase search ??
I tried using omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" and omitPositions="false" but
thats not working for me.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp
uot;true"/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >> positionIncrementGap="100"
> >> omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" omitNorms="true">
> >>
> >>
quot;>
>>
>> > class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>> > ignoreCase="true"
>> words="stopwords.txt" />
>>
>>
>>
>&
uot; and "Disorders"
but while searching for individual words, it will always return those
documents where both the words should exist for which i am already using
q.op="AND" in my query.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR
gnoreCase="true"
> > words="stopwords.txt" />
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I want , if user will search for a phrase then that pharse should always
> > takes the priority in comaprison to the individual words;
> >
> > Example: "Eating Disorders"
> >
> > First it will search for "Eating Disorders" together and then the
> > individual
> > words "Eating" and "Disorders"
> > but while searching for individual words, it will always return those
> > documents where both the words should exist for which i am already using
> > q.op="AND" in my query.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nitin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257510.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
>
> ignoreCase="true"
> words="stopwords.txt" />
>
>
>
>
>
> I want , if user will search for a phrase then that pharse should always
> takes the priority in comaprison to the individu
then the individual
words "Eating" and "Disorders"
but while searching for individual words, it will always return those
documents where both the words should exist for which i am already using
q.op="AND" in my query.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
View this message in context
.
> I also need to give the priority to the phrase search. Kindly suggest on
> this.
> I am using edismax parser right now.
> Using pf, pf2 and pf3 parameters but that too are not working properly.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257420.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
erm
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257378.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
Thanks Binoy..
Actually it is throwing following error:
can not sort on multivalued field: index_term
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257378.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
s
should be ranked in the order of no. of occurrences inside the content
field.
Kindly help in this. I will be really thankful
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Monitoring *
subtopic_title,
> index_term and drug then the documents
> should be ranked in the order of no. of occurrences inside the content
> field.
>
>
> Kindly help in this. I will be really thankful
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabbl
in this. I will be really thankful
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Chris,
I think what you are looking for could be solved using the eDismax query
parser.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
1. Your Query Fields ( qf ) would be - urlKeywords^60 title^40 fulltxt^1
2. To check on adultFlag:N you could use
Dear Varun,
Thank you for your replies, I managed to get point 1 2 done, but for the
boost query, I am unable to figure it out. Could you be kind enough to
point me to an example or maybe advice a bit more on that one?
Thanks for your help,
Chris
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Varun Thacker
Hi Chris,
An example for point 3 could be -
boost=recip(field(domainRank),0.1,1,1)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#recip
recip(x,m,a,b) implementing a/(m*x+b). m,a,b are constants, x is any
numeric field or arbitrarily complex function.
So with these values when domainRank is 1 it
Hi,
I have a document structure that looks like the below. I would like to
implement something like -
(urlKeywords:+keyword+ AND domainRank:[3 TO 1] AND adultFlag:N)^60 +
OR (title:+keyword+ AND domainRank:[3 TO 1] AND adultFlag:N)^20 +
OR (title:+keyword+ AND domainRank:[10001 TO
I kind of suspected stemming to be the reason behind this.
But I consider stemming to be a good feature.
This is the side effect of stemming. Stemming increases recall while
harming precision.
This is a side effect of stemming, the way it is currently implemented in
Lucene. Stemming
On 09.03.2010 16:01 Ahmet Arslan wrote:
I kind of suspected stemming to be the reason behind this.
But I consider stemming to be a good feature.
This is the side effect of stemming. Stemming increases recall while harming
precision.
But most people want the best possible combination of
type if you don't need
stemming.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Confused-by-Solr-Ranking-tp27834227p27836299.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the EnglishPorterFilterFactory from the text type if you don't need
stemming.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Confused-by-Solr-Ranking-tp27834227p27836299.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I kind of suspected stemming to be the reason behind this.
But I consider stemming to be a good feature.
This is the side effect of stemming. Stemming increases recall while harming
precision.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:38 PM, abhishes abhis...@gmail.com wrote:
I am indexing a column in a database. I have chosen field type of text for
this column (this type was defined in the sample schema file which comes in
the Solr Example).
When I search for the word impress and top 3 results.
: I am not really clear to what the analysis mode is supposed to give me. It
: requires me to specify a field when I specify a query. What does that do?
: Also, I don't see anything in the analyzer to explain the weighting of a
: particular document.
i think what Otis ment is that the analysis
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-regarding-Solr-ranking-tp15719752p15768743.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Nutch
- Original Message
From: oleg_gnatovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 1:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: Question regarding Solr ranking
Sorry about the previous message, I had some formatting issues. Below is the
actual message
... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza...
Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Count as simplu one Pizza?
I'd appreciate any help I can get!
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-regarding-Solr-ranking-tp15719752p15719752.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-regarding-Solr-ranking-tp15719752p15719834.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
47 matches
Mail list logo
