(also in standards just to trigger the discussion)
The usage of XMPP in IoT is two folded:
98% of the IoT today is covering the need for a company to get their data
into their systems and makers that quickly would like to get some cool
stuff going.
-That is where XMPP usually gets compared to
Hello
> I propose that we form a special interest group (see XEP-0002) regarding the
> use of XMPP in the Internet of Things:
>
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/iot-sig.html
The IoT SIG sounds like an excellent idea.
> Firstly, it'd be useful to gather a sense of the current state of
> play.
I have longing for this! Love the initiative of the IoT SIG, looking
forward on the future discussions.
Put me on the working list.
Written by Joachim Lindborg on a device running on solar energy from
watt-s.com
CTO, systems architect
Sustainable Innovation SUST.se ,Tel +46 706-442270,
Once again, I’m happy to see the we’re recharging the community ☺
That we’re are moving forward and I hope that we see more minds participating
in the discussions.
Hi Peter W,
With your extensive background in IoT and as the author of most of the IoT
XEPs, I think it would be very good and
Hello everybody
Regarding the XMPP IoT SIG deliverable §5:
> The IoT SIG should at a minumum produce an informational XEP
> that provides an overview of the XMPP IoT "landscape"; this document
> could help the XMPP community (including XSF members, leadership,
> and teams) understand the Intenet
On 10/12/16 2:02 PM, Rikard Strid wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre and Dave,
Should this XEP be done using the XSF Git?
Yes, we'll handle it just like we handle all the other proposals. :-)
Peter
___
Standards mailing list
Info:
Thanks. ☺
Rikard
On 2016-10-13, 06:06, "IOT on behalf of Peter Saint-Andre"
wrote:
On 10/12/16 2:02 PM, Rikard Strid wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre and Dave,
>
> Should this XEP be done using the XSF Git?
Yes,