Mitchell Vincent wrote:
So is a 60%ish reduction in DB size from 2.8.16 to 3.3.13 normal?
Don't know about "normal" but ISTR version 3 did bring some fairly major
improvements in file size. Given that you have your data in both SQLite
formats would it not be fairly easy to dump both
On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So is a 60%ish reduction in DB size from 2.8.16 to 3.3.13 normal?
>
3.3.13 typically generates database files that are 30-40% smaller
than 2.8.16. 60% seems excessive, but is not outside the range of
possibility. What kind of data
"Mitchell Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm converting a bunch of databases from SQLite 2.8.16 to SQLite
> 3.3.13 and am seeing something pretty amazing space saving. So good
> that it might be too good to be true!
>
> For example, a 17 meg database is cut d
On 3/12/07, Mitchell Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm converting a bunch of databases from SQLite 2.8.16 to SQLite
3.3.13 and am seeing something pretty amazing space saving. So good
that it might be too good to be true!
For example, a 17 meg database is cut down to 7 megs.
I'm converting a bunch of databases from SQLite 2.8.16 to SQLite
3.3.13 and am seeing something pretty amazing space saving. So good
that it might be too good to be true!
For example, a 17 meg database is cut down to 7 megs. That's fantastic
if it's just that SQlite is *that* much better
On 9/14/05, Sijm, Norbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi, I'm trying to execute a command in a DOS batchfile , but I get a syntax
> error. Is this supported in 2.8.16 ?
> ( sqlite mydbase.db select * from table1; )
Try enclosing your SQL statements in double quotes, like this:
sqlite
Hi, I'm trying to execute a command in a DOS batchfile , but I get a syntax
error. Is this supported in 2.8.16 ?
( sqlite mydbase.db select * from table1; )
PS. When doing firm sqlite mydbase select ... it works )
Regards
Norbert
Mark Drago wrote:
I don't seem to have the 'md5sum' program installed on the mac that I
have here, but getting the md5sum on linux returns the following. So,
if you have some means of getting the md5sum of the file, make sure it
matches this:
9c79b461ff30240a6f9d70dd67f8faea sqlite-2.8.16
On Sep 8, 2005, at 1:24 PM, Mark Drago wrote:
Richard,
You can use 'curl' to download the file instead of wget. So, run the
following command instead:
curl -o sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz
wget is not available by default on Panther. On the other hand
Nope,
done that, still the same errors.
Have another person, whom is trying to figure this out as well,
in fact, he thinks, something in my shell is mess up..
>
Wow, your results are completely different. When the shell trys to
read the here-document, it gets the garbage.
So the bug is in
Richard,
You can use 'curl' to download the file instead of wget. So, run the
following command instead:
curl -o sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz
I don't seem to have the 'md5sum' program installed on the mac that I
have here, but getting the md5sum on linux
h the command line:
>--
>wget http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz
>gunzip sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz
>tar -xvf sqlite-2.8.16.tar
>cd sqlite-2.8.16
>su
>--
>
>now what happens when you configure/install from here?
:
--
wget http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz
gunzip sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz
tar -xvf sqlite-2.8.16.tar
cd sqlite-2.8.16
su
--
now what happens when you configure/install from here?
On 9/8/05, Richard Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-2.8.16.tar.gz
gunzip sqlite-2.8.16.tar.gz
tar -xvf sqlite-2.8.16.tar
cd sqlite-2.8.16
su
--
now what happens when you configure/install from here?
On 9/8/05, Richard Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On September 08 2005, Cam Crews <[EMAIL PR
On September 08 2005, Cam Crews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, its something with the C compiler...
Well, you can test your compiler pretty easily.. Are you able to
compile anything else? At minimum, try compiling hello world first:
create a file test.c :
---
> So, its something with the C compiler...
Well, you can test your compiler pretty easily.. Are you able to
compile anything else? At minimum, try compiling hello world first:
create a file test.c :
---
#include
int main( ) {
printf("oh my, 1 step closer to
Downloaded this, version, and got the same kind of output.
VÒjx?Âê#MÉfl#?sjKöyæ9>[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
ºhUZ£/S?÷é©='¿l?/ëÿ:ìRb}öVÙ¥"( Å[¿<.Q`hYF¢+¨÷ùáü!"ÀLOÎ
í k?ïë¢xeÃb?e·fi,[\¡"N¨>=
Ã?Ê3}ì?âò<=În'T£? å.
Â1 ÜÙ
ÅÕô/+ yÑ]Ò{¨câ´qîÔhÏ!=Na"Z
17 matches
Mail list logo
