Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-14 Thread Eddie Bush
Andrew Hill wrote: snip/ IMHO you would be better served spending your time providing support for the lynx browser... LOL - ROFL ... Andrew, you made my night with that one!! I'm not saying you're wrong - I'm just saying I nearly busted a gut! (*) Possible underexageration. The real figure

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-14 Thread Eddie Bush
Gemes Tibor wrote: Konqueror ... doesn't. I'm sorry - I run KDE, but there's a *reason* I Since version 3.0 it's OK imho. Sorry to say - it's 3.0.0-12 I'm running :-/ and it seems deficient to me. I can do all things, unhindered in Mozilla, whereas there were some sites which flat did not

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-14 Thread Gemes Tibor
Sorry to say - it's 3.0.0-12 I'm running :-/ and it seems deficient to me. I can do all things, unhindered in Mozilla, whereas there were some sites which flat did not work under Konqueror. I can't remember now which specific funcational areas I found lacking. I'll have to look again

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-14 Thread Eddie Bush
Gemes Tibor wrote: Sorry to say - it's 3.0.0-12 I'm running :-/ and it seems deficient to me. I can do all things, unhindered in Mozilla, whereas there were some sites which flat did not work under Konqueror. I can't remember now which specific funcational areas I found lacking. I'll have

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-14 Thread Gemes Tibor
2002. október 14. 16:31 dátummal Eddie Bush ezt írtad: Which browsers do you build against? ... and what functional areas do you find you still have to test in other browsers? I haven't even I meant IE. Actually unlike most webdevelopers I know I do not use IE during the devel period.

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-14 Thread Eddie Bush
Gemes Tibor wrote: 2002. október 14. 16:31 dátummal Eddie Bush ezt írtad: Which browsers do you build against? ... and what functional areas do you find you still have to test in other browsers? I haven't even I meant IE. Actually unlike most webdevelopers I know I do not use IE during the

RE: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-13 Thread Andrew Hill
. -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 23:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? 99% of the javascript I use has to do with validating form fields. You don't need to know every detail of it to use it well

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-13 Thread Eddie Bush
Konqueror ... doesn't. I'm sorry - I run KDE, but there's a *reason* I don't use Konqueror - it sucks. Maybe it will one day be better, but this is not that day :-) Anyone using that over Mozilla deserves what they get IMHO (they have the option - it's not like it's the only thing

RE: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-13 Thread Andrew Hill
. -Original Message- From: Michael Delamere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 23:50 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? Unfortunately in my case it really is wishful thinking! I hate netscape 4.7.x!!! It´s always the same bl***y

Re: OT : javascript revival?

2002-10-13 Thread V. Cekvenich
JavaScript can also offload processing of the server, thus increasing salability. Ex: Dependent drop down lists in Struts could be javascript arrays, no ping to server and a good practice. Many other examples and rich GUI. AOL 8 had Netscape 7 which is Mozilla 1, so there will be more modern

OT : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread Vincent Stoessel
Maybe because I've done mostly server side stuff but it seems to me that Javascript is more popular than ever. The mozilla project uses it with cool XUL for the interface. And now JSF and EL it seems to be creeping into my world. Ugh. I know the minimal amount of Javascript. What I want to

RE: OT : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread Galbreath, Mark
Nothing wrong with having the O'Reilly book on your desktop :-) -Original Message- From: Vincent Stoessel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:42 AM Maybe because I've done mostly server side stuff but it seems to me that Javascript is more popular than

RE: OT : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread Andrew Hill
, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 22:45 To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: OT : javascript revival? Nothing wrong with having the O'Reilly book on your desktop :-) -Original Message- From: Vincent Stoessel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread David Graham
Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT : javascript revival? Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:42:28 -0400 Maybe because I've done mostly server side stuff but it seems to me that Javascript is more popular than ever. The mozilla project uses it with cool XUL for the interface. And now JSF and EL it seems

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread Michael Delamere
, October 11, 2002 5:22 PM Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? 99% of the javascript I use has to do with validating form fields. You don't need to know every detail of it to use it well. If you want to spend most of your time coding front end gui stuff then you should know all that good dhtml

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:35:41 +0200 exactly! Perhaps, some javascript guru can tell me how to set the cursor back to the end of the text in an input field. Basically, I´m checking the entered

RE: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread Galbreath, Mark
Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? 99% of the javascript I use has to do with validating form fields. You don't need to know every detail of it to use it well. If you want to spend most of your time coding front end gui stuff then you should know all that good dhtml stuff. In my experience

Re: [OT] : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread Michael Delamere
supporting netscape 4.7.x, there´s no choice really Regards, Michael - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:33 PM Subject: Re: [OT] : javascript revival? My suggestion is to forget about Netscape 4.x because it's

Re: OT : javascript revival?

2002-10-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Vincent Stoessel wrote: Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:42:28 -0400 From: Vincent Stoessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT : javascript revival? Maybe because I've done mostly server side