On 9/10/2012 8:37 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 9/10/2012 9:57 p.m., Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Now that there's public software available that supports this feature
on the router side, what would be required in order for Squid to
support IPv6 WCCP on the server side?
Either locating a specificati
On 9/10/2012 9:57 p.m., Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently upgraded a few of my Cisco routers to the latest
15.2(4)M IOS code and amongst the new features in this software is
IPv6 WCCP support.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp/configuration/15-2mt/iap-wccp-v2-ipv6.
Hi all,
I've recently upgraded a few of my Cisco routers to the latest 15.2(4)M
IOS code and amongst the new features in this software is IPv6 WCCP support.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp/configuration/15-2mt/iap-wccp-v2-ipv6.html
The configuration looks to be almost identi
Hi Amos,
At 05.06 17/08/2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>I have just imported and properly wrapped the libesmtp getaddrinfo and
>>supporting implementation from fetchmail 6.3.8.
>>
>>I have done some simple configure and compile tests here. Its time to
>> pass
>>it back to you Guido for the win32 te
> >> Windows they are available only starting from Windows XP. This means
>> >> that your code, even if compiled without IPv6 support, cannot run on
>> >> Windows 2000.
>> >>
>> >> I'm also not sure if getaddrinfo() and freeaddrinfo() fun
> >> Windows they are available only starting from Windows XP. This means
>> >> that your code, even if compiled without IPv6 support, cannot run on
>> >> Windows 2000.
>> >>
>> >> I'm also not sure if getaddrinfo() and freeaddrin
r code, even if compiled without IPv6 support, cannot run on
> Windows 2000.
>
> I'm also not sure if getaddrinfo() and freeaddrinfo() functions are
> available on all systems, someone know something about ?
We have already tested Linux 2.6+ and FreeBSD 4.5+ (4.3 _says_ it has them)
N
>> Hi Amos,
>>
>> Not good news here ... :-(
>>
>> We have a problem:
>> You have used getaddrinfo() and freeaddrinfo() functions, but on
>> Windows they are available only starting from Windows XP. This means
>> that your code, even if compiled wit
> Hi Amos,
>
> Not good news here ... :-(
>
> We have a problem:
> You have used getaddrinfo() and freeaddrinfo() functions, but on
> Windows they are available only starting from Windows XP. This means
> that your code, even if compiled without IPv6 support, cannot run on
On tis, 2007-08-14 at 13:41 +0200, Guido Serassio wrote:
> I'm not sure if the licensing of the implementation coming from the
> PostgreSQL allow its usage in Squid.
Looks fine. PostgreSQL is licensed under the modified/modern
three-clause BSD license, which is fully GPL compatible.
http://www.
che.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 support
I know this may not be completely relevant to the ipv6 discussion, but you
buy a lot of flexibility if you abstract out the socket API /usefully/.
You're then able to do the following:
* easily deal with the different crack unices have when twiddling
s
che.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 support
I know this may not be completely relevant to the ipv6 discussion, but you
buy a lot of flexibility if you abstract out the socket API /usefully/.
You're then able to do the following:
* easily deal with the different crack unices have when twiddling
s
I know this may not be completely relevant to the ipv6 discussion,
but you buy a lot of flexibility if you abstract out the socket
API /usefully/. You're then able to do the following:
* easily deal with the different crack unices have when twiddling
socket stuff (eg, via ioctls, grabbing the
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
The "#if ENABLE_IPV6" conditions are to provide a more smooth transition to
enabled IPv6 support. The idea is: When "ENABLE_IPV6==0", then everything is
as before. But when ENABLE_IPV6==1, every variable and every struc
only partially "object
orientized", and especially the code which does address handling and the
like is currently not enough "object orientized" to do just a "drop in
replacement" of a class.
The "#if ENABLE_IPV6" conditions are to provide a more smooth tra
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
Also, it would be nice if Henrik could start with some comments he said to
have on these first IPv6 steps. :-)
I am still here ;-)
The main comment is that we should try to cut down on the number of
#ifdefs. I prefer introducing a new class to
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Tue, 2005/02/15 (MST),
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to bring forward IPv6 support of squid.
FYI: You can try to use Web Polygraph to test performance aspects of
IPv6 support in Squid. For example, it may be useful to compare IPv4
and IPv6 perfor
On Tue, 2005/02/15 (MST),
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to bring forward IPv6 support of squid.
FYI: You can try to use Web Polygraph to test performance aspects of IPv6
support in Squid. For example, it may be useful to compare IPv4 and IPv6
performance (with or without
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
Further investigation showed: nearly all my IPv6 changes were not distributed
into the "squid-ipv6" branch, but into the "HEAD" branch.
Ok. What probably happened was the same as for the Root, only the top
level directory was correct.
No harm
Xuân Baldauf wrote:
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
Odd.. you should have write permission.
What repository root did you use?
grep . CVS/Root CVS/Repository CVS/Tag
CVS/Root:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/squid
CVS/Repository:squid3
CVS/Tag:Tsquid3-ipv6
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
I think I found the reason: The "CVS/Root" file of the top level
directory was correct, but the "CVS/Root" file of the lower level
directories were not changed by the "cvsmkbranch" script.
cvsmkbranch does not change a
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
I think I found the reason: The "CVS/Root" file of the top level directory
was correct, but the "CVS/Root" file of the lower level directories were not
changed by the "cvsmkbranch" script.
cvsmkbranch does not change any CVS/Root files, but ne
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
Odd.. you should have write permission.
What repository root did you use?
grep . CVS/Root CVS/Repository CVS/Tag
CVS/Root:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/squid
CVS/Repository:squid3
CVS/Tag:Tsquid3-ipv6
Maybe I have checke
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
Odd.. you should have write permission.
What repository root did you use?
grep . CVS/Root CVS/Repository CVS/Tag
CVS/Root:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/squid
CVS/Repository:squid3
CVS/Tag:Tsquid3-ipv6
Maybe I have checked out at a directory leve
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
I'm trying to bring forward IPv6 support of squid. I have created a
patch (see http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1026 ).
Henrik Nordstrom recommended to subscribe squid-dev@squid-cache.org
in ord
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Xuân Baldauf wrote:
I'm trying to bring forward IPv6 support of squid. I have created a
patch (see http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1026 ).
Henrik Nordstrom recommended to subscribe squid-dev@squid-cache.org in order
to discuss this
patch, so
Hello,
I'm trying to bring forward IPv6 support of squid. I have created a
patch (see http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1026 ).
Henrik Nordstrom recommended to subscribe squid-dev@squid-cache.org in
order to discuss this
patch, so here I am. :-)
Xuân Baldauf.
P.S.: Henr
Hello,
I'm trying to bring forward IPv6 support of squid. I have created a
patch (see http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1026 ).
Henrik Nordstrom recommended me to subscribe in order to discuss this
patch, so here I am. :-)
Xuân Baldauf.
28 matches
Mail list logo
