DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17156] - Validate required fails for Integer form fields

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17299] - Page variable not set on DynaValidatorForms for mutlipage validations

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action RequestProcessor.java

2003-02-24 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/02/24 21:14:17 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action RequestProcessor.java Log: Deprecated processActionForward() because ActionForward is a subclass of ForwardConfig so there's no reason we can't use processForwardConfig() instead. Revision ChangesPath

Re: new variation on old question

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
Not good. There are 7 open bug reports to deal with and I'd like to give people a bit more time to test their apps on the RCs. David From: Thomas L Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new variation on old question Dat

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/configControllerConfig.java

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
I don't see how this is at all related to the cvs commit of ControllerConfig documentation changes. Please post this question to struts-user. David Hi, we are using struts into our new project, for that one of our requirement is In html we need to display dynamic fileds based on user selecti

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles DefinitionsFactoryConfig.java

2003-02-24 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/02/24 20:58:30 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionMapping.java Action.java src/share/org/apache/struts/validator Resources.java FieldChecks.java src/share/org/apache/struts/util Stru

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config ControllerConfig.java

2003-02-24 Thread Jasthi, Aravind
Hi, we are using struts into our new project, for that one of our requirement is In html we need to display dynamic fileds based on user selection For ex: if the user selects 5. we need to display five Starttime and Endtimes like Starttime Textbox EndTime Textbox S

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17113] - 1.1 DTD contains incorrect default value for locale attribute of element.

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config ControllerConfig.java

2003-02-24 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/02/24 20:47:38 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/config ControllerConfig.java Log: Documentation changes only. Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +6 -6 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/ControllerConfig.java Index: ControllerConfig.j

RE: new variation on old question

2003-02-24 Thread Andrew Hill
Well mate, for the hypothesis:ship(1.1F<=2003-02-28) Id reckon there is a probability of 0.5 with a confidence factor of +/- 50% ;-> -Original Message- From: Thomas L Roche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new variation on old q

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17312] - RequestUtils.retrieveUserLocale throws Exception without Session

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java

2003-02-24 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/02/24 20:39:32 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java Log: Fix my fix for PR #17312. Revision ChangesPath 1.88 +6 -7 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util/RequestUtils.java Index: RequestUtils.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17254] - html:option tag with an empty body content

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html OptionTag.java

2003-02-24 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/02/24 20:30:46 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html OptionTag.java Log: If body text is empty and there's no resource key to lookup, display nothing in the option. PR#17254 Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +7 -5 jakarta-struts/src/share/org

new variation on old question

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas L Roche
I am NOT gonna ask, "when do youse think 1.1 final will release," because I believe I know the answer. (Something like, "when it's @$#%^&*! ready!" :-) But I would appreciate your _opinions_ (which will NOT be held against you in a court of law!) on the odds that 1.1 final will ship on or before F

beta3 -> RC1 deltas?

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas L Roche
Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/23/2003 04:22 AM > The Struts team is proud to announce the release of Struts 1.1 > Release Candidate 1. This release includes some new functionality, > as well as fixes for a number of bugs which were reported against > earlier versions. > Details of the chang

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17312] - RequestUtils.retrieveUserLocale throws Exception without Session

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17312] - RequestUtils.retrieveUserLocale throws Exception without Session

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17225] - Struts-config.xml parsing issue in JRun 3.0.2a

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17312] - RequestUtils.retrieveUserLocale throws Exception without Session

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17256] - The tag cannot be used with sessions disabled

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17312] - RequestUtils.retrieveUserLocale throws Exception without Session

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java

2003-02-24 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/02/24 19:27:40 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java Log: Fixed PR# 17312 (retrieveUserLocale throws exception without sessions). Revision ChangesPath 1.87 +19 -7 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util/RequestUtils.jav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17254] - html:option tag with an empty body content

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17254] - html:option tag with an empty body content

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17165] - logic:iterate tag not releasing collections from memory

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17328] - Unsafe initialization in PropertyMessageResources

2003-02-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread Robert Leland
I am moving this over to the struts-user list where it belongs. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Release Candidate 1 released

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
I meant final releases. I don't consider "release" to mean beta. David From: "Hohlen, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Release Candi

RE: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
Actually, you've overreacted to every statement I made. I did *not* imply "contribute or shut up". I stated the exact opposite. However, the Struts team does not work for you; we are volunteers. So, if you request an enhancement that no committer has an interest in writing then you'd better

RE: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread Gary Ashley
David Graham wrote: >Gary, >You are not obligated to contribute to Struts in any way and have a right >to express your opinion. You said that 2 "releases" of Struts depend on >nightly builds; however, betas and release candidates are not releases. I understand your point on releases. I intend

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Release Candidate 1 released

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
Struts releases always use released versions of dependant libraries. David From: "Hohlen, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.1 Release Ca

Re: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Cooper
As others have mentioned, Struts 1.1 Final will include only released versions of its dependencies, while the beta and release candidate builds include intermediate versions. One thing I'd like to add, though, is that, while the versions of dependencies included in RC1 are not released, they also

RE: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread David Graham
Gary, You are not obligated to contribute to Struts in any way and have a right to express your opinion. You said that 2 "releases" of Struts depend on nightly builds; however, betas and release candidates are not releases. When Struts 1.1 Final is released it will only depend on released vers

RE: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread Gary Ashley
Robert Leland wrote: >The standard has always been that the Struts 1.1 release will depend on >released version of the commons-x.jar's. >The RC1 and others depend on the nightly builds of commons-xxx because >they almost always fix more bugs than they create. What --released-- >version of

Re: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread Robert Leland
Also, this message would have better been posted on the struts-user list. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread Robert Leland
Gary Ashley wrote: Otherwise, I'd ask that an important criteria in posting future releases be considered. There should not be any dependencies upon nightly builds. Two of my customers will not allow me to use nightly builds for fear of bugs, and this prevents me from using either beta3 or RC1.

RC1 release and Commons Logging 1.0.2

2003-02-24 Thread Gary Ashley
If I understand the issue correctly, I believe that both Struts beta3 and RC1 are dependent upon a non release version of the Commons Logging API (something later than 1.0.2). If I am incorrect, I sincerely apologize and ask that you ignore the rest of my email. Otherwise, I'd ask that an impor