Re: Validator/Tiles integration in Struts

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:53:55 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Validator/Tiles i

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/exercise-taglib/WEB-INF web.xml

On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:10:07 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/exercise-taglib/WEB-INF >

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/exercise-taglib/WEB-INF web.xml

On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:53:56 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/exercise-taglib/WEB-INF >

Tools for Building Web Services (fwd)

If you are interested in developing Web Services, you will be interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version 1.0ea1) that was just released by Sun: http://java.sun.com/webservices The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2 (with schema support), SOAP-b

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config ConfigRuleSet.java

On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Anthony Martin wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:01:41 -0800 > From: Anthony Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apac

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config ConfigRuleSet.java

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Anthony Martin wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:59:43 -0800 > From: Anthony Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: cvs commit: > jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apa

Re: Throwing exceptions from within Struts tags

On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 22:39:28 -0800 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Throwing exceptions from within Struts tags > > I notice

Re: jdk Compliance

On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:57:52 + > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: jdk Compliance > > Hi everyone, > I'm developing a data-load module using the digester as the

Re: dynaforms & checkboxes

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Andre Beskrowni wrote: > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:23:35 -0500 > From: Andre Beskrowni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: dynaforms & checkboxes > > i've been testing the d

Re: Update on the forthcoming Struts 1.0.2 release

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 06:15:33 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Update on the forthcoming Struts 1.0.2 release > > I'd sugg

Article about Struts and XSLT

An interesting approach to using XSLT and XML to create the user interface for Struts based applications ... http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-02-2002/jw-0201-strutsxslt.html Ted, could you please add this to the resources page? Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: [RESULTS] Release Struts RC2 with FileUpload RC1/Beta2

You can count me retroactively +1 as well ... sorry, it's been insanely busy lately. Craig On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, James Turner wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 00:31:38 -0400 > From: James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List'

Re: Status check?

On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:25:15 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Status check? > > > Martin Cooper wrote: > > OK, FileUpload

RE: Status check?

On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, James Turner wrote: > Sounds very Lincoln-ian... Two years and two weeks ago, Craig McClanahan > brought forth upon the Java community a new framework, conceived of MVC, > and devoted to the notion that all business logic should be treated > separate. > :-) > Advice to Crai

Re: What's next for Struts?

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 17:30:36 -0600 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: What's next for Struts? > > To be honest, I haven't had much time to actually use

Re: Status check?

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 16:55:07 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Status check? > > Cr

RE: commons-logging problem in 1.1 RC2

On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Heydtmann, Dirk [ITS] wrote: > Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:30:20 -0500 > From: "Heydtmann, Dirk [ITS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Raible, Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: commons-logging probl

Re: Question on struts, tiles and jsf

I think the concept of extending TilesRequestProcessor (and/or integrating Tiles support into the standard request processor) makes a lot of sense for this ... it would be nice to be able to use Tiles together with JSF. I also want to look at making it possible to use the Validator framework with J

[ANNOUNCE] Updated Struts-Faces Integration Library

As you might already be aware, the Public Draft 2 version of the JavaServer Faces specification is now available: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/javaserverfaces/download.html with many new and exciting features. The EA4 version of the JavaServer Faces reference implementation is available as part of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Updated Struts-Faces Integration Library

On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Dom wrote: > Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 12:41:11 +0200 > From: Dom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Updated

Re: What's next for Struts?

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Bill Johnson wrote: > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 13:39:13 -0700 (PDT) > From: Bill Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: What's next for Struts? > > Tha

Tiles Use In A Disconnected PC

One of my the demos for my JavaOne sessions (using Struts and JDO together) used Tiles -- but I ran into problems trying to parse the tiles-definitions.xml file when disconnected from the Internet. The only way I could fix this was to remove the DOCTYPE declaration (which is bad); this made the ap

Re: Tiles Use In A Disconnected PC

r issue with versions prior to > Validator 1.0.2, but I'm pretty sure there is no problem with 1.0.2, which > is what's bundled with Struts 1.1 RC2. If I'm wrong, someone please > correct me ASAP so that we can fix that too. > Validator worked fine for me offline. > -

Re: Tiles Use In A Disconnected PC

A Disconnected PC > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:39:08 -0700 (PDT) > > > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, James Mitchell wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:20:02 -0400 > From: James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts > > On Monday

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release

+1!!! Hurray!!! Craig On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:42:37 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release > > Since no significant issues h

struts-lagacy.jar on ibiblio/maven (fwd)

Tomsk, I don't know how to make this happen myself, but I'll forward this to the Struts Developer list and one of those folks will be able to help. Craig -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:54:10 +0200 From: Thomas Diesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: struts-lagacy.jar on ibiblio/maven (fwd)

t; Subject: Re: struts-lagacy.jar on ibiblio/maven (fwd) > > > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > Tomsk, > > > > I don't know how to make this happen myself, but I'll forward this to the > > Struts Developer list and one of those fo

Re: struts-lagacy.jar on ibiblio/maven (fwd)

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Joe Germuska wrote: > > Here are what appear to be the latest versions of dependencies > bundled in the RC2 jar. Is there a single list somewhere which > explicitly outlines the dependency versions for Struts? I didn't > find one, but I didn't really scour the search engin

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts-JavaServer Faces Integration Library -- EarlyAccess Version Now Available

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:59:18 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Struts-JavaServer Faces Integration Library -- >

[VOTE] Release Vote: Struts-Faces Integration Library 0.4

The Struts-Faces integration library (in directory "contrib/struts-faces" of the Struts CVS repository) is an adapter layer that allows the use of components and renderers provided by JavaServer Faces (under development via JSR-127 in the Java Community Process). Version 0.4 of this library, curre

Re: [BeanUtils & Struts]RE: Support for Date datatypes!!!

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jon Wilmoth wrote: > Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:50:59 -0700 (PDT) > From: Jon Wilmoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [BeanUtils & Struts]RE: Sup

Re: Struts 1.1 branch

We definitely need a branch based on the 1.1 final release sources, so I just created "STRUTS_1_1_BRANCH" for this. The HEAD can be used for 1.2 development. Craig On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Rob Leland wrote: > Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 08:14:23 -0400 > From: Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: S

Re: Adding 1.1 final to bugzilla

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 20:18:26 -0700 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Adding 1.1 final to bugzilla > > > "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in m

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 06:55:06 -0400 > From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples > > -0. > > Module was... is optional and co

Re: [VOTE] Steve Raeburn as a Struts Committer

+1 Craig On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:04:48 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Steve Raeburn as a Struts Committer > > Steve Raeburn has been a regular

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21230] - 1.0.2 still listed as currentstable release

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 22:13:00 -0700 (PDT) > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21230] - 1.0.2 still liste

Re: request for feedback on proposed parameter tag

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Christopher Bare wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:02:51 -0700 (PDT) > From: Christopher Bare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: request for feedback on proposed parameter tag > > Is there any interest

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 15:27:58 -0400 > From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples > > snip > >> > >>Target servlet 2.3 snip -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > My point was a shade on the other side. Yes Struts can show integration > to do 100's of things out there. > But at its core, Struts is a controller framework. Right now, it's in particular a "front controller" framework, in design pattern terms. That

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 16:32:02 -0400 > From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples > &

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 17:22:21 -0400 > From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples >

Re: 1.2

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 09:49:34 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: 1.2 > > --- S Douglas <[E

Re: [PROPOSAL] Wildcard-matched actions

On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 01:32:45 +0100 > From: Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Wildcard-matched actions > > I like it.

Re: Powered By Struts Logos

On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Hookom, Jacob John wrote: > Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 13:23:58 -0500 > From: "Hookom, Jacob John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Powered By Struts Logos > > As per Craig's comment on the user forum, I'

RE: Request/Response Utils future request

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Andrew Hill wrote: > Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:39:53 +0800 > From: Andrew Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Struts-Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sub

RE: [VOTE-RESULT] Steve Raeburn as a Struts Committer

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:55:52 -0700 > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [VOTE-RESULT] Steve Raeburn a

Re: DynaActionForm.getMap() change

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Rob Leland wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:58:45 -0400 > From: Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: DynaActionForm.getMap() change > > David Graham wrote: > >

RE: DynaActionForm.getMap() change

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Ranjangaonkar, Vaibhav (HQP) wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:56:09 -0700 > From: "Ranjangaonkar, Vaibhav (HQP)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: DynaActionForm.getMap

Re: DynaActionForm.getMap() change

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:35:10 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: DynaActionForm.getMap()

Re: Nightly build is generating empty binary distribution file

On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 22:21:16 -0700 > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Nightly build is generating emp

Re: Building struts-legacy (was: Re: Nightly build is generatingempty binary distribution file)

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: > > Given that we have struts-legacy on its own release cycle, I think we need > to decouple the struts-legacy build from the main Struts build. They were > coupled shortly before the 1.1 final release, and that was a big pain when I > was creating the r

Re: Building struts-legacy (was: Re: Nightly build is generatingempty binary distribution file)

legacy (was: Re: Nightly build is generating > empty binary distribution file) > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > It wouldn't bother me to break the overall build for a while in order to > > get this sorted out -- IMHO it's pretty broken already :-). But we might >

RE: Building struts-legacy (was: Re: Nightly build is generatingempty binary distribution file)

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Edgar Dollin wrote: > Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:04:11 -0400 > From: Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: B

Re: Building struts-legacy (was: Re: Nightly build is generatingempty binary distribution file)

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: > > Decoupling this would probably be nice, but I don't think we're done if we > > just fix that. I never thought I'd see a build environment more complex > > than the one for Tomcat 4.1, but I think we've grown ourselves one :-(. > > I agree that we're

Re: [Vote] Don Brown as committer

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, James Mitchell wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 01:04:22 -0400 > From: James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Vote] Don Brown as committer > > Don has been involved

Re: New TagUtils class

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: New TagUtils class > > Yesterday I committed a new T

Re: ActionServlet init parameters [WAS] Re: cvs commit:jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 11:35:23 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Act

Re: Addition of two new actions

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 23:10:59 -0700 > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Addition of two new actions > >

Re: Reflection

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:43:32 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Reflection > > The framework itself only uses reflection to

RE: Addition of two new actions

d examine the current LookupDispatchAction subclass and create the mapping information automatically. Don't get me wrong ... I like the idea behind what you're proposing. I just think we might already have it (with the potential to improve ease of use by not forcing people to implement g

Re: Reflection

ion) of progress. > FYI CGLIB in CVS is now about 165K including all dependencies. You could > strip that down a little bit if you didn't want all the proxy stuff. > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > The quality of your container's JSP page compiler is very cri

[BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks

TheServerSide (www.theserverside.com) recently published a case study that attempted to analyze the performance characteristics of a variety of middleware configurations, including two J2EE app servers and Microsoft's .NET platform. One of the hot spots that showed up in the Java based figures was

RE: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks

The most important factor in page rendering time (which is not the same as the CPU consumption being discussed on the ServerSide thread) is the quality of the JSP page compiler. Tomcat 4.0.6 (your platform) uses the original version of Jasper, whereas the current generation (4.1.27 and 5.0.6) uses

Re: When is the next release?

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Robert Leland wrote: > Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 22:42:43 -0400 > From: Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: When is the next release? > > Ted Husted wrote: > > > Ju

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc build.xml

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David M. Karr wrote: > Date: 09 Aug 2003 18:12:19 -0700 > From: David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc build.xml &

RE: When is the next release?

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 20:10:16 -0700 > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: When is the next release? > > >

Re: When is the next release?

Miscellaneous comments interspersed. On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:43:16 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: When is the next releas

Re: Struts for Portlets

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Mete Kural wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:23:09 +0100 > From: Mete Kural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Struts for Portlets > > Hello Struts de

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc build.xml

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David M. Karr wrote: > Date: 09 Aug 2003 16:01:52 -0700 > From: David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc build.xml > > > "craigmcc" == craigmcc

RE: When is the next release?

ubject: RE: When is the next release? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: August 10, 2003 12:37 PM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: Re: When is the next release? > > > > &g

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Joe Germuska wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:06:59 -0500 > From: Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction) > > At 12:48 -0

Re: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:30:09 -0400 > From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks > > I think jPetStore is using DynaBean

RE: Wildcard-matched actions (again)

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:55:14 -0700 > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Wildcard-matched actions (aga

RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Byrne, Steven wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:07:42 -0400 > From: "Byrne, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction) > > > > >

Re: When is the next release?

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > * I trimmed the containers to test against to Tomcat 3.3 and Tomcat 4.1, > being the reigning References Implementations for our target platforms. I'm fine with this for now, but I'd also like to sometime start non-normative testing (i.e. failures wouldn

RE: When is the next release?

move it from Alpha to Beta or GA. > > > > At least that's how I understand it =:0) > > > > Since this release is not backwardly compatible with 1.1.x, having > > removed all those deprecations, we are moving to the 1.2.x release > > series. Until som

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:33:31 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction) > > This threw me a

RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Mainguy, Mike wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:05:15 -0400 > From: "Mainguy, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction) > > I thi

RE: Decomposing RequestProcessor -- Some Code To Play With

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Tom Drake wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:38:51 -0700 > From: Tom Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Decomposing RequestProcessor -- Some Code To Play With > > Fo

Re: Struts Composable Request Process (was RE: ActionForwards, etal)

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, PILGRIM, Peter, FM wrote: > In the excitment I got caught up the discussion about customised > action forward, whereas the original design intention got chucked > to the side, namely a ``composable request processor''. So let > me spend some time discussing this: > > Now I am

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

orwards, et al (was SuccessAction) > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: > > > > > >>So we could have convenience methods such as > >> > >>StrutsWebContext scontext = (StrutsWebContext)context; > >

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Sgarlata Matt wrote: > > In terms of making the infrastructure available to callers, it's pretty > > clear how passing a context object around makes the infrastructure > > available to anyone who needs it. Are there other options for how you'd > > make the infrastructure avai

RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Joe Germuska wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:01:30 -0500 > From: Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction) > > At 9:07 PM

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Since, I'm lead to understand Craig finds "http" hard to say when he > gives talks =:) > Ah, you've heard me trip over that one? :-). I actually like "web" better than "http" for a different reason -- it doesn't presume the "one true way" protocol will b

Re: Simplifying DynaActionForms

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:01:59 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Simplifying DynaActionFor

Re: Struts Composable Request Process (was RE: ActionForwards, etal)

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:54:01 -0500 > From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Struts Composable Request Process

Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: > > So we could have convenience methods such as > > StrutsWebContext scontext = (StrutsWebContext)context; > // Where ``StrutsWebContext'' is a type of ``ServletWebContext'' > > ActionForm form = scontext.getActionForm(); > ActionMapping mapping = sco

RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

ought of any. Craig > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:37 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction) > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > One of the p

RE: ActionForwards, et al (was SuccessAction)

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Mike Jasnowski wrote: > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:50:29 -0400 > From: Mike Jasnowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ActionForwards, et al (was

Decomposing RequestProcessor -- Some Code To Play With

During the "Decomposing RequestProcessor" thread a while back, I hinted that I'd been working on some code to propose for this purpose, but had never had time to polish it enough to check in. Well, I actually took a bunch of time this weekend for precisely that purpose, and have checked in two chu

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el build.xml

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David M. Karr wrote: > Date: 09 Aug 2003 19:28:39 -0700 > From: David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el build.xml > > > "craigmcc" == craigmc

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/example/WEB-INF struts-config-registration.xmlstruts-config.xml

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Robert Leland wrote: > Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 22:38:44 -0400 > From: Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/example/WEB-INF > str

Re: Struts Composable Request Process (was RE: ActionForwards, etal)

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote: > Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:16:23 -0500 > From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Struts Composable Request Process

Re: Flexible form support (was Re: Simplifying DynaActionForms)

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 07:00:52 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Flexible form support (was Re: Simplifying DynaActionForms) >

RE: Decomposing RequestProcessor -- Some Code To Play With

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Tom Drake wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:30:56 -0700 > From: Tom Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Decomposing RequestProcessor -- Some Code To Play With > > Th

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22519] - Allow multiple MessageResourcesfiles to be loaded under one key

Vic, Please go away. I'm sat on the sidelines watching you make a fool of yoursself in multiple forums, and enjoyed laughing at you. But I'm absolutely NOT going to put up with YOU thinking you have any RIGHT to change the status on Struts bug reports and enhancement requests. If you've got pat

RE: Support for non-JSTL tags (was RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465] - Enhancement of the html:link tag)

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:26:54 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Support for non-JSTL tags

RE: Support for non-JSTL tags (was RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465] -Enhancement of the html:link tag)

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > > My original point really was that if the standard for Struts continues to be > 2.2/1.1 that we should be careful not to reply to the "How do I do this with > " questions with the stock answer of "use JSTL". > Point well taken -- I've been guilty of th

Re: Support for non-JSTL tags (was RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465]-Enhanc ement: link tag)

On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 09:35:38 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Support for non-JSTL tags (was RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465] >

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >