I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I don't think spamdyke will block
empty senders (I haven't dug through the code to verify this though). Empty
sender addresses are used by many mail servers to send bounce messages;
blocking them would likely have some bad side effects.
For what
Hi,
Recently I started receiving spam from addresses that show up in Outlook mail
client as info.qogo...@nwnsoyuqem.sicotti.nl or some other subdomain of
sicotti.nl. I thought I could block these messages by adding @.sicotti.nl to
the sender-blacklist-file but that didn't work. Upon further
Unfortunately there's no option to hide the RBL name, but you could update the
code to hide it. The log message is generated by filter.c on line 1692. If
you change the 7th parameter to set_rejection() from this:
(tmp_buf[0] != '\0') ? tmp_buf : name_array[rbl_index]
to:
NULL
Hi,
since many commercial DNSBL are providing access to their RBL with a
"key" (es. 1234abcd.zen.dq.spamhaus.net.) we need to hide the RBL name
in the response in order to not divulgate our secret key.
Can we customize the text response for IP in RBL with spamdyke and
omitting the specific
Hi
I know the option reject-sender, but I trying to stop mails on a MX server
when the FROM header has an invalid value like :
servic...@socelec.com.armhs...@loskop.co.za or only a name like "Nielsen"
I know the difference beteween the FROM header and the real FROM
(return-path), but may be
Hi Sam
Thanks to you for the incredible work !
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 11:37 AM
Subject: Re:
he full-log ?
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message ----- From: "Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users"
>> <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
>> To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2
ers@spamdyke.org>
> To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] How can I force users to USE the right
> SMTPserver ?
>
>
> It sounds like "reject-sender" is th
-users@spamdyke.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] How can I force users to USE the right
SMTPserver ?
It sounds like "reject-sender" is the right option... if it's not working, I
would look at qmail's configuration. spamdyke
It sounds like "reject-sender" is the right option... if it's not working, I
would look at qmail's configuration. spamdyke uses qmail's rcpthosts and
morercpthosts files to decide what addresses are "local" -- is there a separate
copy of qmail for each server/jail with different
Hi
I will try to explain the subject
We use Qmail, VpopMail and Spamdyke
We have multiple servers with jails with multiple domains, we have smtp
servers configured in all the jails, in all the servers
Every jail has an smtp server running with auth over spamdyke, and today
(after a lot of years)
I answered myself
reject-sender=not-local
This does the job
- Original Message -
From: "Pablo Murillo via spamdyke-users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
To: "spamdyke users" <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:41 PM
Subject:
: 16 September 2012 23:39
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] How best to whitelist rejected emails
Some RBLs block yahoo because spammers really love to use it. I feel that this
is way too aggressive and any blacklist that blocks like this I avoid. However,
I do have yahoo in my
...@spamdyke.org
[mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Gary Gendel
Sent: 17 September 2012 14:28
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] How best to whitelist rejected emails
Christoph,
I can only give you motherhood advice on this since I have a setup using
OpenIndiana which
Description: ZA102637858
http://www.facebook.com/pages/emailitis/271193302894913 Description:
ZA102637861
From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org
[mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Sam Clippinger
Sent: 16 September 2012 22:51
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users
[mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Sam ClippingerSent: 16 September 2012 22:51To: spamdyke usersSubject: Re: [spamdyke-users] How best to whitelist rejected emailsThis is an RBL rejection, which means that the remote IP address has been blacklisted by a DNS RBL provider you're using
On 09/16/2012 03:38 PM, g...@genashor.com wrote:
Some RBLs block yahoo because spammers really love to use it. I feel
that this is way too aggressive and any blacklist that blocks like this
I avoid.
Me too. I use only:
dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org
dns-blacklist-entry=bl.spamcop.net
Hey Istvan,
Take a look in the documentation for the whitelist_rdns and whitelist_ip
file.
For that particular match you could use the IP 95.64.115.3 inside the
whitelist_ip or use part of the RDNS (more specific, add .netserv.ro to
the file) which will whitelist that connection based on the
Good advice, Sebastian.
In addition, you might want to whitelist a particular sender/domain. If
that's the case, you can add cri...@tegado.ro (for the sender) or
@tegado.ro (for the domain) to the whitelist_senders file. Keep in mind
though, that senders are very easy to spoof.
On a side
That's a very good description Faris. Thank you.
Faris Raouf wrote:
When you installed spamdyke, you specified the location of the configuration
file, spamdyke.conf
And I presume that you have looked at this file, and modified it to your
needs.
In this case, your user is being rejected
hi every body
i wanna know how to edit the whiteIpList file on linux
thanks
mansour hassan
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
use vi editor, which is best to edit a file on linux
RajKumar
Original Message
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] how to edit the whiteIpList file on linux
From: "Christoph Kuhle \(Expat Email Ltd\)" ku...@expat-email.com
Date: Thu, September 17, 2009 2:25 pm
To: "
Thank you, Sam, for a very excellent explanation of how it all works.
Have you considered writing an MTA to replace qmail which can use spamdyke?
Looking forward to the next version...
Bucky
On 5/4/2009 spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote:
When a message is delivered to a stock
BC wrote:
Thank you, Sam, for a very excellent explanation of how it all works.
Have you considered writing an MTA to replace qmail which can use spamdyke?
Looking forward to the next version...
Bucky
Why reinvent the wheel ? could be done just by rewriting only the
qmail-smtpd.
Raj Kumar wrote:
if i send mail to some user [to, cc, bcc, and ] mentioning multiple time
the same user.
my server sends and user recieves the mail specified times in to, cc, bcc,
Which is what you tell MTA to do. This is normal and expected behaviour.
so can anybody suggest me how can i
like on google, if i mention same email account multiple time in to, cc,
bcc, it sends message to that email only once, but in my case, if i use
the same, my server or my user gets mails multiple times.
--
Regards
Rajkumar
mob. 9891698606
Raj Kumar wrote:
if i send mail to some user [to, cc,
Raj Kumar wrote:
like on google, if i mention same email account multiple time in to, cc,
bcc, it sends message to that email only once, but in my case, if i use
the same, my server or my user gets mails multiple times.
You misunderstand the way MTA works. Google most likely removes
duplicate
Hi All,
i have a strange prob
if i send mail to some user [to, cc, bcc, and ] mentioning multiple time
the same user.
my server sends and user recieves the mail specified times in to, cc, bcc,
so can anybody suggest me how can i filter with spamdyke or any other
tools on
Good day,
I was just wondering... when someone sends an email to an invalid
user, does spamdyke still go through the graylisting process (as I
suspect it does), then releases to qmail if the conditions are met, at
which time qmail will reject as an invalid user?
I ask because i was in the domain
I need to offer SMTP-Auth on one server which was previously using
POP-before-SMTP and the issue I am running into is this: I'd like to give
them 90 days to get themselves moved over to SMTP-Auth, while continuing to
use the existing configuration. I am handling the RELAYCLIENT additions in
A bug! Of 300 test scripts, not one of them tests this specific
scenario. Amazing.
Well, I don't have time today to create another release of spamdyke
(I'll do that first thing next week), so until then you can apply the
attached patch. DISCLAIMER: I have not run all of the test scripts
Hi, all
I'm using Spamdyke to secure the SMTP sending using the SSL (465) port,
It's working great. My director asked me to restrict this port only to
send emails after the user authenticate his session, how can i configure
spamdyke to allow receiving emails (including local delivery) only
32 matches
Mail list logo
