Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-20 Thread Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
gt; > Stephane > > > From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg > (ginsberg) > Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 01:13 > To: Uma Chunduri; DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN > Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim) > Subject: Re: [spring] draft-gi

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-13 Thread Mach Chen
:50 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>; Henderickx, Wim (Wim) Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Les, Please see inline [Bruno2] From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Bruno - From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 1:13 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim) Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Les, Thanks

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-13 Thread Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
gt; Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:50 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim) > Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB > INCONSISTENCY > > Les, > > Please see inline [Bruno2] > > From

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-12 Thread HENDERICKX, Wim (Wim)
rtin Horneffer <m...@nic.dtag.de<mailto:m...@nic.dtag.de>>, "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Subject: RE:

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-12 Thread bruno.decraene
/OINIS; Martin Horneffer; spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Hi Les So you are saying a node that generates inconsistent SRGB (overlapping ranges) all by itself should be treated Segment routi

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-12 Thread Jeff Tantsura
.decra...@orange.com> [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:50 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>; Henderickx, Wim (Wim) Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Les, Pleas

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-12 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
;mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Wim - From: HENDERICKX,

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-12 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
;mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Wim – Please explain

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-12 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Bruno - From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:51 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: spring@ietf.org; Henderickx, Wim (Wim) Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Les, Please see inline 1

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-11 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Hi Wim If I understand your Option 1) it can occur, for example, if two nodes that have a conflicting SRGB but they are not directly connected and as such there can be a race

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-11 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
) [mailto:wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 8:18 PM To: Fedyk, Don; bruno.decra...@orange.com Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Martin Horneffer; spring@ietf.org; LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Don, I

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-11 Thread HENDERICKX, Wim (Wim)
;, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com<mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>, "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.co

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-06 Thread bruno.decraene
lto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Hi Les, Pls find more inline. From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 00:34 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS; DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-06 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi Les, Thanks for initiating the thread on SRGB inconsistency. Please see some comments inlined [Bruno] From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 6:55 AM To: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@ietf.org Subject:

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-06 Thread bruno.decraene
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henderickx, Wim (Wim) Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 7:41 PM To: Martin Horneffer; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org; LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY My main question on the proposal is how do

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-06 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Les, [SLI] I'm was not suggesting to use only Adj-SID ... as I also do not see a real use case for that. I'm just saying that the specification does not prevent it. So may be let's prevent it ...so we can update

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-06 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [mailto:wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:19 AM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com Cc: Martin Horneffer; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org; LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-05 Thread Martin Horneffer
Hello Les, Acee, Stephane, everyone, happy new year! From an operator's (carrier's) point of view I clearly and strongly support this alternative solution: Treat an inconsistent set of SRGB announcements as broken and ignore it. - It is the simplest solution. - It only affects traffic of

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-04 Thread stephane.litkowski
Hi Les, Happy new year. I agree with your proposal. The text must state that there must be a local configuration mechanism that avoids sender to originate overlapping SRGB. In this case, as you mention, if a router receives overlapping SRGB, this is a bad behavior and we cannot guess if the

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-04 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Stephane - From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 12:55 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Hi Les, Happy

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

2016-01-04 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Since the ranges are all advertised by a single SR capable router and can easily be validated locally, I support this change. Thanks, Acee From: spring > on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"