> However, I could move it out into a new MIX-NICK. What do people think?
You could probably move channels into a separate XEP too, and messages, and
nodes, and maybe a few other things.
I think if you really try, you could probably get MIX up to at least 24
separate XEPs - that would be
2018-06-03 18:22 GMT+02:00 Steve Kille :
> My sense is that it is handy to have Nicks associated with channel
> participants, to give a more compact display. Perhaps this reflects the UIs
> I'm used to. It feels a pretty basic capability to me.
My issue with nicks in non-anonymous group
> -Original Message-
> From: Standards On Behalf Of Florian
> Schmaus
> Sent: 03 June 2018 17:27
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: Re: [Standards] Using route-able JIDs in MIX-CORE
>
> On 03.06.2018 18:01, Steve Kille wrote:
> >>> That very much looks like that I would currently favour,
On 03.06.2018 18:01, Steve Kille wrote:
>>> That very much looks like that I would currently favour, besides that
>>> I don't see a reason why we shouldn't also use the stable participant
>>> identifier as the resourcepart of the originating address.
>>
>> Uh, and I slightly favour presence also
> As far as I understood nicknames are already optional in current MIX. If
> that's
> the case, then it should be moved out of MIX-CORE.
[Steve Kille]
We do not fundamentally need Nicks to be in MIX-CORE.
You can display participants by use of the JID.
My sense is that it is handy
> Not to be confused with the stable participant identifier that you will get
> upon
> joining the MIX channel (of which I can't find an official term for).
[Steve Kille]
I'll sort this out with a round of editing, when the current conversation dies
down
Steve
Daniel,
> -Original Message-
> From: Standards On Behalf Of Daniel Gultsch
> Sent: 03 June 2018 08:29
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: Re: [Standards] Another proposal - Handling JIDs for MIX-CORE, MIX-
> PRESENCE and MIX-PAM
>
> 2018-06-03 1:33 GMT+02:00 Steve Kille :
> > (Nick and
Flo,
> > That very much looks like that I would currently favour, besides that
> > I don't see a reason why we shouldn't also use the stable participant
> > identifier as the resourcepart of the originating address.
>
> Uh, and I slightly favour presence also from
>
>
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, at 18:22, Steve Kille wrote:
> Would you do me a BIG favour, and do a review of the new slimmed down
> 369 (MIX-CORE). I've worked to get this to a simpler and cleaner base.
> I would be very interested to hear which aspects of this you still
> believe to be too
To whom it may concern, we're working on group chat solution for XMPP.
It is quite a simple solution that we feel is good enough to counter most
issues of XEP-0045.
It is quite simple:
- Group chat is listed in a roster, we use standard xmpp subscription to
join-leave group chats
-
On 03.06.2018 11:48, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 03.06.2018 01:33, Steve Kille wrote:
>>
>> Sam's message made me realize that none of the variant 1/2/3/4 stuff is
>> needed for MIX-CORE.There are some things that might be needed in
>> MIX-ANON, but let's worry about these in the MIX-ANON spec
On 03.06.2018 01:33, Steve Kille wrote:
>
> Sam's message made me realize that none of the variant 1/2/3/4 stuff is
> needed for MIX-CORE.There are some things that might be needed in
> MIX-ANON, but let's worry about these in the MIX-ANON spec and keep them out
> of MIX-CORE.
>
> In
On 03.06.2018 10:56, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> On Sonntag, 3. Juni 2018 09:29:13 CEST Daniel Gultsch wrote:
>> 2018-06-03 1:33 GMT+02:00 Steve Kille :
>>> (Nick and Bare JID).
>>
>> I’m just on my way home from a very productive and interesting meetup
>> with designers and artists. And without
On Sonntag, 3. Juni 2018 01:33:12 CEST Steve Kille wrote:
> Sam's message made me realize that none of the variant 1/2/3/4 stuff is
> needed for MIX-CORE.There are some things that might be needed in
> MIX-ANON, but let's worry about these in the MIX-ANON spec and keep them out
> of MIX-CORE.
On Sonntag, 3. Juni 2018 09:29:13 CEST Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> 2018-06-03 1:33 GMT+02:00 Steve Kille :
> > (Nick and Bare JID).
>
> I’m just on my way home from a very productive and interesting meetup
> with designers and artists. And without knowledge of the current MIX
> debate - just by
2018-06-03 1:33 GMT+02:00 Steve Kille :
> (Nick and Bare JID).
I’m just on my way home from a very productive and interesting meetup
with designers and artists. And without knowledge of the current MIX
debate - just by analyzing the way Conversations currently implements
group chats / MUC -
16 matches
Mail list logo
