thanks Jan.
Sure I will try to upgrade 0.3 to 0.4 .and let you know the result. i am
just wondering is this a known issue ,has someone already encountered with
this problem ? or i am doing something wrong ? as i am not able to find any
thread against this issue at spacewalk-devel list.
On Friday 16 January 2009 11:02:38 am Mike McCune wrote:
> Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
> > One more note I forgot to mention, Spacewalk 0.4 requires cobbler >=
> > 1.4 which is in epel-testing.
> >
> > sincerely,
> > jesus
>
> epel-testing can be found here:
>
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:27:23PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
>> Any reason we checked in rpmbuild-perl-DBD-Oracle-git* directories?
>
> I've removed them now.
>
> I've also changed Makefile.tag-release not to do
>
>git add .
>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 05:25:39PM +0530, tushar ahuja wrote:
>
> 2)I have installed 0.3.version of spacewalk
Spacewalk 0.4 was released yesterday. Could you maybe move over to
that version, so see if it fixes the issue you see?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
___
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:36:55PM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> I am attaching the text file here. Lets discuss the issues here, and
> finalize them, before going ahead with the actual modifications.
Thank you for the writeup. Here are my observations.
> == Open questions relevant to portin
Michael Mraka wrote:
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
% master = spacewalk 0.5
% SPACEWALK-0.4 = spacewalk 0.4
Why 0.4 branch is called SPACEWALK-0.4 while we have RELEASE-0.2 and
RELEASE-0.3 branches?
--
Michael Mráka
Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
As part of the on going Spacewalk to Satellite p
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
One more note I forgot to mention, Spacewalk 0.4 requires cobbler >=
1.4 which is in epel-testing.
sincerely,
jesus
epel-testing can be found here:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/testing/
I believe epel-testing will go to stable today some time.
--
Mik
On Friday 16 January 2009 08:47:19 am Michael Mraka wrote:
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> % E. The builds failed:
> % GenericError: Unable to complete build: release mismatch (build: 1.el5,
> % rpm: 1)
> %
> % Dennis, is it possible that you removed buildsys-macros from
> % dist-5E-sw-0.4-candidate
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:22:08AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>
>> page. However, jabberd is *not* in EPEL.
>>
>> What are our plans with that thing?
>
> Let assume that it is rhetorical question. Rhetorical answer:
> Upgrade to 2.2.4 and ask maintainer if he can build jab
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
% E. The builds failed:
% GenericError: Unable to complete build: release mismatch (build: 1.el5,
% rpm: 1)
%
% Dennis, is it possible that you removed buildsys-macros from
% dist-5E-sw-0.4-candidate ?
IMO this is a very good reason not to move packages between tags bu
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
Please note that with this release, Spacewalk 0.2 will no longer be
available. If you are still using Spacewalk 0.2, please upgrade to
Spacewalk 0.4.
Jesus,
I find one problem post release as well. Monitoring started sending
Notification Meltdown after one day. I spen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:07:46 +0100
Michael Mraka wrote:
> Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
> % master = spacewalk 0.5
> % SPACEWALK-0.4 = spacewalk 0.4
>
> Why 0.4 branch is called SPACEWALK-0.4 while we have RELEASE-0.2 and
> RELEASE-0.3 branches?
I aske
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
The Spacewalk team is happy to announce the release of Spacewalk 0.4.
In a few hours, the repos will be accessible and you can install 0.4
and try it out.
FYI:
Freshmeat page updated:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/spacewalk/?branch_id=76942&release_id=292281
--
Mirosl
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:43:23PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> * SELinux support added:
>https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/Features/SELinux
I've now updated that page with a short list of hints about how to
spot a problem on Spacewalk with SELinux enabled and what could be
done
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:12:05AM +, Rob James wrote:
> Jan, did you ever get this to work? It's been a while since I tried
> getting proxy up and running (probably shortly after the 0.3 release)
> but I never got it to work properly. I'd be interested to know if you
> have any success.
Yes,
Hi Devan & Miroslaw,
Thanks for your response. I have created a FQDN ,initally i have used
localhost.localdomain,now I am using "tushar.enterprisedb.net" .(i am able
to perform ping from different machine so i am assuming i have configured
FQDN correctly)
Theses are the steps i have used after cr
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
% in the satellite/ directory, we have the following packages:
%
% $ find satellite -name '*.spec'
% satellite/admin/spacewalk-admin.spec
% satellite/certs/spacewalk-certs-tools.spec
% satellite/config/spacewalk-config.spec
% satellite/install/Spa
Jan, did you ever get this to work? It's been a while since I tried
getting proxy up and running (probably shortly after the 0.3 release)
but I never got it to work properly. I'd be interested to know if you
have any success.
-R
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Mon, Jan
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
% master = spacewalk 0.5
% SPACEWALK-0.4 = spacewalk 0.4
Why 0.4 branch is called SPACEWALK-0.4 while we have RELEASE-0.2 and
RELEASE-0.3 branches?
--
Michael Mráka
Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing li
Hello,
in the satellite/ directory, we have the following packages:
$ find satellite -name '*.spec'
satellite/admin/spacewalk-admin.spec
satellite/certs/spacewalk-certs-tools.spec
satellite/config/spacewalk-config.spec
satellite/install/Spacewalk-Setup/spa
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
% Hello Dennis,
%
% I can see that you manually (?) bumped version of perl-DBD-Oracle in
% commit 659586abd2a5ab66aed83dd8eed54d997864dee0 and built the result,
% without using make tag-minor-release to keep the information in
% rel-eng in a sane state. Thus, koji-missing-buil
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:27:23PM -0500, Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
> Any reason we checked in rpmbuild-perl-DBD-Oracle-git* directories?
I've removed them now.
I've also changed Makefile.tag-release not to do
git add .
so they should not be added in the future. I've checked that
rel-en
22 matches
Mail list logo
