[SM-USERS] File manager plugin

2008-02-12 Thread kenmiles
When I have installed the file manager plugin I get the following error- Fatal error: Cannot re-assign $this in /var/www/public_html/webmail/plugins/file_manager/functions.php on line 401 I am using squirrelmail 1.4.13 with postfix and dovecot on ubuntu 6.10. Thanks in advance for any help, Kennet

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin [SOLVED]

2005-01-19 Thread David E. Meier
>>>but isn't your problem that you can write (create) but not read? >> >> >> I can upload files to the base directory and create folders in it. But >> those folders are not displayed in the listing. All uploaded files and >> created folders are owned by apache (wwwrun:wwwrun). The base dir is >> ow

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread p dont think
David E. Meier wrote: i would also think safe_mode_include_dir might work; keep looking. might be related to ownership/permissions of the included dirs, who knows After reading a "bug-report" () concerning the same matter I found out that the safe_mode_include_dir variable only lets y

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread p dont think
i would also think safe_mode_include_dir might work; keep looking. might be related to ownership/permissions of the included dirs, who knows After reading a "bug-report" ( ) concerning the same matter I found out that the safe_mode_include_dir variable only lets you read files from that direct

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread David E. Meier
>>>i would also think safe_mode_include_dir might work; keep looking. might >>>be related to ownership/permissions of the included dirs, who knows >> >> >> After reading a "bug-report" ( ) >> concerning the same matter I found out that the safe_mode_include_dir >> variable only lets you r

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread David E. Meier
> actually, given your clarification above, i would have guessed that the > problem is that wwwrun needs +rw access to the base dir and everything > inside of it. that is, your base dir might need to be owned by > webuser:wwwclient, but for file manager to work right, Apache needs write > access t

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread David E. Meier
>> I have the File Manager Plugin v2.0 installed on my server (SM 1.4.3a, >> PHP4.3.4, Apache 2.48, RedHat 9). > > First, try the attached version, as it has a lot of changes. I upgraded to the version you attached with the same result. But this version has a much better look and feel. Congrats.

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread p dont think
David E. Meier wrote: I have the File Manager Plugin v2.0 installed on my server (SM 1.4.3a, PHP4.3.4, Apache 2.48, RedHat 9). First, try the attached version, as it has a lot of changes. I upgraded to the version you attached with the same result. But this version has a much better look and feel

[SM-USERS] File Manager Plugin

2005-01-18 Thread David E. Meier
I have the File Manager Plugin v2.0 installed on my server (SM 1.4.3a, PHP4.3.4, Apache 2.48, RedHat 9). Uploading files to the base directory works. Creating directories does work as well, however, they are not displayed. The directory tree for the user base directory (/www/domain.com/data/user)

[SM-USERS] File Manager plugin problems

2004-10-10 Thread J. Patrick Campbell
I'm getting this error with the file manager program. I've looked at file_manager.php, can't make heads or tails of it. Warning: opendir(patrick): failed to open dir: No such file or directory in /var/www/localhost/htdocs/squirrelmail/plugins/file_manager/file_manager.php on line 1882 here's my u

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-28 Thread p dont think
But if you end up forced into it, look at Samba's "force user" and "force group" config settings. You might be able to get what you want with those. Possibly.. but opening up stuff for apache to write into. Users would have to be in the apache group, so any user could just go into another user

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-28 Thread Jonathan Nichols
p dont think wrote: But if you end up forced into it, look at Samba's "force user" and "force group" config settings. You might be able to get what you want with those. Possibly.. but opening up stuff for apache to write into. Users would have to be in the apache group, so any user could just g

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-28 Thread p dont think
But if you end up forced into it, look at Samba's "force user" and "force group" config settings. You might be able to get what you want with those. Possibly.. but opening up stuff for apache to write into. Users would have to be in the apache group, so any user could just go into another users

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-28 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Dwight Tovey wrote: FWIW: I think this is a REALLY bad idea. You will have all kinds of issues with security, maintenance, ... I agree. But if you end up forced into it, look at Samba's "force user" and "force group" config settings. You might be able to get what you want with those. Possibly.. b

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-27 Thread Jonathan Nichols
certainly, especially if they create files or folders via samba and try to access them thru SM, since surely samba won't create files w/group ownership of apache one solution is to run a daily (more often?) cron that blasts thru users' home directories resetting the group on everything to apac

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-27 Thread p dont think
> it can work it does *not* need to be apache:apache, it can be user:apache > ... and then I'd have to put users in "apache" - hrm.. not necessarily, although it'll probably make it easier >> The Boss thinks that internally, users can access their $HOME via Samba, externally they can acces

Re: [SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-27 Thread p dont think
Can it be used as a basic "home directory file" browser? sure Since stuff will need to be owned by apache:apache, I guess that trying to use it in such a manner wouldn't exactly work, eh? it can work it does *not* need to be apache:apache, it can be user:apache The Boss thinks that intern

[SM-USERS] File Manager plugin question

2004-05-27 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Can it be used as a basic "home directory file" browser? Since stuff will need to be owned by apache:apache, I guess that trying to use it in such a manner wouldn't exactly work, eh? The Boss thinks that internally, users can access their $HOME via Samba, externally they can access it via this

[SM-USERS] File manager Plugin - Bigger edit box ?

2002-12-28 Thread Jean-Pierre Denis
Hi, first i would like to say thanks to pdontthink for writing this plugins. The only problem that i have is that when you edit a file the box where the file appear is not wide enough. I went thru the code quickly but i was unable to find where the box width was specify. Here can i modify this