el Halpern <
> j...@joelhalpern.com>, SPRING WG List
> *Subject: *RE: [spring] Issue 1 regarding
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
>
> Hi Andrew,WG,
>
>
>
>
>
> Let me add my understanding of interoperability.
>
>
>
> If all devices support NEXT-
@foobar.org>>
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 5:43 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) mailto:z...@cisco.com>>
Cc: Joel Halpern mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>>, SPRING WG
List mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
Zafar,
vor or the replace flavor or both. Emails from Changwang Lin and Darren
> Dukes on this tread provides further explanation. I hope that clarifies
> your query.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
>
>
> *From: *Nick Hilliard
> *Date: *Wednesday, Au
Hello WG,
I believe that the issue 1, 2, 3 and 4 have been resolved.
Thanks,
Gurminder
--
Thanks,
Gurminder
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
to compress SID list using the next
> flavor or the replace flavor or both. Emails from Changwang Lin and Darren
> Dukes on this tread provides further explanation. I hope that clarifies
> your query.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
>
>
> *From:
I agree this issue #1 can be closed.
All SIDs both next SID uSID and replace SID GSID can Co-exist in the same
SRH as single data plane solution.
Thank you
Gyan
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:08 PM Joel Halpern wrote:
> As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs
>
Hi Joel and WG,
The resolution is satisfactory to close issue #1.
Brgds
Amit D
Rakuten
From: Joel Halpern
Date: Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 2:38 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117
Hi, yes I agree to close this issue.
Dan
From: spring on behalf of Joel Halpern
Date: Monday, July 31, 2023 at 5:08 PM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [EXT][spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs
Hi Joel and team,
We agree that issue#1 can be closed.
Different SID types coexist in the same SRH: implemented and aligned with
the Broadcom Jericho line implementation.
Best Regards,
Shay
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 11:26 AM Satoru Matsushima <
satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This issue
This issue was resolved and I agree to close issue#1.
Best regards,
--satoru
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 6:08 AM Joel Halpern wrote:
> As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs
> (myself and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can
> close the open
Dear WG,
in my eyes this resolves the issue good enough.
Best regards, Martin
Von: spring im Auftrag von Joel Halpern
Datum: Montag, 31. Juli 2023 um 23:10
An: SPRING WG List
Betreff: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list
From: Joel Halpern
Date: 2023-08-01 05:08
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the open
issues
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the open
issues regarding
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc
ust 9, 2023 at 5:43 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) mailto:z...@cisco.com>>
Cc: Joel Halpern mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>>, SPRING WG
List mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
Zafar,
can you confirm that if Router A in one
t;
> Regards … Zafar
>
>
>
> *From: *Nick Hilliard
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 5:43 AM
> *To: *Zafar Ali (zali)
> *Cc: *Joel Halpern , SPRING WG List
> *Subject: *Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
>
> Zafa
that clarifies your
query.
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
From: Nick Hilliard
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 5:43 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali)
Cc: Joel Halpern , SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
Zafar,
can you confirm that if Router A in one
Hi Darren,
I agree that in the current form, the authors asserted that proposed C-SID
mechanisms are parts of the single data plane. But, as I've noted earlier,
that the resolution should come as a conclusion, not an assertion. I hope
that the authors will share text that would illustrate in
Hello Joel and WG chairs. I’m in agreement with the authors/editors assertion
that we have a single data plane and we can close this issue.
The document defines two new flavors of SID and applies them to existing
behaviors. The resultant behaviors are implemented only on the device deploying
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting
.
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
*From: *spring on behalf of Joel Halpern
*Date: *Monday, July 31, 2023 at 5:09 PM
*To: *SPRING WG List
*Subject: *[spring] Issue 1 regarding
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs
(myself
at 5:09 PM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the open
issues regarding
https
So folks don't get confused, later today I will be issueing calls to
confirm the editor's conclusions on issues #3, #4, and #5. Those will
run for 2 weeks. The call for issue #1 continues, and the call for
issue #2 will be issued next week.
Yours,
Joel
lpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the op
ristics of different networking scenarios.
Thanks,
Changwang
From: Andrew Alston - IETF [mailto:andrew-i...@liquid.tech]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2023 8:22 PM
To: linchangwang (RD); Joel Halpern; SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
Now,
Let me a
Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the open
, 4 August 2023 at 08:24
To: Andrew Alston - IETF , Joel Halpern
, SPRING WG List
Subject: RE: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
Hi Andrew,WG,
Let me add my understanding of interoperability.
If all devices support NEXT-C-SID, the encapsulation is as follows
e same SRH. This
supports the notion that SRv6 is indeed a unified and consistent dataplane
solution.
Best regards,
Lihao
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-i
In my opinion the suggested approach is the most reasonable approach
at this point, and therefore the issue can be closed.
Cheers,
Tal.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 12:08 AM Joel Halpern wrote:
>
> As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
> and Alvaro
Joel Halpern mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>>, SPRING WG
List mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
Hi Joel, WG,
I agree that the issue has been resolved.
According to the SRv6 dataplane definition in the document
&qu
oelHalpern
To: SPRING WG List ;
Date: 2023年08月01日 05:08
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
As per the discussions on list a
deployment.
Thanks,
Cheng
From: spring On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself
and Alvaro
to be
achieved.
Thanks,
Changwang
From: Andrew Alston - IETF [mailto:andrew-i...@liquid.tech]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2023 10:28 AM
To: linchangwang (RD); Joel Halpern; SPRING WG List
Subject: Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
Hi Joel, WG
Speaking strictly
e a single and consistent dataplane solution.
Thanks,
Changwang
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussio
consistent dataplane solution.
Thanks,
Changwang
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
As per the discussions on list and a
Hi, Joel, Authors, et al.,
I have a clarification question and appreciate your help answering it.
According to RFC 8986:
SRv6 Endpoint behavior: A packet processing behavior executed at an SRv6
Segment Endpoint Node.
As I understand it, two compression techniques, NEXT-C-SID and
REPLACE-C-SID,
As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs
(myself and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can
close the open issues regarding
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
The editors have entered proposed resolutions for
36 matches
Mail list logo
