Hi everybody,
I recently encountered a bug I think when people in my lab installed
the newest TPP (v4.3 JETSTREAM rev 1, Build 201004201202 (linux)),
especially when I try to confront the result to v4.0 which was our
former benchmark version.
When searching the same 4 pep.xml files with v4.0 and
In our server we have integrated the Mascot Server 2.2 with the latest
Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (TPP), that is version 4.3 revision 1
(released on September 9, 2009). Now we would like to update to Mascot
server 2.3 for Linux. I already wrote to Mascot customer support and
they told me that they
OK well this is a shame that no one seems to be able to help on this
one. It seems to me this is more of a problem with the way the
application is architected than a problem with the system I run it
on. It's a bit of a shame that I don't feel I can support running TPP
in a Linux environment.
On
Have you had a look at the trans_proteomic_pipeline\installer_linux
directory in the source code tree? Those are the configuration
scripts we use on EC2, and for local continuous integration tests.
Brian
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:40 AM, EricTan mefloqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the
I'm sorry you're having a hard time with it, but you just have to get
in there and mess around with it, or find somebody locally who will do
so for you. Getting a webserver configured on linux isn't trivial,
unfortunately, and not really the kind of thing that can be debugged
by email.
Brian
On
Hi Eliza,
Brian is right, it is difficult to debug through emails...
Though I have not configured it on linux but your issue seems to be related
to environment setting (path for user, etc. as mentioned in 2nd. post)
- Check your apache httpd.conf file (should be somewhere under
etc/apache...)
1) A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123261300/abstract?CRETRY=1SRETRY=0
2) http://tools.proteomecenter.org/wiki/index.php?title=TPP_Demo2009
-Natalie
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Jesse J firstblackphan...@gmail.com wrote:
Um...that
It's is hard to say from your description exactly the problem with the
analysis. The order of files given to xinteract should not affect
results. Something is certainly not right in the analysis. If you
post your files I can tell you more.
-David
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:35 AM, lgillet