gt;
> Stephane
>
>
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg
> (ginsberg)
> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 01:13
> To: Uma Chunduri; DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
> Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-gi
:50 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>; Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Les,
Please see inline [Bruno2]
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday
Bruno -
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 1:13 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Les,
Thanks
gt; Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:50 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
> Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
> INCONSISTENCY
>
> Les,
>
> Please see inline [Bruno2]
>
> From
rtin Horneffer <m...@nic.dtag.de<mailto:m...@nic.dtag.de>>,
"spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>"
<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski
<stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>>
Subject: RE:
/OINIS; Martin Horneffer;
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Hi Les
So you are saying a node that generates inconsistent SRGB (overlapping ranges)
all by itself should be treated Segment routi
.decra...@orange.com>
[mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:50 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>; Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Les,
Pleas
;mailto:spring@ietf.org>"
<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski
<stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>>
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Wim -
From: HENDERICKX,
;mailto:spring@ietf.org>"
<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski
<stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>>
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Wim –
Please explain
Bruno -
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:51 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Les,
Please see inline 1
; LITKOWSKI
Stephane SCE/OINIS
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Hi Wim
If I understand your Option 1) it can occur, for example, if two nodes that
have a conflicting SRGB but they are not directly connected and as such there
can be a race
) [mailto:wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 8:18 PM
To: Fedyk, Don; bruno.decra...@orange.com
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Martin Horneffer; spring@ietf.org; LITKOWSKI
Stephane SCE/OINIS
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Don, I
;, "Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com<mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>,
"spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>"
<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski
<stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.co
lto:spring@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Hi Les,
Pls find more inline.
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 00:34
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS; DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN;
spring@
Hi Les,
Thanks for initiating the thread on SRGB inconsistency.
Please see some comments inlined [Bruno]
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 6:55 AM
To: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@ietf.org
Subject:
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 7:41 PM
To: Martin Horneffer; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org; LITKOWSKI
Stephane SCE/OINIS
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
My main question on the proposal is how do
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Les,
[SLI] I'm was not suggesting to use only Adj-SID ... as I also do not see a
real use case for that. I'm just saying that the specification does not prevent
it. So may be let's prevent it ...so we can update
: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [mailto:wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:19 AM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Cc: Martin Horneffer; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org; LITKOWSKI
Stephane SCE/OINIS
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
Hello Les, Acee, Stephane, everyone,
happy new year!
From an operator's (carrier's) point of view I clearly and strongly
support this alternative solution: Treat an inconsistent set of SRGB
announcements as broken and ignore it.
- It is the simplest solution.
- It only affects traffic of
Hi Les,
Happy new year.
I agree with your proposal.
The text must state that there must be a local configuration mechanism that
avoids sender to originate overlapping SRGB.
In this case, as you mention, if a router receives overlapping SRGB, this is a
bad behavior and we cannot guess if the
Stephane -
From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 12:55 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB
INCONSISTENCY
Hi Les,
Happy
Since the ranges are all advertised by a single SR capable router and can
easily be validated locally, I support this change.
Thanks,
Acee
From: spring > on
behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
22 matches
Mail list logo