[Standards] XMPP IoT the two folded possibility/problem

2016-10-12 Thread Joachim Lindborg
(also in standards just to trigger the discussion) The usage of XMPP in IoT is two folded: 98% of the IoT today is covering the need for a company to get their data into their systems and makers that quickly would like to get some cool stuff going. -That is where XMPP usually gets compared to

Re: [Standards] Fwd: Internet of Things SIG

2016-10-12 Thread Peter Waher
Hello > I propose that we form a special interest group (see XEP-0002) regarding the > use of XMPP in the Internet of Things: > > http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/iot-sig.html The IoT SIG sounds like an excellent idea. > Firstly, it'd be useful to gather a sense of the current state of > play.

Re: [Standards] [IOT] Fwd: Internet of Things SIG

2016-10-12 Thread Joachim Lindborg
I have longing for this! Love the initiative of the IoT SIG, looking forward on the future discussions. Put me on the working list. Written by Joachim Lindborg on a device running on solar energy from watt-s.com CTO, systems architect Sustainable Innovation SUST.se ,Tel +46 706-442270,

Re: [Standards] IoT SIG: overview informational XEP

2016-10-12 Thread Rikard Strid
Once again, I’m happy to see the we’re recharging the community ☺ That we’re are moving forward and I hope that we see more minds participating in the discussions. Hi Peter W, With your extensive background in IoT and as the author of most of the IoT XEPs, I think it would be very good and

[Standards] IoT SIG: overview informational XEP

2016-10-12 Thread Peter Waher
Hello everybody Regarding the XMPP IoT SIG deliverable §5: > The IoT SIG should at a minumum produce an informational XEP > that provides an overview of the XMPP IoT "landscape"; this document > could help the XMPP community (including XSF members, leadership, > and teams) understand the Intenet

Re: [Standards] [IOT] IoT SIG: overview informational XEP

2016-10-12 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 10/12/16 2:02 PM, Rikard Strid wrote: Peter Saint-Andre and Dave, Should this XEP be done using the XSF Git? Yes, we'll handle it just like we handle all the other proposals. :-) Peter ___ Standards mailing list Info:

Re: [Standards] [IOT] IoT SIG: overview informational XEP

2016-10-12 Thread Rikard Strid
Thanks. ☺ Rikard On 2016-10-13, 06:06, "IOT on behalf of Peter Saint-Andre" wrote: On 10/12/16 2:02 PM, Rikard Strid wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre and Dave, > > Should this XEP be done using the XSF Git? Yes,