Already got a response to this. Thanks all
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:03 AM Ben Young
wrote:
> I'm looking for an older tire storage protection scheme that allows an
> overhead density of 0.3/2000 with one level of IRAS at 30 GPM. The current
> version of 8-3 doesn't include this anymore.
>
>
I'm looking for an older tire storage protection scheme that allows an
overhead density of 0.3/2000 with one level of IRAS at 30 GPM. The current
version of 8-3 doesn't include this anymore.
Does anyone have an older copy (pre 2009) that they could send me off forum?
FYI tires are stored in
So I actually work for the person who submitted this and it actually helps
quite a bit. I'm getting ready to leave the office but I'm fill y'all in
later this afternoon.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:19 PM Sean.VanGaal via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> Todd,
>
>
If you have a backflow in the pump room the local water authority may
require a set clearance for testing. 3 feet around everything seems a
little extreme but it's not like clearance is a bad thing. Does that mean
you can't have system risers closer than say 4 feet on center too?
On Thu, Nov 5,
Steve,
Check out the Wheatland fire sprinkler pipe brochure on their website.
There's a chart for megaflow.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:33 PM Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> Happy Hump Day Forumites:
>
> Does anyone have a chart of the capacities
John, please make sure Bob gets an account here. hee hee
Benjamin Young
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:54 PM John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> I am very pleased with this announcement. Congratulations Bob!
>
> *The AFSA Board of Directors and AFSA
As a former contractor who now works for an engineering firm, I think it
sounds like everyone is being a little bit hard headed on this.
I think the requirement for complete submittals can get a little asinine
especially when, as John said, its due in two weeks. And John, I wish they
said only
Yeah it's 3-0 and there's a formula in there on how to pick the number of
heads along a branchline. It's not always intuitive. The length factor is
1.2 now unless a datasheet tells you to use something else.
There is so much that goes into a proper FM system design beyond 2-0 and
8-9. Really so
Yeah, house boats lol
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:18 PM Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> A residential boat dock?
>
>
>
> Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection | 864.676.5252 |
> craig.pr...@jacobs.com | www.jacobs.com
>
>
Does anyone know where I can find some criteria (preferably in FM Global
data sheets) on how to provide exposure protection on the exterior of a
building wall using dry sidewall heads?
I have an insurance company telling me to do this but they didn't give me a
basis of design.
Trying to stay
My understanding is that this was something FM was looking into a few years
back but never got anything that was considered non combustible. So this is
actually a bad leftover reference in the code that should be removed. As
far as I know there is no such thing as non-combustible hydraulic fluid
Is this for one person to look at or multiple people together in a
conference room?
I have not seen how the prints look on 4k TV's but the current gen 2k
monitors will display the PDFs full size very well without loss of detail.
I work now with PDFs almost exclusively and it's still weird even
Ed, thanks for many years of help, information and stories here on the
sprinkler forum. Hate to see you go but I get it.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:43 PM Ed Vining via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> Not really. The codes and standards determine the decision.
>
Sorry, I meant the PLASTICD is going to be pretty small by weight or
volume.
Benjamin Young
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:11 PM Ben Young wrote:
> What does the definition of rolled paper say?
>
> The paper is going to be pretty small weight or volume wise so I'm
> thinking class 3, that's a
What does the definition of rolled paper say?
The paper is going to be pretty small weight or volume wise so I'm thinking
class 3, that's a total shoot from hip without looking at the code though,
so its probably worthless.
Benjamin Young
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:38 PM Matt Grise via
Bruce thanks for sharing. This was an interesting story and I appreciate
the extra details.
Ben
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:10 PM BRUCE VERHEI via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> I’ve seen what about 50 of these stored, on side in a non-sprinklered
> building can
I'm looking to get in touch with companies that do 3D scanning in the
northeastern Ohio area. I would appreciate any contact info or help anyone
could provide.
Thanks in advance,
Benjamin Young
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
The idea is to get out a majority of the trapped air but not every bit. So
in your case you don't need to tie in every sprig and have multiple air
vents, you could put it off one of the back sprigs but a remote branch line
works too.
The other option is to use AGFs in line vent that you can put
I don't have a stamp but I work for an engineering firm that has multiple
PEs in offices around the country. We have a couple people that sign
electronically and the others that stamp paper and then we scan them in.
Wet seals are the worst because then you've got to send them back out.
The
I'll definitely include the extra equivalent feet for a mechanical tee
since they are pretty severe.
For the bushing thing I would say it's basically integral to the tee. My
justification for that is if you have to use bushings upstream to create a
threaded fitting because one doesn't exist do
Reliable has one but it's not flat plate
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:36 AM Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a high-pressure rated extended coverage concealer?
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
> ___
>
10 mil thick laminating pouches and a printed placard. It's about as thick
as a credit card (IE rigid) UV resistant, waterproof and easily readable.
Haven't had anyone complain yet
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 8:18 PM Jamie Seidl via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
>
VIF verify in field
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:49 PM BILL MENSTER via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> NTS. (not too sure)
>
> On January 14, 2020 at 3:08 PM Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum <
> sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
>
> My FAVORITE things
Michael it sounds like you need to find some better GCs to work with then
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:51 AM Michael Goodis via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> Bim modeling, that’s funny. Never seen it work yet…. Only thing its been
> god for is (your duct is in
John,
If you're set up with the new job at AFSA, could you please email me back?
I didn't see anything on the website as far as contact info is concerned.
I wanted to discuss the upcoming joint meeting in King of Prussia with you.
I didn't really have any other way to get in touch with you,
Does anyone know what happened to Table 22.2.2 in between the 2013 and 2016
editions?
Nothing explaining the lack of the table in the annex or handbook
commentary that I can see.
The table was titled Palletized, solid-piled, bin box, shelf, or back to
back shelf storage of class 1 through class 4
Just to try and keep this simple as well, if all of that is protected by a
one single deluge system then you have to calc it all because its open.
That's how deluge systems work, right?
If you have separate deluge systems then you have to look at if its
possible for a fire to activate more than
org> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I will try to contact some of my old ASCOA buds to see if they kept their
> data manuals and let you know.
>
>
> John W. Farabee
>
> 561-707-5150
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 16, 2019, 03:27:29 PM EDT, Ben Young via
> Sprinkle
Does anyone have a cutsheet for the ASCOA 246G sprinkler head? I'm looking
to see if they came in 3/4" timeframe would be about 1995. They are the 7mm
glass bulb type.
I've got a blurry picture and I can't tell the thread size
I think they were bought by Grinnell back in the day, so would JCI
Hey guys that wasn't private. Just a heads up
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:30 PM Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> That would definitely get more water to a building... provide jobs and
> toilets for the homeless...
>
> I'm recruiting at a career
If there's condensation on the LHD, is there also condensation on the
sprinkler piping and or the structure?
The correct way to fix this problem is for the owner to build a vestibule
or to use forced air blowers to keep the warm air out.
Benjamin Young
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:46 AM Mario
I have one made in cad would that work?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 PM David Williams via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> I’ve used the forms that are produced by 185 graph (
> http://www.reckonit.com/) as you can put your logo on them $250 and does
> some
Don't worry, I'm sure they will be recalled long before they need to be
tested
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:15 AM Mike Kramer via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
> Has anyone seen any information about inspecting dry flex balcony
> sprinklers after being installed?
33 matches
Mail list logo
