Travis,
This product commodity falls within the same parameters as boat storage - there
is no prescriptive requirement to follow.
In fact, NFPA has issued a statement this particular type of storage
arrangement is outside the scope of NFPA-13.
That being said, I have done a fair amount of
-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ray Vance
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:09 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: PODs storage again
Travis,
This product commodity falls within the same parameters as boat storage -
there is no prescriptive requirement to follow.
In fact, NFPA
Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:59 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: PODs storage again
If the HPR insurance company makes a judgement call
Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:59 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: PODs storage again
If the HPR insurance company makes a judgement call
I think the consensus was to hang the building for from a fusible link
over a pond.
Is it a new building? If so it would be interesting to see what the EOR
or architect did for a hazard analysis.
Ron Fletcher
Aero Automatic Sprinkler
Phoenix, AZ
-Original Message-
From:
.
Can You Live Without Them?
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Fletcher, Ron
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:37 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: PODs storage again
I think
