On lör, 2007-09-01 at 00:20 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> I'm now getting compile problems.
> Under the new state does USE_POLL or HAVE_POLL have preference over
> runtime code? (src/structs.h:1567 versus src/stat.cc:993)
USE_POLL means configure has selected the poll select loop.
HAVE_POLL mea
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On ons, 2007-08-29 at 00:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
After todays changes I am now getting (with --enable-epoll)
Right. Question is how many will need it..
I think not, and have now killed the section which refers to the script.
Builds using the (these days
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On tor, 2007-08-30 at 13:58 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On the side of this. I read through the PRE7 release notes and noticed
that while the squid.conf changes are covered there is no comparable list
of ./configure changes.
Right.. any takers on writing that?
I can
On tor, 2007-08-30 at 12:38 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On tor, 2007-08-30 at 13:58 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> > On the side of this. I read through the PRE7 release notes and noticed
> > that while the squid.conf changes are covered there is no comparable list
> > of ./configure changes
On tor, 2007-08-30 at 13:58 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On the side of this. I read through the PRE7 release notes and noticed
> that while the squid.conf changes are covered there is no comparable list
> of ./configure changes.
Right.. any takers on writing that?
Regards
Henrik
signature.as
> On ons, 2007-08-29 at 00:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> After todays changes I am now getting (with --enable-epoll)
>>
>> "
>> checking for epoll_ctl in -lepoll... no
>> checking for epoll_ctl... yes
>> checking if epoll works... yes
>>
On ons, 2007-08-29 at 00:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> After todays changes I am now getting (with --enable-epoll)
>
> "
> checking for epoll_ctl in -lepoll... no
> checking for epoll_ctl... yes
> checking if epoll works... yes
> Error - no epoll support found
&
test ac_cv_epoll_works != yes && test x$SELECT_TYPE = xepoll; then
+if test $ac_cv_epoll_works != yes && test x$SELECT_TYPE = xepoll; then
echo "Error - no epoll support found";
echo "Try running 'sh ./scripts/get_epoll-lib.sh'";
After todays changes I am now getting (with --enable-epoll)
"
checking for epoll_ctl in -lepoll... no
checking for epoll_ctl... yes
checking if epoll works... yes
Error - no epoll support found
Try running 'sh ./scripts/get_epoll-lib.sh'
then run configure again
"
The scri
lör 2006-08-12 klockan 11:22 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
> lör 2006-08-12 klockan 09:51 +1000 skrev Robert Collins:
>
> > That is - isn't the for loop completely irrelevant ?
>
> It is.. just a matter of programming style (complex if condition, vs
> smaller conditions with break).
This said I
lör 2006-08-12 klockan 09:51 +1000 skrev Robert Collins:
> That is - isn't the for loop completely irrelevant ?
It is.. just a matter of programming style (complex if condition, vs
smaller conditions with break).
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddeland
for (;;) {
num = epoll_wait(kdpfd, pevents, SQUID_MAXFD, msec);
statCounter.select_loops++;
if (num >= 0)
break;
if (ignoreErrno(errno))
break;
getCurrentTime();
PROF_stop(comm_check_incoming);
return COMM_ERR
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 02:42 +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Wouldn't a runtime check be enough to activate on of the two comm
> loops? I've seen it done in other apps.
Quite some restructuring will be needed for that to happen. Adding
libevent is a lot easier and fits nicely within the existing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 21/lug/06, alle ore 23:31, Henrik Nordstrom ha scritto:
tis 2006-07-11 klockan 14:34 +0200 skrev Luigi Gangitano:
During discussions on the debian-devel mailing list, it was proposed
to enable a fallback if epoll() is not available at
tis 2006-07-11 klockan 14:34 +0200 skrev Luigi Gangitano:
> I've just packaged squid-2.6.STABLE1 and squid-3.0.PRE4 for debian,
> enabling epoll() support at build time.
>
> This obviously makes squid fail with kernels older than 2.6.x which
> are still supported by
Hi all,
I've just packaged squid-2.6.STABLE1 and squid-3.0.PRE4 for debian,
enabling epoll() support at build time.
This obviously makes squid fail with kernels older than 2.6.x which
are still supported by debian.
During discussions on the debian-devel mailing list, it was proposed
ons 2006-04-05 klockan 06:39 -0700 skrev john allspaw:
> ok. thanks a lot for your reply Steven.
> taking a quick look just now, I am seeing 91 of those messages from the last
> minute.
>
> some more questions/info:
>
> 1. if it turns out that they are indeed harmless, (and not indicative of
ect Cache Items
2130094 on-disk objects
box is doing around 490 req/sec, and is basically full.
any ideas ? health-wise, the machine looks fine. I'm seeing this logging on
all 4 of the machines I installed
epoll onto, I patched the squid-2.5STABLE13 source.
thanks a lot,
j
teven
> -Original Message-
> From: john allspaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 April 2006 6:10 AM
> To: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
> Subject: epoll patch on squid2.5stable13 logging way too much debug
>
> ...or, if it's not debug info, then how would it be useful:
-bin/diff2/epoll-2_5.patch?s2_5
and it says:
This patch is generated from the epoll-2_5 branch of s2_5 in squid
Tue Jan 10 22:35:19 2006 GMTI saw someone mention this on the mailing-list
sometime last year, but no real resolution came from it.
thoughts ?
thanks,
John
/var/tmp/build.14768/squid-2.5.STABLE9/src/comm_select.c
/var/tmp/build.14768/squid-2.5.STABLE9/src/comm_select.c: In function
`commEpollBackon':
/var/tmp/build.14768/squid-2.5.STABLE9/src/comm_select.c:1201: warning: unused
variable `ev'
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:15:40 +0200
From: "[Windows-1250] Paweł Staszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: Odp: Re: [squid-users] how to apply epoll-2_5 patch to
squid2.5-st
]: commSetSelect: epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL):
failed on fd=234: (2) No such file or directory
Looks like the epoll patch is not 100% perfect yet.
Regards
Henrik
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Steven Wilton wrote:
I would have thought that if I've manually sync'd the remaining changes
between the s2_5 branch and the epoll-2_5 branch it would now pick up
any new changes in the s2_5 branch and only try and merge them.
If cvsmerge is happy then you are fine
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Steven Wilton wrote:
Yeah, if the interest is there, I would be happy to publish it.
There is interest.
I will have a quick look at the patches, and remove some unnecessary
code.
Ok.
Would it be better to try and make it co-exist with the select() and
poll() code before publi
> -Original Message-
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 11:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Squid Developers
> Subject: Re: epoll squid-2.5
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ps.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps. I've haved together the visolve realtime signal code with the squid
3.0 epoll code to make a version of squid 2.5 that supports epoll. It
overrides the select and poll methods, but it does scale very well.
Interesting!
Is this something you&#
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Muthukumar wrote:
i have tested with squid + epoll() using null fs. it is consuming 90% CPU at
peak rate ( 180 req / sec ). system cpu idleness is
in the range of 0.
180 req/sec sounds very low.
What hardware (CPU type & speed, network type) are you using on the proxy?
er of requests
> > per second.
> > cpu usage is mostly user-mode, so --enable-cpu-profiling/-pg results should
> > be meaningful.
>
> Attachment contains cpu_profiling for 160 req / sec of squid-3.0 with epoll().
>From these results, it seems that you have reached the ma
ip]
> >
>
> I did not get this. How to measure throughput (in bps)?
In linux, I prefer to use iptables. ifconfig provides some numbers, but
some processing is needed. I was curious about throughput on epoll vs
poll/select. Never mind.
>
> >
> >> 008.75| Con
0 148 13033 26 65 35 0 0
>
> Looks like you are running with (the same?) CPU bottleneck.
>
> epoll's advantage is that CPU usage does not grow with the number of
> idle TCP connections. If the number of concurrent connections is large,
> and there are no idle co
hai david,
thanks for your reply.
i have tested with squid + epoll() using null fs. it is consuming 90% CPU
at peak rate ( 180 req / sec ). system cpu idleness is
in the range of 0.
Are you have any benchmarking results to epoll() with squid there?
how to integrate shared
cpu MHz : 927.753
> RAM size : 512
>
> I like to have your review on this. can we get more req / sec
> satisfaction on this setup?
>
> ---
>
> squid 3.0 without epoll():
> Squid Cache: Version 3.0-PRE3
> configure options:
?
---
squid 3.0 without epoll():
Squid Cache: Version 3.0-PRE3
configure options: '--prefix=/usr/local/squid3pre' '--with-aufs-threads=32'
'--with-descriptors=32768' '--with-pthreads'
'--enable-storeio=null,ufs,aufs' '--enable-debug-cb
On Wed, 2004/11/03 (MST), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please note that the Polygraph license does not allow publishing the
results without an prior agreement with The Measurement Factory.
Just FYI: Squid core team and many others have our permission to publish
the results. It usually does not ta
ufs.
On the same server, squid with select/poll did starve CPU, and the number of open fds
never bot bigger than 1600. When I started using epoll, the traffic and the number of
concurrent connections did increase. I recommend epoll (at leas on Linux).
Regards,
G
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:46:54
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Muthukumar wrote:
There has not been any benchmark on Squid-3 + epoll in a long time. The performance of this is not known.
How many requests being generated by squid + poll() / squid + select() on 32 bit hardwares?
As I said there has not been any benchmarks of Squid-3 for a
Hai Gonzalo,
> I've been using squid3 with epoll support for a couple of months.
> In my case, squid with poll/select did consume up to 100% CPU. With epoll, CPU
> usage dropped to less than 10%.
It seems to be great. How many requests are being generated per second?
Are you u
Hello Henrik,
Thanks again.
>> Is there anyone benchmarked squid+epoll() on polygraph? How may I expect requests
>> satisfaction limit on Linux host
>> 2.6.5-1.358 #1 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux platform?
>
> There has not been any benchmark on Squid-3 + e
I've been using squid3 with epoll support for a couple of months.
In my case, squid with poll/select did consume up to 100% CPU. With epoll, CPU usage
dropped to less than 10%.
Long term average & max CPU usage:
http://webs.uolsinectis.com.ar/garana/x/cpu.4.png
With epoll, CPU usage
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Muthukumar wrote:
Is there anyone benchmarked squid+epoll() on polygraph? How may I expect requests
satisfaction limit on Linux host
2.6.5-1.358 #1 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux platform?
There has not been any benchmark on Squid-3 + epoll in a long time. The
performance of this
Hello All,
I am preparing epoll() I/O method benchmarking with Polygraph (Polygraph 2.5.5)
with setup as,
squid + epoll():
Linux host 2.6.5-1.358 #1 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
Squid Cache: Version 3.0-PRE3
configure options: '--prefix=/home/muthu/squid
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > > just commit it.
> >
> > ok.
>
> Except for the first segment in the patch (-lepoll removed)
>
Crap, must've missed that. I'll put it back.
Ad
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Done. Can someone bootstrap it and commit it?
bootstrapping is done automatically before each nightly snapshot.
Regards
Henrik
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > just commit it.
>
> ok.
Except for the first segment in the patch (-lepoll removed)
Regards
Henrik
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Kinkie wrote:
> > yup, this has to do with the order we're checking poll/select/epoll/kqueue.
> > Here's my configure.in patch, it seems to do the right thing.
> > Give it a shot?
>
> If it's possible at all, I think it would be best
Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, David Nicklay wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I second Henrik's suggestion. The epoll stuff actually works on 2.4
>> kernels with a patch, and almost none of those have the new epoll stuff
>>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Done. Can someone bootstrap it and commit it? I've got a few
> > local hacks to get around the epoll linking that I'm thinking
> > of cleaner ways around..
>
> I think Henrik has that cron'd.
Right. I thought
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 14:28, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > > just commit it.
> >
> > ok.
> >
>
> Done. Can someone bootstrap it and commit it? I've go
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > just commit it.
>
> ok.
>
Done. Can someone bootstrap it and commit it? I've got a few
local hacks to get around the epoll linking that I'm thinking
of cleaner ways around..
adrian
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> just commit it.
ok.
adrian
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 14:19, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, David Nicklay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I second Henrik's suggestion. The epoll stuff actually works on 2.4
> > kernels with a patch, and almost none of those have the new epoll stuff
> >
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, David Nicklay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I second Henrik's suggestion. The epoll stuff actually works on 2.4
> kernels with a patch, and almost none of those have the new epoll stuff
> in glibc.
>
> Also, it would be nice if someone could fix the autoc
Hi,
I second Henrik's suggestion. The epoll stuff actually works on 2.4
kernels with a patch, and almost none of those have the new epoll stuff
in glibc.
Also, it would be nice if someone could fix the autoconf scripts, so I
don't have to do:
--disable-select
--disable-poll
--enab
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Should we remove the -lepoll? Make configure test for its presence
> if --enable-epoll is given?
configure test.
new kernel versions are adopted by the users much faster than new glibc
versions.
Regards
Henrik
Hi,
I'm playing with the epoll code in the latest libc+linux 2.6 kernel
and I've found that we don't need the -lepoll anymore. Its
definitely integrated into the newest libc.
Should we remove the -lepoll? Make configure test for its presence
if --enable-epoll is given?
Adrian
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Gonzalo A. Arana wrote:
> True, I've checked squid-3.0-PRE3-20031112 (today snapshot).
> Btw, sory about coding style. I'll follow squid coding style on future
> patches.
No problem. The reformatting is automatic by astyle and is not a burden
when accepting a patch.
The re
> ...
>
> This was fixed in the patch which went into HEAD wasn't it?
True, I've checked squid-3.0-PRE3-20031112 (today snapshot).
Btw, sory about coding style. I'll follow squid coding style on future
patches.
Regards
Gonzalo
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Gonzalo A. Arana wrote:
> 4) then, squid calls again commSetSelect(fd, COMM_SELECT_READ,
> read_handler, ...). This is because a new request may be received from
> client through same TCP connection
Yes. This is part of persistent connection management and also done as
part
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Martes, 11 de Noviembre de 2003 03:10 p.m.
> >>To: Gonzalo A. Arana
> >>Cc: 'Reuben Farrelly'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: new patch & new ideas (squid+epoll)
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >&g
;Reuben Farrelly'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: new patch & new ideas (squid+epoll)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > Ok, it seems that you are using wccp, am I right?
> > If so, please, could you test my patch again without wccp enabled?
> > Please disable as well (if enabl
Hi,
Ok, it seems that you are using wccp, am I right?
If so, please, could you test my patch again without wccp enabled?
Please disable as well (if enabled): external_acls, redirectors,
external auth, and use ufs as cache_dir.
I am curious. Is it only UDP (versus TCP) that you are having problems
acls, redirectors,
external auth, and use ufs as cache_dir.
Please verify which versions are you using of:
Linux kernel (mine's 2.4.21 patched with
http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/epoll-lt-2.4.21-0.18.diff)
Epoll-lib (mine's 0.10)
Pcl (mine's 1.2)
>
> Reverting th
Henrik
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, David Nicklay wrote:
Hi,
I finally took some time to test this. Gonzalo's patch seems to
address a lot of outstanding issues with comm_epoll including:
- CPU usage problem w/ idle clients (both local and remote)
- epoll kernel table being out of sync with fde ta
- CPU usage problem w/ idle clients (both local and remote)
- epoll kernel table being out of sync with fde table
- missed epoll table updates (happens on my boxes but not Gonzalo's)
Could someone apply this to the squid-3.0 HEAD?
Kudos to Gonzalo.
Gonzalo Arana wrote:
Hi,
(yes, it's
ov 2003, David Nicklay wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I finally took some time to test this. Gonzalo's patch seems to address
> >> a lot of outstanding issues with comm_epoll including:
> >>
> >>- CPU usage problem w/ idl
le clients (both local and remote)
- epoll kernel table being out of sync with fde table
- missed epoll table updates (happens on my boxes but not Gonzalo's)
Could someone apply this to the squid-3.0 HEAD?
Kudos to Gonzalo.
Gonzalo Arana wrote:
Hi,
(yes, it's me again :-( ).
I have
gards
Henrik
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, David Nicklay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally took some time to test this. Gonzalo's patch seems to address
> a lot of outstanding issues with comm_epoll including:
>
> - CPU usage problem w/ idle clients (both local and remote)
> - epoll
Hi,
I finally took some time to test this. Gonzalo's patch seems to address
a lot of outstanding issues with comm_epoll including:
- CPU usage problem w/ idle clients (both local and remote)
- epoll kernel table being out of sync with fde table
- missed epoll table updates (happens
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 03:54, David Nicklay wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been looking at this in a little more detail now. Currently, I
> am using read_handler and write_handler as variables to make decisions
> about what epoll is interested in inside of the kernel. Now I can see
> t
;t go down
until I outright killed wget.
I have been looking at this in a little more detail now. Currently, I
am using read_handler and write_handler as variables to make decisions
about what epoll is interested in inside of the kernel. Now I can see
that this is not a good way to do things, bec
Hi,
I did some checking on the source code, and can't find anything that
sets read_handler/write_handler except disk.cc. I am compiling a
2.4.21+epoll kernel to test the patch.
David Nicklay wrote:
Hi,
The early epoll API was virtual impossible to write for, because it did
not do an in
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 09:37, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 06:30, Gonzalo Arana wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > (I'm back to squid-gzip task now).
> > I come up to this situation:
> >
> > squid 3.0-PRE3-20031008 with e
Hi,
The early epoll API was virtual impossible to write for, because it did
not do an initial poll on new file descriptors you register an interest
for, so it could not know about notifications that happened before then.
I just about tore my hair out trying to code around that, and still
had
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 06:30, Gonzalo Arana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I'm back to squid-gzip task now).
> I come up to this situation:
>
> squid 3.0-PRE3-20031008 with epoll
> kernel 2.4.21 patched with
> http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/epoll-lt-2.4.21-0.18.diff
Hi,
(I'm back to squid-gzip task now).
I come up to this situation:
squid 3.0-PRE3-20031008 with epoll
kernel 2.4.21 patched with
http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/epoll-lt-2.4.21-0.18.diff
When a client requests a very long object (such as a video), squid uses
100% of CPU.
I
Kernel-2.4.20
Polygraph: Polygraph-2.55
Query:
# Then another query that anybody tested the squid with epoll support on
IA64 more than 300 requests,
Please suggest your memory consumption,kernel version and kernel parameters
and kernel usage for testing.
# Anybody c
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> I am currently working in a development works in epoll I/O on squid for satisfying
> the requests of 2000 in IA64.I have passed only 300 req/sec in IA64.My squid is
> using more than 1.9 GB outof 2 GB.I have tried a lot in the squid to
ect: [squid-users]Memory leak problem on epoll i/o squid on IA64
Date: 04 Sep 2003 16:01:19 +0530
Hello all ,
I am currently working in a development works in epoll I/O on squid for satisfying the
requests of 2000 in IA64.I have passed only 300 req/sec in IA64.My squid is using more
than 1.9 GB
Hi,
I did:
./configure --enable-epoll --disable-poll --disable-kqueue
--disable-select
which should have done this, but the USE_EPOLL 0 is what shows up.
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 15:26, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thursday 12 June 2003 18.10, David Nicklay wrote:
>
> > Could
On Thursday 12 June 2003 18.10, David Nicklay wrote:
> Could someone with more knowledge of autoconf than I, please submit
> a patch to fix the epoll comm module builds? Currently, it is
> putting "#define USE_EPOLL 0" into include/autoconf.h after a
> configure, when t
Hi,
Could someone with more knowledge of autoconf than I, please submit a
patch to fix the epoll comm module builds? Currently, it is putting
"#define USE_EPOLL 0" into include/autoconf.h after a configure, when
that should be "#define USE_EPOLL 1".
Thanks!
David
--
Da
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 07:52, David Nicklay wrote:
> I still had not heard a reply back about my question.
Ooops!. I've been trying to get a 2.5 kernel on my laptop, but keep
running into problems :p.
I'm trying to get the time to formalise a list of what epoll needs to
support to
I still had not heard a reply back about my question.
-Forwarded Message-
> From: David Nicklay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: epoll on squid
> Date: 28 Jan 2003 11:57:55 -0500
>
>
> The patch for closing connections has been c
The patch for closing connections has been commited to the epoll branch.
Incidentally, what would it take for epoll to be considered for
inclusion into HEAD now? I noticed that kqueue is still missing the two
things that were stated that comm_epoll.cc needed (see below):
from comm_kqueue.cc
David Nicklay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> The patch for closing connections in epoll is forthcoming this week.
Great! I'm looking forward to it.
--
kinkie (kinkie-squid [at] kinkie [dot] it)
Random fortune, unrelated to the message:
Unix: Some sa
I finally got a test box for me to work on again. It is a single CPU
1GHz Pentium III with 2 GB RAM, stock Redhat-7.2 + linux-2.5.59.
Running squid-3.0-devel using the epoll branch and an added patch to
close connections in epoll, I was able to get 1917 requests per second
on i.cnn.net.
This
87 matches
Mail list logo
