Thank you for your answer!
One thing - the blackhair.cf, should it be part of my current local.cf,
or will it work by simply adding the file to "/etc/mail/spamassassin/"?
Will I need to modify anything else to refer to this file?
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 13:46, Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
> Actually
It's "backhair.cf", not "blackhair.cf". If you want it for a system wide
install, you only need to put it in /etc/mail/spamassassin and, if you're
running spamd, restart spamd. Whenever it starts it finds all the .cf files in
that directory and loads them (in alphabetical order).
On Tue, 27 Jan
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 11:38, Kenneth Andresen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am noticing that the majority of the current spam coming through are
> all html messages with invalid html tags, like "spam".
> Since it is rendered as html the invalid tag is removed, so we on the
> screen only see "spam".
>
Actually, we can do better than that. Check out Jennifer's Backhair set.
http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
It'll find invalid HTML tags used to break up words, and give a message points
simply for having them (so your message would have triggered BACKHAIR_22 even
though the word it's breakin
Hello all,
I am noticing that the majority of the current spam coming through are
all html messages with invalid html tags, like "spam".
Since it is rendered as html the invalid tag is removed, so we on the
screen only see "spam".
Wouldn't it be possible to simply make a html rendering tool to f
Hi group,
Got SA working, and I want to test it out on only a few users. I have
SA set up to run when called from Amavisd, which is called by postfix,
which is set up as a relay. Currently it is set up to put a
***SPAM***
tag on every email that is suspicios to every email that passes
through
i
Forgot to add a subject when I first sent this . . . Sorry about that.
_
Hi group,
Got SA working, and I want to test it out on only a few users. I have
SA set up to run when called from Amavisd, which is called by postfix,
which is set up as a relay. Currently it is set u
Mandrake 9.2 dual boot Windoze / Linux, Dell Inspiron laptop 4150.
New to Linux, but loving it so far! Ex TRSDOS boy! but I still can't
type :-(
Would like to dump Windoze.
Running Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.8 and SpamAssassin with two isp accounts.
Using SMTP. ADSL.
Spam assassin filters on the fir
, 2003 7:22 AMTo: Efren
Pedroza; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk]
filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000
SA does have the ability to filter (block/discard)
if so configured.. basically by just setting SA to delete any incoming
scanned msg with a score of 5+ (default score
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bob Apthorpe
Sent: Wed 12/10/2003 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000
Hi,
Hi,
[N.B. Reformatted into a sensible whole. Please trim your posts, line
wrap and (I know this sounds petty) please don't top post if you expect
follow-ups. Thanks.]
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:22:06 -0600 "JRiley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Efren Pedroza
> > On Behalf Of gentian
> > > I a
configuration information.
-JR
http://www.spamfighter.org
http://spamstats.systemnt.net
- Original Message -
From:
Efren
Pedroza
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:34
PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam
tagged email before hitting
valids e-mails, can someone help me on this ?
Saludos
===
Efren Pedroza Huerta
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
gentianSent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:50 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Hildebrandt
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 6:52 AM
[...]
>
> Use Postfix+amavisd-new+SpamAssassin -- and user D_DISCARD to drop the
> spam on the gateway.
What are the pros/cons of using sendmail+MIMEDefang+SA versus
Postfix+amavisd-new+SpamAssassin?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:52 AM
> To: gentian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thomas Kinghorn
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email be
it.
- Original Message -
From:
Bill
To: 'gentian' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:12
AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam
tagged email before hitting exchange 2000
It
would be easy to set up a procmail rule to move all t
]Subject: [SAtalk] filtering
spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000
Hi list,
I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a
gateway for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to
Exchange 2000. I read that spamassassin just tags the mail, doesn'filter it a
* gentian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I will be using Fedora or Redhat Enterprise, one of two.
> I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a gateway for
> external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to
> Exchange 2000. I read that spamassassin just tags the mail,
I will be using Fedora or Redhat Enterprise, one of
two.
- Original Message -
From:
Thomas Kinghorn
To: 'gentian'
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:02
AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam
tagged email before hitting exchange 2000
What pl
gentianSent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:50 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] filtering
spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000
Hi list,
I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup
a gateway for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to
PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting
exchange 2000
Hi list,
I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a gateway
for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to
Exchange 2000. I read that
Hi list,
I am very new to spamassassin and i want to setup a
gateway for external spam and then i want to relay mail from spamassassin to
Exchange 2000. I read that spamassassin just tags the mail, doesn'filter it and
i should filter it on Exhange 2000 and that was done by some other tools.
At 09:08 AM 12/1/2003, Vee Persaud wrote:
I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin and they are working
great. Now I would like to introduce some more filtering, such as
moving tagged items to a separate mailbox/mailboxes (depending on
recipient), etc. Can this be done in SA ? Any advice
Hi,
I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin and they are working
great. Now I would like to introduce some more filtering, such as
moving tagged items to a separate mailbox/mailboxes (depending on
recipient), etc. Can this be done in SA ? Any advice ??
Thanks
---
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Rajdeep Larha stipulated:
> Hi Jennifer,
> I read your mail. But this is something little above it. There are certain
> words in 20_porn.cf. When I use only those words even then the rating given
> is too low. I used 5 words from the list in same case.. even then the mail
> was
: [SAtalk] Filtering.
Okay, I think I am with you now. It looks like you are set up fine.
When I first set up SA, I had to add *many* rules. Especially porn
rules. I haven't done the upgrade yet, so I don't know what they added
to that porn.cf. It was too liberal for me, so I added a LOT of
Hi Rajdeep,
> I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the
> content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules
directory
> but not getting filter. What I have to do with this?
> For e.g I have to filter the vulgar stuff. But it does not filterit.
My
> local.c
At 12:31 PM 11/11/2003, Rajdeep Larha wrote:
I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the
content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory
but not getting filter.
Um what do you mean by "Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the
rules direc
I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the
content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory
but not getting filter. What I have to do with this?
For e.g I have to filter the vulgar stuff. But it does not filterit. My
local.cf is as follows:-
# Sp
On 08.11.2003 15:33, Tom Meunier wrote:
> No. How would this be a bug?
I never said so. I only said I would write a bug report. Of course in the
category "enhancement". This would be clearer if the "bug list"
had a better name, maybe "todo list".
> By definition it would have to be a custom ru
L PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Wolfgang Rohdewald
> Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 8:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Filtering on returned mails not written
> with my mail client
>
> Hi,
>
> I'
Hi,
I'm new on this list, hoping this is not a FAQ (at least I found no such
rule and no bug report)
Is there a rule saying
oh - this mail claiming to be from me has been returned as undeliverable.
But is has not been written with the mail client(s) I use - so it must be spam.
(or - it does not
We really do think very much alike!
> >> rawbody RM_rb_TITLE //i
> >> describe RM_rb_TITLE Testing for HTML title in emails
> >> scoreRM_rb_TITLE 0.001
>
I have the EXACT same rule for testing! Been using it for a while. I will
posts the stats next week with update. But the rati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Keith,
Monday, October 27, 2003, 5:03:57 AM, you wrote:
KCI> Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> # RM rules to identify a completely empty HTML email
>> header RM_hc_HTML Content-Type =~ /text\/html/
>> describe RM_hc_HTML
Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # RM rules to identify a completely empty HTML email
> header RM_hc_HTML Content-Type =~ /text\/html/
> describe RM_hc_HTML Email is text/html format
> scoreRM_hc_HTML 0.001
That seems to be pretty similar to the existing MIME_HTML
Hello Andrea,
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 6:08:02 PM, you wrote:
AR> Hi folks,
AR> Now I'm receiving spam:
AR> - "hi" as subject
AR> - without text in the body (html or not).
AR> Have you got any idea to filter those?
I think I've developed a set of filters for that. They have a content
type of
Hi folks,
Now I'm receiving spam:
- "hi" as subject
- without text in the body (html or not).
Have you got any idea to filter those?
Thanks very much
Andrea
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what
om: Andrea Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 October 2003 13:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Filtering envelope to (was: Info about blacklist_to)
Hi folks,
My problem is filter spam to nonexistent account.
How could I do?
Tha
Hi folks,
My problem is filter spam to nonexistent account.
How could I do?
Thanks
Andrea
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassa
Hi Jeff,
>> Yes, but... how do you get a word like 'CensoredByServer' or
>> other nasty word associated with the symbol
>> 'BAD_WORD' in your example?
Here's an example that seems to be working.
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/
myphrases.cf
header SUBJ_VICODIN Subject =~ /vicodin/i
describ
I have checked the documents but it is not clear where we can add
additional bad words for porn scoring. I've checked 20_porn.cf but I'm not
sure what to change in that file. Is there a way to add more bad words in
the local.cf file and what would the syntax of the configuration directive
look
I have checked the documents but it is not clear
where we can add additional bad words for porn
scoring. I've checked 20_porn.cf but I'm not sure
what to change in that file. Is there a way to add
more bad words in the local.cf file and what would
the syntax of the configuration directive look like
|
| | 16/06/2003 11:56 PM |
| | |
|-+->
>-|
|
|
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|cc:
I'm running Sendmail on a Linux server, and I currently have Spamassassin
set up for my users. Since some of them are untrusting of mail filtering
apps, I use individual .forward files to enable SA for users who want it.
The .forward calls Procmail, and the user's procmailrc file handles the
pi
I'm trying to figure out a good way to send mail from my mbox threw SA on
a machine that i just finished installing SA on. ie the mail was recived
before SA was installed and i want to process it now if i can.
anyone got a good one liner for me?
--
Brad Wyman |\ _,,,---,,_ /
Create custom rule like:
header OLDADDRESS Delivered-To =~ /brians-old-address\@enchanter\.net/i
describe OLDADDRESS This is an old address
score OLDADDRESS 100.0
Now any message with Delivered-To: header will get a score of 100 and
therefore get tagged as Spam.
---
Ed.
>
> I have some old ema
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 24 Apr 2002 3:43 pm, Brian Kendig wrote:
> I have some old email addresses I no longer use which are getting
> flooded with spam these days. I want SpamAssassin to automatically
> tag these as spam.
[snip]
> The spamassassin man page tel
I have some old email addresses I no longer use which are getting
flooded with spam these days. I want SpamAssassin to automatically
tag these as spam.
I receive email sent to any address at my domain; my ISP is nice
enough to add a 'Delivered-To' header to my incoming email to tell
me what
On Thursday 18 April 2002 10:13 am, you wrote:
> > Sorry forgot to mention I already tried that. Same problem.
>
> Hmmmwhat's showing up in your qmail or postfix logs when the delivery
> is attempted?
>
> Dave
Apr 17 22:44:19 server postfix/smtpd[16949]: connect from unknown[127.0.0.1]
Apr 17
> [webmedic@server webmedic]$ cat .mailfilter
> VERBOSE=9
> exception {
> xfilter "spamc -f"
> RETURNCODE=0
> EXITCODE=0
> }
> to "./Maildir"
My guess is a pathing problem. Put the full path to spamc in the xfilter
line, like this:
xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc -f"
>
> I only tried the e
On Thursday 18 April 2002 08:20 am, you wrote:
> > Hello Dave,
>
> Hello Brook
>
> > > Post your .mailfilter. I'm using maildrop under qmail 1.03 + vpopmail
>
> 5.2
>
> > > without any problems whatsoever, using spamc/spamd
> >
> > Actually I've done some more testing and for some reason I get th
> I have been working in this since I posted last and I get the same
behavior
> from both postfix and qmail. When filtering mail with spamassassin using
> maildrop for some reason spamd and spamassassin both are giving an exit
code
> that causes maildrop to pass a fial code back to the smtp server
I have been working in this since I posted last and I get the same behavior
from both postfix and qmail. When filtering mail with spamassassin using
maildrop for some reason spamd and spamassassin both are giving an exit code
that causes maildrop to pass a fial code back to the smtp server. Thi
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Dave Weiner wrote:
> A quick question for you Charlie. As I'm still learning maildrop's
> filtering language, if I wanted to grab the score and the required hits,
> would this work?
>
> if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes, *hits=![:digit:]+ required=![:digit:]+.*/)
> {
> # do somethin
> > A quick question for you Charlie. As I'm still learning maildrop's
> > filtering language, if I wanted to grab the score and the required hits,
> > would this work?
> >
> > if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes, *hits=![:digit:]+ required=![:digit:]+.*/)
> > {
>
> BTW guys -- watch out, the hits and requ
"Dave Weiner" said:
> A quick question for you Charlie. As I'm still learning maildrop's
> filtering language, if I wanted to grab the score and the required hits,
> would this work?
>
> if (/^X-Spam-Status: *Yes, *hits=![:digit:]+ required=![:digit:]+.*/)
> {
BTW guys -- watch out, the hits
> I use Maildir. I use maildrop for local delivery (from the courier
> package).
I'm running qmail + vpopmail, and I've just started playing with
maildrop...God, I love opensource!
Right now, I have maildrop looking for the "X-Spam-Flag: YES" header, and if
it sees it, put it in a sqwebmail fold
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Justin England wrote:
> > SpamAssassin website, would be worth a look too.
> >
> > > So, the thing which popped into my head today was to digest
> > > the SA spam up, and send a daily or weekly summary through,
> > > of spam, based upon the SA score. The digest would have an
> SpamAssassin website, would be worth a look too.
>
> > So, the thing which popped into my head today was to digest
> > the SA spam up, and send a daily or weekly summary through,
> > of spam, based upon the SA score. The digest would have an
> > index of sender, subject, and be ordered by SA sco
On Monday 14 January 2002 22:33 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> > So, the thing which popped into my head today was to digest
> > the SA spam up, and send a daily or weekly summary through,
> > of spam, based upon the SA score. The digest would have an
> > index of sender, subject, and be ordered by SA
60 matches
Mail list logo
