Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Karen Purvis
I am looking for some code help. According to NFPA 13 8.2.4 you can have
separate buildings that share a common roof, walls or passageway be
protected by one riser. Does anyone know if the IBC contradicts this? I have
an architect telling me I have to have a separate riser for each section of
building. They claim that I can have the risers in the same room but that
each building section must have a separate riser.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Paul Pinigis
It depends upon the distance between buildings and the percent of open
wall space under the roof.  

Paul Pinigis, P.E.
Life Safety Department Head




-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Purvis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Possible IBC question

I am looking for some code help. According to NFPA 13 8.2.4 you can have
separate buildings that share a common roof, walls or passageway be
protected by one riser. Does anyone know if the IBC contradicts this? I
have
an architect telling me I have to have a separate riser for each section
of
building. They claim that I can have the risers in the same room but
that
each building section must have a separate riser.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Karen Purvis
The buildings are actually just additions to an existing building and they
are separated by two adjacent fire walls.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Paul Pinigis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:03 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Possible IBC question

It depends upon the distance between buildings and the percent of open
wall space under the roof.  

Paul Pinigis, P.E.
Life Safety Department Head




-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Purvis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Possible IBC question

I am looking for some code help. According to NFPA 13 8.2.4 you can have
separate buildings that share a common roof, walls or passageway be
protected by one riser. Does anyone know if the IBC contradicts this? I
have
an architect telling me I have to have a separate riser for each section
of
building. They claim that I can have the risers in the same room but
that
each building section must have a separate riser.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Paul Pinigis
If they are actually separated by fire walls, and not just fire-rated
walls, then they are separate buildings per the IBC.  But, yes, you can
use one riser to feed both buildings provided that you protect the
connecting pipe from freezing temperatures and you do not exceed the
maximum allowable area for the system.  

Paul Pinigis, P.E.
Life Safety Department Head




-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Purvis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:05 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Possible IBC question

The buildings are actually just additions to an existing building and
they
are separated by two adjacent fire walls.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Pinigis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:03 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Possible IBC question

It depends upon the distance between buildings and the percent of open
wall space under the roof.  

Paul Pinigis, P.E.
Life Safety Department Head




-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Purvis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Possible IBC question

I am looking for some code help. According to NFPA 13 8.2.4 you can have
separate buildings that share a common roof, walls or passageway be
protected by one riser. Does anyone know if the IBC contradicts this? I
have
an architect telling me I have to have a separate riser for each section
of
building. They claim that I can have the risers in the same room but
that
each building section must have a separate riser.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Steve Leyton
I would add to everyone else's replies that it is NOT the intent of NFPA
13 to require separate systems in this situation, whether or not the
structure is considered to be divided into separate buildings, or just
separate fire areas or occupancies - see 8.2.4, 2007 ed.

And thanks again to whoever turned me onto that - saved us a lot of
bitchin' and pissin' with the AHJ on that particular project.

Steve Leyton
Protection Design  Consulting
San Diego, CA




-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Purvis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Possible IBC question

I am looking for some code help. According to NFPA 13 8.2.4 you can have
separate buildings that share a common roof, walls or passageway be
protected by one riser. Does anyone know if the IBC contradicts this? I
have
an architect telling me I have to have a separate riser for each section
of
building. They claim that I can have the risers in the same room but
that
each building section must have a separate riser.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3954 (20090323) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3954 (20090323) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Re: Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Roland Huggins
keep in mind the list of variables to consider listed in A.8.2.5.  It  
is a good question for the consultants and AHJ's to respond to since  
there is a difference on how you treat small auxiliary buildings and  
multiple structures that fall into one fire area verses two buildings  
separated by a fire WALL (keep in mind that there are restrictions on  
penetrating fire walls including where, in relation to the floor, that  
you pass through it).

Roland

On Mar 23, 2009, at 6:07 AM, Karen Purvis wrote:

 I am looking for some code help. According to NFPA 13 8.2.4 you can  
 have
 separate buildings that share a common roof, walls or passageway be
 protected by one riser. Does anyone know if the IBC contradicts  
 this? I have
 an architect telling me I have to have a separate riser for each  
 section of
 building. They claim that I can have the risers in the same room but  
 that
 each building section must have a separate riser.

 Karen Purvis
 Senior Designer
 Facility Systems Consultants
 713 South Central Street,
 Suite 101
 Knoxville, TN 37902
 ph.865-246-0164
 fax 865-246-1084

 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Paul Pinigis
One last thing to keep in mind is that some water companies demand
separate services if they are considered separate buildings; that
supersedes the requirements of NFPA 13.   

Paul Pinigis, P.E.
Life Safety Department Head




-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Leyton
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:04 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Possible IBC question

I would add to everyone else's replies that it is NOT the intent of NFPA
13 to require separate systems in this situation, whether or not the
structure is considered to be divided into separate buildings, or just
separate fire areas or occupancies - see 8.2.4, 2007 ed.

And thanks again to whoever turned me onto that - saved us a lot of
bitchin' and pissin' with the AHJ on that particular project.

Steve Leyton
Protection Design  Consulting
San Diego, CA




-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Purvis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Possible IBC question

I am looking for some code help. According to NFPA 13 8.2.4 you can have
separate buildings that share a common roof, walls or passageway be
protected by one riser. Does anyone know if the IBC contradicts this? I
have
an architect telling me I have to have a separate riser for each section
of
building. They claim that I can have the risers in the same room but
that
each building section must have a separate riser.

Karen Purvis
Senior Designer
Facility Systems Consultants
713 South Central Street,
Suite 101
Knoxville, TN 37902
ph.865-246-0164
fax 865-246-1084

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3954 (20090323) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3954 (20090323) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Possible IBC question

2009-03-23 Thread Thom McMahon
Paul:

That usually only applies if they are on separate lots or arranged so that
in the future they could be separated and sold as separate properties. These
additions don't appear to meet those concerns. I usually like to look at the
other building services.

Is the electric a separate service?
Is the sewer and storm from this new structure a separate service.
Is the phone to this structure a separate service.
Does it have its own gas and electric meters?
Does it have its own water meter?
Could it easily become a separate building, or property for sale?

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926



-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Paul Pinigis
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:19 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Possible IBC question

One last thing to keep in mind is that some water companies demand separate
services if they are considered separate buildings; that
supersedes the requirements of NFPA 13.   

Paul Pinigis, P.E.
Life Safety Department Head





___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: techsupp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)