On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok that is good to know. I will play around with the source
> distribution and try to figure out how to get it to work with python
> 2.5. According to the python 2.5 documentation, to build Python with
> sqlite3, I need the lib
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Zbigniew Baniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry to confirm the problem described at http://tinyurl.com/29wc8x
>
> #v+
> $ tclsh8.5
> % package require sqlite3
> couldn't load file "/usr/lib/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so.0":
> /usr/lib/sqlite3/libtclsql
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:42:50 +0200
Dimitri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I just had several questions regarding SQLite. While at the download
> > page, it states that sqlite-amalgamation is the "preferred" way of
> > acquiring SQLite code. So I went ahead and downloaded the latest
> > ve
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Robert L Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is what I did:
>
> tar -xvzf sqlite-3.5.7.tar.gz
> cd sqlite-3.5.7
> mkdir bld
> cd !$
> ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/sqlite-3.5.7 --disable-tcl
> --enable-threadsafe
> make
>
Yeah, this was reported & fi
Hi,
> I just had several questions regarding SQLite. While at the download
> page, it states that sqlite-amalgamation is the "preferred" way of
> acquiring SQLite code. So I went ahead and downloaded the latest
> version (3.5.7). I get 3 source files and I am stuck. I tried reading
> the documenta
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:54:15PM -0500, John Stanton wrote:
> Install TCL
Another one? What for?
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
___
sqlite-users mailing list
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> I'm sorry to confirm the problem described at http://tinyurl.com/29wc8x
>
> #v+
> $ tclsh8.5
> % package require sqlite3
> couldn't load file "/usr/lib/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so.0":
> /usr/lib/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so.0: undefined symbol: sqlite3StrICmp
> #v-
I'm sorry to confirm the problem described at http://tinyurl.com/29wc8x
#v+
$ tclsh8.5
% package require sqlite3
couldn't load file "/usr/lib/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so.0":
/usr/lib/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so.0: undefined symbol: sqlite3StrICmp
#v-
Does there exist any cure?
--
Robert L Cochran wrote:
> Here is what I did:
>
> tar -xvzf sqlite-3.5.7.tar.gz
> cd sqlite-3.5.7
> mkdir bld
> cd !$
> ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/sqlite-3.5.7 --disable-tcl
> --enable-threadsafe
> make
>
> --
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Matthew L. Creech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 1. Is there any documentation that I may have missed that addresses
> > the above issue? If not, there probably should be a wiki page
> > re
Here is what I did:
tar -xvzf sqlite-3.5.7.tar.gz
cd sqlite-3.5.7
mkdir bld
cd !$
../configure --prefix=/usr/local/sqlite-3.5.7 --disable-tcl
--enable-threadsafe
make
--
(output of make is shown be
You can _generally_ work around this kind of problem using sub-selects. So
instead of:
SELECT x FROM fts_table WHERE fts_table MATCH "y" OR fts_table MATCH "z";
You might write:
SELECT x FROM fts_table WHERE rowid IN (SELECT rowid FROM fts_table WHERE
fts_table MATCH "y") OR rowid IN (SELECT r
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Amit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. Is there any documentation that I may have missed that addresses
> the above issue? If not, there probably should be a wiki page
> regarding this. I could create a wiki page with my notes regarding
> this.
>
There's:
http
Pretty much any folder in the PATH will do.
You can put it \windows\system32\ but that can be a pain to get to and
remember. I usually create one or more folders to hold non-Windows misc
binaries, and add those to the system PATH. The most recent is C:\usr\bin\ for
executables, and C:\usr\lib
Hi everyone,
This is my first time diving into SQLite and I am very excited about
this. Thanks to all the developers.
I just had several questions regarding SQLite. While at the download
page, it states that sqlite-amalgamation is the "preferred" way of
acquiring SQLite code. So I went ahead and
On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Joanne Pham wrote:
> Hi All,
> Should we always call sqlite3_finalize(pReadStmt); and
> sqlite3_close(pDB) after we have done with read/write to database.
> Or sqlite3_finalize(pReadStmt) is good enough.
> Please advice what is the sequence of statement that we shou
On Apr 3, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Steven Fisher wrote:
> Can Final be called without Step first being called?
Yes.
>
>
> If Step is called, will Final always be called?
Yes
D. Richard Hipp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sql
Hi All,
Should we always call sqlite3_finalize(pReadStmt); and sqlite3_close(pDB) after
we have done with read/write to database. Or sqlite3_finalize(pReadStmt) is
good enough.
Please advice what is the sequence of statement that we should call after we
are done with database activities(read/wri
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:09:09 -0400, you wrote:
> For Windows XP, where should I place the
> Sqlite .DLL's for best Sqlite operation,
> and for usage with other COM components?
There is no easy answer, but enough information to
base your decision upon:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms6
A little bit more info: SELECT COUNT(*) is implemented as a full
table scan, so SQLite is visiting every row in the table, which will
get slower and slower as the table gets bigger and the database
fragments. This differs from many database engines (which implement
an optimization for this) Doin
For Windows XP, where should I place the Sqlite .DLL's for best Sqlite
operation, and for usage with other COM components?
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Can Final be called without Step first being called?
If Step is called, will Final always be called?
I know the intention is to call sqlite3_aggregate_context with the
size I really need and not allocate anything myself, but I want to
store a pointer to a C++ class in the aggregate context. I
You could use a trigger to keep the running total in a seperate table.
"Mahalakshmi.m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
I am having 4 records in my Harddisk.
My Processor speed is 400 Mhz.
For "SELECT COUNT(1) FROM MUSIC ;" its getting more time to display the
count.
I have also tried with "S
En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
> En/na Dennis Cote ha escrit:
>> The original corruption may well have been caused by omitting the thread
>> safe option on the version of SQLite you were using.
>
> Pheew, I hope it is really so.
A quick follow-up: everything has been working fine for almost one
On 4/3/08, Mahalakshmi.m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having 4 records in my Harddisk.
> My Processor speed is 400 Mhz.
>
> For "SELECT COUNT(1) FROM MUSIC ;" its getting more time to display the
> count.
> I have also tried with "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM MUSIC ;This also take mor
Hi,
I am having 4 records in my Harddisk.
My Processor speed is 400 Mhz.
For "SELECT COUNT(1) FROM MUSIC ;" its getting more time to display the
count.
I have also tried with "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM MUSIC ;This also take more
time.
Is there any other way we can get the Total number of records.
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> SQLite is not reentrant through the update hook.
>
>
> D. Richard Hipp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Thanks a lot.
I would consider using user-defined functions as callbacks with updated data
in its parameters.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.co
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>
>
>>
>> sqlite3_update_hook(db, Callback, db);
>>
>> and when trying to access to the db inside callback
>>
>> sqlite3_prepare((sqlite3*)data_arg_3, [...])
>
> Show how Callback is declared. Did you really name its first parameter
> dat
I need to know if SQLite works at all if the platform doesn't have a
64-bit integer type.
I see that SQLite has some #ifdefing like
#ifdef SQLITE_INT64_TYPE
that seems to be for the case when the platform does not have the type
natively, but I don't see where this would actually be implemented
29 matches
Mail list logo