ailto:rob...@raszuk.net>; m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [spring] [mpls] redux: Special purpose labels in
draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Would not the concept of
(EOS set)
Get a bit strange? We are simply swapping one reserved label for another…
-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>;
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>;
z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>;
rob...@raszuk.net<mailto:rob...@raszuk.net>; m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] redux: Special pur
.de>;
adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc: draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org;
spring@ietf.org; z...@cisco.com; rob...@raszuk.net; m...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] redux: Special purpose labels in
draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Ruediger,
There i
☺
Best regards,
Jie
From: mpls [mailto:mpls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 3:08 PM
To: Adrian Farrel
Cc: draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths; spring; mpls; Zafar Ali
(zali)
Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] redux: Special purpose labels
iger.g...@telekom.de
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:44 AM
> *To:* adr...@olddog.co.uk
> *Cc:* draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org;
> spring@ietf.org; rob...@raszuk.net; m...@ietf.org; z...@cisco.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] redux: Special purp
ichael.gorokhov...@ecitele.com>
Subject: RE: [spring] [mpls] redux: Special purpose labels in
draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
John,
Looks like a very interesting proposal.
Please note that GAL and GACH would not (hopefully) affect ECMP (if it is used
on the label stack hashing)
fic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>;
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>;
rob...@raszuk.net<mailto:rob...@raszuk.net>;
m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>; z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] redux: Special purpose labels in
dr
...@telekom.de <ruediger.g...@telekom.de>;
adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc: draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org;
spring@ietf.org; z...@cisco.com; rob...@raszuk.net; m...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] redux: Special purpose labels in
draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr
spring@ietf.org>>; 'Zafar Ali (zali)'
<z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>>; 'mpls'
<m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>>
Betreff: Re: [spring] [mpls] redux: Special purpose labels in
draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Let's unpick a couple of things
lt;draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; 'spring'
<spring@ietf.org>; 'Zafar Ali (zali)' <z...@cisco.com>; 'mpls' <m...@ietf.org>
Betreff: Re: [spring] [mpls] redux: Special purpose labels in
draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Let's
Adrian
I do not agree with with #2 .. no marker of any sort is needed.
And debugging LDP networks is no different then debugging IP networks so
sure some who are used to ATM/Frame Relay find it very hard to troubleshoot.
Best
r.
On Nov 16, 2017 13:35, "Adrian Farrel"
Let's unpick a couple of things...
1. This work is not talking about per-flow accounting, it is talking about peer
SR-path accounting
2. ipfix on its own does not cut it because you still have to put a marker in
the packets
3. Yes, SR assumes there is no (i.e. zero) state per SR-path in the
12 matches
Mail list logo