Option 1 works for me. Simplest thing that could possibly work. As
you've said, we can always change things around later.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 20, 2004 9:44 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: branching 1.2 and 1.3
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Nadeem Bitar wrote:
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 20:41 -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Quoting Thomas L Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Geary spoke on JSF at trijug.org M 15 Mar 04. My notes of
his remarks include
- Is JSF a replacement for Struts? Yes!
-
Such as? What kinds of innovations are you looking for, and specifically
what kinds of things are you seeing other frameworks use that Struts could
benefit from?
I posted this before but here is my struts 2.0 wish list again:
* Leverage JSF and JSTL remove struts tags that have similar
I think all of these things are already on the Struts Jericho list. The exception
being workflow integration. The Struts Workflow is OK, but I personally don't like to
use multiple action paths for workflows. Of course, the really cool thing about the
Struts Chain is that it makes it very easy
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:07:28 -0800, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Option 1 works for me. Simplest thing that could possibly work. As
you've said, we can always change things around later.
The problem is that is that we already have the simplest thing. And, if we want
multiple Maven-based products with
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:44:23AM -0800, David Graham wrote:
...
I've expressed my opposition to this on commons-dev so I'll sum up my
points here:
...
2. We've been fairly consistent with tracking corresponding bugzilla
bug numbers in the cvs commit messages. This has proved extremely
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
NOT speaking for IBM
summary: McClanahan should clearly state *in some major publication*
* that JSF does/will not replace Struts
* how JSF and Struts will likely tend to specialize, in future
* how probable specializations will complement (and compete) in
webapp development
I.e. pretty
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Ted Husted wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:07:28 -0800, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Option 1 works for me. Simplest thing that could possibly work. As
you've said, we can always change things around later.
The problem is that is that we already have the simplest thing. And, if
Craig R. McClanahan said:
...
My personal vision is that Struts developers will focus their energy on the
controller and model tiers, leveraging the existence of standard (and not)
technologies in the view tier.
as someone using and working on the VelocityStruts project, this is great to
hear!
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Ted Husted wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:07:28 -0800, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Option 1 works for me. Simplest thing that could possibly work. As
you've said, we can always change things around later.
The problem is that is
Martin Cooper said:
...
Another thought on this. When we get to Struts 2, I'd like to see us
remove all of the JSP-ness of Struts from the core, and also add some
degree of support for other presentation technologies, such as XSLT and
Velocity. So, instead of having 'taglib' where it is in the
At 10:55 AM -0800 3/21/04, Martin Cooper wrote:
I see little advantage of all those separate repos over just one repo,
since that one repo could be organised in exactly the same way. In other
words, why use separate repos over something like this:
I was trying to figure out what people meant by
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27662.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
husted 2004/03/21 16:37:05
Modified:doc/userGuide struts-nested.xml
Log:
Apply #27662 Add filter attribute to nested:options and
nested:optionsCollection submitted by Firepica and John Cavacas.
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +12 -0
husted 2004/03/21 16:41:34
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/upload
CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.java
Log:
Apply #27702 MultipartPost values cannot contain latin1 characters when server is
running on linux reported by Raimo Ihle.
Revision Changes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
martinc 2004/03/21 16:45:28
Modified:web/test/test/org/apache/struts/taglib/html
TestFrameTag1.jsp TestFrameTag3.jsp
Log:
Fix some tests that were broken when module support was added to
TagUtils.computeURL().
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +8
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:05:44 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Martin Cooper said:
..
Another thought on this. When we get to Struts 2, I'd like to see
us remove all of the JSP-ness of Struts from the core, and also
add some degree of support for other presentation technologies,
such as XSLT and
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:55:00 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote:
I am now leaning towards 3 repos myself:
struts-legacy
This is our current repo, renamed. I don't really care for this
name, but I can't think of anything better right now, and I hate
sticking numbers in repo names,
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:50:27 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote:
Incidentally, where would Tiles land in all of this? In theory,
it's not tied to JSP, but rather to Servlets, so it might be
applicable to some other presentation technologies, but clearly not
all.
Yes, it might be a good idea to
Quoting Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Ted Husted wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:07:28 -0800, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Option 1 works for me. Simplest thing that could possibly work. As
you've said, we can always change things around later.
The problem is that is
Quoting Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Ted Husted wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:07:28 -0800, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Option 1 works for me. Simplest thing that could possibly work. As
you've said, we can always change
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:49:45 -0500, Thomas L Roche (not speaking for IBM) wrote:
summary: McClanahan should clearly state *in some major publication*
IMHO, either people like us will be able use JSF without Struts, or we won't.
If we can, great. Less is more. If we can't, we'll create whatever
Ted Husted wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:55:00 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote:
I am now leaning towards 3 repos myself:
struts-legacy
This is our current repo, renamed. I don't really care for this
name, but I can't think of anything better right now, and I hate
sticking numbers in
martinc 2004/03/21 22:06:58
Modified:web/test/test/org/apache/struts/taglib/html
TestFrameTag3.jsp TestFrameTag5.jsp
TestFrameTag7.jsp TestImgTag1a.jsp TestImgTag3a.jsp
TestImgTag5a.jsp TestImgTag7a.jsp
martinc 2004/03/21 23:06:12
jakarta-struts/conf/test/tomcat50 - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martinc 2004/03/21 23:16:37
Modified:.build-tests.xml build.xml
Added: conf/test/tomcat50 server.xml
Log:
Add initial support for Cactus tests running against Tomcat 5.0. The tests
themselves run just fine, but for some reason Tomcat doesn't stop once the
tests
28 matches
Mail list logo
