Re: [Standards] XEP-0369 (MIX) - Approach to options for per-user preferences

On 21 Sep 2016, at 16:21, Steve Kille wrote: > The sort of thing I am looking to avoid is where the server provides the > user with a form to fill in. By standardising common fields, we can avoid form requests in the common case without forcing clients to do the request

Re: [Standards] XEP-0369 (MIX) - Approach to options for per-user preferences

> -Original Message- > From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Dave > Cridland > Sent: 21 September 2016 15:58 > To: XMPP Standards > Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0369 (MIX) - Approach to options for per-user > preferences > > On

Re: [Standards] XEP-0369 (MIX) - Approach to options for per-user preferences

On 21 September 2016 at 14:32, Steve Kille wrote: > I have not been able to think of any additional sensible per-user > preferences. Users might well want to control whether they receive private messages through the MIX or not. In general, unless there's a compelling

[Standards] XEP-0369 (MIX) - Approach to options for per-user preferences

MIX channel participants have the option to configure preferences for JID visibility.There are some comments on the spec in this area, which I aim to address soon. The current specification is formulated so that an implementation can provide implementation specific per-user preferences, which