y and payoff of the endeavour?
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - No
rs-le...@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristes
I would have to agree with Henning that this may be more trouble than it's
worth, particularly when it comes to the bottom-line result.
—
Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Dec 22, 2022, at 2:22 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> we have done some projects
Just to conclude this, I have worked around it by setting tm.wt_timer to about
~300 ms, which is low enough to shuffle the old transaction off before the
retransmissions ad nauseum can start.
But I don't think this is the ideal solution to this problem.
-- Alex
> On Dec 16, 2022, at 9:09
;
> __
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
>
reply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
l Discussions
> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-680
Fax +41 61 826 93 01
> Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
> __
> __
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> To unsubscribe send an em
AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> Yes to all of that. :-)
>
> —
> Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.
>
>> On Dec 16, 2022, at 10:25 AM, Jawaid Bazyar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Thanks for your (as usual) thorough reply.
>
Yes to all of that. :-)
—
Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Dec 16, 2022, at 10:25 AM, Jawaid Bazyar wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for your (as usual) thorough reply.
>
> So, if I understand correctly what you're saying, as an example:
>
&
But what exactly shall we document?
"Don't suspend a transaction and do an auth challenge + exit from the resume
route unless you want the first transaction to be drawn out of wait state by a
rapid subsequent INVITE, despite prior receipt of a negative ACK for the
challenge?" :-
module offering async operation ...
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non
dd more spam to the thread. :-)
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - No
it;
}
I can't say for sure what's going on, not knowing TM internals.
-- Alex
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 2:40 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> Setting tm.wt_timer to a very low value (e.g. 200 ms) does provide a hack
> around this behaviour, but it doe
───> ││60
│ ││ S
The real question is why the negative ACK for the first transaction doesn't
seem to be having the intended effect in this scenario.
-- Alex
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 2:21 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> Adding further to this, it seems to me the real problem
'exit'.
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 12:42 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> As a test, I tried to put the auth_challenge() in the request_route before
> any async suspension, and in that case works fine.
>
> The issue is definitely with the way auth_challenge() issued from _within_
As a test, I tried to put the auth_challenge() in the request_route before any
async suspension, and in that case works fine.
The issue is definitely with the way auth_challenge() issued from _within_ an
async resume route (failure_route context) bears upon transaction state.
-- Alex
the 407 keep being retransmitted?
-- Alex
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 12:00 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> Hi Henning,
>
>> On Dec 15, 2022, at 11:51 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>> it might not help you much, but recently I was implementing a
Hi Henning,
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 11:51 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> it might not help you much, but recently I was implementing a similar
> structure in one larger migration project, and it seems to work fine.
> I am not using any special flags for the chall
│ │xy
If the negative ACK were not being matched, I would think the retransmission
would happen here too. It seems to happen because the subsequent INVITE keeps
the old transaction alive and in its previous state somehow.
Any suggestions welcome!
-- Alex
> On Dec
ort DNS-based failover, or may not implement it in
the way you want. If you're offering a service to many different kinds of
clients or devices, you'll have to take that into account.
-- Alex
[1] At a memory cost, but this isn't really a factor in modern computing.
[2] Where it exists. An established
s being checked, and does
more than its name might imply:
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.6.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_check_trans
-- Alex
> On Dec 14, 2022, at 6:19 PM, Jawaid Bazyar wrote:
>
> Alex, that did it! Now to understand it
> Thanks again,
> Jawaid
> From: Alex
} else if(is_method("ACK")) {
if(t_check_trans()) {
if(!t_relay())
sl_reply_error();
exit;
}
exit;
}
sl_send_reply("404", "Not here");
}
-- A
es/tm.html#tm.serial_forking
What you're after is serialising what is by default parallelised. I believe
this should help you take control of that process.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.
ended to
support, maybe. I'm wondering if the simplest thing to seed the
credentials-info into Kamailio somehow, e.g. via JSONRPC+htable, so that an
async query is not required in order to obtain it dynamically. I was hoping to
avoid that, but maybe there's not another way to do it?
--
To be clear, the two t_newtran() calls in the main request_route were naturally
a typo. :-) Only the first one was intended.
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 3:45 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any good solution for the scenario of an auth_challenge() with two
> se
bly stateful behaviour of auth_challenge() without
"force_stateless_reply" enabled.
In this case, it eclipses the second, unrelated 407 challenge from the
subsequent routing query (407 challenge with +1 CSeq):

-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Te
level that timings are
> accurate
Thank you, Igor. However, this is occurring on already established connections
that have been up for some time, e.g. delayed BYE.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.e
also wonder if this is tied up in some low-level TLS or WS
parameters unrelated to more general TCP configuration.
Thanks much!
— Alex
—
Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial
Are you familiar with how open-source software works?
The project has nothing to sell you, but its maintainers also don't work for
you. We are not your "Team". You need to work on your audience awareness skills.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706
e different routing decisions.
>
> Daniel
>
> On 06.12.22 14:10, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> I suspect that what Jawaid meant by "naive" was that, in Kamailio, there is
>> not a central distributor thread which aims to buffer, serialise and
>> otherwise order packet
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 9:09 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> route[THE_REAL_PROC] {
>while(mq_fetch("proc$var(qnum)")) {
>$var(id) = $(mqk(term_proc){s.select,0,:}{s.int});
>$var(label) = $(mqk(term_proc){s.select,1,:}{s.int});
My bad. Replace `$(mqk(
4 or 8
a great choice. :-)
request_route {
...
$var(q) = core_hash("$ci", "", 2); # 2^2, aka 4 queues
if(!t_suspend()) {
sl_send_reply("500", "Internal server error - cannot suspend");
exit;
}
mq_add("proc$var(q)"
hat "naive" is perhaps not the best choice of vocabulary for it, and
of course there would be performance downsides to such a centralised pipeline.
But I think that's what was probably meant.
-- Alex
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 4:15 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> wrote:
>
> He
.
-- Alex
> On Nov 28, 2022, at 9:57 PM, Clint Crabtree
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I’m a DIY entrepreneurial developer beginning to build a system and I
> stumbled upon Kamailio. I’ve installed asterisk and kamailio in hopes of
> setting up an IVR to collect voice to speech info
Hi,
There is a way to set the shared memory pool size from core config instead of
external CLI arguments:
https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/5.6.x/core/#shm_mem_size
Is there something analogous for package memory (-M)? I could not find it.
Thanks!
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov
on in the city center.
>
>
> Y!
>
> Super!
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> Giovanni Maruzzelli
> OpenTelecom.IT
> cell: +39 347 266 56 18
>
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Hi,
A profile is either “with value” or “without value”, so you cannot use it both
ways simultaneously; “with value” is not a superset of “without value”.
You can, however, add a call to two different profiles, one with values and one
without values.
— Alex
> On Nov 15, 2022, at 7:45
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/
. This in effect would require two stages of
marshalling. I would rather do it in one place and take the hit on
compute-heavy inspection of the JSON payload twice, especially since it’s
wrapped behind the convenience of libjansson.
Thank you for the insights!
— Alex
—
Sent from mobile, apologies
r(...), otherwise you can
> propagate it to other process via mqueue (+rtimer). Using htable with a
> key based on transaction ids should be fine as well, at the end htable
> is designed as a fast key/value in-memory storage.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>> On 07.11.22 05:36, Al
persist, of course, since the route is
scoped outside of the transaction.
I have been using htable to pass data into the transaction, keyed by the index
and label. But, this strikes me as a kind of clumsy memory synchronisation
anti-pattern. Is there a better way?
Cheers,
— Alex
--
Alex
Hi Ilie,
You’re asking more of a proxy than it can do. :-) After a call is established,
the initial INVITE transaction is over and the destinations are fixed. That
initial INVITE transaction is the only point at which the proxy can do any kind
of forking.
— Alex
> On Nov 4, 2022, at 8:42
nsaction for which to add
> new branches?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>> On 01.11.22 00:44, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> And indeed, ts_append_to() almost does what I want, but it still requires
>> that I launder my contacts through a registrar ‘domain’.
>>
&g
https://skalatan.de/blog/
> Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex
> Balashov
> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 12:48 AM
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Appending new
OpenSIPS seems to have captured well the spirit of this functionality, BTW:
https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/tm.html#t_inject_branches
— Alex
> On Oct 31, 2022, at 7:44 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> And indeed, ts_append_to() almost does what I want, but it still requires
And indeed, ts_append_to() almost does what I want, but it still requires that
I launder my contacts through a registrar ‘domain’.
Is there any way to go around this requirement? It seems awfully silly to set
up a stub/shadow registrar when I am not a registrar.
— Alex
> On Oct 31, 2
to accomplish this?
Cheers,
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non
That’s controlled by this function. :-)
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/core#force_rport1
And its cousin, the global parameter (on the same docs page):
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/core#force_rport
— Alex
> On Oct 27, 2022, at 12:54 PM, Chaigneau, Nico
Ni Nicolas,
This behaviour is regulated by:
https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/5.6.x/core/#reply_to_via
— Alex
> On Oct 27, 2022, at 12:33 PM, Chaigneau, Nicolas
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I’m using Kamailio in stateless mode to send redirect resp
creation and destruction of listeners, or the
additional child processes they beget. The child processes need to be forked on
startup, before their heap is laden with runtime baggage. All this is
relatively expensive to initialise.
— Alex
> On Oct 25, 2022, at 4:14 PM, H Yavari wr
Hi,
Unfortunately, for a variety of architectural reasons, this is not practical.
— Alex
> On Oct 25, 2022, at 12:43 PM, H Yavari wrote:
>
> Hi Kamailio community,
>
>
> I am running an IPsec server beside Kamailio, so I am interested to know if
> there is any m
een resolved to a contact binding elsewhere, so there are no
lookup() calls. How should this play into the http_async_client workflow?
Appreciate any help!
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.
Certainly! If you can make that happen due to your greater familiarity with the
module (as the author), my gratitude would know no bounds. :-)
> On Oct 13, 2022, at 8:10 AM, Federico Cabiddu
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> you're right, that's not a pleasant experience.
> Be
If you’re asking if ts_append() has a documented return value, it does not.
A function to count transactions stored for a given seems like a
logical need. Then, one could do something like:
if(ts_trans_count(“location”, “$tu”) > 0)
ts_append(“location”, “$tu”);
— Alex
> On
messages this way? Would a
patch to fix be welcome?
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__
Kamailio
t; email: bbrid...@call48.com | web: www.call48.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex
> Balashov
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2022 14:43
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] suppress t1 timer retra
Might this be what you’re after?
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.6.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_send_reply
— Alex
> On Oct 10, 2022, at 5:37 PM, Brooks Bridges wrote:
>
> So I have a very odd situation that requires me to suppress retransmissions
> when using t_reply() to sen
was to use
regular request routes with the regular blocking HTTP client, suspended/resumed
over mqueue + rtimer.
— Alex
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 5:56 PM, Brooks Bridges wrote:
>
> I'm also running into issue with append_branch working correctly inside the
> http_async event route,
end option, thanks!
>
> Brooks Bridges
> 1200 S. Rogers Circle, Unit 6
> Boca Raton, FL 33487
> Office: 916-235-2097 Main: 888-444-
> email: bbrid...@call48.com | web: www.call48.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex
>
It’s a module-specific event route.
Are you using $http_req(suspend)? If so, try — and it’s a long shot, but try it:
route[HTTP_REPLY] {
…
route(ANOTHER_ROUTE);
}
Are the functions you want available inside route[ANOTHER_ROUTE]?
— Alex
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 4:46 PM, Bro
Hi,
No, there is no such replication; one node is the single source of truth for
the DB, and the other nodes use db_mode 0.
But still, some in-memory contacts are missing from the DB. I can’t really say
if it’s a lot or a little; there are too many to spot-check.
— Alex
—
Sent from mobile
ut it really depends on timings of the
> clusters.
>
> But I'm really interested in the answer, too :)
>
> -- Matteo
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 4:07 PM Alex Balashov
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any known contraindications for replicating contacts using
&g
-free” vis-a-vis DMQ, it’s worth a shot?
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing
Another question: do we know if the handler function can be async/support
coroutines internally?
— Alex
> On Sep 22, 2022, at 7:20 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> It probably makes sense to analyse this further in an issue report, with some
> more detai
()
Is there a reasonable way to try to prevent this type of mid-air explosion?
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com
/dev/sda`[1]?
What about monitoring background I/O demand, i.e. `iostat -x 1`? Look at the
%util on the drive being written to.
I know you said your log isn’t being written to the local disk, but other
storage activity could still be pushing up your I/O base load.
— Alex
[1] Replace `/dev/sd
was abnormally slow for other reasons, such as other heavy
demand on storage, or just intrinsically slow.
— Alex
> On Sep 15, 2022, at 5:18 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Kamailio is using the system interface for syslog, this is also a code which
> is quite stable and
t; -Original Message-
> From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex
> Balashov
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 09:39
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] ndb_redis value substitution or escaping spaces
>
> base64 is a pretty trivial algorit
Message-
> From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex
> Balashov
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 09:11
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] ndb_redis value substitution or escaping spaces
>
> A common approach to avoid delimiter issues in general is
ply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
> * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
evapi workers. (iirc
> :-) )
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 14.09.22 13:58, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When a transaction suspended by evapi_async_relay() is resumed, in which
>> child processes is it resumed? Is it in the dedicated “EVAPI RELAY” workers
&g
for the worker pool for maximal throughput. It sounds, at first
glance, like it should be roughly similar to the sizing considerations for
listener children. Thoughts welcome!
Cheers,
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web
at’s what we have calls out to other languages, e.g.
Python, for. Just thought I would check for the lower-hanging fruit first.
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evarist
Hi,
I wasn’t able to find an answer on the list previously, nor any trail of
breadcrumbs in the docs: do any of the existing HTTP client modules support
HTTP/2?
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http
Hi,
I think these will be useful to you:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/tree/master/misc/examples/webrtc
— Alex
> On Aug 29, 2022, at 9:04 AM, Mahmood Alkhalil
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to configure kamailio to register users over websockets, but i am
>
or whatever,
there are various ways to make such operations asynchronous — that is, to send
them to be performed by a separate pool of worker processes unrelated to the
main SIP message worker processes.
— Alex
> On Aug 26, 2022, at 10:20 AM, Lewis Hutchinson
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Alex
Hi,
While you have not said much about how your BYEs are processed, I would
speculate that the operation in your config script does not consist purely of
relaying these on the network, but also some sort of blocking database
operation that is delaying execution of the config script.
— Alex
Huh! Looks like we both learned something. :-)
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Aug 19, 2022, at 2:39 AM, Brett Nemeroff
> wrote:
>
>
> Hey Alex,
> I solved this, but I'm including my troubleshooting for the archives.
>
> It is
branch should leak into it.
— Alex
> On Aug 19, 2022, at 12:26 AM, Brett Nemeroff
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm receiving calls which I forward to a server I KNOW will reply with a 302.
> When I get that 302, I parse some information and then t_reply(302) the
> originator. T
.x/modules/tmx.html#tmx.f.t_suspend
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.6.x/modules/tmx.html#tmx.f.t_continue
As you can surmise, t_suspend() also halts execution of the current cycle of
message processing, and any further action on the message is done in the
‘continued’ route.
— Alex
> On
pattern for passing relatively more sophisticated, nonscalar data
sets, or bits of state, into the other side of the async HTTP reply is to store
some kind of payload in `htable`, keyed by `$http_req_id`.
— Alex
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 5:50 PM, Brett Nemeroff
> wrote:
>
> Hello K
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 5:50 PM, Brett Nemeroff
> wrote:
>
> When I get to the end of the HTTP_REPLY block, I'm EXPECTING it to RESUME
> FROM the suspended location from the original route block, which it does NOT
> seem to do. Is that expected?
No, alas, that’s not going t
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 7:33 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>
> Alex Balashov writes:
>
>> In principle, that’s right. Practically, this depends on the behaviour
>> of various intermediaries. I have seen both behaviours. In the
>> scenarios I have troubleshot,
be logged.
— Alex
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 4:20 AM, Ali Taher wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Lately I faced an issue that Kamailio is not responding to some invite
> packets coming from SBC. When investigating I found that these packets
> exceeds MTU size.
> Could th
Depending on what you’re trying to accomplish, you could intercept the negative
reply (if a negative reply is what you’re trying to change) in a failure_route
and use send_reply() to send back an entirely different reply to the caller,
functionally altering the status/reason.
— Alex
> On
ead of,
> Contact:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:56 PM Alex Balashov
> wrote:
> The suggestion given by Henning was to remove the existing Contact header,
> and replace it with whatever value you like.
>
> > On Aug 2, 2022, at 1:12 AM, Ankit Jayswal wrote:
>
ion that can replace the contact header's value.
> Please help me with this.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ankit Jayswal | Specialist - Software Development
>
> __
> Kamailio -
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
> * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
However, I don’t think that has any bearing on the functionality of the timeout
facility.
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_
sion. Last version I have on which this
positively works is 4.4.7, though, so not sure when it might have broken.
One nuance: $avp(dlg_timeout) is not initialised prior to calling dlg_manage(),
and the value is only set if certain conditions are true. Not sure if some
stricter check appeared in lat
rg/docs/modules/5.6.x/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.p.aggressive_redetection
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.6.x/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.p.rtpengine_tout_ms
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.6.x/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.p.rtpengine_retr
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal |
> On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:44 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> wrote:
>
> As you could notice, in the branch route the r-uri has the domain in its
> value, the dns is done later, when about to send to the network.
Ahhh. This is insightful. Thank you for clarifying this behav
If you think about the logic of capriciously changing the From user in just a
reply, in a way that doesn’t match the From user in the request which formed
the transaction and/or dialog, there… isn’t any. :-)
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Jul 5, 2022, at
> On Jul 1, 2022, at 10:23 AM, Patrick Karton wrote:
>
> do i need again to set branch_route in failure_route ?
>
Short answer: yes.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesy
chains which
an Internet-connected package manager normally takes care of for you without
much involvement on your part.
— Alex
> On Jun 29, 2022, at 9:03 AM, Rahul mm wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> Ab initio, I'm loving Kamailio and the endless horizons it opens-up.
> Is
> On Jun 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>
> I don’t know how to do it that way, but I would add stuff to mqueue and
> process it asynchronously in the background.
+1 — I think this is the way to go. Just push the workload off to some other
async routine.
--
A
#tm.f.t_branch_timeout
— Alex
> On Jun 14, 2022, at 1:31 PM, Antonio Couto wrote:
>
> There some way to set a callback route for TM´s "fr_inv_timer" ?
> I want to receive this callback when its fires and before Kamailio send 408
> Request Timeout to the caller ?
>
> I tryed
.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http
My best guess is that `libphonenumber` just isn't perfect ... :-)
-- Alex
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:49 AM David Escartín wrote:
> Hello all
>
> we are using the phonenum_match_cn function to detect valid phone numbers,
> but seems there are some numbers like 576015145834 which are
201 - 300 of 1116 matches
Mail list logo
