husted 2002/10/11 14:52:33
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions
LookupDispatchAction.java
Log:
Javadoc update submitted by Wendy S.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
James Mitchell wrote:
Can anyone tell me who's doing which?
Most of us don't actually know until we go to do it. :0)
Since we all just work on this whenever we can, it's usually best to
defer signing anything out until you are actually ready to do it. (Lest
someone else come along with
Is this just a usage question, or am I wrong? I'm tempted to mark it
INVALID with an explaination that Bugzilla is for reporting aberrant
behavior - not asking how the digester works.
Looking for guidance!
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13520
--
Eddie Bush
--
To
husted 2002/10/11 15:00:02
Modified:doc volunteers.xml
Log:
Add Donald Ball.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +1 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/volunteers.xml
Index: volunteers.xml
===
RCS file:
husted 2002/10/11 15:00:23
Modified:doc/userGuide index.xml building_controller.xml
Log:
New 1.1 sections contributed by Donald Ball.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +1 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/index.xml
Index: index.xml
husted 2002/10/11 22:05:26
Modified:doc/userGuide building_controller.xml
Log:
New 1.1 sections contributed by Eddie Bush.
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +89 -4 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/building_controller.xml
Index: building_controller.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12315.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes, I did a search earlier today. I'll refresh cvs and search again.
Okrefresh went fine...
Here's what my search reveals:
STATUS(27): 10537 [:TODO:] sections (18)
doc\proposals\release-plan-1.1b2.xml(102): td[:TODO:] sections (18)/td
doc\userGuide\building_controller.xml(318):
husted 2002/10/11 22:05:58
Modified:doc newbie.xml kickstart.xml
Log:
New FAQs from recent DEV list exchanges.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +37 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/newbie.xml
Index: newbie.xml
MY GOSH! TED! You are SMOKE'N!!
... I thought I'd goofed when I updated CVS and my changes were already
there!!!
Husted! Husted! He's our man! If he can't patch it, NO-ONE
can!! Yeah, Ted!! Yeah, Ted!! GoO TED! :-D
--
Eddie Bush
--
To
husted 2002/10/11 22:15:58
Modified:doc/userGuide building_controller.xml
Log:
New 1.1 sections contributed by Eddie Bush.
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +10 -9 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/building_controller.xml
Index: building_controller.xml
rleland 2002/10/11 15:17:51
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html
JavascriptValidatorTag.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java
StrutsValidatorUtil.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
That particular page needs some love :-( There's more TODOs on that
page than all the rest combined, I believe.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10537
[:TODO:] sections
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-11 21:48 ---
dmkarr 2002/10/11 22:21:35
Modified:contrib/struts-el/src/test/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/html
TestELButtonTag.java
Log:
Added test for all event handlers, combined with testing EL attributes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +65 -4
dmkarr 2002/10/11 22:23:01
Added: contrib/struts-el/src/test/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/html
TestELHiddenTag.java
Log:
Test for ELHiddenTag.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, James Mitchell wrote:
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:11:49 -0400
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Resources] XMLMessageResources and Proposal
That's
Are you using Ant 1.5?
David M. Karr wrote:
David == David M Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David I could use a hand figuring out what I did to break my Struts-EL unit test
David process.
David I decided to get back to building some more unit tests for Struts-EL
tags, but
I was updating to see what all was left since Ted has been busy applying
patches - but my CVS doesn't seem to build anymore. I did a cvs update
-dP - and ant clean - then ant dist fails. Looks like something in the
validator.
Just wanted to throw out an FYI - I don't have time to dig into
Update your CVS again. Ted just commited my *most recent*
changes!! Give that boy a raise!! Oh - nvm - how about a cookie?!
I think the docs should be current in CVS. I'm adding a note about
pingquery per bugid 13177, but I'm not working on any other TODO
sections right now.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13565.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
A Dissabte 12 Octubre 2002 00:25, Craig R. McClanahan va escriure:
Do *you*
really want to have to type all those messages in more than once? Or
could I use the same source document to produce both the end user docs and
the message resources file for the webapp?
Is a plain text
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13177.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
David M. Karr wrote:
Ted == Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ted Are you using Ant 1.5?
I know to build Commons I needed Ant 1.5.1
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's all the damage I can do for a bit. Thanks so much for staying on
top of the patches, Ted! I'll try to get to some of the meatier
problems next time. I'm not real sure when that's going to bed though -
have some things I need to get done.
Hopefully the folks I notified about being
I can get to it some time this weekend, though if
Martin wishes to fix it that is great also...
Which bring up another question...see [Policy on depreciation vs deleting]
-Rob
Eddie Bush wrote:
Yes. My goal was to not create a session just to get at the
ServletContext though. That's why I
Thanks - what else did you have to change? It worked fine for me. Just
curious! Nevermind - I'll update CVS and see for myself ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10348
Validator is not available under sub-application
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10537.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eddie Bush Screamed:
Just wanted to throw out an FYI - I don't have time to dig into it
right now.
Eddie it works for me, after doing a CVS get a clean copy, no sticky.
Do you have recient versions of the commons ?
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13177.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13177.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Looks like you straightened the docs out good, Ted - that was just a
wild mess after that one patching session - good job. I sent you some
more ;-)
If anyone gets bored, you can feel free to help me show the docs some
love :-) Let me know if there's something I've added that needs
Eddie Bush wrote:
That's all the damage I can do for a bit. Thanks so much for staying
on top of the patches, Ted! I'll try to get to some of the meatier
problems next time. I'm not real sure when that's going to bed though
- have some things I need to get done.
... can you tell
At 02:05 AM 10/12/2002, you wrote:
I would hate to piss off the people who buy Chuck's and Ted's books,
too much ;-) !
So what is the feeling on handling this.
The next version of the books will probably take at least
12 - 18 months, and I would hate to wait that long since we
The new version of getValidatorResources() added here takes a ServletContext
and an HttpServletRequest. It seems to me that it should only take the
request, since the servlet context can be obtained from that. It would be a
little less error-prone this way, too.
My 2 cents.
--
Martin Cooper
Robert Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Small patch related to logic:empty for your consideration. The
intent of
Robert, best place to put this is in Buzilla:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
If you don't have an account it only takes a minute to fill out the
no-nonsense form.
-Rob
--
To
That's brand new - I added it. ... or are you saying I should have just
replaced it instead of deprecating? I'll check the docs :-) In any
case, I submitted a patch. It was my error - should be my correction to
make. Of course, if you don't approve of what I've done, feel free to
do what
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
snip/
I'll try to find some time soon to wade through Bugzilla and pick out
some more patches that need submission.
I was going to send in something about that.
Are we still maintaining the STATUS file in the root
Actually, I think it was Ted. He has really loose criteria. As I
recall he simply leaves everything alone and selects Struts as the product.
There are still *many* [:TODO:] sections left in the docs :-) I try to
knock one out here and there because it's really easy to locate them ...
hint/
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13565.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes, Karapan Sapi, strips all text out and creates properties file. Very cool tool.
I've been working on it, helping the author debug some things [bugs, what are those?]
and have so far generated a fairly working app without writing any java code yet...of
course thats to come when i apply my
43 matches
Mail list logo
