On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:49:44 +, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote:
Would the same principle work with people who have taken Struts and
integrated or embedded as another framework? Having spent some type
integrating 1.1 into Expresso Framework in 2002, in our case can we
be classified as Struts
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:31:51 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
Something like Expresso is large enough to be a framework
s/framework/Apache project
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Ted Husted wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:49:44 +, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote:
Would the same principle work with people who have taken Struts and integrated or embedded
as another framework? Having spent some type integrating 1.1 into Expresso Framework in
2002, in our case can we be classified
Ted Husted wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:31:51 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
Something like Expresso is large enough to be a framework
s/framework/Apache project
See my other earlier post for my views.
--
Peter Pilgrim
__ _ _ _
/ //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside
James Holmes wrote:
+1 on this!!
You hit the nail on the head. Many people (mostly managers) are reluctant
to adopt Struts add-ons because they are not perceived as having the same
tried and true stamp as the official Struts core. I think doing this
would be a huge boon for Struts and would
and sslext become sub projects of the top-level Struts project.
-James
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
-Original Message-
From: Peter A. Pilgrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 9:50 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts TLP Sub-projects (RE: Making Struts
James Holmes wrote:
Not exactly sure what you're referring to here, but am guessing you mean
would there be an offer for integrators/embedders to become committers? I
personally think this makes sense for cases like Expresso.
My point was to show my support for Ted's proposal (of sorts) that
Quoting James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1 on this!!
Agreed.
You hit the nail on the head. Many people (mostly managers) are reluctant
to adopt Struts add-ons because they are not perceived as having the same
tried and true stamp as the official Struts core. I think doing this
