RE: 'Stable' 4.0 version

2011-08-17 Thread Jaeger, Jay - DOT
geospatial requirements Looking at your email address, no surprise there. 8^) What insight can you share (if any) regarding moving forward to a later nightly build? I used build 1271 (Solr 1.4.1, which seemed to be called Solr 4 at the time) during some testing, and it performed well --

Re: 'Stable' 4.0 version

2011-08-17 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
As far as I know, Solr's trunk is pretty stable, so you shoundl't have many problems with it if you test it correctly. Lucid's search platform is built upon the trunk ( http://www.lucidimagination.com/products/lucidworks-search-platform/enterprise ). The one thing I would be concerned is with the

RE: 'Stable' 4.0 version

2011-08-17 Thread Herman Kiefus
all confuse me. I just had our operations personnel install versions until I got the needed functionality. -Original Message- From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:12 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 'Stable' 4.0

Re: 'Stable' 4.0 version

2011-08-17 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
until I got the needed functionality. -Original Message- From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:12 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 'Stable' 4.0 version As far as I know, Solr's trunk is pretty stable, so you